ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MEMBATALKAN PUTUSAN BANDING CLASS ACTION (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 896 K/PDT/2019)

Rafli Abigail Wijanarko, Ismawati Septiningsih

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal considerations of the Supreme Court judges in Decision Number 896 K/Pdt/2019 in overturning the DKI Jakarta High Court Decision Number 192/Pdt/2018/PT.DKI. The Supreme Court judge has a different opinion from the decision of the DKI Jakarta High Court on the case of normalization of the Ciliwung Riverbank involving the Bukit Duri village community and the Central Jakarta government, in this case the Head of the Ciliwung Cisadane River Basin Center (BBWSCC). Based on the results of the discussion, it shows that the Supreme Court judge in his consideration emphasized on the non-fulfillment of the notification and option-out provisions which resulted in formal legal errors. In addition, the Supreme Court judge considered that the validity of a class action lawsuit if it is stated in a court decision. In the absence of a determination issued by the Judex Factie, the case did not meet the criteria as a class action.

Keywords

Class Action Lawsuit; Notification; Judge’s Consideration

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ali, Achmadi. Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Jakarta: Chandra Pratama, 1996.

Edward Pontoh, Muhammad. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Melalui

Gugatan Class Action.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion 2, No. 4 (2016): 1-9.

Harjono. Hukum Acara Class Action (Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok). Lembar Kuliah Praktis

Hukum Acara Class Action. Surakarta, 2021.

Iffah, Fadillah, Yuni Fitri Yasni. “Manusia Sebagai Makhluk Sosial.” Lathaif: Literasi Tafsir, Hadis dan Fisiologi 1, No. 1 (2022): 38-47.

Kussunaryatun, Th., dkk. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2015.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2021.

Mustikowati, Endang. “Analisis Normatif Terhadap Pengajuan Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok (Class Action) di Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata.” Jurnal Yustisiabel 3, No. 1 (2019): 62-75.

Rosita. “Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Litigasi dan Non Litigasi).” Al-Bayyinah: Journal of Islamic Law 6, No.2 (2017): 99-113.

Sitorus, Syahrul. “Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata.” Jurnal Hikmah 15, No. 1 (2018): 63-71.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI press, 2006.

S. Randang, Ivan. “Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Peranan Identitas Domisili dalam Menentukan Kompetensi Relatif Pengadilan.” Lex Privatum 4, No. 1 (2016): 24-32.

Sugianto, Indro. Class Action: Konsep dan Strategi Gugatan Kelompok untuk Membuka Akses Keadilan Bagi Rakyat. Malang: Setara Press, 2013).

Widowati, Christiani. “Hukum Sebagai Norma Sosial Memiliki Sifat Mewajibkan.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 4, No.1 (2013): 150-167.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i3.96233

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.