ANALISIS PUTUSAN NIET ONTVANKELIJKE VERKLAARD DALAM GUGATAN CLASS ACTION (PUTUSAN NOMOR 18/PDT.G/2022/PN PSW)

Clara Noviana, Zakki Adlhiyati

Abstract

Filing lawsuits as a group has been regulated in PERMA Number 1 of 2002. However, implementing this PERMA often creates a number of problems because the substance of the articles in PERMA Number 1 of 2002 has not been regulated clearly and in detail. Decision Number 18/Pdt.G/2022/PN PSW is one of the court decisions which states that the lawsuit cannot be accepted (niet ontvankelijke verklaard). The lawsuit was submitted to the Pasarwajo District Court using a class action lawsuit mechanism. This article aims to analyze the judge's considerations in declaring the class action lawsuit unacceptable in Decision Number 18/Pdt.G/2022/PN PSW and the legal consequences of the class action lawsuit being declared unacceptable. The results of the research show that the reason the judge declared the class action lawsuit unacceptable was because the class representative as plaintiff did not meet the criteria for a class action lawsuit as regulated in PERMA Number 1 of 2022. The legal consequence of an  nacceptable class action lawsuit was that the examination of the lawsuit was stopped so that the status and the legal relationship between the parties and the object of the case does not experience any changes.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Achmad Ali, S H. Menguak Tabir Hukum: Ed. 2. Kencana, 2015.

Bisri, Hasan. Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2000.

Harahap, M Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Hsb, Putra Halomoan. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Upaya-Upaya Hukum.” Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi 1, no. 1 (2015): 42–53.

Makalew, Jordan Marciano. “ANALISIS YURIDIS GUGATAN NIET ONTVANKELIJKE VERKLAARD (NO) PADA SENGKETA TANAH DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA.” LEX ADMINISTRATUM 11, no. 2 (2023).

Marsono, Muhaimin, Syahruddin Nawi, and Ilham Abbas. “Pelaksanaan Gugatan Class Action Di Indonesia.” Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) 3, no. 2 (2022): 1–15.

Marzuki Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum (Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Memah, Alisia Revalina. “KAJIAN YURIDIS GUGATAN CLASS ACTION DALAM HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA.” LEX PRIVATUM 11, no. 3 (2023).

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty Yogyakarta, 2009.

Miyanto, Bram, and Icha Cahyaning Fitri. “ANALISIS YURIDIS GUGATAN CLASS ACTION MASYARAKAT TERHADAP KERUGIAN YANG DISEBABKAN OLEH BANJIR DI WILAYAH

KECAMATAN IJEN KABUPATEN BONDOWOSO.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Terpadu 8, no. 7 (2024).

Nugroho, S A. Class Action Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Negara Lain. Kencana, 2010.

Pai’pin, Hamzah, Sufirman Rahman, and Salle Salle. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Menyatakan Gugatan Penggugat Tidak Dapat Diterima.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) 3, no. 4 (2022): 617–33.

Putra, Raynaldo Handojo, and Mia Hadiati. “Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dan Akibat Hukum Dalam Menolak Gugatan Cerai Yang Tidak Dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) Di Pengadilan Dilihat Dari Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4843–56.

Santosa, Achmad. Konsep Dan Penerapan Gugatan Perwakilan (Class Actions). Lembaga Pengembangan Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (ICEL), 1997.

Yuliska, Edwin. “UPAYA HUKUM PERDATA TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG BELUM MEMUASKAN PIHAK BERPERKARA.” Normative Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 11, no. 2 November (2023): 119–33.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v14i1.99276

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.