Indexing metadata

Regional Anesthesia vs Opioid Therapy for Postoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Regional Anesthesia vs Opioid Therapy for Postoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Arila Atalia; Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University, Malang; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Avisa Cetta Cresma; Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University, Malang; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Ariq Fadhil Athallah; Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University, Malang
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Ritma Ratri Ayunda Putri; Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University, Malang; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Putra Mahakarya Dewa; Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University, Malang
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Analgesia; Cardiac surgery; Opioids; Postoperative pain ; Regional anesthesia.
 
4. Description Abstract

Background : Postoperative pain after cardiac surgery can persist for extended periods, with up to 43% of patients experiencing pain three months post-surgery, and is associated with inadequate management and intense acute postoperative pain. Peripheral sensitization due to tissue injury and central sensitization within the central nervous system contributes to heightened pain sensitivity post-surgery. While opioids are effective, concerns over their adverse effects and potential for misuse prompt a shift towards multimodal analgesia, including regional anesthesia. Despite its advantages, there has been no comprehensive review comparing regional anesthesia and opioids in cardiac surgery. This study aims to systematically review randomized controlled trials to compare the effectiveness of these pain management strategies. context and purpose of the study.

Methods: The literature search was performed across four databases. This study focuses on the postoperative pain scale. Regional block intervention relieves pain in cardiac surgery patients by administering local anesthetics near nerves, which minimizes reliance on systemic opioids and their associated side effects. This approach enhances patient comfort, accelerates recovery, and reduces the risk of opioid dependence. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2. A total of ten articles were included in this systematic review.

Result : The analysis of pain scale data from eight studies revealed significant reductions in postoperative pain with regional block interventions compared to controls. Opioid consumption was notably reduced, indicating a decreased reliance on opioids. The length of time to extubation varied, with the intervention group showing a shorter duration compared to the controls. Adverse effects, including diaphoresis and nausea, were reported, but further research is needed to investigate these effects thoroughly.

Conclusion: Regional anesthesia has proven effective in reducing postoperative pain and minimizing both the dose and duration of opioid use.

 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2025-05-01
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/SOJA/article/view/91746
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier https://doi.org/10.20961/soja.v5i1.91746
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Solo Journal of Anesthesi, Pain and Critical Care (SOJA); Vol 5, No 1 (2025): April 2025
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files Supplementary 1 (25KB)
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright (c) 2025 Arila Atalia, Avisa Cetta Cresma, Ariq Fadhil Athallah, Ritma Ratri Ayunda Putri, Putra Mahakarya Dewa
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.