ANALISIS PEMBELAJARAN SEJARAHISU-ISU KONTROVERSIAL DI SMA
Abstract
This study aims to (1) describe the planning; (2) describes the learning process; (3) identify the obstacles encountered by teachers in teaching history; (4) analyzing the efforts made by teachers of history to overcome obstacles in learning, and (5) determine the appreciation of learners in learning the history of a controversial issue.
This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Banyumas, using the form of qualitative descriptive study with a single case study research strategy spikes. The data source consists of speakers, events / activities, documents and archives. Data collection techniques using in-depth interview techniques, direct observation, and content analysis. The sampling technique used purposive sampling and time sampling. The validity of the data use triangulation of data, methods, and theory.
Analysis of data using interactive analysis with three stages that occur bergayutan, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions / verification. The results showed that (1) in planning lessons, teachers make learning devices independently, but can not be separated from the sample that has been made in a top-down from the government; (2) execution history teaching of controversial issues still running half-hearted because of the mindset held by teachers is still in the stage of action and weak in re-actualization stage, so that learning becomes out of context; (3) obstacles in learning the history of a controversial issue consists of all aspects of planning, implementation, and other supporting factors in the learning process; (4) efforts to overcome the obstacles still limited in technical level, teachers have not been able to explore the concept because it is constrained by the environment and position; (5) appreciation of learners towards learning is very varied history of controversial issues, many of which have a material interest in the history of the controversial and potentially to train students to think critically to an event.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adam, Asvi Warman. 1999. “Pengendalian Sejarah Sejak Orde Baru”. Dalam Chambert-Loid, Henri dan Ambary, Muarif Hasan (eds). 1999. Panggung Sejarah Persembahan kepada Prof. Dr. Denys Lombard. Jakarta: Yayaan Obor Indonesia.
-------------------------. 2007. Seabad Kontroversi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Aman. 2011. Model Evaluasi Pembelajaran Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Arifin, Zainal. 2009. Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Garg, Bhuvan. 2007. Teaching of History. New Delhi: Rajat Pubplications.
Hariyono. 2013. “Kontroversi Sejarah Indonesia: Distorsi Komunikasi yang Sistematik, Sebuah Dialektika tanpa Sintesa”. Makalah. Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Menumbuh kembangkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Melalui Pembelajaran Sejarah
Kontroversial. Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah PPs UNS Surakarta, disajikan pada tanggal 29 Mei 2013.
Hess, Diana. 2008. Controversial Issues and Democratic Discourse. dalam Levstik, Linda S and Tyson, Cynthia A (eds). Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education. New York and London: Routledge.
Hunt, Martin (ed). 2006. A Practical Guide to Teaching History in the Secondary School. New York and London: Routledge.
Indrawati, Henny. 2012. “Meningkatkan Ketrampilan Berpikir Kritis mahasiswa Melalui Implementasi Model Controversial Issues” dalam Jurnal Pekbis Vol. 4 No. 1 maret 2012: Hal. 63-70.
Kochhar, S.K. 2008. Pembelajaran Sejarah (Teaching of History). Jakarta: Grasindo.
Kuntowijoyo. 2008. Penjelasan Sejarah (Historical Ekplanation). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Purwanto, Bambang. 2009. “Sejarah, Kurikulum, dan Pembelajaran Kontroversi: Sebuah Catatan Diskusi”. Makalah. Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran Sejarah Kontroversi: Problem dan Solusi. Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah PPs UNS Surakarta, disajikan pada tanggal 29 Mei 2009.
Rosyid, Ikhsan. 2009. “Historiografi Indonesiasentris: Usaha Membangun Kesadaran Historiografi Indonesia“. Dalam M. Faisal Aminuddin, dkk. Globalisasi dan Neoliberalisme: Pengaruh dan Dampaknya bagi Demokrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Loging Printika.
Santrok, John W. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Schunk, Dale H. 2012. Teori-teori Pembelajaran: Perspektif Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Seifert, Kelvin. 2008. Manajemen pembelajaran dan Instruksi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Sugihartono, dkk. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Press.
Suhartono. 2010. Teori dan Metodoligi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sutopo. H.B. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar Teori dan Penerapannya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret Press.
Syamdani (ed). 2001. Kontroversi Sejarah di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Widodo, Tri. 2011. “Memahami Makna Praksis Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Sejarah Kontroversial”, dalam Jurnal Paramita Vol. 21 No. 2, Juli 2011: Hal. 238-247.
Wood, Michael. 2013. Sejarah Resmi Indonesia Modern Versi Orde Baru dan Para Penentangnnya. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.