LEGITIMASI PENGGUNAAN KEKUATAN BERSENJATA PADA KONFLIK PEREBUTAN WILAYAH ANTARA INDIA DAN PAKSITAN (KAJIAN BERDASARKAN TEORI JUST WAR)
Abstract
The conflict between India and Pakistan starts with the territorial conflict of a region called Kashmir. The tension of the conflict arises along with the use of force, makes the territorial conflict become an armed conflict. This study explains the conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir territory on 1947 and 1965. The objectives of this study are to determine whether the use of force on territorial conflict can be legitimate and to determine the applications of international humanitarian law on the territorial conflict. This study uses case approach and conseptual approach. This study also uses deductive methods, by using the analysis of the legitimate use of force by a state based on just war theory in common as major premise, and the use of force by India and Paksitan on territorial conflict as minor premise.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Majid, S. A. (2019). Kashmir: The Major Source of Conflict between Pakistan and India. South Asian Studies, 367-382.
Additional Protocol I 1977 Relating To The Protection Of Victims Of International Armed Conflicts
Additional Protocol II 1977 Relating To The Protection Of Victims Of Non-International Armed Conflicts
Ankit, R. (2013). Great Britain and Kashmir, 1947-48. India Review, 20-40.
Annex of Hague Convention 1907
Anthony F. Lang, J. (2009). Authority and the Problem of Non-state Actors. In B. J. Eric A. Heinze, Ethics, Authority, and War: Non-state Actors and Just War Tradition (pp. 47-72). New York: Palgrave and Macmillan.
Bose, S. (2007). Contested Lands. London: Harvard University Press.
Brown, D. (2011). Proportionality in Modern Just War Theory: A Tort-Based Approach. Journal of Military Ethics, 213-229.
Chaudhuri, R. (2019). 'Just another border incident': The Rann of Kutch and the 1965 India-Pakistan War. Journal of Strategic Studies, 654-676.
Childress, J. F. (1978). Just-war Theories : The Base, Interrelations, Priorities, and Functions of their Criteria. Theological Studies, 427-445.
Francisco de Vitoria, A. P. (1991). On the Law of War. In F. d. Vitoria, Vitoria: Political Writings (pp. 293-328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geneve Convention 1949
Haryomataram. (2012). Pengantar Hukum Humaniter. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Hilali, A. (1997). Kashmir Dispute and UN Mediation Efforts: An Historical Perspective. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 61-86.
ICRC. 2016 (11 Agustus 2021). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Comment.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=BE2D518CF5DE54EAC1257F7D0036B518#_Toc452041596
ICRC. 2016 (29 September 2021). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Comment.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=59F6CDFA490736C1C1257F7D004BA0EC#_Toc465169871
ICRC. 2021 (24 September 2021). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/vwTreaties1949.xsp
Ishaq. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Marzuki, P. M. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.
McMahan, J. (2005). Just Cause for War. Ethics & International Affairs, 1-21.
Mir, M. A. (2014). India - Pakistan; the History of Unsolved Conflicts. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science, 101-110.
Naidu, M. (2000). The Kashmir Dispute and India-Pakistan Relations: the Untold Story of Cold War Diplomacy. Peace Research, 1-30.
Nazir, M. (2003). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Nelson, R. (1985). Erasmus and Grotius on Just War Theory. Canadian Journal of Netherlandic Studies, 40-60.
Parry, J. (2015). Just War Theory, Legitimate Authority, and Irregular Belligerency. Philosophia, 175-196.
Prosecutor vs. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, ICC-01/05-01/08-3343 (International Criminal Court March 21, 2016).
Schofield, V. (2003). Kashmir in Conflict: India, Pakistan and the Unending War. London: I.B. Taurus.
Steinhoff, U. (2014). Just Cause and 'Right Intention'. Journal of Military Ethics, 32-48.
Stumpf, C. (2012). Hugo Grotius: Just War Thinking Between Theology and International Law. In H.-G. Justenhoven, From Just War to Modern Peace Ethics (pp. 197-216). De Gruyter.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969
Yamauchi, S. (2008). New Just War Theory of the 20th Century: The Rebirth of Grotius and the United States. Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics, 1-20.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.