Dampak Penerapan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif terhadap Korban dan Pelaku

Airlangga Surya Nagara, Elizabeth Ayu Puspita Adi, Reza Ilham Maulana

Abstract

The paradigm shift in Indonesian criminal law toward restorative justice (RJ) reflects an effort to address the shortcomings of the retributive system, which focuses solely on punishment. The central issue in this study is how the policy of terminating prosecution based on restorative justice affects the position of victims and offenders within the criminal justice system. This research aims to analyze the normative and empirical impacts of such policy on substantive justice, as well as to identify the potential and challenges of its implementation. The method employed is normative juridical, using both conceptual and case approaches, supported by systematic literature analysis guided by the PRISMA framework. The findings indicate that RJ provides a space for dialogue-based resolution, reduces over-criminalization, and strengthens offender reintegration without negating victims’ rights. However, its practical application still faces obstacles such as disparities in institutional understanding, potential pressure on victims, and regulatory inconsistencies. Case studies in East Flores and Tojo Una-Una reaffirm the effectiveness of RJ in strengthening social cohesion. It is concluded that RJ is not merely an alternative, but an integral component of criminal law reform in Indonesia that is just, inclusive, and transformative, aligned with local values, the principle of opportunity, and the theories of Zehr and Braithwaite.

Keywords

Restorative Justice, Prosecution, Victim, Offender, Legal Reform.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akbar, M. F. (2022). Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 199–208. Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Mmh.51.2.2022.199-208

Baidi, R. (2023). Restorative Justice: Implementasi Kebijakan Pemidanaan Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Indonesia Criminal Law Review, 2(1). Https://Scholarhub.Ui.Ac.Id/Iclr/Vol2/Iss1/3

Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame And Reintegration. Cambridge University Press. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/Cbo9780511804618

Chang, Y. J., & Finkbeiner, M. (2016). Evaluating Sustainable Development From A Child’s Perspective—A Proposal Of Sustainable Child Development Index (Scdi). Procedia Cirp, 40. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Procir.2016.01.102

Fikarudin, W., & Widjajanti, E. (2025). Efektivitas Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Pasca Peraturan Kejaksaan No. 15 Tahun 2020. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(2), Article 2. Https://Doi.Org/10.61104/Alz.V3i2.1010

Hafiz, M. A., & Yunanto, Y. (2023). Penerapan Konsep Hukum Progresif Perdata Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Keadilan Substantif. Pamulang Law Review, 6(2), Article 2. Https://Doi.Org/10.32493/Palrev.V6i2.35450

Hamirul, Hidayat, N. A., & Syahwami. (2024). Implementasi Restorative Justice Pada Kasus Guru Honorer Supriyani. Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), Article 2. Https://Doi.Org/10.70292/Pchukumsosial.V2i2.66

Kejaksaan Agung. (2024). Catatan Akhir Tahun 2024 Kejagung Telah Menyelesaikan 1985 Kasus Lewat Restorative Justice. Kejaksaan Agung.

Kejaksaan Negeri Tojo Una-Una. (2024, Agustus 5). Restorative Justice Pasal 362 Kuhp Tentang Pencurian – Kejaksaan Negeri Tojo Una-Una. Https://Kejari-Tojounauna.Kejaksaan.Go.Id/1951-2/

Lubis, M. I., Humario, N. K., & Mukti, S. A. (2024). Dampak Pemberlakuan Pasal 132 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Terhadap Implementasi Restorative Justice Oleh Kejaksaan. Desiderata Law Review, 1(2), 20–34. Https://Doi.Org/10.25299/Dlr.2024.17972

Lubis, M. K. (2022). Rekonstruksi Hukum Kewenangan Pelaksanaan Deponaring Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Asas Opportunitas Oleh Kejaksaan Berbasis Nilai Keadilan [Doctoral, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung]. Https://Repository.Unissula.Ac.Id/30901/

Marasin, F., & Koto, Z. (2024). Rungkad Hakekat Penuntutan Dalam Penjelasan Pasal 132 Uu Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang_Undang Hukum Pidana (Kuhp Baru) Dan Kegalauan Penyidik/Penyidik Pembantu Polri. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 18(1), Article 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.35879/Jik.V18i1.439

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum (14 Ed.). Kencana.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews And Meta-Analyses: The Prisma Statement. International Journal Of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ijsu.2010.02.007

Noviansyah, W. (2022, Desember). Polri Tangani 276.507 Perkara Selama 2022, 15.809 Restorative Justice. Https://News.Detik.Com/Berita/D-6491523/Polri-Tangani-276-507-Perkara-Selama-2022-15-809-Restorative-Justice?

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Kompas.

Rahman, T. (2023). Restorative Justice Sebagai Pendekatan Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Oleh Kejaksaan Ri. The Prosecutor Law Review, 1(3), Article 3. Https://Prolev.Kejaksaan.Go.Id/Kejaksaan/Article/View/23

Rahmathoni, L. Y. (2024). Perbedaan Makna Restorative Justice Pasca Perma No.1 Tahun 2024 Pada Sistem Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(10), Article 10. Https://Doi.Org/10.56370/Jhlg.V5i10.567

Riyanto, T. A. (2021). Fungsionalisasi Prinsip Dominus Litis Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 6(3), Article 3. Https://Doi.Org/10.20885/Jlr.Vol6.Iss3.Art4

Rote, E. (2024). Kejari Flores Timur Damaikan Tersangka Dan Korban Pengaiayaan—Pos-Kupang.Com. Https://Kupang.Tribunnews.Com/2024/08/14/Kejari-Flores-Timur-Damaikan-Tersangka-Dan-Korban-Pengaiayaan

Zaidun, Z., & Setiyono, J. (2024). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 6(1), 49–60. Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Jphi.V6i1.%P

Zehr, H. (2015). The Little Book Of Restorative Justice: Revised And Updated. Simon And Schuster.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v13i2.107070

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.