Student’s Creativity Profile with Base on Thinking Model for Physics Problem Solving

Hartono Bacong, Subaer S

Abstract

A research that aims to determine the profile of student’s creative who have a concrete sequential thinking styles, sequential abstract, concrete random, and abstract random in solving physics problems at the State University of Makassar. This study is a qualitative research. The sample was taken by using purposive random sampling technique. The data obtained were analyzed using Miles and Hubermann model. The results describe creativity of student thinking style in solving physics problems. The conclusion shows that the concrete sequential of thinking’s style "less creative", abstract sequential "quite creative", random concrete "less creative" and abstract random "creative" in solving physics problems at the State University of Makassar

Full Text:

PDF

References

G. Bas and O. Beyhan, Effects of Multiple Intel¬ligences Supported Project-Based Learning on Students’ Achievement Levels and Attitudes Towards English Lesson, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2 (3), 2010, pp. 365 – 385

G. Polya, How to Solve It : a new aspect of mathematical method, Princeton University Press, Oxford, 1973

Hartono. B., Profil penalaran Logis Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir Peserta Didik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika di MAN Baraka, Tesis, Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, 2013

Hartono. B., and Subaer, Profil penalaran Logis Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir Peserta Didik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika di MAN Baraka, Prosiding Seminar Nasional IPA IV, Vol. 2, Semarang, 26 April 2013, pp.610-617

Hartono. B., and Subaer , Profil penalaran Logis Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir Peserta Didik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (JPII), 2(2), 2013, pp. 195 – 202

Hartono. B., M. I. Safitri and H. Halimah, Pengaruh Kecerdasan Multiple Intelligences Melalui Model Pembelajaran Langsung Terhadap Sikap dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Peserta Didik Di SMA Negeri I Tellu Limpoe, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (JPII), 2(2), 2013, pp. 156 – 160

J. Carson, A Problem With Problem Solving: Teaching Thinking Without Teaching Knowl¬edge. The Mathematics Educator, 17 (2), 2007, pp. 7–14.

K.K.R. Hensberry, The effects of Polya’s heu¬ristic and diary writing on children’s problem solving, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24, 2012, pp. 59-85

M. E. Lehman, Relationships of Learning Styles, Grades, an Instructional Preferences, NACTA Journal, 9, 2011, pp. 40-45

Nurdin, Profil Alur Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Mem¬ecahkan Masalah Limit Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya, Disertasi, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, 2010

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendeka¬tan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Penerbit Alfabeta, Banding, 2011

T. Y. E. Siswono, Penjenjangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Identifikasi Tahap Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Memecahkan dan Mengajukan Masalah Matematika, Disertasi, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/ijap.v5i01.250

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.