PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA PEMBUNUHAN DENGAN PELAKU ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 24/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN.BIT

Chacha Feillysita Marsha, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This article analyzesthe Judge's Consideration in Rendering a Criminal Judgment in a Murder Case Involving a Child Perpetrator in Verdict Number 24/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN.BIT. The purpose of this article is to examine the conformity of the Judge's consideration in deciding the criminal judgment in Verdict Number 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN.Bit with Article 183 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This study is normative legal research, with legal sources obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The author conducted an analysis of Verdict Number 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Bit. The analysis was performed using a major premise based on Article 338 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and Verdict Number 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Bit as the minor premise. The legal material collection technique in this research was through literature study, and the legal materials were gathered and processed using the deductive syllogism method. The findings demonstrate that the judge's considerations in imposing a criminal sentence on a child perpetrator in the murder case under Verdict Number 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Bit are in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Article 183 of KUHAP.

Keywords

Child Perpetrator; Judge Consideration; Murder

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Revisi Kedua (Jakarta: SinarGrafika, 2016) Asman Syaha, “KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI YANG MENGIKAT TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PIDANA,”.

I Ketut Arjuna Satya Prema, Masruchin Ruba’i, Nurini Aprilianda. PEMBATASAN USIA PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ANAK DALAM PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 4, Nomor 2 (2019)

I. Rusyadi, “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana,” Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS 5, no. 2 (13 Februari 2016): https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v5i2.558.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi (Jakarta: Prenamedia Group, 2014) Muhammad Yahya Harahap. (2003). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003)

Mulyadi. Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Manajemen. (Jakarta: Salemba Empat,2007) Naufal Zharif Anggara dan Muhammad Rustamaji, “RATIO DECIDENDI DALAM ENJATUHKAN

HUKUMAN TERHADAP TERDAKWA TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN LUKA BERAT” 12, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v12i3.83773.

Nikolas Simanjuntak. Acara Pidana Indonesia Dalam Sirkus Hukum. (Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2009)

Raihan Hadi Prama, Tajul Arifin. “ANALISIS SANKSI PIDANA TENTANG PERBUATAN EMBUNUHAN

BERDASARKAN PASAL 338 KUHP DAN HR. AL-TIRMIDZI.” CAUSA Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 4, No. 12 (2024): https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461.

Ridwan Darmawan, “RATIO DECIDENDI HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA KONFLIK BATAS WILAYAH DI ERA OTONOMI DAERAH (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 24/PUU-XVI/2018)”

Subekti. Hukum Pembuktian. (Jakarta: Pradnya Pramita,1983)

Yuni Priskila Ginting dkk., “Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi” 02, no. 10 (2023)

Zainudin Ali. Hukum Pidana Islam. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v14i1.97918

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.