<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2356-1424</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>SAINS TANAH - Journal of Soil Science and Agroclimatology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Sains Tanah J. Soil Sci. Agroclimatology</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2356-1424</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">1412-3606</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Universitas Sebelas Maret</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20961/stjssa.v23i2.110381</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Soil Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Influence of charged-biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on rice cell wall composition in iron toxicity-prone soils</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Jamilah</surname><given-names>Jamilah</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>jamilahfatika@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Maradona</surname><given-names>Maradona</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>maradona_81@ymail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fridarti</surname><given-names>Fridarti</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>fridartif@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Desi</surname><given-names>Yulfi</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>yulfidesi@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kasim</surname><given-names>Nur Qursyna Boll</given-names></name><address><country country="MY">Malaysia</country><email>qursyna@uitm.edu.my</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sidabalok</surname><given-names>Inawaty</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>inawatysidabalok@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-5"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chrisnawati</surname><given-names>Chrisnawati</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>chrisnawatimp@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-6"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-0754</contrib-id><name><surname>Komariah</surname><given-names>Dr. Komariah</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>sainstanah@mail.uns.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Agrotechnology</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Tamansiswa Palembang University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/048d4j826</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Animal Husbandry</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Tamansiswa Palembang University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/048d4j826</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-3"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Ekasakti</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03nhjhr13</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-4"><institution content-type="dept">Soil Conservation and Management Research Initiative Group (RIG), Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universiti Teknologi MARA</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05n8tts92</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="MY">Malaysia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-5"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Agricultural Product Technology, Faculty of Agriculture</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Ekasakti</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03nhjhr13</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-6"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture.</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01xydej26</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1"><institution-wrap><institution>Institut za zemljište</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03gef1f50</institution-id></institution-wrap><city>Faculty of Agriculture</city><country country="RS">Serbia</country></aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-07-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>07</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-07-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>07</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>December</issue-title><fpage>142</fpage><lpage>156</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-10-26"><day>26</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2026-01-08"><day>08</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-03-16"><day>16</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Jamilah Jamilah, Maradona Maradona, Fridarti Fridarti, Yulfi Desi, Nur Qursyna Boll Kasim, Inawaty Sidabalok, Chrisnawati Chrisnawati</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Jamilah Jamilah, Maradona Maradona, Fridarti Fridarti, Yulfi Desi, Nur Qursyna Boll Kasim, Inawaty Sidabalok, Chrisnawati Chrisnawati</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License that allows others to Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and AdaptÂ (remix, transform, and build upon the material)Â the work non-commerciallyÂ with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/view/110381" xlink:title="Website link"></self-uri><abstract><p>Iron toxicity severely constrains rice production on acidic soils by inducing nutrient imbalance and suppressing biomass accumulation. This study evaluated the effects of charged biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on rice growth, nutrient status, and cell wall dynamics under Fe-toxic conditions. A factorial experiment was conducted on a strongly acidic Ultisols (pH 4.63; Fe 3616.89 ppm) with AMF inoculation (0, 5, and 10%) and charged-biochar application (0, 2.5, and 5 t ha⁻¹). Both amendments significantly improved plant height, shoot dry weight, and forage dry weight (FDW), primarily through enhanced vegetative growth, nutrient-use efficiency, and root development. AMF colonization reached 68%, while charged biochar effectively ameliorated soil acidity and Fe stress. Regression analysis identified shoot dry weight, nitrogen content, ash (silica) content, and AMF colonization as the main determinants of FDW (R² = 0.996), whereas excessive plant phosphorus negatively affected yield. Cell wall components showed no direct association with FDW but contributed to tissue structural integrity. The combined application of charged biochar and AMF, supported by improved silica accumulation, provides an effective strategy to mitigate Fe toxicity and enhance rice forage productivity on acidic soils.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Acidic paddy soils</kwd><kwd>Lignin biosynthesis</kwd><kwd>Soil–plant relationships</kwd><kwd>Biomass enhancement</kwd><kwd>Cell wall modification</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value>https://jatseditor.com</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec-1"><title>1. INTRODUCTION</title><p>Rice is the staple food crop for many nations worldwide. However, paddy fields are not always established on fertile soils; many are acidic, low in nutrient availability, high in soluble iron (Fe), and poor in organic matter. The Fe concentration in soil that triggers toxicity symptoms varies considerably depending on environmental conditions and plant species. Studies have shown that, in rice, Fe toxicity symptoms appear at specific Fe concentrations in soil solution, particularly under flooded conditions. Severe toxicity symptoms are observed at Fe concentrations ≥ 325 ppm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Noor et al., 2012)</xref>. In certain soils, such as Ultisols, Fe levels can reach as high as 4881 ppm, posing a significant risk of Fe toxicity to rice production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Ahmed et al., 2023)</xref>. Similarly, the experimental soil used in this study contained Fe concentrations as high as 3616.89 ppm.</p><p>The rice cell wall is composed of structural fiber fractions—hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin—together with inorganic mineral components such as silica (SiO₂). The relationships <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Ramírez-Olvera et al., 2021)</xref> among silica, lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose contents in rice plants significantly influence growth and structural integrity. Silica accumulation affects the balance of carbon-based compounds, including cellulose and lignin, which are critical for plant health and ecosystem functioning. Silica does not directly improve the quality of cellulose and lignin; rather, it may operate through substitution or metabolic trade-off mechanisms, reducing carbon energy requirements and enabling plants to conserve carbon for growth through a carbon-sparing strategy. The interactions among these components can either enhance or limit plant growth, depending on their concentrations and relative proportions. Rice is known for its exceptional ability to accumulate silica, which can constitute up to 10% of shoot dry weight <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Du et al., 2022)</xref>. Silicon enhances both shoot and root biomass, thereby promoting overall plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">Mundada et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">Ramírez-Olvera et al., 2021</xref>). There is no strong evidence that silica reduces essential carbon compounds; on the contrary, many studies demonstrate that silica can conserve carbon and reinforce cell walls, thereby supporting plant health and resilience <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Schaller et al., 2019)</xref>.</p><p>Several studies suggest that lignin accumulation may increase under high-silica conditions, not only during silicon deficiency. The findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">Mir et al. (2022)</xref> are therefore valid but should not be generalized as a universal physiological mechanism across all plant species. Similarly, cellulose deposition is often elevated in the absence of silicon, indicating that silicon plays a regulatory role in cell wall composition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Ghouri et al., 2022)</xref>. Maintaining a balance between lignin and cellulose is thus essential for preserving structural integrity and resistance to environmental stress. Hemicellulose, together with cellulose and lignin, contributes to the overall structural framework of rice plants. The composition of rice husk, which contains approximately 18–21% hemicellulose, further highlights its potential for diverse applications such as biofuel production and soil amendment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">Mishra et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">Nawaz et al., 2023</xref>). While silica accumulation and its interactions with lignin and cellulose generally promote rice growth, excessive silica may reduce the availability of essential carbon compounds, thereby influencing plant and ecosystem performance.</p><p>The application of biochar, particularly rice husk biochar (RHB), has been shown to significantly increase silica levels in rice plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">de Tombeur et al., 2021</xref>). Numerous studies have demonstrated that biochar not only enhances silicon availability in soil but also promotes leaf silicification, thereby improving plant resilience and yield <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14 BIBR-15">(Guo et al., 2020; Hailegnaw et al., 2019)</xref>. Rice husk biochar serves as a readily available source of plant-available silicon; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">Olanrewaju et al. (2024)</xref> reported that its application increased pore-water silicon concentrations by up to 39.5% during the reproductive stage of rice growth. Research conducted between 2020 and 2024 has increasingly clarified carbon allocation patterns and the mechanical functions of silica, lignin, and cellulose through metabolomics and cell-wall modelling approaches (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-61">Yao et al. (2022)</xref>). The use of rice-derived biochar can increase leaf silicon concentrations from 19.0 to 70.4 g kg⁻<sup>¹, </sup>leading to greater silica deposition in rice leaves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Jabborova et al., 2022)</xref>. Biochar application has also been associated with improved leaf characteristics, although some studies have reported reductions in leaf mass per area (LMA), suggesting complex interactions between biochar treatments and plant physiological responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">Pouangam Ngalani et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-59">Wen et al., 2022</xref>). Under normal conditions, LMA increases with silica and biochar application due to cell wall thickening; where LMA decreases, contextual factors such as excessive biochar dosage, nutrient immobilization, nitrogen deficiency, or physiological stress must be considered. The effectiveness of biochar can therefore vary depending on the method and rate of application, with some instances reporting yield reductions linked to nutrient immobilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">Olanrewaju et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">Shifa et al., 2025</xref>).</p><p>Sustainable fertilization and soil amelioration technologies are thus essential to enhance rice performance while simultaneously supplying high-quality forage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Aufa Ain &amp; Noraini, 2023)</xref>. Two promising approaches are arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and charged biochar. AMF enhances nutrient uptake, particularly phosphorus (P), by extending root exploration zones and secreting phosphatases that mobilize insoluble P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">Huang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">Khaliq et al., 2022</xref>). Biochar, in contrast, functions as a soil amendment that improves pH, cation exchange capacity, soil structure, and microbial habitat, thereby supporting nutrient retention and microbial diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">Akbar et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">Mulyadi &amp; Jiang, 2023</xref>). Synergistic interactions between AMF and biochar have been shown to significantly enhance P uptake and plant biomass, particularly in P-deficient soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">Alotaibi et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">Meng et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">Sun et al., 2022</xref>).</p><p>Charged biochar, defined as biochar enriched with Crocober Plus liquid organic fertilizer (LOF) and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB), has the potential to further improve nutrient delivery and AMF colonization. Crocober Plus supplies nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, humic and alginic acids, and amino acids, while stimulating microbial activity and plant growth, with reported increases in rice yield of up to 6.34 t ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>of dry grain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Jamilah et al., 2021)</xref>. Previous studies have also demonstrated that AMF–biochar co-application can enhance P uptake by up to 67%, improve soil microbial communities, and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in paddy systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">Meng et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">Saikanth et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-58">Wen et al., 2024</xref>).</p><p>Despite these promising findings, research on the interaction between AMF and charged biochar under flooded acidic paddy soils remains limited, particularly with respect to forage productivity as a value-added by-product of rice cultivation. This study therefore aimed to elucidate the mechanistic relationships linking AMF–charged biochar interactions, plant physiological traits, cell wall composition, and forage dry weight (FDW) in flooded acidic paddy soils.</p></sec><sec id="sec-2"><title>2. MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec id="sec-3"><title>2.1. Study Site and Experimental Design</title><p>The study was conducted in Nagari Tigo Koto Silungkang, Palembayan Sub-district, Agam Regency, West Sumatera, Indonesia, located at 00°09′22″ S and 100°08′17″ E, at an altitude of 498 m above sea level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Fig. 1</xref>). The soil is classified as Ultisol, a typical acidic paddy soil, which was puddled and prepared prior to transplanting. The study soil was classified as an Ultisols based on its strongly acidic reaction (pH H₂O 4.63), low cation exchange capacity (10.64 cmol kg⁻<sup>¹</sup>), very low exchangeable base contents, and low base saturation (24.31%), which is below the 35% threshold defined in USDA Soil Taxonomy. In addition, the very low available phosphorus (P) and high iron (Fe) content indicate advanced weathering and intensive leaching, which are characteristic of Ultisols in humid tropical environments. Complete soil analysis included pH (H₂O and KCl), nutrient content (N), C/N ratio, exchangeable base and acid cations, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and micronutrients such as Cu, Zn, Mn, and Fe. These analyses were conducted at the Laboratory of the West Sumatra Centre for the Implementation of Agricultural Instrument Standards (BPSIP), Indonesia. The soil laboratory is accredited in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="sec-4"><fig id="figure-1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Study site at Nagari Tigo Koto Silungkang, Palembayan, Agam Regency</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/110381/version/1598/55951/362228/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-2-142-g1.jpeg" mime-subtype="jpeg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 1.</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-1"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>Initial soil and charged-biochar chemical properties*</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Property*)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Value</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Criteria**)</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>range</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">pH H<sub>2</sub>O (1:5)</td><td align="center">4.63</td><td colspan="2" align="center">acidic</td><td colspan="2" align="center">4.5-5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">pH KCl (1:5)</td><td align="center">3.67</td><td colspan="2"></td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Organic-C (%)</td><td align="center">2.72</td><td colspan="2" align="center">moderate</td><td colspan="2" align="center">2-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">N (%)</td><td align="center">0.3</td><td colspan="2" align="center">moderate</td><td colspan="2" align="center">0.21-0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C/N</td><td align="center">9.07</td><td colspan="2" align="center">low</td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td align="center">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5 </sub>Bray-1 (ppm)</td><td align="center">7.28</td><td colspan="2" align="center">Very low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">&lt;15</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3" align="center">Exchangeable bases (cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td colspan="2"></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Exchangeable K</td><td align="center">0.09</td><td colspan="2" align="center">Very low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">&lt;0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Exchangeable Ca</td><td align="center">0.034</td><td colspan="2" align="center">Very low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">&lt;2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Exchangeable Mg</td><td align="center">0.002</td><td colspan="2" align="center">Very low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">&lt;0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Exchangeable Na</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td colspan="2" align="center">low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">&lt;0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Total bases</td><td align="center">0.38</td><td colspan="2" align="center">-</td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Base saturation (%)</td><td align="center">24.31</td><td colspan="2" align="center">low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">20-40</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="center">exchangeable acidity (cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Exchangeable Al</td><td align="center">0.81</td><td colspan="2" align="center">-</td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Exchangeable H</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td colspan="2" align="center">-</td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Total acidity (cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td align="center">1.17</td><td colspan="2" align="center">-</td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Al saturation (%)</td><td align="center">7.61</td><td colspan="2" align="center">low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">&gt;40</td></tr><tr><td align="center">CEC (cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td align="center">10.64</td><td colspan="2" align="center">low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">5-16</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="center">Micro elements (ppm) H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-HClO<sub>4</sub>   extract</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Cu</td><td align="center">0</td><td colspan="2" align="center">deficiency</td><td colspan="2" align="center">0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Zn</td><td align="center">120.3</td><td colspan="2" align="center">Very high</td><td colspan="2" align="center">&gt;1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Mn</td><td align="center">163.71</td><td colspan="2" align="center">Very high</td><td colspan="2" align="center">23</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Fe</td><td align="center">3616.89</td><td colspan="2" align="center">Very high</td><td colspan="2" align="center">53</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="center">Charged-Biochar nutrients (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Total-N</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td colspan="2" align="center">low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">9.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center">0.68</td><td colspan="2" align="center">low</td><td colspan="2" align="center">10</td></tr><tr><td align="center">K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center">0.83</td><td colspan="2" align="center">high</td><td colspan="2" align="center">0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ash</td><td align="center">41.77</td><td colspan="2"></td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Organic-C</td><td align="center">33.84</td><td colspan="2"></td><td colspan="2"></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Remarks: *Analysed at the BPTP West Sumatra Laboratory, 2025; **Criteria based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-55">Tripathi et al. (2018)</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="sec-5"><p>BB</p><p>A</p><fig id="figure-2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Glomus sp.(A) and Acaulospora sp.(B) (Courtesy of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">Magurno et al. (2024)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">da Silva et al. (2022)</xref>).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/110381/version/1598/55951/362229/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-2-142-g2.png" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 2.</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec id="sec-6"><title>2.2. Mycorrhizal Inoculum</title><p>A consortium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), comprising Glomus sp. and Acaulospora sp., was used in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Fig. 2</xref>). The inoculum was mass-multiplied under greenhouse conditions using zeolite as a carrier medium and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) as the host plant. Zeolite provided a porous and chemically stable matrix that supported spore survival and hyphal development, while sorghum facilitated rapid root colonization and AMF proliferation. After 10–12 weeks, the inoculum, consisting of zeolite particles, AMF spores, extraradical hyphae, and colonized root fragments, was harvested, air-dried, and homogenised. Inoculum quality was assessed based on spore density and viable propagule density. Spore density was determined using the wet sieving and decanting method and averaged approximately 125 spores per 5 g of inoculum. Viable propagule density, representing infective AMF units capable of initiating root colonization, was estimated using a host-plant bioassay and expressed as 1 × 10<sup>⁵ </sup>CFU-equivalent g⁻<sup>¹ </sup>inoculum.</p></sec><sec id="sec-7"><title>2.3. Experimental Design and Treatments</title><p>The experiment was arranged in a factorial Randomised Block Design (RBD) with two factors: AMF inoculation in seedbed media at 0, 5, and 10% (v/v), and charged-biochar application at 0, 2.5, and 5 t ha⁻<sup>¹</sup>. Each treatment was replicated three times. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 5% significance level, and mean separation was conducted using the least significant difference (LSD) test at a 5% probability level.</p></sec><sec id="sec-8"><title>2.4. Statistical Analysis Using Pearson Correlation and Multiple Regression</title><p>Pearson’s correlation analysis (bivariate) was performed to evaluate the strength and significance of relationships between measured variables using a two-tailed test at a significance level of α = 0.05. Variables showing strong and significant correlations with forage dry weight (FDW) at 50 days after transplanting (DAT) were identified and interpreted based on the magnitude and direction of the correlation coefficients. A significant positive correlation indicated a supportive contribution to biomass accumulation, whereas a significant negative correlation indicated an inverse relationship; non-significant correlations were considered indicative of weak or no linear association. To further assess the combined influence of multiple factors on plant biomass, multiple linear regression analysis was conducted with FDW at 50 DAT as the dependent variable. The significance of individual predictor variables was evaluated using t-tests after accounting for the effects of other variables in the model. All statistical analyses were conducted using appropriate statistical software (e.g. SPSS or R), and statistical significance was declared at p ≤ 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="sec-9"><title>2.5. Charged-Biochar Preparation</title><p>Rice husk biochar was produced via pyrolysis under low-oxygen conditions to prevent complete combustion. The charging process involved mixing 1 tonne of fresh biochar with 10 L of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB; Pseudomonas fluorescens at 1.2 × 10<sup>¹³ </sup>CFU mL⁻<sup>¹ </sup>and Bacillus subtilis at 1.6 × 10<sup>¹³ </sup>CFU mL⁻<sup>¹</sup>), 20 L of Crocober Plus liquid organic fertilizer (LOF), and 50 L of water, followed by incubation for 48 h.</p></sec><sec id="sec-10"><title>2.6. Propagation of Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB) and Preparation of Charged Biochar</title><p>The propagation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) was conducted at the Laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Tamansiswa Padang. PSB were isolated from paddy soil collected in vivo at a depth of 5–15 cm and subsequently propagated. A soil suspension was prepared by dissolving 10 g of soil in physiological NaCl solution (0.85%) and shaking the mixture for 30 minutes to detach microorganisms from soil particles. Serial dilutions were then carried out up to 10⁻<sup>⁶, </sup>and 0.1 mL from each dilution was inoculated onto Pikovskaya agar (PVK) medium and incubated at 28–30°C for 3–5 days.</p><p>Selection of PSB colonies was based on the formation of clear halos around colonies, indicating phosphate solubilization. Selected colonies were purified through repeated subculturing. Laboratory-scale propagation of PSB cultures was performed using Pikovskaya liquid medium prepared in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks and sterilised by autoclaving at 121°C for 15 minutes. Inoculation was carried out by transferring one loopful of PSB culture into the sterile liquid medium, followed by incubation on a shaker at 150 rpm for 3–5 days at 30°C. Harvesting was conducted after optimal growth was achieved, with a recommended cell density of 10<sup>⁷–</sup>10<sup>⁹ </sup>CFU mL⁻<sup>¹, </sup>which was verified using the Total Plate Count (TPC) method prior to application.</p><p>Charged biochar was prepared using a ratio of 1 tonne of biochar combined with 10 L of PSB suspension (10<sup>¹³ </sup>CFU mL⁻<sup>¹</sup>) and 20 L of Crocober Plus liquid organic fertilizer (POC). The preparation of Crocober Plus followed established guidelines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Jamilah et al., 2021)</xref>. The PSB suspension and POC were diluted in 50 L of water, after which 1 tonne of biochar was immersed in the solution for 48 h to allow optimal absorption of microorganisms and nutrients. Subsequently, following the procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-51">Selvarajh et al. (2024)</xref>, the biochar was drained and air-dried to approximately 50% moisture content prior to field application. The charged biochar was applied at the beginning of planting according to the respective treatment doses.</p></sec><sec id="sec-11"><title>2.7. Parameters Measured</title><p>The following parameters were measured. Soil properties: Soil pH (H₂O, 1:5). Plant growth: Plant height, tiller number, leaf area index (LAI), net assimilation rate (NAR), and relative growth rate (RGR) at 50 days after transplanting (DAT). AMF colonisation: Root infection percentage was determined using the root clearing and staining technique. Root samples were carefully washed with distilled water to remove adhering soil and cut into 1 cm segments. From each sample, ten root segments were randomly selected and placed on a clean microscope slide.</p><p>The root segments were cleared in 10% (w/v) KOH at 90°C for 30–60 min, rinsed thoroughly with distilled water, and acidified in 1% HCl for 10–15 min. Roots were then stained with 0.05% trypan blue in lactoglycerol (or aniline blue as an alternative) at 90°C for 15–30 min, followed by destaining in lactoglycerol to remove excess stain. The stained root segments were mounted on microscope slides and observed under a compound microscope (×100–×400). Each root segment was examined for the presence of AMF structures, including hyphae, arbuscules, and vesicles. Root infection percentage was calculated using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-1">Formula 1</xref>.</p><disp-formula id="equation-1"><tex-math id="math-1"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle AMF colonization (\%) = \frac{\text{Number~of~root~segments~showing~AMF~structures}}{Total number of observed root segments (10)} \times 100 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Forage quality: Ash content and forage yield at 50 DAT, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, silica.  The chemical composition of the rice plant tissues, including cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and silica, was analysed using standard methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Kostryukov et al., 2023)</xref>. Cellulose content was determined using the acid detergent fibre (ADF) method, in which plant material was treated with acid detergent to remove hemicellulose and soluble compounds, leaving cellulose as the primary residue, which was then quantified gravimetrically. Hemicellulose content was estimated indirectly as the difference between neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and ADF fractions, where NDF represents cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and ADF represents cellulose and lignin. In addition, acid hydrolysis followed by sugar analysis can be used to quantify hemicellulose-derived sugars when higher precision is required. Lignin was determined using the acid detergent lignin (ADL) method, where the residue obtained from the ADF treatment was further treated with concentrated sulfuric acid to remove cellulose, leaving lignin, which was then washed, dried, and weighed. Silica (SiO₂) content was measured by ashing the plant material at high temperature (500–600°C) and dissolving the ash in acid, followed by either gravimetric determination of insoluble silica or colorimetric analysis using the molybdenum blue method. All analyses were conducted in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.</p><p>Protein yield was determined using crude protein analysis by the Kjeldahl method. Dried and ground plant samples were analysed for total nitrogen, and crude protein concentration was calculated as N × 6.25. Protein yield (kg ha⁻<sup>¹</sup>) was obtained by multiplying crude protein concentration by shoot dry matter yield per hectare.</p><p>Growth Indices Calculation, Leaf Area Index (LAI) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Ribeiro et al., 2019)</xref>, in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-2">Formula 2</xref>.</p><disp-formula id="equation-2"><tex-math id="math-2"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle LAI = \frac{Total leaf area per hill (cm²)}{Ground area occupied by the hill (cm²)} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><disp-formula id="equation-3"><tex-math id="math-3"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \text{Leaf~area~}\left( \text{cm}^{2} \right) = Leaf length (cm) \times Maximum width (cm) \times k \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><fig id="figure-3"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><p>Leaf bronzing symptoms on older rice leaves under treatment C0B0 (1) and the absence of symptoms under treatment C2B2 (2) at 65 DAT.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/110381/version/1598/55951/362230/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-2-142-g3.png" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 3.</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>where k = correction factor for rice leaf shape (0.75).</p><p>Net Assimilation Rate (NAR), at <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-4">Formula 3</xref>.</p><disp-formula id="equation-4"><tex-math id="math-4"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \text{NAR} = \frac{W2 - W1}{t2 - t1} \times \frac{\text{lnA}2 - lnA1}{A2 - A1} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where W₁, W₂ = plant dry weight at times t₁, t₂; A₁, A₂ = total leaf area; ln = natural logarithm.</p><p>Relative Growth Rate (RGR) at <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-5">Formula 4</xref>.</p><disp-formula id="equation-5"><tex-math id="math-5"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle LPR = \frac{\ln W2 - \ln W1}{t2 - t1} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Ash content (%) (gravimetric method) in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-6">Formula 5</xref>.</p><disp-formula id="equation-6"><tex-math id="math-6"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \text{Ash~}\left( \% \right) = \frac{W\text{dry} - W\text{ash}}{W\text{dry}} \times 100 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where Wdry = oven-dried weight at 105°C until constant weight; Wash = residue weight after ignition at 500°C for 5 h in a muffle furnace.</p><p>The assessment of iron toxicity symptoms in rice plants was conducted exclusively based on visual symptom expression using standardized reference images developed by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Visual scores were used solely for descriptive purposes and were not subjected to statistical analysis.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec-12"><title>3. RESULTS</title><sec id="sec-13"><title>3.1. Rhizosphere Soil Chemistry</title><p>The initial soil analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>) showed strongly acidic conditions with high exchangeable Al and soluble Fe, both of which are limiting factors for rice in acidic soils. Excess Zn and Mn also indicated risks of nutrient imbalance and toxicity. Under prolonged flooding, Fe toxicity appeared at 65 DAT, marked by reddish-brown bronzing on older leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Fig. 3</xref>). This coincided with very high soil Fe (3616.89 ppm), as flooding accelerates the reduction of Fe<sup>³</sup>⁺ to soluble Fe<sup>²</sup>⁺.</p></sec><sec id="sec-14"><title>3.2. Root Infection by AMF and Charged Biochar on Plant Dry Weight and LAI at 30 DAT, Root Dry Weight, AMF Infection and P-concentration at 50 DAT</title><p>Based on the ANOVA results, AMF, charged biochar, and their interaction had significant effects on root dry weight and AMF root colonization at 50 DAT (p &lt; 0.05). In contrast, biochar alone did not have a significant effect on root length (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). At 30 DAT, significant effects of AMF, charged biochar, and their interaction were also observed on plant dry weight and leaf area index (LAI) (p &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table-2"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p>Interaction of AMF and charged-biochar on plant dry weight and LAI at 30 DAT, root dry weight, AMF colonization and plant P concentration at 50 DAT</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Application of AMF and charged biochar</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>At 30 DAT</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>At 50 DAT</bold></th><th scope="col"></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">Plant dry weight per clump (g)</th><th scope="col" align="center">LAI</th><th scope="col" align="center">Weight of dry root (g)</th><th scope="col" align="center">AMF infection in root (%)</th><th scope="col" align="center">Plant P concentration (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">C<sub>0</sub>B<sub>0</sub></td><td align="center">2.01 + 0.48<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center">1.14 + 0.13<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center">21.20 + 2.83<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center">50.00 + 0.00<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center">0.087+0.009<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">C<sub>0</sub>B<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center">3.24 + 0.17<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">1.35 + 0.34<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center">20.49 + 2.91<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center">86.67 + 8.89<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">0.113+0.011<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">C<sub>0</sub>B<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center">2.81 + 0.32<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center">1.40 + 0.08<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center">20.91 + 3.34<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center">60.00 + 6.67<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">0.140+0.007<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">C<sub>1</sub>B<sub>0</sub></td><td align="center">2.64 + 0.22<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center">1.26 + 0.23<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center">14.25 + 1.85<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center">86.67 + 4.44<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">0.117+0.004<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">C<sub>1</sub>B<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center">3.13 + 0.32<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">1.81 + 0.32<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">17.96 +3.47<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center">56.67 + 8.89<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center">0.117+0.004<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">C<sub>1</sub>B<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center">4.83 + 0.21<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">1.80 + 0.09<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">33.73 + 1.29<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">60.00 + 6.67<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">0.093+0.016<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">C<sub>2</sub>B<sub>0</sub></td><td align="center">3.63 + 0.35<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">1.67 + 0.10<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center">29.49 + 4.14<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">36.67+ 5.44<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center">0.120+0.013<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">C<sub>2</sub>B<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center">3.17 + 0.26<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center">1.61 + 0.17<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center">43.96 + 4.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">63.33 + 4.44<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">0.113+0.009<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">C<sub>2</sub>B<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center">4.62 + 0.51<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">2.45 + 0.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">37.20 +2.96<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">80.00 + 6.67<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">0.107+0.004<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">CV (%)</td><td align="center">14.07</td><td align="center">13.80</td><td align="center">14.74</td><td align="center">13.81</td><td align="center">11.72</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Mean values in each column marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments for AMF or biochar, based on LSD Test at the 5% significance level (p &lt; 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. CV = Coefficient of Variation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>Description: C0B0 = 0% AMF in the seedbed medium + 0 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar; C0B1 = 0% AMF in the seedbed medium + 2.5 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar; C0B2 = 0% AMF in the seedbed medium + 5.0 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar; C1B0 = 5% AMF in the seedbed medium + 0 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar; C1B1 = 5% AMF in the seedbed medium + 2.5 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar; C1B2 = 5% AMF in the seedbed medium + 5.0 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar; C2B0 = 10% AMF in the seedbed medium + 0 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar; C2B1 = 10% AMF in the seedbed medium + 2.5 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar; C2B2 = 10% AMF in the seedbed medium + 5.0 tons ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar.</p><p>Numerical results showed that, at 30 DAT, plant dry weight and LAI were higher in treatments receiving AMF and charged biochar than in the control (C0B0). The highest plant dry weight (4.83 g) was recorded in treatment C1B2 (5% AMF + 5 t ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar), whereas the maximum LAI (2.45) was observed in C2B2 (10% AMF + 5 t ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar).</p><p>At 50 DAT, root dry weight varied significantly among treatments. The highest root dry weight (43.96 g) was obtained in treatment C2B1 (10% AMF + 2.5 t ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar). AMF root colonization ranged from 36.7% to 86.7%, with the highest colonization values recorded in treatments without biochar. Nevertheless, combined treatments such as C2B2 maintained relatively high AMF colonization (80%). Detailed mean comparisons for all parameters are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>Based on the ANOVA results, plant P concentration was significantly affected by biochar application (p &lt; 0.05), whereas the main effect of AMF and the AMF × biochar interaction were not significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). Among the treatments, the highest plant P concentration was recorded in C0B2, corresponding to the highest biochar application rate without AMF. Treatments receiving AMF without biochar (C2B0) also showed a higher plant P concentration than the control, although values were lower than those observed in C0B2.</p><p>Across biochar levels, plant P concentration increased with increasing biochar dose irrespective of AMF inoculation. In combined treatments, plant P concentration did not exceed the values obtained under the highest biochar treatment alone. Mean values and statistical comparisons of plant P concentration across treatments are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="sec-15"><title>3.3. Response of Rice Growth Components (Plant Height, Tiller Number, and Ash Content) to AMF and Charged Biochar during 30–50 DAT</title><p>ANOVA revealed significant effects of AMF inoculation and charged biochar application on rice growth traits between 30 and 50 DAT (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>). Plant height increased under both AMF inoculation and biochar application. At 30 DAT, the tallest plants were observed with 10% AMF (36.44 cm), while by 50 DAT, plant height reached 65.87 cm under 5 t ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>biochar. This improvement was associated with the combined application of AMF and charged biochar treatments. ANOVA showed that, at 30 DAT, tiller number was significantly affected by the main effects of AMF and charged biochar without a significant interaction, whereas at 50 DAT, only AMF had a significant main effect. Plant ash content was significantly affected only at 50 DAT; in general, higher doses of AMF and charged biochar increased ash concentration.</p></sec><sec id="sec-16"><title>3.4. Responses of Rice Physiological Traits and Tissue Nutrient Content (NAR, RGR, LAI, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose) to AMF and Charged Biochar during the 30–50 DAT Period</title><p>The ANOVA results showed that AMF and charged biochar treatments had significant effects (p &lt; 0.05) on several physiological traits of rice grown in acidic soils. While the net assimilation rate (NAR) remained relatively stable across treatments, both the relative growth rate (RGR) and leaf area index (LAI) responded positively. Cellulose and hemicellulose contents were not significantly affected by either AMF or biochar treatments. The highest RGR (79.65 mg g⁻<sup>¹ </sup>day⁻<sup>¹</sup>) and LAI (3.52) were achieved with 10% AMF, while 5 t ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar also supported greater canopy development (LAI 3.51) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>). ANOVA results further demonstrated that AMF and charged biochar treatments significantly affected growth parameters, nutrient-associated traits, and forage productivity under acidic soil conditions.</p></sec><sec id="sec-17"><table-wrap id="table-3"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><p>Effect of AMF and charged-biochar on plant height, number of tillers and ash content during 30-50 DAT period</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Treatment</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Plant height (cm)</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Number of tillers</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Ash-content (%)</bold></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">30 DAT</th><th scope="col" align="center">50 DAT</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">30  DAT            50 DAT</th><th scope="col" align="center">30  DAT</th><th scope="col" align="center">50 DAT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3" align="center">AMF application in seedling media (%)</td><td colspan="2"></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">0.0</td><td align="center">32.83+ 1.89<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">58.60+2.67<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">18.50+0.18<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">24.14+0.98<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">15.44+0.74a</td><td align="center">11.44+1.16<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">35.89+1.63<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">63.46+4.52<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">20.61+0.75<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">25.44+1.41<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">14.45+1.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">10.73+0.97<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">36.44+0.41<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">63.16+3.89<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">22.28+0.72<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">29.67+0.67<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">15.98+0.42<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">10.30+0.19<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3" align="center">Charged- biochar (tons ha⁻<sup>¹</sup>)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">34.44 + 0.93<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">60.19+3.73<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">19.33+1.00<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">27.03+1.76<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">14.92+1.84<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">10.22+0.08<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">2.5</td><td align="center">33.94 + 2.63<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">59.16+1.66<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">20.50+0.56<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">24.89+2.52<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">15.38+0.10<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">10.27+0.41<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">36.78 + 1.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">65.87+3.83<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">21.56+0.76<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">27.33+2.22<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">15.60+0.69<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">11.99+0.93<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">CV (%)</td><td align="center">7.22</td><td align="center">8.42</td><td align="center">7.54</td><td align="center">14.95</td><td align="center">15.52</td><td align="center">13.86</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: Mean values in each column marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments for AMF or biochar, based on LSD Test at the 5% significance level (p &lt; 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. CV = Coefficient of Variation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-4"><label>Table 4.</label><caption><p>Effect of AMF and charged biochar on NAR, RGR, LAI, cellulose, and hemicellulose during the 30–50 DAT period</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Treatment</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>NAR (g m</bold><sup><bold>2 </bold></sup><bold>day</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup><bold>)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>RGR mg g</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup><bold> day</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup></th><th scope="col" colspan="3" align="center"><bold>LAI</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Cellulose (%)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Hemicellulose (%)</bold></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">30-50 DAT</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">30 DAT</th><th scope="col" colspan="3" align="center">50 DAT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="8" align="center">AMF application in seedling media (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">0.0</td><td align="center">4.14+0.21<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">78.11+1.40<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="2" align="center">1.29+0.104<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">2.35+0.39<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">29.42+0.65<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">29.18+1.58<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">3.81+0.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">71.71+2.47<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="2" align="center">1.62+0.24<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">3.02+0.34<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">28.57+1.09<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">28.81+0.96<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">4.00+0.39<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">77.13+6.61<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="2" align="center">1.91+0.36<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">3.52+0.46<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">29.25+0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">31.87+1.95<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8" align="center">Charged- biochar (tons ha⁻<sup>¹</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">0.0</td><td align="center">3.91+0.11<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">74.08+1.28<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="2" align="center">1.62+0.24<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">2.75+0.48<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">29.02+1.06<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">30.69+2.53<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">2.5</td><td align="center">4.24+0.39<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">79.65+4.93<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="2" align="center">1.91+0.36<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">2.62+0.45<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">29.11+0.73<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">30.91+1.27<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">3.79+0.20<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">73.22+4.34<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="2" align="center">1.29+0.104<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">3.51+0.46<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">29.12+0.69<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">28.26+0.59<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">CV (%)</td><td align="center">14.43</td><td align="center">10.86</td><td colspan="2" align="center">15.55</td><td align="center">18.61</td><td align="center">8.89</td><td align="center">15.67</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Mean values in each column marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments for AMF or biochar, based on LSD Test at the 5% significance level (p &lt; 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. CV = Coefficient of Variation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5"><label>Table 5.</label><caption><p>Effect of AMF and charged biochar on mycorrhizal infection, root length, and root dry weight of rice plants during the 30–50 DAT period</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Treatment</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Michorrizhae Infection (%)</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Root Length (cm)</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Root Dry Weight (g hill</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup><bold>)</bold></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">30 DAT</th><th scope="col" align="center">50 DAT</th><th scope="col" align="center">30 DAT</th><th scope="col" align="center">50 DAT</th><th scope="col" align="center">30 DAT</th><th scope="col" align="center">50 DAT</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">AMF application in seedling media (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">0.0</td><td align="center">25.56+10.37<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center">65.55+14.07<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">17.81+0.41<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">23.69+1.09<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">2.42+0.13<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">20.87+0.25<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">48.89+10.37<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">67.78+12.59<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">18.33+1.07<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">26.08+0.99<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">4.27+1.08<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">21.98+7.83<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">62.22+12.59<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">60.00+15.56<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">19.29+1.28<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">25.05+1.63<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">4.49+0.70<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">36.88+4.93<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">Charged- biochar (tons ha⁻<sup>¹</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">57.78+16.29<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">57.78+19.26<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">19.03+0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">23.52+0.76<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">3.85+0.71<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">21.64+5.23<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">2.5</td><td align="center">28.89+12.59<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">68.89+11.85<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">17.1+0.24<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">26.28+0.81<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">2.89+0.10<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">27.47+10.99<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">50.00+11.11<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">66.67+8.88<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">19.3+0.96<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">25.02+1.69<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">4.41+0.63<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">30.61+6.47<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">CV (%)</td><td align="center">15.30</td><td align="center">14.39</td><td align="center">15.34</td><td align="center">11.57</td><td align="center">15.01</td><td align="center">14.74</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Mean values in each column marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments for AMF or biochar, based on LSD Test at the 5% significance level (p &lt; 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. CV = Coefficient of Variation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec id="sec-18"></sec><sec id="sec-19"><title>3.5. Responses of Mycorrhizal Infection, Root Traits, and Forage Yield Quality of Rice Plants to AMF and Charged Biochar during 30–50 DAT</title><p>The ANOVA results indicated that AMF inoculation had a significant effect on mycorrhizal infection at 30 DAT (p &lt; 0.05). As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>, mycorrhizal infection increased from 25.6% in the non-inoculated treatment to 62.2% in the AMF-inoculated treatment, and infection levels stabilized around 60–68% at 50 DAT. Charged biochar also supported higher infection rates (50–68%), indicating a more favorable rhizosphere environment. Root length remained relatively stable (17–19 cm at 30 DAT; 23–26 cm at 50 DAT), showing limited response to treatments. However, root dry weight increased sharply, with 10% AMF producing the highest biomass at 50 DAT (36.9 g hill⁻<sup>¹</sup>) compared with 20.9 g in the control. Similarly, 5 t ha⁻<sup>¹ </sup>charged biochar improved root biomass (30.6 g hill⁻<sup>¹</sup>).</p></sec><sec id="sec-20"><title>3.6. Relationship Between Root Infection and Soil Chemistry, Growth Components, Nutrient Content, and Forage Quality</title><p>The ANOVA results showed that the combined application of AMF and charged biochar had significant effects (p &lt; 0.05) on rice herbage dry matter, protein yield, and several soil and plant chemical parameters under acidic conditions. Treatments involving both AMF and charged biochar were associated with higher values of these variables than single or control treatments. These results indicate significant treatment-related differences in plant growth and nutrient-related traits, as reflected in increased tillering and forage yield. The application of AMF and charged biochar significantly affected dry biomass, protein yield, silica content, and lignin content (p &lt; 0.05), but did not significantly affect rhizosphere soil pH at 50 DAT (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-6">Table 6</xref>). Silica and lignin contents tended to increase with higher AMF and biochar doses, although this trend was not entirely consistent.</p></sec><sec id="sec-21"><title>3.7. Relationships among Growth Parameters, Mycorrhizal Colonization, and Plant Chemical Components Based on Pearson Correlation Analysis</title><p>According to Pearson’s correlation analysis restricted to variables showing significant effects in the ANOVA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-7">Table 7</xref>), vegetative growth parameters, including shoot dry weight and plant height, exhibited strong and significant positive correlations with FDW. Silica content also showed a significant positive association with FDW. In contrast, cell wall chemical components (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) did not show significant correlations with growth parameters. Net assimilation rate (NAR) and relative growth rate (RGR) did not show significant correlations with most variables. Photosynthesis- and respiration-related parameters did not show significant correlations with FDW under the experimental conditions.</p></sec><sec id="sec-22"><title>3.8. Multiple Linear Regression Analysis among Growth Variables, AMF Root Infection, and Chemical Components Affecting Forage Dry Weight (FDW)</title><p>The multiple linear regression model was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001), with an R<sup>² </sup>of 0.996, indicating that a large proportion of the variation in FDW was associated with the combined set of predictor variables (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-8">Tables 8</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-9">9</xref>). Given the number of predictors relative to sample size, the model was used to describe overall statistical associations rather than to infer individual causal effects.</p><p>Nearly all variation in FDW was statistically explained by the studied variables. FDW showed strong positive associations with shoot dry weight, AMF colonization, nitrogen content, and ash content, whereas cell wall components (hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin) exhibited weaker or indirect statistical associations with FDW. Based on ANOVA results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-9">Table 9</xref>) (F = 175.948; p &lt; 0.001), the multiple regression model involving 16 independent variables simultaneously had a highly significant effect on FDW. The model explained 99.6% of the variation in yield (R<sup>² </sup>= 0.996) with a very small prediction error (Std. Error = 0.0326).</p><p>The final regression model (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-10">Table 10</xref>) confirms that increases in shoot dry weight, N content, AMF activity, ash content, and combined fertilizer–ameliorant treatments were the main factors contributing to higher forage dry weight (FDW). Conversely, excessively high plant P content was negatively associated with FDW, which may reflect nutrient imbalance; however, causal mechanisms cannot be inferred from the present analysis.</p><table-wrap id="table-6"><label>Table 6.</label><caption><p>Effect of AMF and charged biochar on dry matter of rice herbage, protein yield, rhizosphere soil pH, Silica and Lignin at 50 days after transplanting (DAT)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Treatment</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Dry matter (tons ha</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup><bold>)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>protein yield (kg ha</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup><bold>)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Rhizosphere soil pH</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Silica (%)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Lignin (%)</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6" align="center">AMF application in seedling media (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">0.0</td><td align="center">1.00+0.13<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">90.93 + 14.31<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">5.94+0.05<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">2.88 +0.56<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">4.08+0.43<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">1.29+0.99<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">115.63+14.73<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">5.81+0.28<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">3.27+0.97<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">3.98+0.57<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">10.0</td><td align="center">1.53+0.13<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">139.84+16.64<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">5.67+0.24<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">3.08+0.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">3.09+0.49<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="center">Charged- biochar (tons ha⁻<sup>¹</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">1.10+0.19<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">103.02+14.52<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">5.82+0.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">2.99+0.39<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">3.22+0.46<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">2.5</td><td align="center">1.25+0.20<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">106.07+24.32<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center">5.88+0.16<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">2.44+0.51<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center">4.22+0.41<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">5.0</td><td align="center">1.48+0.21<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">137.32+16.62<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">5.72+0.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">3.79+0.41<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">3.73+0.66<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">CV (%)</td><td align="center">18.98</td><td align="center">19.79</td><td align="center">7.09</td><td align="center">19.26</td><td align="center">13.73</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Mean values in each column marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments for AMF or biochar, based on LSD Test at the 5% significance level (p &lt; 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. CV = Coefficient of Variation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-7"><label>Table 7.</label><caption><p>Pearson correlation matrix among growth parameters, mycorrhizal traits, and plant chemical components</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" colspan="2"></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>LAB g m</bold><sup><bold>-2</bold></sup><bold> day</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>RPR mg g</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup><bold> day</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>shoot dry weight (g)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>plant height (cm)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>AMF (%)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>FDW (tons ha</bold><sup><bold>-1</bold></sup><bold>)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Silica (%)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Hemi cellulose (%)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Cellulose (%)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Lignin (%)</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">LAB  g m<sup>-2</sup> day<sup>-1</sup></td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">RPR  mg g<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup></td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">.330</td><td align="center">1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.093</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">shoot dry weight (g)</td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">.031</td><td align="center">-.104</td><td align="center">1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.879</td><td align="center">.607</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">plant height (cm)</td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">-.292</td><td align="center">-.283</td><td align="center">.637<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center">1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.140</td><td align="center">.153</td><td align="center">.000</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">AMF (%)</td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">-.002</td><td align="center">-.122</td><td align="center">.112</td><td align="center">.423<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center">1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.994</td><td align="center">.545</td><td align="center">.579</td><td align="center">.028</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">FDW  (tons ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">.040</td><td align="center">-.064</td><td align="center">.994<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center">.626<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center">.107</td><td align="center">1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.841</td><td align="center">.750</td><td align="center">.000</td><td align="center">.000</td><td align="center">.596</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">Silica (%)</td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">.051</td><td align="center">.072</td><td align="center">.375</td><td align="center">.503<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center">.092</td><td align="center">.398<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center">1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.802</td><td align="center">.722</td><td align="center">.054</td><td align="center">.008</td><td align="center">.646</td><td align="center">.040</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">Hemi Cellulose (%)</td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">.067</td><td align="center">.164</td><td align="center">-.069</td><td align="center">-.122</td><td align="center">-.007</td><td align="center">-.067</td><td align="center">-.093</td><td align="center">1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.739</td><td align="center">.414</td><td align="center">.734</td><td align="center">.544</td><td align="center">.973</td><td align="center">.739</td><td align="center">.644</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center">Cellulose</td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">-.075</td><td align="center">-.228</td><td align="center">-.101</td><td align="center">-.269</td><td align="center">-.030</td><td align="center">-.121</td><td align="center">-.462<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center">-.510<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center">1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.711</td><td align="center">.252</td><td align="center">.617</td><td align="center">.175</td><td align="center">.882</td><td align="center">.549</td><td align="center">.015</td><td align="center">.007</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="center">Lignin</td><td align="center">Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center">-.125</td><td align="center">.173</td><td align="center">-.179</td><td align="center">.003</td><td align="center">-.014</td><td align="center">-.159</td><td align="center">.076</td><td align="center">-.361</td><td align="center">-.111</td><td align="center">1</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center">.535</td><td align="center">.389</td><td align="center">.371</td><td align="center">.989</td><td align="center">.945</td><td align="center">.429</td><td align="center">.705</td><td align="center">.064</td><td align="center">.583</td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">N</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">27</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>**Correlation is statistically significant at the 0.01 probability level (two-tailed test) * Correlation is statistically significant at the 0.05 probability level (two-tailed test).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-8"><label>Table 8.</label><caption><p>Summary of Multiple Linear Regression Model among Growth Variables, AMF Root Infection, and Chemical Components of the Plant</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" colspan="5" align="center"><bold>Model Summary</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">Model</td><td align="center">R</td><td align="center">R Square</td><td align="center">Adjusted R Square</td><td align="center">Std. Error of the Estimate</td></tr><tr><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">0.998<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center">0.996</td><td align="center">0.991</td><td align="center">0.03259</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" align="center">a. Predictors: (Constant), lignin, plant height (cm), N-content (%), P-plant (%), cellulose, ash content (%), root dry weight (g), root length (cm), LAB g m<sup>-2</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>, AMF infection in root (%), RPR mg g<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>, silica, pH, shoot dry weight (g), hemicellulose, treatment (Charged-biochar and AMF)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-9"><label>Table 9.</label><caption><p>ANOVA Test Results for the Multiple Linear Regression Model on Forage Dry Weight (FDW)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Model</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Sum of Squares</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>df</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Mean Square</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>F</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Sig.</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" align="center">1</td><td align="center">Regression</td><td align="center">2.991</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">.187</td><td align="center">175.948</td><td align="center">.000<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Residual</td><td align="center">.011</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">.001</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Total</td><td align="center">3.001</td><td align="center">26</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">a. Dependent Variable: FDW (tons ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">b. Predictors: (Constant), lignin, plant height (cm), N-content (%), P-plant (%), cellulose, ash content (%), root dry weight (g),  root length (cm), LAB g m<sup>-2</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>, AMF infection in root (%), RPR mg g<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>, silica, pH, shoot dry weight (g), hemicellulose  and treatments.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="sec-23"><title>4. DISCUSSION</title><p>Soil analysis revealed that the experimental site was strongly acidic (pH H₂O 4.63), with low alluminium ferrum saturation (7.61%) and iron (Fe) concentration (3616.89 ppm). These conditions indicate a high risk of iron toxicity, which is widely known to inhibit the uptake of essential nutrients such as P, Ca, and Mg, thereby suppressing plant physiological activity and biomass accumulation. The very low availability of these nutrients observed in this study confirms the severity of nutrient stress at the experimental site. Similar conditions have been reported to severely restrict root development and nutrient uptake in acidic soils with pH below 5.5 due to elevated Al and Fe toxicity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-57">(Varghese et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>Under such adverse soil conditions, improvements in nutrient uptake efficiency and plant physiological performance become critical. The combined application of charged biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) appeared to play a significant role in improving soil–plant functioning. Charged biochar, as a carbon-rich soil amendment, has been reported to ameliorate soil acidity by increasing soil pH and reducing Al and Fe toxicity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Kasno, 2019)</xref>. In parallel, AMF form symbiotic associations with plant roots, extending the effective root surface area and enhancing the uptake of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, which is often limiting in acidic soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">Paymaneh et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-57">Varghese et al., 2022</xref>). The integration of these two amendments therefore provides both physicochemical and biological improvements in the rhizosphere, leading to more favorable root-zone conditions and enhanced nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">Assaye, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-56">Tusar et al., 2025</xref>).</p><p>The improved soil–plant interactions were reflected in enhanced vegetative growth performance. Pearson correlation analysis showed that shoot dry weight was very strongly and positively correlated with forage dry weight (FDW), indicating that increases in above-ground biomass were closely associated with higher forage productivity. Plant height also exhibited a strong positive correlation with shoot dry weight, suggesting that improved vertical growth contributed to greater biomass accumulation. In addition, AMF colonization was positively correlated with plant height, implying that stronger symbiotic associations supported enhanced vegetative elongation and overall plant vigor.</p><p>However, AMF colonization did not show a significant direct correlation with FDW, suggesting that its contribution to yield formation was primarily indirect. Rather than directly increasing forage yield, AMF appeared to support structural growth and biomass development through improved nutrient acquisition and root function. In contrast, physiological indices such as net assimilation rate (NAR) and relative growth rate (RGR) did not show significant correlations with most measured variables, indicating that, under the prevailing experimental conditions, growth variation was driven more by biomass accumulation and canopy development than by changes in intrinsic physiological efficiency.</p><p>Silica accumulation emerged as an important supporting factor in plant growth and forage productivity. Silica content showed significant positive correlations with both plant height and FDW, indicating that higher silica accumulation was associated with greater plant sturdiness and biomass yield. Previous studies have demonstrated that silica application enhances plant height, photosynthetic capacity, and biomass production in various crops, including maize and rice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">Melo et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">Prisa, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-60">Yang et al., 2025</xref>). Reported silica concentrations in rice typically range from 1.62 to 2.66%, depending on genotype <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Gan et al., 2004)</xref>, and increases in silica content up to an optimal level have been shown to improve net photosynthesis and stress tolerance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Li et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">Rakian et al., 2023</xref>). Nevertheless, excessive silica accumulation may reduce nutrient return under certain conditions, emphasizing the importance of balanced nutrient management.</p><table-wrap id="table-10"><label>Table 10.</label><caption><p>Multiple Linear Regression Coefficients between Growth Variables and Chemical Components on Forage Dry Weight (FDW)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" colspan="7" align="center"><bold>Coefficients</bold><sup><bold>a</bold></sup></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" colspan="2" rowspan="2" align="center">Model</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">Unstandardized Coefficients</th><th scope="col" align="center">Standardized Coefficients</th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center">t</th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center">Sig.</th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">B</th><th scope="col" align="center">Std. Error</th><th scope="col" align="center">Beta</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="17" align="center">1</td><td align="center">(Constant)</td><td align="center">.275</td><td align="center">.401</td><td></td><td align="center">.687</td><td align="center">.508</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Treatments (Charged biochar and AMF)</td><td align="center">.014</td><td align="center">.006</td><td align="center">.105</td><td align="center">2.446</td><td align="center">.034</td></tr><tr><td align="center">LAB g m<sup>-2</sup> day<sup>-1</sup></td><td align="center">.004</td><td align="center">.017</td><td align="center">.007</td><td align="center">.256</td><td align="center">.803</td></tr><tr><td align="center">RPR mg g<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup></td><td align="center">.002</td><td align="center">.001</td><td align="center">.040</td><td align="center">1.454</td><td align="center">.177</td></tr><tr><td align="center">root dry weight (g)</td><td align="center">-.001</td><td align="center">.001</td><td align="center">-.021</td><td align="center">-.601</td><td align="center">.561</td></tr><tr><td align="center">ash content (%)</td><td align="center">.016</td><td align="center">.006</td><td align="center">.077</td><td align="center">2.484</td><td align="center">.032</td></tr><tr><td align="center">shoot dry weight (g)</td><td align="center">.101</td><td align="center">.004</td><td align="center">.982</td><td align="center">23.304</td><td align="center">.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center">pH</td><td align="center">-.049</td><td align="center">.024</td><td align="center">-.071</td><td align="center">-2.037</td><td align="center">.069</td></tr><tr><td align="center">root length (cm)</td><td align="center">-.005</td><td align="center">.003</td><td align="center">-.047</td><td align="center">-1.831</td><td align="center">.097</td></tr><tr><td align="center">plant height (cm)</td><td align="center">-.005</td><td align="center">.002</td><td align="center">-.086</td><td align="center">-1.909</td><td align="center">.085</td></tr><tr><td align="center">N-content (%)</td><td align="center">.173</td><td align="center">.063</td><td align="center">.077</td><td align="center">2.754</td><td align="center">.020</td></tr><tr><td align="center">AMF (%)</td><td align="center">.001</td><td align="center">.001</td><td align="center">.077</td><td align="center">2.325</td><td align="center">.042</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P-plant (%)</td><td align="center">-1.303</td><td align="center">.580</td><td align="center">-.070</td><td align="center">-2.246</td><td align="center">.048</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Silica (%)</td><td align="center">-.009</td><td align="center">.012</td><td align="center">-.024</td><td align="center">-.746</td><td align="center">.473</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Hemicellulose (%)</td><td align="center">.001</td><td align="center">.003</td><td align="center">.014</td><td align="center">.358</td><td align="center">.728</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Cellulose (%)</td><td align="center">-.007</td><td align="center">.005</td><td align="center">-.053</td><td align="center">-1.356</td><td align="center">.205</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Lignin (%)</td><td align="center">.012</td><td align="center">.007</td><td align="center">.051</td><td align="center">1.597</td><td align="center">.141</td></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">a. Dependent Variable: FDW (tons ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In contrast to silica and vegetative growth parameters, cell wall components exhibited different patterns of association. Cellulose showed a significant negative correlation with both silica and hemicellulose, suggesting a structural trade-off within the cell wall, whereby increases in silica or hemicellulose are accompanied by reductions in the proportional contribution of cellulose. Hemicellulose is known to form strong non-covalent associations with cellulose microfibrils, creating a dense cellulose–hemicellulose matrix <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Cosgrove, 2022)</xref>. Silica further interacts with these components to enhance tissue rigidity and mechanical strength <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-53">(Singh et al., 2023)</xref>. Several studies have reported that cellulose content tends to increase under silica-deficient conditions, supporting the inverse relationship observed among these structural components (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">Huang et al., 202</xref>4; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">Schaller et al., 202</xref>2).</p><p>Despite these structural interactions, Pearson correlation analysis confirmed that cell wall components (hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin) were not significantly correlated with FDW. This indicates that while these components are essential for tissue strength, mechanical stability, and stress resilience, they do not directly determine total biomass yield. Previous studies have shown that hemicellulose and lignin contribute to pest resistance, stem stiffness, and lodging resistance, thereby indirectly supporting yield stability rather than directly enhancing biomass accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">Hu et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">Li et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">Li et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">Rongpipi et al., 2019</xref>).</p><p>Multiple regression analysis further clarified the determinants of forage productivity. The regression model showed that FDW was strongly and positively associated with shoot dry weight and nitrogen content, with additional contributions from ash content (reflecting mineral and silica accumulation) and AMF colonization. The very high coefficient of determination (R<sup>² </sup>= 0.996) indicates that most of the variation in FDW was explained by these physiological and nutritional variables. In contrast, phosphorus concentration in plant tissue was negatively associated with FDW, suggesting that excessive P accumulation may lead to nutrient imbalance or antagonistic interactions with other essential elements, such as Zn or Cu. This finding emphasizes that nutrient balance and efficiency are more critical than absolute nutrient concentration under Fe-toxic conditions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">Kim and Li (2016)</xref> explained that nutrient balance is essential for maximizing growth and yield, as observed in various crops where P levels above a threshold resulted in diminished returns.</p><p>The relationships revealed by correlation and regression analyses are closely linked to the underlying soil constraints imposed by Fe toxicity. Variables such as nitrogen status, AMF colonization, silica accumulation, and phosphorus balance are directly influenced by nutrient limitations and chemical stress in acidic soils. The combined application of charged biochar and AMF appears to mitigate these constraints by improving nutrient retention, enhancing root–microbe interactions, and supporting the development of both vegetative biomass and structural tissue components.</p><p>Changes in cell wall composition during the early vegetative stage (30–50 DAT) further support this interpretation. While cellulose content remained relatively stable across treatments, hemicellulose content tended to increase under higher AMF inoculation rates, suggesting enhanced cell wall development associated with improved vegetative growth and leaf area expansion. Charged biochar did not significantly affect cellulose content but influenced hemicellulose dynamics, indicating that these amendments primarily affected the more flexible and dynamic components of the cell wall rather than the rigid cellulose framework. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">Ezquer et al. (2020)</xref> demonstrated that higher AMF inoculation rates are associated with increased hemicellulose content, promoting enhanced vegetative growth. Conversely, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">Clemente-Moreno et al. (2025)</xref> confirmed that while hemicellulose dynamics can be beneficial for growth, excessive modification of cell wall components could potentially hinder photosynthetic efficiency and stress tolerance, suggesting a need for balance in cell wall composition management.</p><p>In addition, silica content and protein yield of rice herbage increased significantly under AMF inoculation and charged-biochar application, particularly at higher treatment levels. These responses reflect improved nitrogen uptake, enhanced nitrogen-use efficiency, and greater silicon accumulation, which collectively supported stronger vegetative growth. These improvements were largely driven by biological and physicochemical mechanisms rather than direct changes in rhizosphere soil pH, highlighting the importance of integrated soil–plant–microbe interactions.</p><p>The observed increases in forage dry weight and shoot biomass confirm that the combined application of AMF and charged biochar effectively enhanced rice vegetative productivity under Fe-toxic conditions. Enhanced root length and root dry weight further explain these responses, as a more developed root system allows more efficient exploration of soil resources. AMF colonization increased the effective absorptive surface area of roots, while charged biochar improved soil chemical conditions and microbial habitat, creating a rhizosphere environment conducive to sustained plant growth. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">Mulyadi and Jiang (2023)</xref> stated that AMF colonization increases the root surface area, allowing more efficient nutrient and water absorption. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">Li et al. (2023)</xref> stated that the presence of biochar also supports microbial habitats, which can further enhance soil fertility and plant health.</p><p>Overall, these findings indicate that improvements in rice forage productivity were primarily driven by enhanced vegetative growth, improved nutrient-use efficiency, and silica-mediated structural reinforcement, rather than by direct modification of cell wall composition. While cell wall components contributed to tissue strength, resilience, and forage quality, they played a secondary role in determining total biomass yield. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">Manonmani et al. (2025)</xref> explained that Si contributes to the mechanical strength of rice plants, reducing lodging risks and enhancing resilience against biotic and abiotic stresses. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">Joy et al. (2025)</xref> reported that Si enhances the availability of essential nutrients (N, P, and K) and mitigates nutrient toxicity, which is crucial for rice productivity.</p><p>This study was conducted under controlled conditions and focused on early vegetative growth stages. Therefore, future research should examine the persistence of these mechanisms across later growth stages, under field-scale conditions, and in ratoon systems following grain harvest. Given the inherent environmental variability in field conditions and the limited number of sites and seasons evaluated, multi-season and multi-location studies incorporating broader soil biochemical and microbial parameters are recommended to validate and strengthen the applicability of these findings.</p></sec><sec id="sec-24"><title>5. CONCLUSION</title><p>Rice forage productivity under Fe-toxic acidic soil conditions was primarily governed by vegetative growth performance and silica accumulation rather than by direct modification of cell wall components. Strongly acidic soil with high Fe and Al saturation imposed severe nutrient stress; however, the combined application of charged biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improved soil–plant functioning through enhanced nutrient-use efficiency and plant growth. Forage dry weight was closely associated with shoot dry weight, nitrogen status, ash (silica) content, plant height, and AMF colonization, while cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contributed mainly to structural integrity rather than yield formation. AMF promoted biomass production predominantly via improved growth dynamics rather than alteration of cell wall structure. These findings highlight silica accumulation and AMF–charged biochar integration as key mechanisms for mitigating Fe toxicity and enhancing rice forage productivity. Future studies should assess the persistence of these mechanisms across growth stages, particularly under ratoon systems following grain harvest, to support sustainable forage-based rice production on acidic soils.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Iron Toxicity Tolerance of Rice Genotypes in Relation to Growth, Yield and Physiochemical Characters</article-title><source>Rice Science</source><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>S.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ullah</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aung</surname><given-names>M.Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tisarum</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cha-Um</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Datta</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>321</fpage><lpage>334</lpage><page-range>321-334</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rsci.2023.02.002</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ahmed, S. F., Ullah, H., Aung, M. Z., Tisarum, R., Cha-Um, S., &amp; Datta, A. (2023). Iron Toxicity Tolerance of Rice Genotypes in Relation to Growth, Yield and Physiochemical Characters. Rice Science, 30(4), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2023.02.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Mycorrhizal inoculation enhanced tillering in field grown wheat, nutritional enrichment and soil properties</article-title><source>PeerJ</source><volume>11, e15686</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akbar</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chohan</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yasin</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akram</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nazir</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.15686</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akbar, M., Chohan, S. A., Yasin, N. A., Ahmad, A., Akram, W., &amp; Nazir, A. (2023). Mycorrhizal inoculation enhanced tillering in field grown wheat, nutritional enrichment and soil properties. PeerJ, 11, e15686. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15686</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Examining the role of AMF-Biochar in the regulation of spinach growth attributes, nutrients concentrations, and antioxidant enzymes in mitigating drought stress</article-title><source>Plant Stress</source><volume>10</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alotaibi</surname><given-names>M.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ikram</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alotaibi</surname><given-names>N.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hussain</surname><given-names>G.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghoneim</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Younis</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Danish</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>100205</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.stress.2023.100205</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Alotaibi, M. O., Ikram, M., Alotaibi, N. M., Hussain, G. S., Ghoneim, A. M., Younis, U., . . . Danish, S. (2023). Examining the role of AMF-Biochar in the regulation of spinach growth attributes, nutrients concentrations, and antioxidant enzymes in mitigating drought stress. Plant Stress, 10, 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100205</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Enhancing Rice Seed Production in Ethiopia with Silicon-Rich Biochar</article-title><source>Research &amp; Development</source><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Assaye</surname><given-names>Y.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>94</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><page-range>94-96</page-range></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Assaye, Y. M. (2024). Enhancing Rice Seed Production in Ethiopia with Silicon-Rich Biochar. Research &amp; Development, 5(3), 94-96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of rice husk biochar (RHB) with combined inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) on growth of maize (Zea mays</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source><volume>1131</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aufa Ain</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Noraini</surname><given-names>M.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>012007</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/1131/1/012007</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aufa Ain, A. S., &amp; Noraini, M. J. (2023). Effects of rice husk biochar (RHB) with combined inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) on growth of maize (Zea mays). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1131(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1131/1/012007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Photosynthesis and stress tolerance: cell walls at the cross-roads</article-title><source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source><volume>76</volume><issue>17</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clemente-Moreno</surname><given-names>M.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Frey</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>López-Serrano</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Acebes</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Flexas</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gago</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>4884</fpage><lpage>4895</lpage><page-range>4884-4895</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/eraf281</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Clemente-Moreno, M. J., Frey, C., López-Serrano, L., Acebes, J. L., Flexas, J., &amp; Gago, J. (2025). Photosynthesis and stress tolerance: cell walls at the cross-roads. Journal of Experimental Botany, 76(17), 4884-4895. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf281</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Plant cell growth and cell wall enlargement</article-title><source>Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (eLS)(Online</source><volume>2</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cosgrove</surname><given-names>D.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9780470015902.a0029421</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cosgrove, D. J. (2022). Plant cell growth and cell wall enlargement. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (eLS)(Online), 2(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0029421</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Phylogenetic Review of Acaulospora (Diversisporales, Glomeromycota) and the Homoplasic Nature of Its Ornamentations</article-title><source>Journal of Fungi</source><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>K.J.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>J.A.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Magurno</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Leandro</surname><given-names>L.B.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goto</surname><given-names>B.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Theodoro</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>892</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jof8090892</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">da Silva, K. J. G., Fernandes, J. A. L., Magurno, F., Leandro, L. B. A., Goto, B. T., &amp; Theodoro, R. C. (2022). Phylogenetic Review of Acaulospora (Diversisporales, Glomeromycota) and the Homoplasic Nature of Its Ornamentations. Journal of Fungi, 8(9), 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8090892</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Biochar affects silicification patterns and physical traits of rice leaves cultivated in a desilicated soil (Ferric Lixisol</article-title><source>Plant and Soil</source><volume>460</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tombeur</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cooke</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Collard</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cisse</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saba</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lefebvre</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cornelis</surname><given-names>J.-T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>375</fpage><lpage>390</lpage><page-range>375-390</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-020-04816-6</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">de Tombeur, F., Cooke, J., Collard, L., Cisse, D., Saba, F., Lefebvre, D., . . . Cornelis, J.-T. (2021). Biochar affects silicification patterns and physical traits of rice leaves cultivated in a desilicated soil (Ferric Lixisol). Plant and Soil, 460(1), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04816-6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Silica nanoparticles protect rice against biotic and abiotic stresses</article-title><source>Journal of Nanobiotechnology</source><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>197</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12951-022-01420-x</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Du, J., Liu, B., Zhao, T., Xu, X., Lin, H., Ji, Y., . . . Ding, X. (2022). Silica nanoparticles protect rice against biotic and abiotic stresses. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 20(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01420-x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Plant Cell Walls Tackling Climate Change: Biotechnological Strategies to Improve Crop Adaptations and Photosynthesis in Response to Global Warming</article-title><source>Plants</source><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ezquer</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salameh</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Colombo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalaitzis</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>212</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9020212</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ezquer, I., Salameh, I., Colombo, L., &amp; Kalaitzis, P. (2020). Plant Cell Walls Tackling Climate Change: Biotechnological Strategies to Improve Crop Adaptations and Photosynthesis in Response to Global Warming. Plants, 9(2), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020212</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Characteristics and genotypic difference of silicon accumulation and distribution in rice</article-title><source>Plant Nutrition and Fertitizer Science</source><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gan</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><fpage>531</fpage><lpage>535</lpage><page-range>531-535</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://europepmc.org/abstract/CBA/464144chi" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Characteristics and genotypic difference of silicon accumulation and distribution in rice">https://europepmc.org/abstract/CBA/464144chi</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gan, X., Jiang, L., Xu, J., Dong, D., &amp; Wei, S. (2004). Characteristics and genotypic difference of silicon accumulation and distribution in rice. Plant Nutrition and Fertitizer Science, 10(5), 531-535. http://europepmc.org/abstract/CBA/464144 chi</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of Silicon and Selenium in Alleviation of Drought Stress in Rice</article-title><source>Silicon</source><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghouri</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Naeem</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ul-Allah</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Babar</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baloch</surname><given-names>F.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shahid</surname><given-names>M.Q.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>5453</fpage><lpage>5461</lpage><page-range>5453-5461</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12633-021-01277-z</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ghouri, F., Ali, Z., Naeem, M., Ul-Allah, S., Babar, M., Baloch, F. S., . . . Shahid, M. Q. (2022). Effects of Silicon and Selenium in Alleviation of Drought Stress in Rice. Silicon, 14(10), 5453-5461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01277-z</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Biochar-Facilitated Soil Remediation</article-title><source>Mechanisms and Efficacy Variations [Review]. Frontiers in Environmental Science</source><volume>8</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>-2020</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2020.521512</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Guo, M., Song, W., &amp; Tian, J. (2020). Biochar-Facilitated Soil Remediation: Mechanisms and Efficacy Variations [Review]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, Volume 8 - 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.521512</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Mutual relationships of biochar and soil pH, CEC, and exchangeable base cations in a model laboratory experiment</article-title><source>Journal of Soils and Sediments</source><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hailegnaw</surname><given-names>N.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mercl</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pračke</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Száková</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tlustoš</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>2405</fpage><lpage>2416</lpage><page-range>2405-2416</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-019-02264-z</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hailegnaw, N. S., Mercl, F., Pračke, K., Száková, J., &amp; Tlustoš, P. (2019). Mutual relationships of biochar and soil pH, CEC, and exchangeable base cations in a model laboratory experiment. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 19(5), 2405-2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02264-z</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Cellulose Synthase Mutants Distinctively Affect Cell Growth and Cell Wall Integrity for Plant Biomass Production in Arabidopsis</article-title><source>Plant and Cell Physiology</source><volume>59</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>1144</fpage><lpage>1157</lpage><page-range>1144-1157</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcy050</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hu, H., Zhang, R., Tao, Z., Li, X., Li, Y., Huang, J., . . . Peng, L. (2018). Cellulose Synthase Mutants Distinctively Affect Cell Growth and Cell Wall Integrity for Plant Biomass Production in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology, 59(6), 1144-1157. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy050</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Mycorrhiza-improved P acquisition of host plants: a mini-review</article-title><source>GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences</source><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>G.-M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y.-J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Q.-S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>62</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><page-range>62-67</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30574/gscbps.2021.14.3.0063</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Huang, G.-M., Xu, Y.-J., &amp; Wu, Q.-S. (2021). “Mycorrhiza-improved P acquisition of host plants: a mini-review. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 14(3), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.14.3.0063</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Silicon in soil and its interaction with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrients on rice yield: A case study of paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region, China, without a history of silicon fertilization</article-title><source>Soil and Tillage Research</source><volume>238</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>106027</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2024.106027</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Huang, S., Pu, L., He, G., Wang, X., Chen, D., Xie, X., . . . Lu, Y. (2024). Silicon in soil and its interaction with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrients on rice yield: A case study of paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region, China, without a history of silicon fertilization. Soil and Tillage Research, 238, 106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106027</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Co-inoculation of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizae for growth promotion and nutrient fortification in soybean under drought conditions [Original Research</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>13</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jabborova</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Annapurna</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Azimov</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tyagi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pengani</surname><given-names>K.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sayyed</surname><given-names>R.Z.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>-2022</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.947547</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jabborova, D., Annapurna, K., Azimov, A., Tyagi, S., Pengani, K. R., Sharma, P., . . . Sayyed, R. Z. (2022). Co-inoculation of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizae for growth promotion and nutrient fortification in soybean under drought conditions [Original Research]. Frontiers in Plant Science, Volume 13 - 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.947547</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Response of soybean (Glycine max L.) that was applied by various liquid organic fertilizer in climate change at acid soil</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source><volume>883</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jamilah</surname><given-names>Rapialdi</given-names></name><name><surname>Ernita</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>012041</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012041</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jamilah, Rapialdi, &amp; Ernita, M. (2021). Response of soybean (Glycine max L.) that was applied by various liquid organic fertilizer in climate change at acid soil. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 883(1), 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012041</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Impact of silicon fertilization on crop growth, productivity and nutrients enhancement in rice: A review</article-title><source>Plant Science Today</source><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joy</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Neetu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rakesh</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lalrammawii</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nihal</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hritik</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Swati</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14719/pst.4287</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Joy, M. S., Neetu, S., Rakesh, K., Lalrammawii, C., Nihal, D., Hritik, S., . . . Swati, M. (2025). Impact of silicon fertilization on crop growth, productivity and nutrients enhancement in rice: A review. Plant Science Today, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4287</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Perbaikan tanah untuk meningkatkan efektivitas dan efisiensi pemupukan berimbang dan produktivitas lahan kering masam [Improving Soil For Better Fertilization Efficiency and Productivity in Acid Drylands</article-title><source>Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan</source><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kasno</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><page-range>27-40</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jsl/article/view/3346" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Perbaikan tanah untuk meningkatkan efektivitas dan efisiensi pemupukan berimbang dan produktivitas lahan kering masam [Improving Soil For Better Fertilization Efficiency and Productivity in Acid Drylands">https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jsl/article/view/3346</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kasno, A. (2019). Perbaikan tanah untuk meningkatkan efektivitas dan efisiensi pemupukan berimbang dan produktivitas lahan kering masam [Improving Soil For Better Fertilization Efficiency and Productivity in Acid Drylands]. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 13(1), 27-40. https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jsl/article/view/3346</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Symbiosis to Enhance Plant–Soil Interaction</article-title><source>Sustainability</source><volume>14</volume><issue>13</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khaliq</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perveen</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alamer</surname><given-names>K.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zia Ul Haq</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rafique</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alsudays</surname><given-names>I.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Attia</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>7840</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14137840</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Khaliq, A., Perveen, S., Alamer, K. H., Zia Ul Haq, M., Rafique, Z., Alsudays, I. M., . . . Attia, H. (2022). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Symbiosis to Enhance Plant–Soil Interaction. Sustainability, 14(13), 7840. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137840</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of Phosphorus on Shoot and Root Growth, Partitioning, and Phosphorus Utilization Efficiency in Lantana</article-title><source>HortScience</source><volume>51</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>H.-J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>1001</fpage><lpage>1009</lpage><page-range>1001-1009</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/hortsci.51.8.1001</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kim, H.-J., &amp; Li, X. (2016). Effects of Phosphorus on Shoot and Root Growth, Partitioning, and Phosphorus Utilization Efficiency in Lantana. HortScience, 51(8), 1001-1009. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.51.8.1001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Determination of Lignin, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose in Plant Materials by FTIR Spectroscopy</article-title><source>Journal of Analytical Chemistry</source><volume>78</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kostryukov</surname><given-names>S.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Matyakubov</surname><given-names>H.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Masterova</surname><given-names>Y.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kozlov</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pryanichnikova</surname><given-names>M.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pynenkov</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khluchina</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>718</fpage><lpage>727</lpage><page-range>718-727</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1061934823040093</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kostryukov, S. G., Matyakubov, H. B., Masterova, Y. Y., Kozlov, A. S., Pryanichnikova, M. K., Pynenkov, A. A., &amp; Khluchina, N. A. (2023). Determination of Lignin, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose in Plant Materials by FTIR Spectroscopy. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 78(6), 718-727. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934823040093</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Simultaneous regulation of both lignin and cellulose biosynthesis modifies xylem fiber properties in Populus [Original Research</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>16</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>-2025</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1646316</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Li, J., Han, Y., Lu, X., Tang, X., Sun, J., Li, M., &amp; Li, L. (2025). Simultaneous regulation of both lignin and cellulose biosynthesis modifies xylem fiber properties in Populus [Original Research]. Frontiers in Plant Science, Volume 16 - 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1646316</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of biochar amendment and organic fertilizer on microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil of wheat in Yellow River Delta saline-alkaline soil [Original Research</article-title><source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source><volume>14</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>-2023</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250453English</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Li, M., Chen, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Song, N., Li, J., . . . Guo, X. (2023). Effects of biochar amendment and organic fertilizer on microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil of wheat in Yellow River Delta saline-alkaline soil [Original Research]. Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 14 - 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250453 English</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Crop Lodging and The Roles of Lignin, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose in Lodging Resistance</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ou</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>1795</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12081795</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Li, Q., Fu, C., Liang, C., Ni, X., Zhao, X., Chen, M., &amp; Ou, L. (2022). Crop Lodging and The Roles of Lignin, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose in Lodging Resistance. Agronomy, 12(8), 1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081795</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Silicon enhancement of estimated plant biomass carbon accumulation under abiotic and biotic stresses. A meta-analysis</article-title><source>Agronomy for Sustainable Development</source><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>26</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-018-0496-4</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Li, Z., Song, Z., Yan, Z., Hao, Q., Song, A., Liu, L., . . . Liang, Y. (2018). Silicon enhancement of estimated plant biomass carbon accumulation under abiotic and biotic stresses. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 38(3), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0496-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Glomus mongioiense, a New Species of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi from Italian Alps and the Phylogeny-Spoiling Issue of Ribosomal Variants in the Glomus Genus</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magurno</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uszok</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bierza</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bakr</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kende</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Queiroz</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Casieri</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14071350</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Magurno, F., Uszok, S., Bierza, K., Bakr, J., Kende, Z., Bessa de Queiroz, M., &amp; Casieri, L. (2024). Glomus mongioiense, a New Species of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi from Italian Alps and the Phylogeny-Spoiling Issue of Ribosomal Variants in the Glomus Genus. Agronomy, 14(7), 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071350</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Silicon as a key driver of phytolith and phytolith-occluded carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation in rice ecosystems - a review</article-title><source>Plant Science Today</source><volume>11</volume><issue>sp4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manonmani</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rajkumar</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramamoorthy</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murugaragavan</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jayabalakrishnan</surname><given-names>R.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jasmine</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Christy</surname><given-names>N.M.P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14719/pst.5815</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Manonmani, M., Rajkumar, K., Ramamoorthy, P., Murugaragavan, R., Jayabalakrishnan, R. M., Jasmine, R., . . . Christy, N. M. P. (2025). Silicon as a key driver of phytolith and phytolith-occluded carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation in rice ecosystems - a review. Plant Science Today, 11(sp4). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5815</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Crescimento e partição da matéria seca de milho submetido a adubação silicatada em solo de Cerrado no Amapá, Brasil</article-title><source>CONTRIBUCIONES A LAS CIENCIAS SOCIALES</source><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Melo</surname><given-names>M.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>K.S.d Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>C.F.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>H.C.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Melo</surname><given-names>N.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moraes</surname><given-names>F.K.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>F.P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>5950</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55905/revconv.17n.4-044</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Melo, M. P., Costa, K. S. d. Q., Oliveira, C. F. d., Lima, H. C. d., Melo, N. C., Moraes, F. K. C., . . . Martins, F. P. (2024). Crescimento e partição da matéria seca de milho submetido a adubação silicatada em solo de Cerrado no Amapá, Brasil. CONTRIBUCIONES A LAS CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 17(4), e5950. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.17n.4-044</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Interacted with Biochar and Enhanced Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganism Abundance and Phosphorus Uptake in Maize</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Clarke</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>1678</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14081678</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Meng, L., Cheng, Z., Wang, Y., Li, S., &amp; Clarke, N. (2024). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Interacted with Biochar and Enhanced Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganism Abundance and Phosphorus Uptake in Maize. Agronomy, 14(8), 1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081678</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Multidimensional Role of Silicon to Activate Resilient Plant Growth and to Mitigate Abiotic Stress [Review</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>13</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mir</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>B.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yousuf</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>S.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raza</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rizvi</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zargar</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>-2022</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.819658</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mir, R. A., Bhat, B. A., Yousuf, H., Islam, S. T., Raza, A., Rizvi, M. A., . . . Zargar, S. M. (2022). Multidimensional Role of Silicon to Activate Resilient Plant Growth and to Mitigate Abiotic Stress [Review]. Frontiers in Plant Science, Volume 13 - 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.819658</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Rice Husk: From Agro-Industrial to Modern Applications</article-title><source>Agricultural Waste to Value-Added Products: Technical, Economic and Sustainable Aspects</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dhada</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Haldar</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Neelancherry</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wisniewski</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>295</fpage><lpage>320</lpage><page-range>295-320</page-range><publisher-name>Springer Nature Singapore</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-99-4472-9_14</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Mishra, S., Dhada, I., &amp; Haldar, P. (2023). Rice Husk: From Agro-Industrial to Modern Applications. In R. Neelancherry, B. Gao, &amp; A. Wisniewski Jr (Eds.), Agricultural Waste to Value-Added Products: Technical, Economic and Sustainable Aspects (pp. 295-320). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4472-9_14</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The Combined Application of Biochar and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Enhanced the Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Rice Productivity in Indonesia</article-title><source>Sustainability</source><volume>15</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mulyadi</surname></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>9782</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su15129782</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mulyadi, &amp; Jiang, L. (2023). The Combined Application of Biochar and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Enhanced the Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Rice Productivity in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(12), 9782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129782</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Silicon and Plant Responses Under Adverse Environmental Conditions</article-title><source>Plant Performance Under Environmental Stress : Hormones, Biostimulants and Sustainable Plant Growth Management</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mundada</surname><given-names>P.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jadhav</surname><given-names>S.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salunkhe</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurme</surname><given-names>S.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Umdale</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barmukh</surname><given-names>R.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahire</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Husen</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>357</fpage><lpage>385</lpage><page-range>357-385</page-range><publisher-name>Springer International Publishing</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-78521-5_14</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Mundada, P. S., Jadhav, S. V., Salunkhe, S. S., Gurme, S. T., Umdale, S. D., Barmukh, R. B., . . . Ahire, M. L. (2021). Silicon and Plant Responses Under Adverse Environmental Conditions. In A. Husen (Ed.), Plant Performance Under Environmental Stress : Hormones, Biostimulants and Sustainable Plant Growth Management (pp. 357-385). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78521-5_14</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Valorization of lignocellulosic rice husk producing biosilica and biofuels—a review</article-title><source>Journal of Physics: Energy</source><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nawaz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jamil</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akhter</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hussain</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Y.-K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>012003</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/2515-7655/aca5b4</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nawaz, S., Jamil, F., Akhter, P., Hussain, M., Jang, H., &amp; Park, Y.-K. (2023). Valorization of lignocellulosic rice husk producing biosilica and biofuels—a review. Journal of Physics: Energy, 5(1), 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7655/aca5b4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Pengaruh Konsentrasi Besi dalam Larutan Hara terhadap Gejala Keracunan Besi dan Pertumbuhan Tanaman Padi [The Effect of Iron Concentration in Nutrient Solution to Iron Toxicity Symptoms and Growth of Rice</article-title><source>Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia</source><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noor</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lubis</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghulamahdi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chozin</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anwar</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wirnas</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>98</lpage><page-range>91-98</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jurnalagronomi/article/download/14311/10646" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Pengaruh Konsentrasi Besi dalam Larutan Hara terhadap Gejala Keracunan Besi dan Pertumbuhan Tanaman Padi [The Effect of Iron Concentration in Nutrient Solution to Iron Toxicity Symptoms and Growth of Rice">https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jurnalagronomi/article/download/14311/10646</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Noor, A., Lubis, I., Ghulamahdi, M., Chozin, M. A., Anwar, K., &amp; Wirnas, D. (2012). Pengaruh Konsentrasi Besi dalam Larutan Hara terhadap Gejala Keracunan Besi dan Pertumbuhan Tanaman Padi [The Effect of Iron Concentration in Nutrient Solution to Iron Toxicity Symptoms and Growth of Rice]. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia, 40(2), 91-98. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jurnalagronomi/article/download/14311/10646</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influence of Rice Husk Biochar and Its Application Methods on Silicon Dynamics and Rice Yield in Sandy-Loam Soil</article-title><source>Applied and Environmental Soil Science</source><volume>2024</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olanrewaju</surname><given-names>J.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamamoto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Masunaga</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>6697604</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2024/6697604</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Olanrewaju, J. S., Sato, K., Yamamoto, S., &amp; Masunaga, T. (2024). Influence of Rice Husk Biochar and Its Application Methods on Silicon Dynamics and Rice Yield in Sandy-Loam Soil. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2024(1), 6697604. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6697604</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Soil Matrix Determines the Outcome of Interaction Between Mycorrhizal Symbiosis and Biochar for Andropogon gerardii Growth and Nutrition [Original Research</article-title><source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source><volume>9</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paymaneh</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gryndler</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Konvalinková</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Benada</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Borovička</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bukovská</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jansa</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>-2018</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.02862</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Paymaneh, Z., Gryndler, M., Konvalinková, T., Benada, O., Borovička, J., Bukovská, P., . . . Jansa, J. (2018). Soil Matrix Determines the Outcome of Interaction Between Mycorrhizal Symbiosis and Biochar for Andropogon gerardii Growth and Nutrition [Original Research]. Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 9 - 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02862</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of coffee husk and cocoa pods biochar on phosphorus fixation and release processes in acid soils from West Cameroon</article-title><source>Soil Use and Management</source><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pouangam Ngalani</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ondo</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Njimou</surname><given-names>J.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nanseu Njiki</surname><given-names>C.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prudent</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ngameni</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>817</fpage><lpage>832</lpage><page-range>817-832</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sum.12894</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pouangam Ngalani, G., Ondo, J. A., Njimou, J. R., Nanseu Njiki, C. P., Prudent, P., &amp; Ngameni, E. (2023). Effect of coffee husk and cocoa pods biochar on phosphorus fixation and release processes in acid soils from West Cameroon. Soil Use and Management, 39(2), 817-832. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12894</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Increasing plant resistance with silicon applications</article-title><source>World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews</source><volume>17</volume><issue>03</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prisa</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>602</fpage><lpage>608</lpage><page-range>602-608</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.3.0413</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Prisa, D. (2023). Increasing plant resistance with silicon applications. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 17(03), 602-608. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.3.0413</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Soil biological quality in rhizosphere, growth, and yield of upland rice grown on acid soil after amended biochar enriched sap of Kappaphycus alvarezii</article-title><source>Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity</source><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rakian</surname><given-names>T.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>KILOWASID</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>MUHAMMAD</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>AFA</surname><given-names>L.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>RISKYANA</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wijayanti</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alam</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>6780</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/biodiv/d241241</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rakian, T. C., KILOWASID, H., MUHAMMAD, L., AFA, L. O., RISKYANA, A., Wijayanti, Y., . . . Alam, S. (2023). Soil biological quality in rhizosphere, growth, and yield of upland rice grown on acid soil after amended biochar enriched sap of Kappaphycus alvarezii. Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity, 24(12), 6780. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d241241</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Silicon Stimulates Plant Growth and Metabolism in Rice Plants under Conventional and Osmotic Stress Conditions</article-title><source>Plants</source><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramírez-Olvera</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Trejo-Téllez</surname><given-names>L.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gómez-Merino</surname><given-names>F.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruíz-Posadas</surname><given-names>L.d M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alcántar-González</surname><given-names>E.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saucedo-Veloz</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>777</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10040777</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ramírez-Olvera, S. M., Trejo-Téllez, L. I., Gómez-Merino, F. C., Ruíz-Posadas, L. d. M., Alcántar-González, E. G., &amp; Saucedo-Veloz, C. (2021). Silicon Stimulates Plant Growth and Metabolism in Rice Plants under Conventional and Osmotic Stress Conditions. Plants, 10(4), 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040777</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Can leaf area in rice be defined by a mathematical model?</article-title><source>Revista Ceres</source><volume>66</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ribeiro</surname><given-names>B.S.M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>M.R.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Richter</surname><given-names>G.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ribas</surname><given-names>G.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Streck</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zanon</surname><given-names>A.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/0034-737X201966030005</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ribeiro, B. S. M. R., Silva, M. R. d., Richter, G. L., Ribas, G. G., Streck, N. A., &amp; Zanon, A. J. (2019). Can leaf area in rice be defined by a mathematical model? Revista Ceres, 66. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X201966030005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Progress and Opportunities in the Characterization of Cellulose – An Important Regulator of Cell Wall Growth and Mechanics [Review</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>9</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rongpipi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomez</surname><given-names>E.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomez</surname><given-names>E.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>-2018</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.01894English</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rongpipi, S., Ye, D., Gomez, E. D., &amp; Gomez, E. W. (2019). Progress and Opportunities in the Characterization of Cellulose – An Important Regulator of Cell Wall Growth and Mechanics [Review]. Frontiers in Plant Science, Volume 9 - 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01894 English</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Biochar Implementation in Rice Paddies for Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Nutrient Loss: A Review</article-title><source>International Journal of Plant &amp; Soil Science</source><volume>35</volume><issue>18</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saikanth</surname><given-names>D.R.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>B.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rai</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>U.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Surender</surname><given-names>Yadav</given-names></name><name><surname>B.</surname></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>610</fpage><lpage>623</lpage><page-range>610-623</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183326</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Saikanth, D. R. K., Singh, B. V., Rai, A. K., Kumar, U. S., Surender, Yadav, B., &amp; Singh, O. (2023). Biochar Implementation in Rice Paddies for Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Nutrient Loss: A Review. International Journal of Plant &amp; Soil Science, 35(18), 610-623. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183326</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Silicon accumulation in rice plant aboveground biomass affects leaf carbon quality</article-title><source>Plant and Soil</source><volume>444</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schaller</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Heimes</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>J.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meunier</surname><given-names>J.-D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>J.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujii-Kashino</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Knorr</surname><given-names>K.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>399</fpage><lpage>407</lpage><page-range>399-407</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04267-8</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schaller, J., Heimes, R., Ma, J. F., Meunier, J.-D., Shao, J. F., Fujii-Kashino, M., &amp; Knorr, K. H. (2019). Silicon accumulation in rice plant aboveground biomass affects leaf carbon quality. Plant and Soil, 444(1), 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04267-8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Silicon as a potential limiting factor for phosphorus availability in paddy soils</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schaller</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amelung</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stein</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lehndorff</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Obst</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>16329</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-20805-4</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schaller, J., Wu, B., Amelung, W., Hu, Z., Stein, M., Lehndorff, E., &amp; Obst, M. (2022). Silicon as a potential limiting factor for phosphorus availability in paddy soils. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 16329. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20805-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Enriched rice husk biochar superior to commercial biochar in ameliorating ammonia loss from urea fertilizer and improving plant uptake</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Selvarajh</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ch&#39;ng</surname><given-names>H.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Md Zain</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seong Wei</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liew</surname><given-names>J.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohammad Azmin</surname><given-names>S.N.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Damrongrak</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32080</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Selvarajh, G., Ch'ng, H. Y., Md Zain, N., Seong Wei, L., Liew, J. Y., Mohammad Azmin, S. N. H., . . . Damrongrak, I. (2024). Enriched rice husk biochar superior to commercial biochar in ameliorating ammonia loss from urea fertilizer and improving plant uptake. Heliyon, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32080</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-52"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Compost and biochar application to acidic soils in a hot submoist tropical environment improves the forage yield and quality of Desho grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin</article-title><source>All Life</source><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shifa</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Worku</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Beyene</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>2448173</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/26895293.2024.2448173</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shifa, S., Worku, M., &amp; Beyene, A. (2025). Compost and biochar application to acidic soils in a hot submoist tropical environment improves the forage yield and quality of Desho grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin.). All Life, 18(1), 2448173. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895293.2024.2448173</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-53"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Interaction of silicon with cell wall components in plants: a review</article-title><source>Journal of Applied and Natural Science</source><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31018/jans.v15i2.4352</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Singh, P., Kumar, V., &amp; Sharma, A. (2023). Interaction of silicon with cell wall components in plants: a review. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i2.4352</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-54"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Biochar on Growth, Nutrient Absorption, and Physiological Properties of Maize (Zea mays L</article-title><source>Journal of Fungi</source><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>1275</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jof8121275</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sun, J., Jia, Q., Li, Y., Zhang, T., Chen, J., Ren, Y., . . . Fu, S. (2022). Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Biochar on Growth, Nutrient Absorption, and Physiological Properties of Maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Fungi, 8(12), 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8121275</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-55"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Rapid Diagnosis of Soil Nutrients Using Microscopic Techniques</article-title><source>Microscopy and Microanalysis</source><volume>24</volume><issue>S1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tripathi</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alonso-Perez</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tiwari</surname><given-names>D.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>680</fpage><lpage>681</lpage><page-range>680-681</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s1431927618003896</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tripathi, D., Alonso-Perez, M., &amp; Tiwari, D. K. (2018). Rapid Diagnosis of Soil Nutrients Using Microscopic Techniques. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 24(S1), 680-681. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927618003896</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-56"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Oxidized alkaline biochar and phosphate solubilizing bacteria mixture enhances direct seeded maize yield in an acid soil [Acidic soil; Maize; Microbes; Phosphorus; Pyrogenic carbon</article-title><source>Sains Tanah Journal of Soil Science and Agroclimatology</source><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tusar</surname><given-names>H.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uddin</surname><given-names>M.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mia</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kasim</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abd. Wahid</surname><given-names>S.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Makino</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Solaiman</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>19</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20961/stjssa.v21i2.93130</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tusar, H. M., Uddin, M. K., Mia, S., Kasim, S., Abd. Wahid, S. B., Makino, T., &amp; Solaiman, Z. (2025). Oxidized alkaline biochar and phosphate solubilizing bacteria mixture enhances direct seeded maize yield in an acid soil [Acidic soil; Maize; Microbes; Phosphorus; Pyrogenic carbon]. Sains Tanah Journal of Soil Science and Agroclimatology, 21(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/stjssa.v21i2.93130</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-57"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Chapter 25 - Rhizosphere microbe-mediated alleviation of aluminum and iron toxicity in acidic soils</article-title><source>Rhizosphere Engineering</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Varghese</surname><given-names>E.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kour</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramya</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>N.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jisha</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramakrishnan</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Dubey</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>499</fpage><lpage>526</lpage><page-range>499-526</page-range><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-323-89973-4.00003-X</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Varghese, E. M., Kour, B., Ramya, S., Kumar, N. S., Jisha, M. S., &amp; Ramakrishnan, B. (2022). Chapter 25 - Rhizosphere microbe-mediated alleviation of aluminum and iron toxicity in acidic soils. In R. C. Dubey &amp; P. Kumar (Eds.), Rhizosphere Engineering (pp. 499-526). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89973-4.00003-X</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-58"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effect of AMF combined with biochar on plant growth and soil quality under saline-alkali stress: Insights from microbial community analysis</article-title><source>Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety</source><volume>281</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>116592</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116592</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wen, Y., Wu, R., Qi, D., Xu, T., Chang, W., Li, K., . . . Song, F. (2024). The effect of AMF combined with biochar on plant growth and soil quality under saline-alkali stress: Insights from microbial community analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 281, 116592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116592</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-59"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi stimulate rice root growth strategy and soil nutrient availability</article-title><source>European Journal of Soil Biology</source><volume>113</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>103448</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2022.103448</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wen, Z., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., &amp; Meng, J. (2022). Biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi stimulate rice root growth strategy and soil nutrient availability. European Journal of Soil Biology, 113, 103448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2022.103448</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-60"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Silicon Accumulation and Photosynthetic Capacity of Dendrocalamus brandisii in Response to Sodium Silicate Foliar Application Across Vegetative Phenological Stages</article-title><source>Plants</source><volume>14</volume><issue>17</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhan</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>2624</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants14172624</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yang, Y., Huang, L., Yu, L., Zhu, F., Chang, J., Li, M., . . . Zhan, H. (2025). Silicon Accumulation and Photosynthetic Capacity of Dendrocalamus brandisii in Response to Sodium Silicate Foliar Application Across Vegetative Phenological Stages. Plants, 14(17), 2624. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172624</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-61"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Changes in soil silicon forms and availability as affected by rice straw and its biochar</article-title><source>European Journal of Soil Science</source><volume>73</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>13316</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.13316</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yao, D., Wu, J., Gao, H., Wu, D., &amp; Wei, Z. (2022). Changes in soil silicon forms and availability as affected by rice straw and its biochar. European Journal of Soil Science, 73(6), e13316. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13316</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>