PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMERIKSA DAN MEMUTUS PERKARA ITE BERMUATAN SARA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 169/PID.SUS/2017/PN.RAP)

Dini Adhilia, Vincentius Patria Setiawan

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the consideration of judges  in examining and deciding case of hate speech and hostility cases that contain ethnicity, religion, racial, and inter-group (SARA) to Decision Number: 169/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Rap. This research is a perspective normative legal research, and applied. The approach used is case approach based on case study. The type and sources in this research use primary and secondary legal materials with legal material collection techniques in form of literature studies. The analysis technique uses syllogistic deduction by formulating the facts from the mayor premise and minor premise. The results of the research and subsequent discussion shows in deciding and examining cases of hate speech, there must be at least two pieces of evidence and from the facts that appeared at trial, apart from that there were also aggravating and mitigating circumstances so that the judge's conviction emerged to sentence him to imprisonment 2 (two) years and a fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000.00 (one billion rupiah) with the provision that if the fine is not paid it will be replaced by imprisonment for 3 (three) months.

Keywords

Judge Concideration; Hate Speech containing SARA; ITE Law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad Rifai, 2010, Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika Anang Sugeng Cahyono, 2016, Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. ISSN : 1979-0295, 160 Diah Eva Subadra, 2018, Argumentasi Kasasi Penuntut Umum Jedex Factie Keliru Menilai Keterangan Saksi Anak Dalam Tindak Pidana Perncabulan Terhadap Anak Oleh Pendidik (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2658 K/Pid.Sus/2015), Jurnal Verstek Volume 6 No. 1 Endra Wijaya, Peranan Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana di Indonesia (Kajian Putusan Nomor 2189/Pid.B/2007/PN.Jkt.Sel), Jurnal Yudisial Vol III/No-02/Agustus/2005, 117 Hwian Christianto, Perbuatan Pidana Ujaran Kebencian: Ragam dan Studi Kasus, (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2018), 2-3 Johni Najwan, 2009, Konflik Antar Budaya dan Antar Etnis di Indonesia Serta Alternatif Penyelesaiannya, Jurnal Hukum No. Edisi Khusus Vol. 16, 196 Lilik Mulyadi, 2010, Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktek Praperadilan, Bandung : Mandar Maju, 193 M. Choirul Anam dan Muhammad Hafiz, 2015, Surat Edaran Kapolri Tentang Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) dalam Kerangka Hak Asasi Manusia, Jurnal Keamanan Nasional Vol.1 No.3, 350-353 M. Yahya Harahap, 2014, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika Nasrul Alief Pratama & Bambang Santoso, 2022, Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim (Ratio Decidendi) Terhadap Penjatuhan Pidana Anak Pelaku Perncabulan, Jurnal Verstek Volume 10 Issue 4 Natasya Serepina Parhusip, 2015, Hukum Pidana dan Kaitannya dengan Penggunaan Media Sosial, Jurnal Hukum tô-râ, Vol. 1 No. 1, 68, https://doi.org/10.33541/tora.v1i1.1097 Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2014, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Rusli Muhammad,2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 212 Undang Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Rantauprapat Nomor 169/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Rap

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i4.76681

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.