PERANAN KETERANGAN AHLI SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA

Ahmad Puji Sulistyo Adi, Itok Dwi Kurniawan

Abstract

This article aims to examine the legality of the pharmacist's testimony in proving that meets the qualifications as evidence according to the Criminal Procedure Code in the case of Supreme Court Decision Number 122/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Bbs. This article is a prescriptive normative legal research, and uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques using literature studies. The approach used in this article is the case approach. The data analysis technique used is the syllogistic method which uses a deductive mindset. The results of the study show that the legality of the pharmacist's testimony has met the qualifications in Article 179 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the proof of the position of a pharmacy expert witness submitted by the Public Prosecutor is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code because members of the National Police provide information for the purposes of investigation, prosecution and justice regarding a criminal case that they heard himself, he saw it himself, and he experienced it himself. Thus, the information given has the same status as an ordinary witness, so that the statement can also be used as material for the judge's consideration in making a decision.

Keywords: Strength of Evidence;Expert Information; proof; Unlicensed Drug Circulation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Achmad Ali. 2008. Menguak Tabir Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia. Bogor.

Arini, K. N., & Sujarwo, H. (2021). Kedudukan Saksi Ahli dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana. Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum, 7(2), 245-256.

Bambang Poernomo, “Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana”, Yogyakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1983.

Catur Nugroho Jati. (2013). Kajian Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Pemeriksaan Sengketa Perdata (Studi Perkara Nomor : 19/Pdt.G./2011/Pn.Ska). Verstek, 1(2).

Djoko Prakso, 1988. Alat Bukti dan Kekuatan Pembuktian di dalamProses Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Gani, R. A. (2017). Peranan Keterangan Ahli Dalam Proses PerkaraPidana Pengadilan Negeri. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 27-43.View of Kedudukan Saksi Ahli dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana. (2022).

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Nugroho, B. (2017). Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim

Menurut KUHAP. Yuridika, 32(1), 17-36.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014

Putri, J. E. (2020). KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI VERBALISAN DALAM PERKARA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman Nomor. 284/Pid.Sus/2016/PN Smn). Verstek, 8(1).

Rivai, L. R. (2018). Kedudukan Saksi Ahli dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Menurut Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif (Doctoral dissertation, UIN RADEN FATAH PALEMBANG).

Soedirjo, 1985, Jaksa Dan Hakim Dalam Proses Pidana, Akademika Presindo, Jakarta. Surat Putusan Nomor 122/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Bbs Unsiq.ac.id.https://ojs.unsiq.ac.id/index.php/syariati/article/view/22 44/1347

Umboh, P. J. (2013). Fungsi dan Manfaat Saksi Ahli Memberikan Keterangan dalam Proses Perkara Pidana. Lex Crimen, 2(2).

Yesi Puji Astutiningrum. (2016). Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Dalam Peranan Saksi Ahli Dalam Pembuatan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Kematian. Verstek, 4(1).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i4.74360

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.