PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PEMIDANAAN TERDAKWA ANAK DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN

Seno Satrio Heryadi, Muhammad Rustamaji

Abstract

This research in legal writing aims to examine the judge's considerations in giving a criminal decision in a criminal case of theft with aggravating circumstances in decision number: 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN SKH. who imposed a prison sentence of 4 (four) months based on Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Code concerning Aggravated Theft and Based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is prescriptive normative legal research. The approach used is the case approach, the case approach is an approach carried out by examining cases that relate to legal issues and have received a decision by a judge that has permanent legal force. Legal materials are obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials in this research is library research. The legal material obtained is then processed using the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on this research, research results were obtained which showed that the judge's consideration in deciding the case was in accordance with Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Procedure Code and based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal Procedure.

Keywords

Child; Judge's considerations

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ar, El Firsta Nopsiamti, and Dessy Rakhmawati. 2023. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Bersama-Sama ”. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 4 (2):184-90. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v4i2.27002

Assidiqi, Rafli dan Muhammad Rustamaji, 2022, Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo Dalam Memutus Perkara Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual, Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 10 No. 3, hlm. 563-564. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v10i3.70575

Fioren Mataheru, Yanti Amelia Lewerissa, Carolina Tuhumury. 2024. "Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak." TATOHI 38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i1.2119.

Soedarto, 1987, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, halaman 78.

Supramono,Gatot, 2005, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Anak, Djambatan, Jakarta, halaman 154.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2011.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2014.

Harahap, M. Yahya , 1988, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid I. Jakarta:

Pustaka Kartini. SCC. (2001) 7 SCC 740. "Danial Latifi and another v. Union of India."

Prakoso, Djoko, 1987. Penyidik, Penuntut Umum, Hakim, dalam Proses Hukum Acara Pidana, Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Rustamaji, Faisal dan Muhammad. 2020. hukum pidana umum. Yogyakarta: Thafa media.

Rahayu, Siti dan Wahyono, 1993, Tinjauan Tentang Peradilan Anak Di Indonesia, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.

Yudaningsih, Lilik P. "Penanganan Perkara Anak Melalui Restorative Justice." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, vol. 5, no. 2, Oct. 2014. https://www.neliti.com/citations/43277/ris

Nurhafifah dan Rahmiati, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum No. 66, Th. XVII (Agustus,2015), pp 341-362, Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terkait Hal yang Memberatkan dan Meringankan Putusan,2015. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/kanun/article/view/6067/5000

Qotrunnada, A.A dan Mukhtar Z., (2020), Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Anak yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan, Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol.1, No.2, Hal. 102. DOI: 10.18196/ijclc.v1i2.9646

Sarumaha, Emiasari. 2023. “DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN KEPADA ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN YANG DILAKUKAN DENGAN KEKERASAN”. JURNAL PANAH KEADILAN 2 (2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.57094/jpk.v2i2.1007.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i3.96046

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.