KESESUAIAN ALAT BUKTI PETUNJUK PADA PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PORNOGRAFI MELALUI MEDIA ELEKTRONIK

Amadeus Anugrah Dharmawan, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

his article aims to examine the appropriateness of the evidence used in evidence in trials of criminal acts of pornography through electronic media. This legal writing includes normative legal research, which is prescriptive by using sources of legal materials, both in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials in this research is by means of library research. In writing this law, the author uses an analysis using the syllogism method which stems from the reasoning in the submission of the major premise, namely the Law and Minor Premises of the Decision of the Wates District Court Number 23/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Wat. From these two matters, then a reasoning is drawn regarding suitability of Evidence Guide and proof of expert testimony in proving pornography cases.

Based on the results of the research, the Public Prosecutor charged the defendant with alternative subsidiary charges. The evidentiary process at trial shows that the evidence used in proving this crime is in accordance with the provisions of Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding evidence. The assessment of the results of evidence has given the Judge confidence that it was the defendant who had committed the crime and obtained the value of expert testimony that supports the evidentiary process in court.

Keywords

Penal Procedural Law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agus Raharjo, Cyber Crime Pemahaman dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002): 21.

Ahmad Ramli, Cyber Law dan HAKI-Dalam System Hukum Indonesia, (Bandung: Rafika Aditama, 2004): 1.

Azimah Soebagijo, Pornografi Dilarang Tapi Dicari, (Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2008): 43

Bastianto Nugroho, “Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut KUHAP”. Yuridika. Vol. 32. No. 1. (2017): 5, https://ejournal.unair.ac.id/YDK/issue/view/Volume%2032%20No%201%20January%20 2017

Daniel Widya Kurniawan, “Kekuatan Pembuktian Cetakan Media Sosial Dalam Menyebarluaskan Konten Pornografi Sebagai Tindak Pidana di Bidang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik”. Jurnal Verstek. Vol. 8 No.3. (2020): 72, https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v8i1.39612

Edmon Makarim, Komplikasi Hukum Telematika, (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003):

Ignatius Ridwan Widyadharma, Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, (Semarang: PT. Tanjung Mas, 2000): 175

Kadi Sukarna, “Alat Bukti Petunjuk dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana”. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta. (2015): 56, https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11617/5682/23.Kadi%20Suka rna.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Lutfan Muntaqo, Porno, Definisi & Kontrovesi, (Yogyakarta: Jagad Pustaka, 2006): XIII

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2000): 265

Nitralia Prameswari. Samirah. Sri Wahyuningsih. 2015. “Kedudukan Alat Bukti Petunjuk Di Ranah Hukum Acara Pidana”. Jurnal Verstek Vol 3 No 2 (2015): 9. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v5i1.33424

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2022): 21- 181.

Ronaldo Ipakit, “Urgensi Pembuktian Alat Bukti dalam Praktek Peradilan Pidana”. Lex Crimen Vol. 4 No. 2 April (2015): 89-90, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/7789/7352

Sony Set, 500 Gelombang Video Porno Indonesia, Jangan Bugil di Depan Kamera!, (Yogyakarta : ANDI, 2017

Thomas Adi Wiguna. Bambang Santoso. “Penggunaan Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan” (Studi Putusan Nomor: 78/Pid.B/2013/Pn.Unh). Jurnal Verstek Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): 133-142, https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.