PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MASYARAKAT GUARANI DALAM KASUS BIOPIRACY OLEH COCA-COLA BERDASARKAN PENGATURAN ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING DALAM CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (STEVIA STUDY CASE)

Layla W Puspita Sari

Abstract

This research traces the identification of biopiracy conducted by Coca-cola Company toward stevia leaf in the jurisdiction of Brazil and Paraguay based on the provision of access and benefit sharing according to Convention on Biological Diversity. The type of research used is normative with prescriptive analytic to identifiy the conduct of biopiracy by Coca-cola Company to establish legal protection for Guarani People. The data used is secondary data that was collected by library reseacrh and with editing analysis style. The result of this research lead to the fact that the conduct of biopiracy did exist during the utilization of stevia by Coca-cola Company due to the absence of State’s Consent and no information delivered to the Guarani People. The locus of the conduct was involved two nations which impacted to the State’s obligation to protect the rights of its people. The fact that Brazil has already eancted the provision of access and benefit sharing but Paraguay has not due its unawareness that such commercial benefit may arise from the utilization of genetic resources take into account that if it requires for legal enforcement. The implementation of access and benefit sharing provision will ensure the legal protection for its people with optimal supervision.

Keywords

Biopiracy; Access and Benefit Sharing; Legal Protection

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku

C. Rhodes. 2013. Governance of Genetic Resources: A Guide to Navigating the Complex Global Landscape. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Elisa Moregera. 2015. An International Legal Concept of Fair and Equitable Benefit Sharing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2015/20

Philipus M. Hadjon. 1987. Perlindungan Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: PT.Bina Ilmu.

Soedarsono, dkk. 2005. Taksonomi Tumbuhan Tinggi. Malang: UM Press.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. 2003. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sunaryati Hartono. 2006. Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia pada Akhir Abar Ke-20. Bandung: Alumni

Jurnal

Ani Mardiastuti. 2019. “Implementation of Access and Benefit Sharing In Indonesia: Review And Case Studies”. Journal of Tropical Forest Management. Vol. 25 No. 1

Bertoni M. S. 1918. “Anales Cientificos Paraguayos”. Puerto Bertoni Paraguay. Serie II, Vol. 6, No.2

David Smith, dkk. 2018. “Biological Control and the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing – a case of effective due dilligence”. Biological Science and Technology Journal. Vol. 28, No. 10

Evanson Chege Kamau, Bevis Fedder dan Gerd Winter. 2010. “The Nagoya Protocol On Access To Genetic Resources And Benefit Sharing: What Is New And What Are The Implications For Provider And User Countries And The Scientific Community?”. Law Environmental and Developent Journal”. Vol. 6, No. 3.

Florian Rabitz. 2017. “Access without benefit-sharing: design, effectiveness and reform of the FAO seed treaty”, International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 11, No. 2.

Francois Meinberg, dkk. 2015. “The Bittersweet Taste of Stevia”. Berne Declaration.

Lyle Glowka. 1996. “The The Deepest of Ironies: Genetic Resources, Marine Scientific Research, and the Area”. Oceen Yearbook Online. Vol. 12, No. 1.

Manuela Da Silva dan Danilo Ribero De Oliveira. 2018.“The new Brazilian legislation on access to the biodiversity (Law 13,123/15 and Decree 8772/16)”. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. Vol. 49, No. 1

Nicholas Pauchard. 2017. “Access and Benefit Sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity and Its Protocol: What Can Some Numbers Tell Us about the Effectiveness of the Regulatory Regime?”. MDPI Journal Publisher. Vol. 6, No. 11

Stellina Jolly. 2015. “Access and Benefit Sharing Under Nagoya Protocol and Sustainable Development: A Critical Analysis”, AGORA International Joural of Juridical Science, No. 3.

Publikasi Lainnya

Arianna Broggiato, dkk. 2018. “Access Benefit-Sharing and the Nagoya Protocol: The Confluence of Abiding Legal Doctrines”. HAL Archieves-Ouvertes

O. Katayama, T. Sumida, H. Hayashi, H. Mitsuhashi. 1976. “The Practical Application of Stevia and Research and Development Data”. I.S.U Company Japan

Oxfam Briefing Note. 2013. “Sugar Rush Land Rights and The Supply Chains of The Biggest Food and Beverage Companies”. Oxfam International

Laurent Gabarell. 2016. “Stevia: Path To A Benefit Sharing Agreement”. Berne Declaration.

Perjanjian Internasional

Conevention on Biological Diversity, 1992. Universal Declaration of Human Right, 1948

Bonn Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of the Benefits Arising out of their Utilization, 2002.

Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and The Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising From Their Utilization to The Convention on Biological Diversity, 2001

Universal Declaration of Human Right, 1948.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966

Peraturan perundang-undangan Nasional

Medida Provisoria (MP) 2,186-16, 2001

Decreto Nr. 8392, 2015

Paraguay Constitution, 1992.

Internet

Sandra Weiss. 2017. https://www.milenio.com/cultura/la-batalla-por-eldulce-del-futuro-la-esteviaguarani Diakses pada 24 Juli 2019 pukul 14.56 WIB

Secretariat of CBD https://absch.cbd.int/about/ Diakses pada 12 Juli 2019 pukul 16.33 WI

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.