DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF REPUBLISHED HOAX
Abstract
One of the way of hoaxes spreads is that old hoax narratives are republished then can be redistributed, so that we encounter them more and more often. This study examined the transformation pattern of repeated hoax narratives. The data were qualitative, collected using library and triangulation methods. The data was collected from the Turnbackhoax.id. Data documentation used the 'Search' menu. Keywords used to get pre-transformation and post-transformation hoaxes. To optimize the search, it was done by inputting the title in full, in part, or only relevant keywords. The analysis was carried out using the side-by-side comparison method assisted by the Plagiarism Checker application. The analysis also applied the triangulation method with journalistic theories. The data presented were pre-modified and post-modified. Data was presented in an organized and periodic manner from old hoaxes to recycled hoaxes. The analysis was presented descriptively. The results indicated two things. First, old hoaxes that were republished could be categorized into hoaxes with fixed and transformed narratives. Each of these categories had a different movement. Second, narrative transformation in recycled hoaxes could be in the form of paraphrasing, minimal changes, addition, reduction and elimination, unique (different), alphabetic transformation, and transformation of nominal or numeric values.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baker, M. (2006). In other words coursebook on translation. London & New York: Routledge.
Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Oxon: Routledge.
Bell, R. T. (1991). Translation and translating, theory and practice. London & New York: Routledge.
Chiluwa, I. (2009). The discourse of digital deceptions and “419” emails. Discourse Studies, 11(6), 635–660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609347229
E.B, G. A., & S.W., E. D. (2017). Correlation of social media uses and social consciousness level in teenagers. Jurnal The Messenger, 9(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v9i1.428
Eginli, A. T., & Tas, N. O. (2018). Interpersonal communication in social networking sites: An investigation in the framework of uses and gratification theory. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(2), 81–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/ojcmt/2355
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London & New York: Routledge.
Iswara, A. A. (2021). Komposisi dan modifikasi narasi pada hoaks berulang. Linguistik Indonesia, 39(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v39i2.239
Iswara, A. A., & Bisena, K. A. (2020). Manipulation And persuasion through language features in fake news. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 6(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.6.1.1338.26-32
Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications.
Lau, R. W. (2012). Re-theorizing News’ construction of reality: A realist-discourse-theoretic approach. Journalism, 13(7), 886–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911432660
Marlianingsih, N., Rasyid, Y., & Lusyantie, N. (2020). Online media and politics: Critical discourse analysis about hoax news. In In 1st International Conference on Folklore, Language, Education and Exhibition (ICOFLEX 2019) (pp. 156–161). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.030
Nurdin, I., & Hartati, S. (2019). Metodologi penelitian sosial. (Lutfiah, Ed.). Surabaya: Media Sahabat Cendekia.
Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J. (2012). The Effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012439020
Sellnow, T. L., Parrish, A., & Semenas, L. (2019). From hoax as crisis to crisis as hoax: Fake news and information disorder as disruptions to the discourse of renewal. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 2(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.30658/jicrcr.2.1.6
Soroka, S. N. (2012). The gatekeeping function: Distributions of information in media and the real world. The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161100171X
Syaefullah, F., & Perdana, A. (2019). Critical discourse analysis of hoax on primordial issues in the Jakarta Gubernatorial Election 2017. In 1st International Symposium on Indonesian Politics, SIP 2019. Semarang: European Alliance for Innovation (EAI). http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-6-2019.2287981
Van Dijk, T. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2018). Journalism fake news disinformation. (C. Ireton & J. Posetti, Eds.). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Zaim, M. (2014). Metode penelitian bahasa: Pendekatan struktural. Padang: FBS UNP Press. Retrieved from http://repository.unp.ac.id/1830/
Zulfadhli, M., Hamdani, H., & Farokhah, L. (2021). The analysis of hoax news content on Facebook reviewed from theory of Critical Discourse Analysis and Linguistic Rules. AKSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.21009/AKSIS.050204
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
