PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMUTUS KASASI TERDAKWA PERKARA KORUPSI PUTUSAN NOMOR 5190K/PID.SUS/2023

Mahaldika Nilan Triwardani, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This article analyzes the field of Criminal Procedure Law related to the considerations of the Justice in examining and deciding the cassation filed by the Defendant in a corruption case. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the justice's considerations in issuing a cassation decision in decision Number 5190K/Pid.Sus/2023 are in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research method used is doctrinal or normative legal research. This research is prescriptive in nature which uses the collection of legal materials by means of literature study and the legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the Supreme Court Judge (/justice?) has appropriately determined the cassation decision in the corruption case in decision Number 5190K/Pid.Sus/2023 because of the judge did not find any errors in the application of the law made by Judex Factie so that the Defendant is considered not to meet the requirements as stipulated in Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and states that the Defendant's cassation is rejected with revisions.  

Keywords

Cassation, Corruption, Justice's Considerations

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adelia Dwi. “Alasan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Keberatan Mengenai Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Korupsi Secara Bersama-sama dan Berlanjut (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1722K/Pid.Sus/2014). Jurnal Verstek, 6 no. 3 (2018): 33. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v6i3

Ahmad Fauzi, Madjid, Aprilianda. Rasio legis eksistensi pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12 no. 1 (2021): 11- 20. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5779 Andi Sofyan, Abdul Asis. Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2014.

Arsyad Aldyan. Et.Al. The Model of Law Enforcement Based on Pancasila Justice. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System. Vol 2. No 3. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i3.51 Azzahra H, Muhammad R. “Telaah ratio decidendi Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan permohonan kasasi penuntut umum dalam perkara penggelapan”. Jurnal Verstek, 12.3 (2024): 165. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v12i3

Bambang Tri Bawono, Emilwan Ridwan, Anis Mashdurohatun, & Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. Legal reconstruction of corruption crime as a result of the abuse of authority based on the Pancasila justice value. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 6 no. 4 (2023). 245-250. 10.36348/sijlcj.2023.v06i04.008

Elwi Danil, Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana Dan Pemberantasannya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2016.

IGM Nurdjana. Sistem Hukum Pidana dan Bahaya Laten Korupsi “Perspektif Tegaknya Keadilan Melawan Mafia Hukum”. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Hendri Irawan, “Alasan kasasi penuntut umum terhadap putusan judex factie terhadap kesalahan penilaian pembuktian dan pertimbangan judex juris mengadili sendiri perkara korupsi (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 316K/Pid.Sus/2016)”. Jurnal Verstek, 8 no.1 (2020). 141, https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v8i1.

Karina Pandora. “Tinjauan Pengajuan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Bebas Perkara Korupsi Dengan Alasan Kesalahan Penerapan Hukum Pembuktian Oleh Hakim Pengadilan Tipikor Bandung (Studi Kasus Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1692 K/Pid.Sus/2014)”. Jurnal Verstek, 5 no. 3 (2017): 216. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v5i3.33544

Mahfud M.D, Hukum dan Pilar Demokrasi. Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Gama Media, 2006.

Peter Bima. “Argumentasi Penuntut Umum Terhadap Kesalahan Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Ambon Tidak Mempertimbangkan Tuntutan Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Jurnal Verstek, 8 no.2 (2020): 193. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v8i2

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

R. Soesilo. Hukum Acara Pidana (Prosedur Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Bagi Penegak Hukum). Penerbit: Politeia, Bogor, 1992.

Romli Atmasasmita, "Pengantar Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia". Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2014.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Undang-

Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Website https://www.icw.or.id/sites/default/files/dokumen/Materi%20Pemaparan%20Laporan%20Pem antauan%20Tren%20Korupsi%20Tahun%202023%20.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 01 Desember 2024.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i4.96305

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.