AI-Induced Fatalities: A Criminal Law Perspective from Indonesia and International Perspective

Vicko Taniady

Abstract

The rapid development of AI has raised legal challenges, particularly when AI causes harm or even death. This study analyses criminal liability in AI cases from the perspectives of Indonesian and international law, with a primary case study focusing on the death of a teenager resulting from interaction with an AI chatbot. The study aims to examine whether traditional principles of criminal liability (actus reus and mens rea) can be applied to AI and evaluate the readiness of the Indonesian legal system to manage AI-related cases. The research adopts a qualitative approach with doctrinal, comparative, and interdisciplinary analyses. The findings indicate that AI cannot fulfil the element of mens rea. Thus, criminal liability must be transferred to the actors behind AI, such as developers or service providers, through vicarious liability mechanisms. Comparatively, some jurisdictions, such as the European Union, have adopted a risk-based approach to regulate AI, while Indonesia still faces a legal vacuum. This study suggests that legal reforms are needed, including the establishment of a special category of liability for AI, mandatory risk assessment, and harmonising international regulations. Therefore, a responsive legal framework can be established to protect individual rights and ensure the responsible development of AI.

Keywords

AI; criminal liability; legal reform

References

Alhitmi, H. K., Mardiah, A., Al-Sulaiti, K. I., & Abbas, J. (2024). Data security and privacy concerns of AI-driven marketing in the context of economics and business field: An exploration into possible solutions. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2393743

Almada, M. (2023). Governing the Black Box of Artificial Intelligence (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4587609). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4587609

Alper, J. S. (1998). Genes, free will, and criminal responsibility. Social Science & Medicine, 46(12), 1599–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10136-8

Australia Government. (2021). Australia’s AI Action Plan. Commonwealth of Australia.

Australian Law Enforcement Commission. (2015). What is a tort? ALRC. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/traditional-rights-and-freedoms-encroachments-by-commonwealth-laws-alrc-interim-report-127/17-immunity-from-civil-liability/what-is-a-tort/

Aven, T. (2023). A risk and safety science perspective on the precautionary principle. Safety Science, 165, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106211

Bathaee, Y. (2018). The Artificial Intelligence Black Box and the Failure of Intent and Causation. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2), 890–938.

Bérubé, M., Beaulieu, L.-A., Allard, S., & Denault, V. (2025). From digital trace to evidence: Challenges and insights from a trial case study. Science & Justice, 65(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2025.101306

Bhat, P. I. (2020). Doctrinal Legal Research as a Means of Synthesizing Facts, Thoughts, and Legal Principles. In Idea and Methods of Legal Research (pp. 143–168). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199493098.003.0005

Botero Arcila, B. (2024). AI liability in Europe: How does it complement risk regulation and deal with the problem of human oversight? Computer Law & Security Review, 54, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106012

Brown, R. D. (2021). Property ownership and the legal personhood of artificial intelligence. Information & Communications Technology Law, 30(2), 208–234.

Brożek, B., Furman, M., Jakubiec, M., & Kucharzyk, B. (2024). The black box problem revisited. Real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 32(2), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09356-9

Buell, S. W. (2022). A Restatement of Corporate Criminal Liability’s Theory and Research Agenda. Journal of Corporation Law, 47(4), 937–961.

Burman, H. S. (1997). United Nations: Uncitral Model Law on Electronic Commerce. International Legal Materials, 36(1), 197–209.

Child, J. J., & Hunt, A. (2022). Beyond the Present-Fault Paradigm: Expanding Mens rea Definitions in the General Part. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), 438–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab033

Congress.Gov. (2023). Cybercrime and the Law: Primer on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Related Statutes. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47557

Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0

Dickinson, G. M. (2025). Section 230: A Juridical History (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5164697). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5164697

Greenberg, A. (2024). Awareness and the Recklessness/Negligence Distinction. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 18(2), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09687-3

Grynbaum, M. M., & Mac, R. (2023). The Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over A.I. Use of Copyrighted Work. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/business/media/new-york-times-open-ai-microsoft-lawsuit.html

Hajdin, N. R. (2021). The actus reus of the crime of aggression. Leiden Journal of International Law, 34(2), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156521000042

Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., Scardapane, S., Spinelli, I., Mahmud, M., & Hussain, A. (2024a). Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 16(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10179-8

Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., Scardapane, S., Spinelli, I., Mahmud, M., & Hussain, A. (2024b). Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 16(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10179-8

Hern, A. (2017). Give robots ‘personhood’ status, EU committee argues. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/12/give-robots-personhood-status-eu-committee-argues

Intahchomphoo, C., Millar, J., Gundersen, O. E., Tschirhart, C., Meawasige, K., & Salemi, H. (2024). Effects of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics on Human Labour: A Systematic Review. Legal Information Management, 24(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669624000264

Klasén, L., Fock, N., & Forchheimer, R. (2024). The invisible evidence: Digital forensics as key to solving crimes in the digital age. Forensic Science International, 362, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112133

Lewis Brisbois. (2024). DOJ’s Strategic Approach to Countering Cybercrime and AI Misuse—Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP. https://lewisbrisbois.com/newsroom/legal-alerts/dojs-strategic-approach-to-countering-cybercrime-and-ai-misuse

Mansar, A., & Lubis, I. (2023). Harmonization of Indonesian Criminal Law Through the New Criminal Code Towards Humane Law. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2381

Maronie, S. (2025). Implementasi Penanganan Barang Bukti Elektronik dan Penerapan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Perikanan. Kementerian Kelautan Dan Perikanan. https://kkp.go.id/news/news-detail/implementasi-penanganan-barang-bukti-elektronik-dan-penerapan-alat-bukti-elektronik-dalam-penyidikan-tindak-pidana-perikanan-99zB.html

McAuley, F. (1988). The Action Component of Actus Reus. Irish Jurist, 23(2), 218–239.

Meyersfeld, B. (2025). Corporations and positive duties to fulfil socio-economic rights: Developing international human rights law. The International Journal of Human Rights, 29(2), 240–281.

Montgomery, B. (2024). Mother says AI chatbot led her son to kill himself in lawsuit against its maker. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/23/character-ai-chatbot-sewell-setzer-death

Mordell, D. (2021). Neither physical nor juridical persons: Electronic personhood and an evolving theory of archival diplomatics. Archives and Records, 42(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2021.1873120

Nowik, P. (2021). Electronic personhood for artificial intelligence in the workplace. Computer Law & Security Review, 42, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105584

Nuraeni, Y., & Sihombing, A. S. (2024). The Malpractice Administration Procedure in the Vortex of Crime: An Indonesian Perspective and Its Comparison with Other Countries. JURNAL AKTA, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i2.34556

Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. (2024). Guidance on privacy and the use of commercially available AI products. https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-guidance-for-organisations-and-government-agencies/guidance-on-privacy-and-the-use-of-commercially-available-ai-products

Peters, U. (2023). Explainable AI lacks regulative reasons: Why AI and human decision-making are not equally opaque. AI and Ethics, 3(3), 963–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00217-w

Prananingrum, D. H. (2014). Telaah Terhadap Esensi Subjek Hukum: Manusia Dan Badan Hukum. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2014.v8.i1.p73-92

Presno Linera, M. Á., & and Meuwese, A. (2025). Regulating AI from Europe: A joint analysis of the AI Act and the Framework Convention on AI. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2025.2492524

Putra, G. A., Taniady, V., & Halmadiningrat, I. M. (2023). Tantangan Hukum: Keakuratan Informasi Layanan AI Chatbot Dan Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Penggunanya. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v12i2.1258

Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell, T. (2023). The revision of the product liability directive: A key piece in the artificial intelligence liability puzzle. ERA Forum, 24(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-023-00751-y

Roose, K. (2024). Can A.I. Be Blamed for a Teen’s Suicide? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/23/technology/characterai-lawsuit-teen-suicide.html

Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review. Cognitive Robotics, 3, 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001

Stafie, C. S., Sufaru, I.-G., Ghiciuc, C. M., Stafie, I.-I., Sufaru, E.-C., Solomon, S. M., & Hancianu, M. (2023). Exploring the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Healthcare: A Multidisciplinary Review. Diagnostics, 13(12), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13121995

Staszkiewicz, P., Horobiowski, J., Szelągowska, A., & Strzelecka, A. M. (2024). Artificial intelligence legal personality and accountability: Auditors’ accounts of capabilities and challenges for instrument boundary. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(7), 120–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2023-2204

Steffen, B. (Ed.). (2024). Bridging the Gap Between AI and Reality: First International Conference, AISoLA 2023, Crete, Greece, October 23–28, 2023, Proceedings. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46002-9

Suryono, M. V. A. (2023). Legal Reforming of Smart Contract in Supply Chain Demands Process between Retailer and Consumer. Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v3i1.33610

Taniady, V., & Siahaan, S. T. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Constitutional Court: A Newpath of Making Independent Decisions? Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v3i2.41726

Taylor, G. (2004). Concepts of Intention in German Criminal Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24(1), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/24.1.99

The Guardian. (2024). Tesla settles lawsuit over 2018 fatal Autopilot crash of Apple engineer. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/apr/08/tesla-crash-lawsuit-apple-engineer

Vines, P. (2000). The Needle in the Haystack: Principle in the Duty of Care in Negligence. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 23(2), 35–57.

Walker, R., Dillard-Wright, J., & Iradukunda, F. (2023). Algorithmic bias in artificial intelligence is a problem—And the root issue is power. Nursing Outlook, 71(5), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2023.102023

Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., Qiu, J., Hua, K., Su, W., Wu, J., Xu, H., Han, Y., Fu, C., Yin, Z., Liu, M., … Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation, 2(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179

Zhang, L., & Xu, J. (2025). The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI’s impact on university students’ task completion. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100978

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v14i2.101636

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.