PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DITOLAKNYA PENGAJUAN JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENYUAPAN (PUTUSAN NOMOR 46/PID.SUS/TPK/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst)

Muhammad Rizqi Andia, Ismawati Septiningsih

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and review Judges Legal Considerations regarding the decline of a Justice Collaborator, Arif Fitrawan, in the criminal act of corruption case. How should the Judges' Legal Considerations toward Justice Collaborator on Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/TPK/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst based on SEMA Number 4 of 2011. This type of research is normative legal research that is perspective and applied with case studies. The technique of collecting primary and secondary legal materials used for this research is documental study and literature materials. The result and discussion indicated that Judges' Legal Considerations (Ratio Decidendi) used to establish the defendant Arif Fitrawan as Justice Collaborator on Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/TPK/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst, in the writer's opinion it had been appropriate, and according to the criteria for being a Justice Collaborator that regulated on SEMA Number 4 of 2011 and Law Number 13 of 2006 jo. Law Number 31 of 2014 about Protection against Witnesses and Victims. The writer has an opinion that the demands of Public Prosecutor are not overburdening, demands of the Public Prosecutor could referred to as a summary of examination of case based on proofing process. As justice upholders, judges could have a weighting of demands of the Public Prosecutor.

Keywords: Criminal Act of Corruption; Justice Collaborator; Ratio Decidendi; Bribery

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku: Oemar Seno Adji, Peradilan Bebas Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1980. Muhammad Rustamaji & Dewi Gunawati, MOOT COURT Membedah Peradilan Pidana dalam Kelas Pendidikan Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Thafa Media, 2021. Amir Ilyas & Jupri, Justice Collaborator: Strategi Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2018. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2014. Faisal & Muhammad Rustamaji, Hukum Pidana Umum, Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2020. Lilik Mulyadi, Perlindungan Hukum WHISTLEBLOWER & JUSTICE COLLABORATOR dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime. Bandung: Alumni, 2015. Jurnal: Abdul Haris Semendawai. “Penetapan Status Justice Collaborator bagi Tersangka atau Terdakwa dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia”. PJIH. Volume 3 No. 3. (2016): 468-490. Ardiva Naufaliz Azzahra. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Justice Collaborator dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut UU Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban”. Jurnal Verstek. Volume 10 No. 1. (2022): 1-9. Bahrudin Machmud, dkk. “Reposisi Kedudukan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Jurnal USM Law Review. Volume 4 No. 1. (2021): 362-377. Claudhya C. Coloay. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Menurut UU No. 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban". Jurnal Lex Crime. Volume 7 No. 1. (2018): 5-12. Hariman Satria. “Menakar Perlindungan Justice Collaborator”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Volume 13 No. 2. (2016): 432-454. Ni Luh Made Dwi Pusparini, dkk. “Urgensi Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum. Volume 1 No. 1. (2020): 179-185. Rika Ekayanti. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator Terkait Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia”. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udanaya. Volume 4 No. 1. (2015): 138-149. River Yohanes Manalu, “Justice Collaborator dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Lex Crimen. Volume 4 No. 1. (2015): 152-163

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v10i3.68521

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.