Respons Petani terhadap Rancangan Penyuluhan Pertanian Tumpang Sari Jagung-Cabai di Kecamatan Sitellu Tali Urang Julu, Kabupaten Pakpak Bharat

Raihana Rahma Kamila, Dwiningstyas Padmaningrum, Suminah Suminah

Abstract

The IP 400 rice program enables four rice-growing seasons annually on the same land, but its implementation can generate both expected benefits and unintended risks. This study aimed to describe information dissemination, farmers' responses, cultivation practices, innovation consequences, and continued-adoption plans in Sukoharjo Regency. A descriptive quantitative survey was conducted in Mojolaban, Polokarto, and Weru in 2025. Seventy-two farmers were selected from a population of 263 through multistage random sampling. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, observation, records, and documentation, then analyzed using frequency distributions, percentages, and modes. All respondents received information from extension workers or the Agriculture Office more than twice and participated in socialization and farmer-group discussions, while 66.67% sought additional information. Only 41.67% followed the recommended varietal pattern, and 66.67% reported insufficient irrigation for four seasons. IP 400 increased annual land-use intensity and cumulative production, although per-season productivity was lower than conventional cultivation, at 4.8 versus 5.2 tons/ha. All respondents reported increased labor, time, dependence on early-maturing seed and irrigation, and chemical-input use; 22.2% perceived declining soil fertility. Continued adoption was planned independently by 23.6%, conditionally with government support by 44.4%, and discontinued by 31.9%. IP 400 should therefore be implemented selectively in locations with reliable irrigation, adequate seed, manageable costs, continuous extension support, and sustainable soil management.

Keywords

innovation; food security; farmers; IP 400 rice

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Ambarwati, L., Dewi, T. R., & Solikah, U. N. (2022). Pengaruh modal, luas lahan, dan tenaga kerja terhadap pendapatan petani program IP Padi 400 di Kelompok Tani Sumber Harapan Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Ilmiah Inovasi, 22(3), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.25047/jii.v22i3.3558

Burhansyah, R. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi adopsi inovasi pertanian. Informatika Pertanian, 23(1), 65–74.

Chairunnisya, R. A., Lubis, R. L., Khairiyah, Y., Purgawa, K., & Purnama Sari, R. (2025). Transformasi mineral klei pada pertanian intensif: Implikasi terhadap kesuburan tanah dan keberlanjutan. Berkala Ilmiah Pertanian, 8(1), 51–66.

Frattini, N., Pulido Carrasquero, A., Pronsato, L., et al. (2023). Effects of common fertilizers on the soil ecosystem. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 47, 78.

Indraningsih, K. S. (2018). Strategi diseminasi inovasi pertanian dalam mendukung pembangunan pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 35(2), 107–123.

Liverpool-Tasie, L. S. O. (2014). Farmer groups and input access: When membership is not enough.

Food Policy, 46, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.01.006

Muthayya, S., Sugimoto, J. D., Montgomery, S., & Maberly, G. F. (2014). An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1324(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12540

Musyafak, A., & Ibrahim, T. M. (2005). Strategi percepatan adopsi dan difusi inovasi pertanian mendukung Prima Tani. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 3(1), 20–37.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Rosário, J., Madureira, L., Marques, C., & Silva, R. (2022). Understanding farmers’ adoption of sustainable agriculture innovations: A systematic literature review. Agronomy, 12(11), 2879.


Sari, P. P., Suminah, S., & Permatasari, P. (2022). Sikap kognitif petani pada program IP Padi 400 di Kecamatan Ngemplak Kabupaten Boyolali. Jurnal Agribest, 6(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.32528/agribest.v6i2.8328

Simbolon, T., Marbun, P., & Fauzi, F. (2013). Pengaruh varietas dan bahan organik terhadap jumlah anakan dan produksi padi sawah IP 400 fase vegetatif musim tanam I. Jurnal Online Agroekoteknologi, 2(1), 428–434.

Siregar, D., Marbun, P., & Marpaung, P. (2013). Pengaruh varietas dan bahan organik yang berbeda terhadap bobot 1000 butir dan biomasa padi sawah IP 400 pada musim tanam I. Jurnal Online Agroekoteknologi, 1(4), 1413–1421.

Sudana, W. (2010). Respon terhadap kebijakan IP Padi 400: Pola penelitian versus pola tanam petani. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 8(2), 103–117.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Supriatna, A. (2012). Meningkatkan indeks pertanaman padi sawah menuju IP Padi 400. AGRIN, 16(1), 123–136.

Sutardi, Apriyana, Y., Rejekiningrum, P., Alifia, A. D., Ramadhani, F., Darwis, V., Setyowati, N., Setyono, D. E. D., Gunawan, & Malik, A. (2023). The transformation of rice crop technology in Indonesia: Innovation and sustainable food security. Agronomy, 13(1), 1.

Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Six, J., Hartmann, M., et al. (2023). Enhancing soil health through balanced fertilization: A pathway to sustainable agriculture and food security. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 15(2), 101–115.

Zulfikar, Z., Amanah, S., & Asngari, P. S. (2018). Persepsi petani terhadap kompetensi penyuluh pertanian tanaman pangan di Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 14(1), 159–17

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/agritexts.v50i2.115501

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.