PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENGABULKAN PERMOHONAN BANDING PERKARA PERDATA ANTARA ADVOKAT DAN KLIEN

Farrely Jacynda Sukma Putri, Arsyad Aldyan

Abstract

This article analyzes the judge's consideration in granting the appeal request for a civil case in Decision No. 182/Pdt/2022/PT.SMG. The purpose of this article is to understand and identify the alignment of the judge's consideration with Article 16 of Law No. 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates. The research method used is normative legal research, making the nature of this research descriptive and applied with a case study approach. The legal materials were collected through library research from primary and secondary legal sources. The legal material analysis technique uses the method of syllogistic deduction. Based on the research results, it is concluded that the judge's consideration in granting the Appeal Request for Case No. 182/Pdt/2022/PT.SMG was solely based on the deadline for filing the appeal. The panel of judges did not properly consider the evidence submitted by the Appellant. The immunity rights guaranteed by Article 16 of Law No. 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates should apply in this case, and the Appellant should be protected by these immunity rights.

Keywords

Judge's Consideration Basis; Restorative Justice; Serious Assault Crime

Full Text:

PDF

References

A. Ahsin Thohari. Komisi Yudisial dan Reformasi Peradilan. Jakarta: ELSAM, 2004. hlm 1.

Achmad Ali, Wiwie Heryani. Asas-Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012. hlm 61-62.

Aldyan, Arsyad. “The Indonesian State Law System Is Based on The Philosophy of Pancasila and Constitution.” Res Judicata 6, no. 1 (4 Agustus 2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.29406/rj.v6i1.4939.

Aldyan, Arsyad, dan Abhishek Negi. “The Model of Law Enforcement Based on Pancasila

Justice.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 2, no. 3 (17 November 2022): 178–90. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i3.51.

Arsyad Aldyan. “The Influence of Legal Culture in Society to Increase the Effectiveness of the Law to Create Legal Benefits.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 9, no. 11 (November 2022).

Bhekti Suryani, Sartono. Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Profesi Advokat. Jakarta: Dunia Cerdas, 2013. hlm 39.

Kharis, Alvan. “Reciprocal Trust: Hal Mendasar Dalam Hubungan Advokat dan Klien" Delarex Lakidende Law Review 2, no. 2 (2023). hlm 448

Koesparmono Irsan. Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Masalah Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti Elektronik. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1996. hlm 2-3.

Marudut Tampubolon. Membedah Profesi Advokat Perspektif Ilmu Sosial Interaksi Advokat-Klien. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2014. hlm 25-27.

Muhammad Khambali. “Hak Imunitas Advokat Tidak Terbatas.” Cakrawala Hukum 14, no. 1 (2017): 20.

Mutmainah, Siti. “Rekonstruksi UU Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Terhadap Sengketa Perdata (Perbuatan Melawan Hukum) Berbasis Nilai Keadilan,” Verstek 12, no. 4 (2024): 319.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021. hlm 89.

Qudama, Ibnu, Zainuddin Hasibuan, dan Fauziah Lubis. “Pertanggung Jawaban Advokat Terhadap Klien berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003.” Journal Of Science and Social Research 6, no. 1 (17 Februari 2023): 166. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v6i1.1182.

Soerjono Soekanto. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 1986.

Suherman, Andi. “Implementasi Independensi Hakim dalam Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (27 September 2019): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.29.

Teguh Prasetyo. Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015. hlm 60.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i3.100087

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.