ANALISIS PERMOHONAN PRAPERADILAN TENTANG KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN STATUS TERSANGKA (STUDI PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN NOMOR: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/ PN.Wat)

Anisya Noviana Hartono, Ismawati Septiningsih

Abstract

This article aims to determine the compatibility between the reasons for submitting a pretrial request regarding the validity of determining the suspect's status in the Pretrial Decision Number: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Wat with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and other provisions relating to pretrial. This research is included in normative legal research with a case approach. Types of legal materials consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the research on the writing of this law show that the reason for submitting a pretrial request regarding the validity of determining the status of a suspect in the Pretrial Decision Number: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Wat is not in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, this is in accordance with the provisions of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 21/PUU-XII/2014 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016. This shows that the provisions regarding Pretrial in the Criminal Procedure Code are not perfect, so several additional regulations are needed to perfect them as contained in the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 21/PUUXII/2014 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare pretrial procedural legal instruments in the form of a law that can ensure that the pretrial process can be carried out in a fair and accountable manner.

Keywords

Determination of Suspect Status, Judge's Legal Considerations; Pretrial

Full Text:

PDF

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Gagasan Kedaulatan Lingkungan: Demokrasi Versus Ekokrasi, Bunga Rampai, Saduran dari Buku Green Constitution. Jakarta: Rajawali Grafindo Persada, 2009.

Hamzah, Andi dan Surachman, Pre-Trial Justice & Discretionary Justice dalam KUHAP berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Ismail, Dian Ekawaty dan Yowan Tamu. “Upaya Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka/Terdakwa Melalui Mekanisme Praperadilan di Kota Gorontalo.” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol 21 no. 1 (2009); 81-92.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum (edisi revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2014.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Larangan Peninjauan Kembali Putusan Praperadilan

Pigome, Martha. “Implementasi Prinsip Demokrasi dan Nomokrasi Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan RI Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol 11 no. 2 (2011); 335-348.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014

Riki Perdana Raya Waruwu, “Praperadilan Pasca 6 Putusan MK”. Artikel (2018).

Roberts, K. “Perluasan Kewenangan Praperadilan sebagai Lembaga Pencari Keadilan Pascaputusan Mahkamah Konsitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014.” Civitas (Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Ilmu Civic), Vol 5 no. 2 (2019); 64-79.

Sari, Arifah Wulan dan Muhammad Rustamaji. “Analisis Ketidaksinkronan Putusan Hakim dan Ketentuan Perundang-Undangan Terkait Justice Collaborator dalam Perkara E-KTP Irman Dan Sugiharto.” Jurnal Verstek, Vol 8 no. 3 (2020); 273-280.

Sondakh, Rifkha A. “Fungsi Lembaga Praperadilan Mencegah Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia.” Lex et Societatis, Vol 1 no. 3 (2013); 56-66.

Sumadi, Rusman. “Praperadilan Sebagai Sarana Kontrol Dalam Melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Tersangka.” Jurnal Hukum Sasana, Vol 7 no. 1 (2021); 149-162.

Tajudin, I. “Urgensi pemeriksaan Sah Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Perluasan Objek Pra Peradilan Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Padjajaran Law Review, Vol 3 no. 1 (2015);1-19.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i4.76176

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.