PROBLEMATIKA PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH (PEMILUKADA) DI SURAKARTA TAHUN 2010

Sutapa Mulja Widada

Abstract

The results of research show that the regional election in Surakarta Year 2010 can run smoothly with parameters: administrative electoral success, political success and the electoral success of quality products. Nevertheless, there is still the problem of including the establishment Supervisory Committee, the organizing body Formation (PPK, PPS, and KPPS), budget Election, Data and Designation Update Voters List (DP4), Campaign, Regional Head General Election Regulations. Election classic problem of money politics going on with the modus operandi of money politics is varied, while the money politics. Election regulations contained in Article 82 paragraph ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of Act No. 32 of 2004 are legal loopholes of the legal aspects of the subject of money politics just a couple of candidates and/or the campaign team and aspects of legal sanctions no deterrent effect . Article 117 paragraph ( 2 ) of Act No. 32 of 2004 just threatened with imprisonment ' a minimum of 2 ( two ) months and a maximum of 12 (twelve ) months and / or a fine of Rp . 1,000,000.00 ( one million rupiah ) and maximum Rp . 10,000,000.00 ( ten million dollars ).

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul Asri Harahap, 2005. Manajemen dan Resolusi Konflik Pilkada. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Cidesindo.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

………..., Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

………...., Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 6 Tahun 2005 tentang Tata Cara Pemilihan, Pengesahan, Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah.

Lexy J. Moleong, 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: P.T. Remaja Rosdakarya

Moh. Jamin, 2005. ”Menuju Pilkada Demokratis Suatu Catatan Pengantar”. Dokumentasi Pelaksanaan Pilkada Kota Surakarta 27 Juni 2005. KPU Surakarta.

Moh. Mahfud MD, 2011. “Membangun Demokrasi Substantif, Meneguhkan Integritas Institusi”, Risalah Rekaman Konfrensi Pers Akhir Tahun 2010 Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

…………., 2006. Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konsitusi. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES.

Mukti Fajar Nur Dewata dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mulyanto, 2010. “Studi Evaluatif-Preskriptif Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Langsung dalam Era Otonomi Daerah”, Jurnal Konstitusi P3KHAM LPPM Universitas Sebelas Maret kerjasama dengan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Volume III, Nomor 1, Juni 2010 ISSN 1829-7706, Jakarta: MKRI.

Sabian Utsman, 2010. Dasar-dasar Sosiologi Hukum: Dilengkapi Proposal Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2006. Hukum dalam Jagat Ketertiban, Jakarta: UKI Press.

Solopos, 20 April 2010.

………., 23 April 2010.

Sulistyowati Irianto dan Shidarta, 2009. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v1i1.50126

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.