STRATEGI PENUNTUT UMUM MENGGABUNGKAN (VOEGING) BERKAS PERKARA DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 750/PID.B/2023/PN.BDG

Aqila Rahmada Zulfani Firdaus, Muhammad Rustamaji

Abstract

This article aims to determine the suitability of the prosecution strategy of the public prosecutor merging (voeging) case files of crime using forged letters in Verdict Number 750/Pid.B/2023/PN Bdg based on the provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code. This type of research is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. The legal material collection technique used is a literature study, which is then analyzed using the syllogism technique with deductive reasoning. Based on the research results, the public prosecutor has merged the case files into one indictment (voeging) based on Article 141 of the Criminal Procedure Code which is then linked to Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. However, in its preparation, several things are not following the material requirements in Article 143 of the Criminal Procedure Code, so it can cause the indictment to be obscure (obscuur libel) and declared null and void. In addition, the use of an alternative form of indictment is not an appropriate form of indictment for merging case files (voeging), because the merger of case files or cumulating criminal cases uses a cumulative form of indictment. Thus, it can be concluded that the merger of case files (voeging) into one indictment by the public prosecutor is not following the provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code.

Keywords

Crime of Using Forged Letter; Criminal Procedure Code; Indictment; Voeging

Full Text:

PDF

References

Achjani Zulfa, Eva. “Menghancurkan Kepalsuan (Studi tentang Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan
dan Problema Penerapannya).” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48 no. 2 (2018):
345-360. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no2.1667
Aga Yudhistira, Gabrielle, and Aqsha Surgana. “Penggunaan Dakwaan Berbentuk
Alternatif dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pemalsuan Surat di Pengadilan Negeri
Bandung.” Verstek 4 no. 2 (2016): 92-100. https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jv.v4i2.38382
Akmalia, Afina, and Asyad Aldyan. “Analisis Penggunaan Dakwaan Alternatif Subsidair
oleh Penuntut Umum dalam Perkara Perlindungan Anak.” Verstek 11 no. 3 (2023):
488-497. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i3.73335
Chazawi, Adami, and Ardi Ferdian. Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan: Tindak Pidana yang
Menyerang Kepentingan Hukum Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Mengenai
Kebenaran Isi Tulisan dan Berita yang Disampaikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.
Faisal, and Muhammad Rustamaji. Hukum Pidana Umum. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2020.
Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
------------------. Surat Dakwaan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2021.
Irsan Arief, M. Memahami Kesalahan Penyusunan Surat Dakwaan (Studi Kasus 25 Perkara
Pidana) Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Mekar Cipta Lestari, 2021.
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2014.
M. Husein, Harun. Surat Dakwaan: Teknik Penyusunan, Fungsi, dan Permasalahannya.
Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta, 1989.
Rahim, Abdul, and Muhammad Ibnu Fajar Rahim. “Pemalsuan Surat dalam Arti Formil dan
Materil Beserta Akibat Hukumnya.” Pleno Jure 10 no. 2 (2021): 68-80.
https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v10i2.575
Putra Perbawa, Gede.”Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Eksistensi Asas Dominus Litis
Dalam Perspektif Profesionalisme Dan Proporsionalisme Jaksa Penuntut Umum”. Arena Hukum 7 no. 3 (2014): 325-342. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2014.00703.2

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bandung Nomor 750/Pid.B/2023/PN.Bdg.
Santosa, Wayan. “Interpretasi Kerugian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat.” Jurnal
Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Magister Law Journal) 5 no. 1 (2016): 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i01.p01
Sofyan, Andi, and Abd. Asis. Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pidana Suatu Pengantar (ed.
Pertama). Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Tan, David. ”Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas dan Mengulas Metodologi dalam
Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum”. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
8 no. 8 (2021): 2463–2478. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v8i8.2021.2463-2478
Yahya Harahap, M. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid I. Jakarta:
Pustaka Kartini, 1993.
------------------------. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v14i3.100735

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.