_CROSREF.jpg)
Application of Sanctions Against State Administrative Officials Failing to Implement Administrative Court Decisions
Abstract
In its constitution, Indonesia declares itself a state of law. However, government practice frequently ignores the State Administrative Court's judgements, despite the fact that court decisions are a crucial part of the state of law notion. The purpose of this research is to determine the nature, types, and execution of administrative court decisions, as well as the position of the Prosecutor's office in the Indonesian legal system. This research also examines the legal consequences for officials that do not comply with administrative court decisions. This is prescriptive and descriptive normative legal research, comprising a statute and case approach, with data collected from primary and secondary legal materials. The result of this study shows, Firstly, the results showed that the nature of administrative court decisions is erga omnes. Secondly, the position of the Prosecutor is categorized into executive power. Thirdly, state administrative officials are obliged to implement administrative court decisions. To not implementing the administrative court decision is a violation of the principle of legality. Legal consequences for government officials that do not subject to and are disobedient to the administrative court decision with legal force should still be imposed administrative sanctions by their superiors.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrams, J. (2019). The emergence of network governance in U.S. National Forest Administration: Causal factors and propositions for future research. Forest Policy and Economics, 106, 101977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101977
Arayankalam, J., Khan, A., & Krishnan, S. (2021). How to deal with corruption? Examining the roles of e-government maturity, government administrative effectiveness, and virtual social networks diffusion. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102203
Berlemann, M., & Christmann, R. (2020). Disposition time and the utilization of prior judicial decisions: Evidence from a civil law country. International Review of Law and Economics, 62, 105887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105887
Bogdanova, E. (2018). Obtaining redress for abuse of office in Russia: The Soviet legacy and the long road to administrative justice. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.07.002
Derks, M., & Romijn, H. (2019). Sustainable performance challenges of rural microgrids: Analysis of incentives and policy framework in Indonesia. Energy for Sustainable Development, 53, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.08.003
Dirckinck-Holmfeld, K. (2015). The options of local authorities for addressing climate change and energy efficiency through environmental regulation of companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.067
Effendi, M. (2018). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia Suatu Pemikiran Ke Arah Perluasan Kompetensi Pasca Amandemen Kedua Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 3(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.25-36
Faiz, P. M. (2016). The Protection of Civil and Political Rights by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 6(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v6n2.230
Farhan, F., & Hoebink, P. (2019). Can campaigns save forests? Critical reflections from the Tripa campaign, Aceh, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 105, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.012
Fossati, D., Aspinall, E., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case. Electoral Studies, 63, 102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102111
Goldstein, J. (1960). Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low-Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice. The Yale Law Journal, 69(4), 543. https://doi.org/10.2307/794445
Gore, R. (2021). Ensuring the ordinary: Politics and public service in municipal primary care in India. Social Science & Medicine, 283, 114124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114124
Gössling, S. (2017). 7 - Rights, Authority, and the Police. In S. Gössling (Ed.), The Psychology of the Car (pp. 139–169). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811008-9.00007-7
Habibie, M. I., Noguchi, R., Matsushita, S., & Ahamed, T. (2020). Development of micro-level classifiers from land suitability analysis for drought-prone areas in Indonesia. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 20(June), 100421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100421
Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., Karjoko, L., & Jaelani, A. K. (2019). Model Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Eksekutabilitas Dalam Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Bestuur, 7(1), 36–46. https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v7i1.42700
Harjiyatni, F. R., & Suswoto, S. (2017). Implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan Terhadap Fungsi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(4), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art5
Henricks, K. (2021). Power to the Paperwork? Mandatory Financial Sanctions and the Bureaucratic Means to Racially Unequal Ends. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(8), 1104–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219859620
Herman, H., & Noor, H. J. (2017). Doktrin Tindakan Hukum Administrasi Negara Membuat Keputusan (Beschikking). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 3(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v3i1.9240
Huda, N., Nur Heriyanto, D. S., & Gani Wardhana, A. F. (2021). The urgency of the constitutional preview of law on the ratification of international treaty by the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(9), e07886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07886
Imam, M. I., Jamasb, T., & Llorca, M. (2019). Sector reforms and institutional corruption: Evidence from electricity industry in Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy, 129, 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.043
Ishak, N., Hasibuan, R. R., & Arbani, T. S. (2020). Bureaucratic and Political Collaboration Towards a Good Governance System. Bestuur, 8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42922
Jones, J., Keller, P., & van der Flier Keller, E. (2021). Review of official responsibility for the Salish Sea marine environment. Ocean and Coastal Management, 211(May), 105748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105748
Koskimaa, V., Rapeli, L., & Hiedanpää, J. (2021). Governing through strategies: How does Finland sustain a future-oriented environmental policy for the long term? Futures, 125, 102667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102667
Lee, D., Heffron, J. L., & Mirza, M. (2019). Content and Effectiveness of Interventions Focusing on Community Participation Poststroke: A Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(11), 2179-2192.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.008
López-Ayllón, S., García, A., & Fierro, A. E. (2015). A Comparative-Empirical analysis of administrative courts in Mexico. Mexican Law Review, 7(2), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30001-4
Minzner, C. (2011). Judicial disciplinary systems for incorrectly decided cases: The imperial Chinese heritage lives on. Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China, 63, 58–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977008.003
Moriconi, P. R., & Moriconi, K. (2021). Conflito de competência entre órgãos da saúde e da agricultura na inspeção e fiscalização de açougues no Estado de São Paulo. Revista de Direito Sanitário, 21. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.rdisan.2021.156112
Noor, H. J., Afkar, K., & Glaser, H. (2021). Application of Sanctions Against State Administrative Officials in Failure to Implement Administrative Court Decisions. BESTUUR, 9(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.49686
Othman, N. (2006). Muslim women and the challenge of Islamic fundamentalism/extremism: An overview of Southeast Asian Muslim women’s struggle for human rights and gender equality. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.05.008
Pratama, I. W. D. C., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2020). Upaya Paksa terhadap Pejabat yang Tidak Melakukan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Denpasar. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.2.2352.145-149
Rukundo, S. (2019). Wikipedia in the Courts: An examination of the citation of Wikipedia in judicial opinions in Uganda. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(5), 105316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.010
Rumadan, I. (2012). Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(3), 435. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.435-462
Ruysschaert, D., & Hufty, M. (2020). Building an effective coalition to improve forest policy: Lessons from the coastal Tripa peat swamp rainforest, Sumatra, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 99, 103359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.034
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M., Nasri, N., Dharmiasih, W., Verheijen, B., & Maryudi, A. (2020). Anticipating a new conservation bureaucracy? Land and power in Indonesia’s Essential Ecosystem Area policy. Land Use Policy, 97(June), 104789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104789
Santaularia, N. J., Larson, R., & Uggen, C. (2021). Criminal punishment and violent injury in Minnesota. Injury Epidemiology, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-021-00303-3
Shah, D. (2015). The “Allah” case: Implications for religious practice and expression in Malaysia. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 4(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwu057
Simanjuntak, E. (2014). Prospek Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Rangka Memperkuat Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 3(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.163-176
Simanjuntak, E. (2018). Prospek Prinsip Fiktif Positif Dalam Menunjang Kemudahan Berusaha Di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 7(2), 301. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v7i2.250
Spencer, D. M. (2021). Sanctuary cities and the power of the purse: An executive dole test. Iowa Law Review, 106(3), 1209–1251. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3716652
Stewart, R. B. (1977). Pyramids of Sacrifice? Problems of Federalism in Mandating State Implementation of National Environmental Policy. The Yale Law Journal, 86(6), 1196. https://doi.org/10.2307/795705
Suhariyanto, B. (2019). Urgensi Kriminalisasi Contempt of Court untuk Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk16110
Takagi, H., Esteban, M., Mikami, T., Pratama, M. B., Valenzuela, V. P. B., & Avelino, J. E. (2021). People’s perception of land subsidence, floods, and their connection: A note based on recent surveys in a sinking coastal community in Jakarta. Ocean and Coastal Management, 211(March), 105753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105753
Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802760199908
Taxman, F. S., Soule, D., & Gelb, A. (1999). Graduated sanctions: Stepping into accountable systems and offenders. Prison Journal, 79(2), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885599079002004
Toumbourou, T. (2020). Using a Delphi approach to identify the most efficacious interventions to improve Indonesia’s forest and land governance. Land Use Policy, 99, 102768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.017
Wagenaar, H. (2004). “Knowing” the rules: Administrative work as practice. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00412.x
Wibowo, R. A., Yuniza, M. E., Widyaningtyas, R. S., & Noor, H. J. (2018). Wacana Pemerintah Untuk Mereposisi Kelembagaan Inspektorat: Tindak Lanjut, Tanggapan, Serta Inisiasi Kedepan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(4), 716. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no4.1800
Zhang, M., Rasiah, R., & Lee, J. K. Y. (2017). Navigating a Highly Protected Market: China’s Chery Automobile in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(5), 774–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1345000
Zhou, W., Peng, Y., & Bao, H. (2017). Regular pattern of judicial decision on land acquisition and resettlement : An investigation on Zhejiang ’ s 901 administrative litigation cases. Habitat International, 63, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.49686
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Hendry Julian Noor, Kardiansyah Afkar, Henning Glaser
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
|
