KAJIAN YURIDIS KESESUAIAN PERMOHONAN PKPU TERHADAP PASAL 222 UU NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004
Abstract
This article examines the PKPU Application submitted by PT Bank QNB Indonesia Tbk against PT Senang Kharisma Textil and Iwan Setiawan Lukminto in light of Article 222 of Law Number 37 of 2004. The type of research used by the author in this article is normative legal research with a prescriptive nature, where this research uses a case study approach with legal material from literary studies and analyzed through deductive syllogism. The purpose of this article is to determine the suitability of the PKPU Application submitted by PT Bank QNB Indonesia Tbk with the requirements for submitting a PKPU as stated in Article 222 of Law Number 37 of 2004. The findings show that there is a mismatch between the requirements for submitting a PKPU Application as stated in Article 222 creditor the PKPU Application submitted by PT Bank QNB Indonesia Tbk against PT Senang Kharisma Textil and Iwan Setiawan Lukminto, specifically creditor on the requirement that there be more than one creditors and submitted when the debt is due and can be collected.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andani, Devi, dan Wiwin Budi Pratiwi. “Prinsip Pembuktian Sederhana dalam Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 28, no. 3 (1 September 2021). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art9.
Christiawan, Rio. Hukum Pembiayaan Usaha. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.
Faqi, Ahmad Fachri, Fadilla Jamila, Raga Rai, dan Erika Pappa. “ANALISIS PENYELESAIAN UTANG PIUTANG PADA LAYANAN FINTECH LENDING MELALUI KEPAILITAN DAN PKPU” 12 (2024).
Manik, Edward. Cara Mudah Memahami Proses Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2012.
Mantili, Rai, dan Putu Eka Trisna Dewi. “PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) TERKAIT PENYELESAIAN UTANG PIUTANG DALAM KEPAILITAN.” Jurnal Aktual Justice 6, no. 1 (10 Juni 2021): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v6i1.618.
Marilang. Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian. Makassar: Indonesia Prime, 2017.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: Alumni, 2010.
Poesoko, Herowati, Hadi Shubhan, dan Ivrida Dewi Amrih Suci. Hukum Kepailitan. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Justitia, 2024.
Rijanto, S.H., M.K. Huda, S. Suhartono, dan Y.A. Mangesti. “THE PAYMENT OF RECEIVABLES OF SEPARATIST CREDITOR AS A MORTGAGE RIGHTS HOLDER UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY AND SUSPENSION OF OBLIGATIONS FOR DEBT PAYMENT ACT.” Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences 144, no. 12 (25 Desember 2023): 69–73. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2023-12.08.
Sari, Eka Putri Amalia, Iswi Hariyani, dan Bhim Prakoso. “KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN SEDERHANA UTANG DEBITOR DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU)” 7, no. 2 (2023).
Simanjuntak, Ricardo. Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan PKPU Indonesia (Teori dan Praktik). Jakarta: Kontan Publishing, 2023.
Sukandar, Dadang. Panduan Membuat Kontrak Bisnis. Jakarta: Visimedia, 2017.
Tirayo, Adriel Michael, dan Yoefanca Halim. “Problematik Definisi Harta Pailit dalam Kepailitan dan PKPU untuk Mencapai Kepastian Hukum.” Verstek 10, no. 2 (2 Agustus 2022): 306. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v10i2.67631.
Wulandari, Siti, Nizam Zakka Arrizal, dan Fayza Ilhafa. “Restrukturisasi Kontrak Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Dalam Bisnis,” t.t.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.










