TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA PENGANIAYAAN BERAT DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 209/PID.B/2023/PN.SKT

Danam Isyafara Bahapasca, Muhammad Rustamaji

Abstract

This study analyzes to determine the role and power of experts in the evidentiary examination process in the fraud case of decision Number 717/Pid.B/2023/PN.Bdg and to find out the judge's legal considerations in decision Number 717/Pid.B/2023/PN.Bdg. in accordance with the provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This study analyzes is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This research uses a case study approach and a legislative approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials uses library study techniques. Legal material analysis techniques are processed using the deductive syllogism method. Based on the research results, it was found that the evidentiary strength value of expert testimony in Decision Number 717/Pid.B/2023/PN.Bdg is the same as the evidentiary strength value attached to the witness statement evidence. The evidentiary strength value attached to expert testimony evidence has the independent evidentiary strength value. And the judge's considerations were in accordance with the provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Keywords

Fraud, Evidence, Judge's Consideration

Full Text:

PDF

References

Subekti. 2001. Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha.

Mertokusumo, S. 2006. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2021. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.

Eddy O.S.Hiariej. 2012.Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga

Prameswari, Nitralia, and Sri Wahyuningsih Yulianti. "Kedudukan Alat Bukti Petunjuk Di Ranah Hukum Acara Pidana." Verstek . 3, no. 2 (2015), 2.

Chazawi, A. 2003. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Abdullah Sulaiman. 2005. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (PIH). Bahan Ajar-PIH-1. Jakarta. Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Jakarta.

M. Yahya Harahap. 1985. "Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP", Jilid 11, Pustaka Kartini.hal. 793.

Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, cet V (Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, 2004), hal.140

Wahyu Sari Asih. 2021. Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana Kekerasan

Terhadap Anak (Studi Putusan Nomor 166/Pid.Sus/2016/Pn.Pwt). Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Hal. 283

Rusli Muhammad. 2007. Hukum Acara Pidana Kotemporer. Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti,

Hal.212.

Surya Guritno.2014. “Argumentasi Hukum Penuntut Umum Menyusun Dakwaan Tunggal Dalam Perkara Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor: 817/Pid.B/2013/PN.Smg)” Universitas Sebelas Meret. Hal.239

A. Pangkerego & Vicky F. Taroreh. 2020. "Pengambilan Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan KUHAP". Jurnal Lex Administratum no. 4. Hal. 126-130.

Idham Latuconsina, 2008. Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Surat Dakwaan Sebagai Dasar Bagi Pemeriksaan Di Persidangan Dan Pengambilan Keputusan Oleh Hakim. Fakultas Hukum. Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogya. Hal.19

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.