PENGELOLAAN PROGRAM INDUKSI GURU PEMULA (PIGP) DI SMP NEGERI 3 KUNDURAN BLORA

S. Sugiyarti, Bambang Sumarjoko

Abstract

The method used in the study was a qualitative research for this study aimed to describe the planning, implementation, and evaluation of programs induction of beginning teachers in SMP Negeri 3 Kunduran. Data were collected by interview, observation, and documentation. Validity of the data with data triangulation. Data analysis techniques with data collection, data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The results of this study stated that the planning PIGP planned jointly by the school principal and guidance counselor. Implementation PIGP in the second to the ninth month, in which the novice teachers implement instructional tahab accompanied by a tutor with evaluation performed at least once a month by the supervising teacher. The final evaluation was conducted in the tenth and eleventh by a guidance counselor, school principals and supervisors to determine the continuation of a career profession beginner teachers.

Keywords

induction, news teacher, guidance teacher

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bickmore DL. 2005. Interdispilary Teaming as an Induction Practise. Hart, Laurie E. National Association of Secondary School Principal. NASSP Bulletin. 89.644.(sep 20105) 30-53.

Dirjen peningkatan mutu PTK kementerian pendidikan nasional. 2010. Modul Program Induksi Guru Pemula (PIGP) bagi guru pembimbing, kepala sekolah, dan pengawas. Jakarta: Dirjen Peningkatan mutu pendidik dan tenaga pendidikan kementerian pendidikan Nasional.

Depdiknas Dirjen Dikdas, 2003, Guru di Indonesia. Pendidikan, pelatihan dan perjuangan sejak zaman kolonial hinga era reformasi. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Dirjen Dikdas Direktoral tenaga pendidikan.

Hellsten, L M. 2009. Teacher Induction: Exploring Beginning Teacher Mentorship. Canadian Journal of Education. 32-4. (2009) 703-733.

Maya, I; Kamman, ML; McCray, E. 2014. Profesional Assistance, Emotional Suport, and evaluation. Exceptional Children 81.1 (Fall 2014): 45-63.

Moir, E. 2009. Acceleting teacher effetiveness: Lessons Learned from Two Decade of New Teacher Induction. Phi Delta Kappan. 91.2 (okt 2009) 14-19

Moleong, LJ. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Permendiknas Nomor 27 tahun 2007 Program Induksi Guru Pemula (PIGP) Pirkle, SF. 2011. Stemming the Tide: Retaining and Supporting Science Teachers. Science Educator 20.2 (Fall 2011): 42-46.

Priyambodo, RH. 2010. 1,3 guru belum layak mengajar. Diambil dari http:// www.antaranews.com/berita/176844/13-juta-guru-belum-layak-mengajar. Diakses 10 September 2016.

Schuster, D. 2012. Aligning University Based Teacher Preparation and New STEM Teacher Suport. Science Educator. (winter 2012):39-44

Shanks, R. 2012. Apprenticeship of new teachers during their induction year. Higher education skill & works based learning.2.3.(256-270)

Stobaugh, R. 2014. Preparing for succes.Principal Leadership 14.7 (Mar 2014): 36-40.

Sudrajat, A. 2010. Sekilas tentang program Induksi Guru Pemula (PIGP). Diambil dari https://akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com/.../sekilas-tentang-program-induks... Diakses 10 September 2016

Sukmadinata, N.S. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Cetakan kedelapan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sumardjoko, B. 2015. Diktat Perkuliahan, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: UMS.

Tummons, J. 2010. Care and Feeding of young teacher: Missouri’s Model for Beginning Teacher Succes. The Agricultur Education Magazine. 82.6 (may jun 2010): 16.

Wibowo, A. 2012. Menjadi Guru Berkarakter, Strategi Membangun Kompetensi & karakter guru. Yokjakarta: Pustaka pelajar.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/historika.v21i1.29510

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.