BAGAIMANA PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PERKARA PENCABULAN ANAK PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR: 36/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Lbb

Ricky Febriyansyah Akbar, Zakki Adlhiyati

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of testimonium de auditu (hearsay witness testimony) in a child molestation case, as addressed in Decision No. 36/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Lbb. The research method employed is normative or doctrinal legal research, which is prescriptive and applied in nature. The approach used in this study is a case study approach. The legal materials utilized consist of both primary and secondary sources. Primary legal materials include statutory regulations and court decisions, while secondary legal materials comprise books, legal journals, theses/dissertations, and online sources. The legal materials were collected through a literature study and analyzed using syllogistic deduction, based on major and minor premises. The study concludes that the hearsay witness testimonies submitted in this case were not taken into consideration by the judges, as they originated from unsworn witnesses and were inconsistent, thereby failing to establish judicial conviction.

Keywords

Judicial Consideration; Acquittal Verdict; Testimonium De Auditu; Child Molestation Crime

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agusta, M. Amry, and Nanda Sahputra Umara. “KONSTRUKSI PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 93/Pid.B/2013/PN.TK).” Al-Qisth Law Review 6, no. 1 (2022): 130. https://doi.org/10.24853/al-qisth.6.1.130-155.

Alfarizah, Lavarizky, Fitria Dewi Navisa, and Sunardi. “ANALISIS YURIDIS KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA INDONESIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 65/PUU-VIII/2010.” DINAMIKA 30, no. 2 (2024): 93–98.

Barokah, Windri Anggraini, and Ridho Mahargyo. “Penerapan Hukum Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Sebagai Alasan Pengajuan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Dalam Perkara Pengguguran Kandungan.” Jurnal Verstek 3, no. 1 (2015): 88–98.

Destiana, Elsa Syafira, and Sri Wahyuningsih Yulianti. “TELAAH NILAI PEMBUKTIAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ATAS PERLUASAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU.” Verstek 9, no. 2 (2021): 262–71.

Feni, Evita, and Edi Yunara. “Pembaharuan Keabsahan Pembuktian Testimonium de Auditu Dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual : Analisis Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Legalite: Jurnal Perundang-Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana

Hamzah, Andi. HUKUM ACARA PIDANA INDONESIA. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Harahap, Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.

Krisnamurti, Hana. “KEDUDUKAN SAKSI ANAK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA.” Wacana Paramarta 15, no. 2 (2016): 1–11.

Kristanto, Respati Bayu, and Hervina Puspitosari. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Terhadap Kesusilaan (Tinjauan Putusan Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN. Sby).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2024): 6653–64.

Kristiawanto. MEMAHAMI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PIDANA. Edited by Muh Isra. 1st ed. Klaten: Nasmedia, 2021.

Loway, Stiklif John Ridel, Adi T. Koesoemo, and Herlyanti Bawole. “Kedudukan Hakim Dalam Proses Pembuktian Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” E-Journal Unsrat 9, no. 2 (2009). Mertokusumo, Sudikno. MENGENAL HUKUM SUATU PENGANTAR. Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2010.

Mukhlis, Muhammad Iqbal, and Nurhafifah. Mengungkap Perkara Dalam Hukum Pembuktian Pidana. Edited by Tarmizi. 1st ed. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2022.

Mustafa, La ode ali, Hadibah Z Wadjo, Samaluddin, Mittakhul & Hisam Ahyani Huda,

Hardi Done, Harly Clifford Jonas Salmon, Judy Marria Saimima, et al. Sistem Hukum Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Edited by La Ode Ali Mustafa. 1st ed. Bandung: Widina Media Utama, 2024.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2021.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i3.101940

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.