Effectiveness Comparison: Saddle Block vs. Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy
Abstract
Background: Brachytherapy plays a role in the management of cervical cancer by delivering radiation to large tumors at the end or in conjunction with chemoradiotherapy. Regional anesthesia is the dominant technique used for brachytherapy. Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia involves injecting local anesthetic into the subarachnoid space. Saddle block anesthesia is a type of low spinal block that provides anesthesia to the saddle area. Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia has the disadvantage of longer motor recovery in the extremities compared to saddle block. This study aims to compare the sensory and motor effectiveness between saddle block anesthesia and Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia in cervical cancer patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy.
Methods: A non-paired double-blind consecutive clinical trial with cervical cancer patients undergoing elective brachytherapy at Dr. Kariadi Hospital, Semarang. Patients were divided into two groups: Saddle block anesthesia and Low dose spinal anesthesia. Vital signs, NRS pain scale, Bromage motor activity score, side effects including hemodynamics, patient satisfaction level (EVAN-LR), and operator satisfaction level were recorded. The collected data were analyzed using independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests, with results considered significant if p < 0.05.
Results: Bromage scores at 30 minutes and 60 minutes in the saddle block anesthesia group were significantly higher than those in the low dose spinal group (p=0.000). The numerical rating scale during applicator placement, after moving rooms, and after removing the indicator in the saddle block anesthesia group was better than the low dose spinal group but not significant (p=0.054).
Conclusion: Sensory and motor effectiveness in patients using Saddle Block Anesthesia is better compared to Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
WHO Globocan. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2020.
Andrijono, Purwoto G, Sekarutami SM, Handjari DR, Primariadewi, Nuhonni SA, Octavia LI. Panduan Penatalaksanaan Kanker Serviks. Komite Penanggulangan Kanker Nasional. 2013; 1–30.
Indriyani S, Wahyono B. Penyedia Layanan terhadap Implementasi Program Inspeksi Visual dengan Asam Asetat. Higeia Journal of Public Health Research and Development. 2019.
Petitt MS, Ackerman RS, Hanna MM, et al. Anesthetic and analgesic methods for gynecologic brachytherapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Brachytherapy. 2020; 19(3):328-336.
Benrath J, Kozek-Langenecker S, Huofl M, Lierz P, Gustroff B. Anaesthesia for brachytherapy—5½ yr of experience in 1622 procedures. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2006. 96 (2): 195–200.
Bernharda R, Lucia M, Burkharda G. Anaesthesia for brachytherapy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21(4):514–8.
Korhonen AM. Use of spinal anaesthesia in day surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19(6):612–6.
Frankart AJ, Meier T, Minges TL, Khafora J. Comparasion of spinal and anesthesia for MRI-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Brachytherapy. 2018.
Haus N, Kambarami T, Dyer R. Spinal anaesthesia for brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: a comparison of two dose regimens of hyperbaric bupivacaine. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2013;19(3):154–9.
Tantri RA, Kapuangan C, Edwin FA. Waktu Pulih Anestesia Spinal pada Brakhiterapi Intrakaviter: Perbandingan Levobupivakain 5 mg Hiperbarik + Fentanil 25 mcg dengan Bupivakain 5 mg Hiperbarik + Fentanil 25 mcg. Anesthesia and Critical Care. 2016; 34(3): 132-139.
Krobot R, Premuzic J. Comparison of general and spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair. Period Biol. 2013;115(2):225–9.
Riyma M. Perbandingan Efektivitas Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia dengan Total Intravenous Anesthesia pada Pasien Kanker Leher Rahim yang Menjalani Brachytherapy. (Tesis). Universitas Diponegoro. 2021.
Hance AC, Jordan T, Jenny LM, Joseph K. Saddle Block Analgesia for High- dose-rate Brachytherapy: A Prospective Study. Brachytherapi. 2009.
Imre R. Anesthesia for cerclage. The Anasthesia Guide. McGrawHill: 2013.
Nicholau D. Acute Postoperative Pain. In: Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA et al., ed. Miller's Anesthesia. USA: Elsevier; 2009:2757-76.
Jaggar SI, Holdcroft A, Principle of Pain Evaluation, In: Holdcroft A., Jaggar SI, eds. Core Topic in Pain, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005, 81- 84.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.







