KEDUDUKAN BUKTI ILMIAH DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERDATA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

Prasetyo Utomo, Zakki Adlhiyati

Abstract

Decision Number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh is a verdict issued by the Sukoharjo District Court, handling a civil environmental case filed by residents affected by water and air pollution caused by waste discharged by PT Rayon Utama Makmur (PT RUM). This case was examined using the class action mechanism. In this decision, there is an interesting aspect to study, namely the plaintiffs, who are the residents, and the defendant, PT RUM, both submitted scientific evidence to prove their claims and defenses. This article aims to analyze and examine the position and application of scientific evidence in environmental dispute case number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh. This article uses a normative-empirical legal research method with a case study approach using data collection techniques, namely interviews and literature studies, which are analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that in this case, the judge based the position and application of scientific evidence on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2023 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Environmental Cases, in which the position of scientific evidence is the result of research which is then supported by expert testimony in court. In case number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh, the Plaintiff submitted 14 pieces of evidence of research on testing the air and water of the Gupit River, which was reinforced by 2 expert testimonies in court. Meanwhile, the Defendant submitted 8 pieces of scientific evidence consisting of testing the quality standards of waste discharged from production activities through the results of wastewater and air testing, supported by one expert testimony in court. Although the Plaintiff submitted conclusive scientific evidence, the Panel of Judges rejected all of the Plaintiff's claims against the Defendant and stated that the act of pollution committed by the Defendant was not proven. Thus, PT RUM was declared to have not committed any unlawful act

Keywords

Environmental Dispute; Letter; Scientific Evidence.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aminudin, Cecep. “Peranan Bukti Ilmiah (Scientific Evidence) Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Hukum Perkara Tata Usaha Negara Lingkungan Hidup." IBLAM Law Review 4 no. 1 (2024): 266-275, https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.264.

Angga, La Ode and Miracle Soplanit. “Penyelesian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup Menurut ndangUndang No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang UUPPLH.” Lutur Law Journal 1 no.1 (2020): 9-14, https://doi.org/10.30598/lutur.v1i1.2837.

Black, Henry Campbell. Black Law's Dictionary. St. Paul Minn: West Publishing Co., 1968. Damanik, Muhammad Irfan Luthfi and Fauziah Lubis. " Arti Pentingnya Pembuktian dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum di Peradilan Perdata." Judge : Jurnal Hukum 5 no. 2 (2024): 74-81, https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v5i02.568.

Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.

Haryadi, Prim. “Pengembangan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Penegakan Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14.1 (2017): 124-149, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1416.

Heryani, Wiwie and Achmad Ali. Asas-Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2012.

Hiariej, Eddy O. S. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

Iqbal, Muhammad and Ali Imron. Hukum Pembuktian. Tangerang: Unpam Press, 2019.

Kisworo, Windu. “Aplikasi Prinsip-Prinsip Terkait Bukti Ilmiah (Scientific Evidence) Di Amerika

Serikat Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata Lingkungan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 5 no. 1 (2018): 24-49, https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v5i1.74.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata (Het Herzein Inlandcsh Reglement/Reglemen

Indonesia Yang Diperbaharui. Jakarta: Visi Media Pustaka, 2015.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Nugraha, Helmi Abi. "Pembuktian dalam Hukum Perdata," Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia, 26 September 2023, https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-batam/baca-artikel/16467/Pembuktian-dalamHukum-Perdata.html.

Nurendra A, Chandra. (Hakim yang memeriksa perkara Nomor 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh, Pengadilan Negeri Kelas 1A Sukoharjo), dalam wawancara dengan penulis, 28 November 2024.

Park, Keum J. ”Judicial Utilization of Scientifi Evidence in Complex Enviromental Torts: Redefining Litigation Driven Research”. Fordhan Enviromental Law Journal 7 no. 2 (2011): 483-513. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/elr/vol7/iss2/3.

Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1990.

Rahmadi, Takdir. Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.

Ramlan, Prilla Geonestri. “Mengenal Jenis Alat Bukti dalam Hukum Acara Perdata.” irektoran

Jenderal Kekayaan Negara Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia, 30 Juni 2022, https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-lahat/baca-artikel/15189/Mengenal-Jenis-AlatBukti-dalam-Hukum-Acara-Perdata.html/.

Sushanty, Vera Rimbawani. "Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan sebagai Upaya Pemulihan Dampak Kerusakan Lingkungan." Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 7 no. 1 (2020): 27-35, 10.31289/jiph.v7i1.3183.

Thomaidou, Mia A. and Colleen M. Berryessa. “Bio-Behavioral Scientific Evidence Alters Judges’ Sentencing Decision-Making: A Quantitative Analysis.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 95 (2024): 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102007.

Violiandari, Aloysia Gesya and Harjono. “Kekuatan Pembuktian E-Mail Sebagai Digital Evidence Menurut UU ITE.” Verstek, 12(3): 21-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v12i3.84116.

Wahyu and Trisna Agus Brata. "Penggunaan Scientific Evidence dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Lingkungan." Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sultan Adam : Wasaka 10 no. 2 (2022): 34-49, https://ojs.stihsa-bjm.ac.id/index.php/wasaka/article/view/72/70.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.