PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA MENYEBARKAN BERITA BOHONG

Mukhtar Bima Suyanto, Muhammad Rustamaji

Abstract

The research in this legal writing aims to examine the position of the prosecution's expert witness and legal counsel in proving the criminal case of spreading false news and to examine the judge's consideration in giving a punishment decision in verdict number: 319/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Skt. which imposed a prison sentence of 6 (six) years based on Article 14 paragraph (1) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code on spreading false news with participation and based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a prescriptive normative legal research. The approach used is a case approach, a case approach is an approach that is carried out by examining cases related to legal issues and has received a decision by a judge that has permanent legal force. Legal materials are obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials in this research is literature study or library research. The legal materials obtained are then processed using the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on this research, the results show that the Judge's consideration in deciding the case is in accordance with Article 14 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 Year 1946 Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code and based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Keywords

Expert testimony; spreading false news; judge's consideration

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andi Hamzah, 2002, Hukum acara pidana Indonesia Edisi Revisi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Dedi Rianto Rahadi, Perilaku Pengguna dan Informasi Hoax di Media Sosial, Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2017, h. 58. http Bambang Waluyo, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Sinar grafika, Jakarta, 2004, hlm 33 s://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v5i1.1342

Barda Nawawi Arief. 2010. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Bernadeta Lyra (2024). Title: Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Terkait Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Terhadap Seorang Jurnalis (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5940 K/Pid.Sus/2022). Verstek, 12(3): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v12i3.84603

Dewi, Sri Dewi Rahayu, and Yulia Monita. 2021. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika ”. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 1 (1):125-37. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8314.

Nugroho, Bastianto. “Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut Kuhap.” Yuridika, vol. 32, no. 1, 2017, p. 17. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4780

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2011), 24.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2014), 21-181.

M. Yahya Harahap, 2002, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Rusli Muhammad, Potret Lembaga Pengadilan Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, hlm 124-125

Haris, O. K., Hidayat, S., & Rante, G. S. S. (2023). Pemeriksaan Ahli Kominfo Dan Ahli Akademisi Dalam Perkara Pembuktian Tindak Pidana ITE. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 5(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v5i1.219

Umi Rozah, Bambang Dwi Baskoro, Aska W. P.. "KAJIAN TENTANG PENGGUNAAN KETERANGAN AHLI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PRAKTIK PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA." Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2017): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2017.19579

Ar, El Firsta Nopsiamti, and Dessy Rakhmawati. 2023. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Bersama-Sama ”. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 4 (2):184-90. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v4i2.27002

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i3.96152

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.