PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA KEKERASAN BERSAMA-SAMA TERHADAP ORANG

Dimey Cantika Ardinata, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This article analyzes the judge's consideration in deciding the crime of joint violence against persons. The purpose of this article is to find out whether the judge's consideration in imposing a punishment decision is in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, especially Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a prescriptive and applied normative legal research with a case approach, namely examining one case of joint violence against persons with the Decision of the Surakarta District Court Number: 202/Pid.B/2023/PN.Skt. The collection of legal materials is carried out by means of literature studies in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The analysis technique is to use the deductive syllogism method. Based on this research, it is found that in the case of joint violence against persons, the judge in handing down the verdict is in accordance with the provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code so that the defendant can be convicted. Translated with DeepL.com (free version).

Keywords

Collective Violence Against a Person; Judges’s Consideration; Article 183 KUHAP

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Keempat Belas), Jakarta:Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Ghoniyah Zulindah Maulidya, dkk. 2023. “Ratio Decidendi Putusan, Jenis-Jenis Putusan dan Upaya Hukum terhadap Putusan yang Telah Memiliki Kekuatan Hukum Tetap Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia”. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum. 3 no. 1 (2023): 211-230.

Herman, dkk. 2023. “Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Raha Nomor 178/Pid.B/2017/PN Rah tentang Prinsip Ultra Petita”. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 5, no. 2 (2023): 501- 513.

Izza Meutia Aziza & Kristiyadi. 2023. “Ratio Decidendi Mahkamah Agung Mengabulkan Kasasi Penuntut Umum dalam Perkara Kekerasan Bersama”. Jurnal Verstek, 11, no. 1 (2023): 50-58.

Lilik Mulyadi. Hukum Acara Pidana dan Permasalahannya, Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2007.

Lilik Mulyadi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.

M. Solly Lubis. Landasan dan Teknik Perundang-Undangan, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1989.

Mukti Arto. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.

Nimerodi Gulo & Cornelius Dikae Zolohefona Gulo. 2024. “Timbulnya Keyakinan Hakim dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Peradilan Indonesia”. UNES Law Review, 6 no. 3 (2024):8115-8122.

Novaizin Ramadhani Putra Bastian, Siswanto, Fajar Dian Aryani. 2024. “Tinjauan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Article.” Pancasakti Law Journal, 2, no. 1 (2024): 85-92.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Rika Rahmawati, Warfa’u Dina Zahroh, Dian Rosita. 2024. “Kajian Yuridis Permintaan Maaf Pelaku Tindak Pidana dalam Perspektif Restorative Justice”. Politika Progresif, 1 no. 2 (2024): 344-348.

Rusli Muhammad. Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Citra Aditya, 2007.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Zainab Ompu Jainah, Intan Nurina Seftiniara, Muhammad Yudha Novandre. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Pengeroyokan Yang Luka Tumpul (Studi Putusan Nomor 576/Pid.B/2021/PN.Tjk).” Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 1, no. 2 (2022): 50-56.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i3.96900

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.