TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA PENCABULAN ANAK (Studi Putusan Nomor 104/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tli.)

Elnajj Keysha Nabila, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This article analyses criminal procedure law related to the suitability of the judge's consideration of rendering a judgment of acquittal of case of obscene act against a child in Verdict Number 104/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tli. with the provision of Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the judge's consideration of rendering a judgment of acquittal of case of obscene act against a child in Verdict Number 104/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tli. is in accordance with the provision of Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a normative or doctrinal legal research that is prescriptive and applied. Types of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique used in collecting legal materials is literature study or document study. The finding proves that the judge's consideration of rendering a judgment of acquittal of case of obscene act against a child in Verdict Number 104/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tli. has been in accordance with the provision of Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Keywords

Child Obscenity Act; Judge’s Consideration; Judgement of Acquittal

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ali Imron dan Muhamad Iqbal, Hukum Pembuktian. Tangerang Selatan: UNPAM PRESS, 2019.

Amiratul Aulia Hanifah, Syarah Zafira Keisua, Annisa Kharen Pricilla, Sherlytta Ananova, Ahmad Feisal Abi Hanif, Naufal Febriansyah, Warih Ayu Indah Kusumo, dan Alsa Mustafa Malawati. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Bebas Pelaku Pemerkosaan Anak di Lubuk Basung.” Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora 2, no. 3 (22 Juni 2024): 54–67. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1350.

Aria Zurnetti, Fitri Wahyuni, dan Siti Rahmah, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2021.

Faisal dan Muhammad Rustamaji, Hukum Pidana Umum. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2020.

Febriani Sari, Indah Rizeki, S Sahabuddin, dan Ruslan Abdul Gani. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jambi Nomor: 276/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Jmb Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Terhadap Anak.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 16, no. 1 (12 Juli 2024): 52–55.

https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v16i1.592.

Fitra Triyana dan Maria Silvya E. Wangga. “TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN DAN PERSETUBUHAN ANAK: Testimony by Hearing as the Basis for Judicial Consideration in Deciding Cases of Child Molestation and Rape.” Reformasi Hukum Trisakti 6, no. 3 (30 Agustus 2024): 1280–1291. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v6i3.21199.

Fitriani, Rahma Eka, M. Muhibin Asshofa, dan Nisbati Sandiah Humaeroh. “Analisis Penetapan Surat Dakwaan Terhadap Suatu Tindak Pidana.” Al-Jinayah Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 8, no. 1 (17 Juni 2022): 38–57. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2022.8.1.38-57.

Fransiska Novita Eleanora, Buku Ajar Hukum Acara Pidana. Bojonegoro: Madza Media, 2021.

Hapsari, Rhevika Gurindra, dan Bambang Santoso. “TINJAUAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 56/PID.SUS/2023/PN WNG.” Verstek 12, no. 2 (6 Mei 2024): 187–195. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v12i2.82605.

Harahap, Rizky Olivia Kartina, dan Rajin Sitepu. “Ketepatan Putusan Bebas No. 36/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Lbb dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Incest.” Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 3 (27 Agustus 2024): 664–673. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i3.10146.

Haria, Diswanto. “PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN DIBAWAH ANCAMAN MINIMUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN KEPADA ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR.” Jurnal Panah Hukum 3, no. 1 (31 Juli 2024): 224–236. https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1390.

Hendar Soetarna, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Acara Pidana. Bandung: PT Alumni, 2023.

Imantika, Yuniar Diva, dan Bambang Santoso. “ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PERSETUBUHAN ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN No. 989/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Bdg).” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 2, no. 3 (6 Februari 2024): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.572349/kultura.v2i3.1108.

Komnas Perempuan, PELUANG PENGUATAN SISTEM PENYIKAPAN DI TENGAH

PENINGKATAN KOMPLEKSITAS KEKERASAN TERHADAP PEREMPUAN. Indonesia: Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/catatan-tahunan-detail/catahu-2023-peluang-penguatan-sistem-penyikapan-di-tengah-peningkatan-kompleksitas-kekerasan-terhadap-perempuan diakses pada 13 September 2024, pukul 18.55.

Loway, Stiklif John Ridel, Adi T Koesoemo, dan Herlyanty Bawole. “KEDUDUKAN HAKIM DALAM PROSES PEMBUKTIAN PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA.” Lex Crimen 11, no. 5 (29 Juli 2022): 1–11.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2015.

Rusli Muhammad, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

SIMFONI-PPA, Jumlah Kasus Kekerasan di Indonesia. Indonesia: Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak, 2024. https://kekerasan.kemenpppa.go.id/ringkasan diakses pada 13 September 2024, pukul 18.35.

Waruwu, Septi Efi Jernih. “PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN TERHADAP PERBUATAN PENCABULAN DAN KEKERASAN KEPADA ANAK YANG MENGAKIBATKAN MATI.” Jurnal Panah Hukum 3, no. 1 (31 Juli 2024): 117–128. https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1354.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i3.95944

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.