<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2356-1424</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>SAINS TANAH - Journal of Soil Science and Agroclimatology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Sains Tanah J. Soil Sci. Agroclimatology</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2356-1424</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">1412-3606</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Universitas Sebelas Maret</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20961/stjssa.v23i1.108781</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Soil Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Andosols property dynamics under intensive tea cultivation in West Java: Implications for sustainable management</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-2700</contrib-id><name><surname>Gani</surname><given-names>Rachmat Abdul</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>rach031@brin.go.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1354-6542</contrib-id><name><surname>Trisasongko</surname><given-names>Bambang Hendro</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>trisasongko@apps.ipb.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0191-7350</contrib-id><name><surname>Mulyanto</surname><given-names>Budi</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>bdmulyanto@yahoo.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7593-2388</contrib-id><name><surname>Sukarman</surname><given-names>Sukarman</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>suka022@brin.go.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-4305</contrib-id><name><surname>Yatno</surname><given-names>Edi</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>ediy002@brin.go.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-5081</contrib-id><name><surname>Muslim</surname><given-names>Rufaidah Qonita</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>rufa001@brin.go.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Prayudi</surname><given-names>Haikal Caesa</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>haikalcaesaprayudi@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-9318</contrib-id><name><surname>Wulanningtyas</surname><given-names>Heppy Suci</given-names></name><address><country country="JP">Japan</country><email>heppy.suci.wulanningtyas.qv26@vc.ibaraki.ac.jp</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-5"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8461-0700</contrib-id><name><surname>Cahyana</surname><given-names>Destika</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>destika.cahyana@brin.go.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-0754</contrib-id><name><surname>Komariah</surname><given-names>Dr. Komariah</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>sainstanah@mail.uns.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Research Center for Food Crops</institution><institution-wrap><institution>National Research and Innovation Agency</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/02hmjzt55</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Soil Science and Land Resource, Faculty of Agriculture</institution><institution-wrap><institution>IPB University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05smgpd89</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-3"><institution content-type="dept">Research Center for Estate Crops</institution><institution-wrap><institution>National Research and Innovation Agency</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/02hmjzt55</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-4"><institution content-type="dept">Graduate Program in Soil Science</institution><institution-wrap><institution>IPB University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05smgpd89</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-5"><institution content-type="dept">United Graduate School of Agricultural Science</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00qg0kr10</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="JP">Japan</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1"><institution-wrap><institution>Institut za zemljište</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03gef1f50</institution-id></institution-wrap><city>Faculty of Agriculture</city><country country="RS">Serbia</country></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor-0">Corresponding author: Rufaidah Qonita Muslim. Email: <email>rufa001@brin.go.id</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-06-13" publication-format="electronic"><day>13</day><month>06</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-01-02" publication-format="electronic"><day>02</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>June</issue-title><fpage>38</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-09-06"><day>06</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2025-11-28"><day>28</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-12-17"><day>17</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Rachmat Abdul Gani, Bambang Hendro Trisasongko, Budi Mulyanto, Sukarman Sukarman, Edi Yatno, Rufaidah Qonita Muslim, Haekal Caesa Prayudi, Heppy Suci Wulanningtyas, Destika Cahyana</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Rachmat Abdul Gani, Bambang Hendro Trisasongko, Budi Mulyanto, Sukarman Sukarman, Edi Yatno, Rufaidah Qonita Muslim, Haekal Caesa Prayudi, Heppy Suci Wulanningtyas, Destika Cahyana</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>Copyright (c) 2026 Rachmat Abdul Gani, Bambang Hendro Trisasongko, Budi Mulyanto, Sukarman Sukarman, Edi Yatno, Rufaidah Qonita Muslim, Haekal Caesa Prayudi, Heppy Suci Wulanningtyas, Destika CahyanaAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License that allows others to Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and AdaptÂ (remix, transform, and build upon the material)Â the work non-commerciallyÂ with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/view/108781" xlink:title="Website link"></self-uri><abstract><p>Despite its significant economic value, tea cultivation in Indonesia is experiencing a continuous decline in plantation area, primarily due to changes in land use. Soil fertility degradation and reduced yields present a significant threat to the long-term sustainability of tea production. A comprehensive understanding of the dynamic nature of tea plantation soil properties is essential for developing sustainable land management strategies aimed at enhancing and maintaining the productivity and sustainability of healthy tea cultivation. This study investigates the properties of Andosols formed from andesite tuff in a heavily managed tea plantation in Cisarua, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. Four vertical soil profiles and ten composite soil samples were collected from depths of 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm across varying tea vigor and slope class gradients in block plantations. The ongoing production of tea on Andosols has led to significant chemical decline, evidenced by decreased organic matter, increased acidity, reduced cation exchange capacity, and compromised andic properties. The observed rise in base saturation primarily indicates a reduction in CEC, rather than an improvement in fertility. The observed patterns indicate progressive soil weathering and reduced resilience in monoculture systems. Restorative management, which encompasses the incorporation of organic matter and a balanced nutrient supply, is essential for maintaining soil functionality and securing long-term tea productivity. This article synthesizes key findings regarding soil properties, anthropogenic impacts, and strategies for sustainable management. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing good soil management practices and enhancing tea productivity in volcanic areas.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Impact</kwd><kwd>Productivity</kwd><kwd>Soil characteristics</kwd><kwd>Plant vigor</kwd><kwd>Volcanic soils</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value>https://jatseditor.com</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec-1"><title>1. INTRODUCTION</title></sec><sec id="sec-2"><p>The tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) ranks among the most extensively consumed beverages worldwide. The annual demand for tea in Indonesia has risen, attributed to its high export value. The total area of tea plantations in the country has been experiencing a decline over time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">Manumono &amp; Listiyani, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">Pratiwi &amp; Andriyani, 2021</xref>). This paradox highlights the critical necessity to reinforce the sustainability of the national tea industry.</p><p>This scenario necessitates robust backing from land resources, the development of human capital, and a resilient ecosystem within the tea industry. A crucial factor is the accessibility of current research regarding soils in tea plantation areas. The tradition of tea research in Indonesia extends back to the colonial era (Alatas &amp; Wan Sulong, 2020).  The focus has evolved from agronomy and climate studies to encompass productivity, thereby becoming the predominant area of national research on tea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">Anjarsari et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">Anjarsari et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">Febriantika et al., 202</xref>2; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">Heryana &amp; Rokhmah, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">Ramadhan et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">Siahaan et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">Surbakti &amp; Irsal, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">Umiyati et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-64">Wulansari, Athallah, et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-62">Wulansari &amp; Huga, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-61">Wulansari, Pranoto, et al., 2022</xref>). However, research on soil characteristics in tea plantations—generally situated in volcanic landscapes—remain limited. The studies address the factors affecting tea plant growth only in part. The existing research on the factors affecting tea plant growth in a holistic manner remains insufficient. This identified gap is critical, as soil properties are essential for the long-term sustainability of tea cultivation. </p><p>The research was conducted at the Ciliwung Tea Plantation in the Cisarua District, Bogor Regency, West Java Province, situated in a volcanic area. This location represents the most extensive tea plantation within Bogor Regency. In addition, limited research exists regarding the correlation between local soil characteristics and the vigor of tea plants. Previous studies on pedogenesis have shown that the soils in the study area originate from andesitic and slightly basaltic parent materials and are currently in an early stage of weathering, as evidenced by limited pedogenic development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-55">(Wahyudin, 1989)</xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">Marianti et al. (2021)</xref> reported that altitude significantly affects soil properties more than slope factors in tea plantations located in Central Java. Furthermore, landform position as a geographical feature significantly role in ecosystem services and soil quality (Ahmadi Mirghaed &amp; Souri, 2022). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Arifin et al., 2022)</xref> identified the main factors influencing the formation of volcanic soils—particularly Andisols—as the type of parent material, climate, and eruption age, which collectively influence the extent of soil development. Climatic factors, including increased annual rainfall and decreased annual temperature, can influence soil properties and types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">Azurianti et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">Hu et al., 2021</xref>).</p><p>Recent studies have highlighted the relationship between environmental factors, soil characteristics, and the health of tea plants in intensive cultivation. Long-term tea monoculture in West Java has been associated with the degradation of soil organic matter, leading to reduced fertility and a decline in tea productivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-63">(Wulansari &amp; Pranoto, 2018)</xref>. The ongoing depletion of nutrients and loss of organic matter diminish the resilience of Andisols, which were initially well-suited for tea cultivation. In China, analogous trends have been noted, with the overuse of chemical fertilizers leading to accelerated soil acidification, disrupted nutrient balances, and a consequent decline in both tea yield and quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-56">Wang et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-66">Ye et al., 2022</xref>). Soil acidification presents a significant concern, as tea cultivation necessitates slightly acidic soils (pH 4.5–5.5). However, the overuse of nitrogen fertilizers frequently results in soil pH falling below these optimal thresholds. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-66">Ye et al. (2022)</xref> demonstrated that substituting a part of chemical fertilizers with organic amendments mitigated acidification and improved tea yields, highlighting the importance of balanced management in maintaining soil health.</p><p>The age of the plantation is another significant factor influencing outcomes. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-57">Wang et al. (2024)</xref> showed that soil organic carbon in tea plantations exhibits a unimodal pattern: younger plantations accumulate organic carbon, whereas older plantations show significant declines, indicating long-term depletion of soil resources. This finding has significant implications for Indonesia, where numerous tea estates are several decades old and consequently more vulnerable to soil degradation. Soil physical and thermal properties, alongside chemical changes, are essential in influencing plant vigor. Research conducted in Sri Lanka demonstrated that organic amendments improved soil water retention, reduced thermal conductivity, and stabilized aggregate structure in Ultisols, thereby fostering a more conducive environment for tea roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">Vidana Gamage et al., 2025</xref>). The findings indicate that organic inputs may enhance the resilience of volcanic soils, enabling them to better withstand climatic stresses, despite being derived from a different soil order.</p><p>These findings highlight that the sustainability of tea plantations cannot be assessed solely through yield statistics or climatic factors; it is essential to also consider the underlying dynamics of soil properties. Intensive tea plantations consistently stress soils, leading to organic matter depletion, nutrient imbalances, and acidification that collectively diminish plant vigor. The transition from young to mature plantations presents further challenges associated with the decline of soil organic carbon and the loss of soil resilience. The interplay of chemical, physical, and biological degradation poses a serious risk to the long-term viability of tea production, particularly in West Java, where plantations are typically managed intensively, and soils are derived from volcanic materials.</p><p>Improving tea plantation productivity requires soil development and management strategies that consider soil capacity and functional characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-64">Wulansari, Pranoto, et al., 2022</xref>). Volcanic soils possess distinctive properties that enhance their ability to support agricultural practices and demonstrate significant potential for carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">Muslim et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-67">Zhu et al., 2017</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">Fiantis et al. (2023)</xref> demonstrated that cultivation on volcanic soils affects the geochemical properties of the soil, especially the carbon and phosphorus content. Research examining the relationship between tea plant vigor, intensive plantation management, and pedogenetic processes in volcanic soils derived from tuff and andesitic breccia is limited.</p><p>This study investigates the dynamics between soil properties and tea plant vigor, evaluating the implications for land management in tea plantations. This study assesses the impact of long-term intensive tea cultivation on the variations in the physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties of volcanic soils. By addressing this gap, this study enhances the understanding of the impact of intensive management on soil development and plant health, while also exploring how improved management strategies can sustain soil fertility and tea productivity moving forward.</p></sec><sec id="sec-3"><title>2. MATERIAL AND METHODS</title><sec id="sec-4"><title>2.1. Site Description</title><p>The research was conducted at the Ciliwung Tea Plantation in Cisarua District, Bogor Regency, West Java Province, Indonesia, from November 2023 to March 2024.  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref> shows the distributions of soil sampling sites within the Ciliwung Tea Plantation, located at approximately 6° 41' 00” S and 107° 00' 00” E. The research site has an elevation ranging from 1,363 to 1,560 meters above sea level (m asl). This study employed descriptive statistics to summarize and interpret the soil property data collected from the sampling sites.</p></sec><sec id="sec-5"><fig id="figure-1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Location of the study site.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/108781/version/1560/55963/362315/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-1-38-g1.png" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 1.</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec id="sec-6"><title>2.2. Climate Data Collection</title><p>Climate data for the research location were obtained from the Bogor Regency Statistics Agency covering the period from 2010 to 2023 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(BPS, 2023)</xref>. The study site exhibits a humid tropical climate characterized by an annual precipitation of 3,164 mm. The rainy season extends from October to May, featuring peak average rainfall in February at 500.7 mm month<sup>-1</sup>, while July and August record the lowest rainfall, approximately 90.3 mm month<sup>-1</sup> and 92.1 mm month<sup>-1</sup>, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Fig. 2</xref>). The mean temperature at the study site varies between 24 to 25 °C. No significant temperature variations occur between the rainy and dry seasons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Fig. 2</xref>). In the rainy season, the research site exhibits air humidity levels ranging from 84–89%, whereas in the dry season, these levels drops to between 80–79%. Air humidity peaks in January and February, whereas it reaches its lowest levels in August and September (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Fig. 2</xref>).</p><fig id="figure-2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Climate data for the study site: (a) Rainfall average (mm month-1): period 2010-2023; (b) Air Temperature average (°C): period 2011-2022; (c) Air Humidity average (%): period 2011-2022.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/108781/version/1560/55963/362316/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-1-38-g2.png" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 2.</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec id="sec-7"><title>2.3. Lithology</title><p>The parent material at the study site is identified based on the geology map of Bogor, utilizing secondary data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">Effendi et al. (1998)</xref>. The geological map indicates that the research area is composed of parent rock material, specifically andesite and andesite breccia. The parent material identified in the study was andesitic tuff rock.</p></sec><sec id="sec-8"><title>2.4. Soil Sampling</title><p>The study was conducted in four designated blocks (C-4, C-9, C-10, and C-12) within the tea plantation area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Fig. 1</xref>), encompassing an area of 98 ha. Soil profile observations and soil sampling were performed in each block. This study utilized four vertical soil profile samples, composite soil samples collected from 10 points surrounding the soil profile observation, and ring soil samples taken from the top layer of the soil profile.  Four soil samples were selected according to varying tea health conditions (vigor), aspect, elevation, and slope position. The health conditions of the tea plants were categorized as follows: healthy tea plants on slopes of 3-8% (P1) and 30-40% (P4), rejuvenated healthy tea plants on slopes of 8-15% (P2), and unhealthy tea plants on slopes of 8-15% (P3). The samples comprised those taken from each layer of the soil profile, composite soil samples (disturbed), and soil samples from rings (undisturbed). All soil samples were analyzed using various methods, reflecting the differing vigor of tea plants.</p><p>Soil profiles were constructed with dimensions of 2 m in length, 1 m in width, and 1.5 m in depth; however, variations in depth may occur depending on the presence of the C layer/parent material, as well as the specification of the soil order control section. The parameters observed in the soil profile consist of: solum depth, horizon boundaries, horizon thickness, plant rooting, field soil texture, soil color, soil structure, soil consistency, field soil pH, slope position, slope class, and elevation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">Soil Survey Staff, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">Sukarman et al., 2017</xref>). </p><p>Composite samples were collected from the topsoil layer at depths of 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm at various locations, subsequently combined into a single sample with two repetitions. Composite sampling was used to acquire more representative soil chemical data. A ring sample, representing an undisturbed soil sample, has been collected from the topsoil at a depth of 0-20 cm. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref> presents methods for physical, chemical, and mineral analysis. Legacy soil data from published <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-55">Wahyudin (1989)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">Muslim et al. (2025)</xref>. The data sites near the Ciliwung Plantation, assumed to be comparable, exhibit similar soil chemical values corresponding to tea plantations with equivalent land use. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref> presents various methods for physical, chemical, and mineral analysis. In addition, we analyzed the correlations between soil characteristics—including base saturation, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and organic C and N—and tea yield through Pearson correlation analysis.</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>Methods for analyzing chemical, physical, and mineral properties of soil.</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>No</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Soil analysis</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Methode</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3" align="center">Soil physical</td></tr><tr><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">Soil texture (sand, silt, clay)</td><td align="center">Pipette (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">Kurnia et al., 2022</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">Water holding capacity</td><td align="center">Alhricks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">Kurnia et al., 2022</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">Bulk volume</td><td align="center">Soil sample ring/core method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">Kurnia et al., 2022</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">Soil colors</td><td align="center">Munsell soil color chart book</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3" align="center">Soil chemical</td></tr><tr><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">Soil pH reaction (H<sub>2</sub>O dan KCl) ratio 1:5</td><td align="center">pH meter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">NaF pH ratio 1:5; 1 dan 60 minutes</td><td align="center">Solution NaF 7,7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">Organic Carbon</td><td align="center">Walkey dan Black (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">Total-N</td><td align="center">Kjeldahl (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">Soil Cation Exchangeable Capacity</td><td align="center">Extraction NH<sub>4</sub>OAc 1 N pH 7,0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">Base saturation</td><td align="center">Extraction NH<sub>4</sub>OAc 1 N pH 7,0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">Exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na)</td><td align="center">Extraction NH<sub>4</sub>OAc 1 N pH 7,0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">Total K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center">Extraction HCl 25% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">Total P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center">Extraction HCl 25% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> available</td><td align="center">Extraction Bray 1 dan Olsen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">K<sub>2</sub>O available</td><td align="center">Morgan Wolf (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">Retention P</td><td align="center">Blackmore (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">Exchangeable Al and H</td><td align="center">Extraction KCl 1 N (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">Eviati et al., 2023</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3" align="center">Soil mineral</td></tr><tr><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">Clay minerals</td><td align="center">XRD</td></tr><tr><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">Sand minerals</td><td align="center">Polarizing microscope with counting line (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">Buurman, 1990</xref>)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="sec-9"><title>2.5. Soil Classification</title><p>The soil classification used in this study follows the outline in the USDA Soil Taxonomy book (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">Soil Survey Staff, 2022</xref>). The National Soil Classification System <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Subardja et al., 2014)</xref> and World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) by FAO (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015</xref>) serve as equivalents.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec-10"><title>3. RESULTS</title><sec id="sec-11"><title>3.1. Soil Morphology Characteristics</title><p>The research site exhibited a deep solum, supported by four soil profiles, each exceeding 150 cm in depth, as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>. The depths were determined according to the deepest observable pedogenic horizon. All profiles exhibited dark brown topsoil (7.5YR 3/2 to 7.5YR 3/3) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>), indicating a relatively elevated concentration of soil organic matter. Profile P1 exhibited greater color variation relative to other profiles, characterized by a significant darker horizon at a depth of 18 cm to 49 cm compared to the surface layer. The soil matrix exhibited colors varying from reddish dark brown to brownish yellow within the depth range of 49 cm to 129 cm. The observed reddish and yellowish colors indicate the presence of iron oxide minerals, such as hematite, goethite, and lepidocrocite. Yellowish hues were observed in subsoil layers at depths greater than 120 cm in additional profiles. The varied colors observed in profile P1 suggest a more developed soil formation, presumably linked to enhanced structural development relative to the other profiles. This is evidenced by its well-developed structure and significant clay accumulation, which is also indicated by its higher bulk density. Profile P3 exhibited a distinct contrast, characterized by a dark upper horizon and a lighter lower horizon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Fig. 3</xref>), indicative of variations in organic matter content. In wet conditions, soil consistency varied from slightly sticky to sticky in profiles P2, P3, and P4, whereas profile P1 exhibited a consistency ranging from sticky to very sticky, indicating a higher clay content. In moist conditions, the soil exhibited friability. The horizon boundaries across all profiles exhibited variability, ranging from distinct and gradual to diffuse and smooth. </p><table-wrap id="table-2"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p>Soil morphology of soil profiles.</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Pedon/ Horizons</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Solum (cm)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>MSCC</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Soil Color (moisture)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Soil Structure</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Consistency (wet &amp; moisture)</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Horizon Boundary</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">P1 Alic Hapludands</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-18</td><td align="center">7.5YR 3/3</td><td align="center">Dark brown</td><td align="center">2, vf, sb</td><td align="center">s, p, fr</td><td align="center">-</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">18-49</td><td align="center">7.5YR 2.5/3</td><td align="center">Very dark brown</td><td align="center">3, f, sb</td><td align="center">vs, vp, fr</td><td align="center">c, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">49-105</td><td align="center">7.5YR 3/4</td><td align="center">Redish dark brown</td><td align="center">3, f, sb</td><td align="center">vs, vp, fr</td><td align="center">gr, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">105-129</td><td align="center">5YR 3/4</td><td align="center">Brownish yellow</td><td align="center">2, f, sb</td><td align="center">vs, vp, fr</td><td align="center">d, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">129-150</td><td align="center">7.5YR 3/3</td><td align="center">Dark brown</td><td align="center">2, f, sb</td><td align="center">vs, vp, fr</td><td align="center">c, sm</td></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">P2 Alic Hapludands</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-14</td><td align="center">7.5YR 3/2</td><td align="center">Dark brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">ss, sp, fr</td><td align="center">gr, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">14-42</td><td align="center">7.5YR 4/3</td><td align="center">Brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">ss, sp, fr</td><td align="center">c, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">42-82</td><td align="center">7.5YR 4/4</td><td align="center">Brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">ss, sp, fr</td><td align="center">c, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">82-142</td><td align="center">7.5YR 4/4</td><td align="center">Brown</td><td align="center">2, m, sb</td><td align="center">s, p, t</td><td align="center">gr, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">142-170+</td><td align="center">7.5YR 7/6; 7.5YR 4/6</td><td align="center">Redish yellow; Strongly brown</td><td align="center">2, m, sb</td><td align="center">s, p, t</td><td align="center">-</td></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">P3 Alic Hapludands</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-18</td><td align="center">7.5YR 3/3</td><td align="center">Dark brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">ss, sp, fr</td><td align="center">c, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">18-48</td><td align="center">7.5YR 4/4</td><td align="center">Brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">ss, sp, fr</td><td align="center">c, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">48-82</td><td align="center">7.5YR 5/6</td><td align="center">Strongly brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">s, p, fr</td><td align="center">d, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">82-124</td><td align="center">7.5YR 5/6</td><td align="center">Strongly brown</td><td align="center">2, m, sb</td><td align="center">s, p, t</td><td align="center">d, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">124-170+</td><td align="center">7.5YR 6/6; 7.5YR 7/3</td><td align="center">Redish yellow; Pink</td><td align="center">2, m, sb</td><td align="center">s, p, t</td><td align="center">-</td></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="center">P4 Acrudoxic Hapludands</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-16</td><td align="center">7.5YR 3/2</td><td align="center">Dark brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">so, po, fr</td><td align="center">c, w</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">16-46</td><td align="center">7.5YR 4/4</td><td align="center">Brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">ss, sp, fr</td><td align="center">c, w</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">46-85</td><td align="center">7.5YR 4/3</td><td align="center">Brown</td><td align="center">1, f, sb</td><td align="center">ss, sp, fr</td><td align="center">d, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">85-155</td><td align="center">7.5YR 4/4</td><td align="center">Brown</td><td align="center">2, m, sb</td><td align="center">s, p, t</td><td align="center">d, sm</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">155-170+</td><td align="center">7.5YR 4/4; 7.5YR 4/3; 5YR 5/6</td><td align="center">Brown; Brown; Yellowish red</td><td align="center">2, m, sb</td><td align="center">s, p, t</td><td align="center">-</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: soil structure (level of development: 1= weak, 2= moderate, 3= strong; size: vf = very fine, f = fine, m = moderate; shape: sb = subangular blocky); consistency (so= non sticky, ss= slightly sticky, s= sticky, vs= very sticky, po= non plastic, sp= slightly plastic, p= plastic, vp= very plastic, fr= friable, t= firm), horizon boundary (c= clear, gr= gradual, d= diffuse, sm= smooth, w= wavy).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-3"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><p>Landscape and soil profile at study site (A= soil profile P1, B= soil profile P2, C= soil profile P3, and D= soil profile P4)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/108781/version/1560/55963/362317/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-1-38-g3.png" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 3.</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec id="sec-12"><title>3.2. Soil Physical Properties</title><p>The physical properties of all soil profiles are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>. The values of bulk density (Bd) and particle density (Pd) exhibited an inverse relationship with total porosity. Bd exhibited low (0.58-0.73 g cm<sup>-3</sup>) values, while total porosity is consistently high (63.25-68.55 %). Profile P1 exhibited the highest values of Bd and Pd, followed by P3, whereas P2 and P4 exhibited similar and comparatively lower values. Profiles P2 and P4, characterized by lower Bd and Pd, exhibited increased total porosity. In contrast, P1, with higher Bd and Pd, had the lowest total porosity. </p><table-wrap id="table-3"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><p>Physical properties of the topsoil horizon.</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="3" align="center"><bold>Pedon</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Water content</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Bulk density (BD)</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Particle density (PD)</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Total  porosity</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="4" align="center"><bold>Water content</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Aeration pores</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Available water</bold></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">pF1</th><th scope="col" align="center">pF 2</th><th scope="col" align="center">pF2.54</th><th scope="col" align="center">pF 4.2</th><th scope="col" align="center">Fast</th><th scope="col" align="center">Slow</th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">(% volume)</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">-------- g cm<sup>-3</sup> ------</th><th scope="col" align="center">(%)</th><th scope="col" colspan="6" align="center">-------------------- % volume -------------------</th><th scope="col" align="center">(%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">39.70</td><td align="center">0.73</td><td align="center">1.97</td><td align="center">63.25</td><td align="center">56.30</td><td align="center">47.10</td><td align="center">43.45</td><td align="center">26.90</td><td align="center">16.15</td><td align="center">3.65</td><td align="center">16.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">49.65</td><td align="center">0.58</td><td align="center">1.80</td><td align="center">67.65</td><td align="center">60.40</td><td align="center">49.90</td><td align="center">43.45</td><td align="center">26.35</td><td align="center">17.75</td><td align="center">6.45</td><td align="center">17.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P3</td><td align="center">44.15</td><td align="center">0.65</td><td align="center">1.90</td><td align="center">66.10</td><td align="center">55.80</td><td align="center">47.15</td><td align="center">39.90</td><td align="center">23.30</td><td align="center">18.95</td><td align="center">7.25</td><td align="center">16.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P4</td><td align="center">48.15</td><td align="center">0.58</td><td align="center">1.85</td><td align="center">68.55</td><td align="center">58.40</td><td align="center">41.90</td><td align="center">35.65</td><td align="center">23.20</td><td align="center">26.65</td><td align="center">6.25</td><td align="center">12.45</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Bd and Pd reflect the proportion of solid material within the soil, whereas total porosity represents the void present between soil particles. Bulk density and porosity variations are significantly influenced by the soil particle‐size distribution, or texture (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4a</xref>). P1 exhibited a higher bulk density and lower porosity due to its clay loam texture, which is characterized by a predominance of fine particles. P4 exhibited reduced bulk density and increased porosity attributed to its sandy loam texture, characterized by a higher proportion of coarse particles. In contrast, P2 and P3 exhibited a silty loam texture, indicating an intermediate condition relative to P1 and P4.</p><p>Fast aeration pores are characterized by larger pore spaces exceeding 28.8 microns in diameter, whereas slow aeration pores are defined by smaller pore spaces ranging from 8.6 to 28.8 microns. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref> indicates that profile P4 exhibited the highest percentage of fast aeration pores compared to all profiles. Conversely, profile P1, characterized by a higher Pd, exhibited a reduced percentage of fast aeration pores. Profile P3 exhibited the highest percentage of slow aeration pores, whereas profile P1 displayed the lowest percentage. The highest availability of water was observed in P2, succeeded by P3, P1, and P4.</p><p>The soil water retention curves (SWRC) presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 4</xref> demonstrate notable variations in pore-size distribution and water holding capacity across the four pedons, which are critical factors influencing soil physical quality and crop productivity. All four pedons exhibited low bulk densities (0.58–0.73 g cm⁻<sup>³</sup>) and high total porosities (63.25–68.55%), characteristics of volcanic andic soils abundant in amorphous minerals such as allophane and imogolite; however, their water dynamics varied considerably. The findings indicate that soil water availability is influenced more by pore architecture than by total porosity.</p><fig id="figure-4"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><p>Curve depicting the relationship between soil water retention (pF) and water content.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/108781/version/1560/55963/362318/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-1-38-g4.png" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 4.</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Pedon 2 (P2) demonstrated the highest volumetric water content at all matric potentials, achieving a plant-available water content (PAWC) of 17.10%. This indicates an optimal distribution of macropores and micropores, enhancing both drainage and water retention. The findings are consistent with earlier research indicating that well-aggregated soils characterized by moderate clay content and stable structure enhance soil water retention while maintaining adequate aeration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Dexter, 2004)</xref>. </p><p>Conversely, Pedon 4 (P4), which demonstrated the highest total porosity at 68.55%, experienced significant water loss at higher matric potentials, resulting in the lowest PAWC of 12.45%. This suggests a prevalence of macropores and a coarser texture, facilitating infiltration and aeration while diminishing water storage capacity. This observation aligns with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">Jiang et al. (2020)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">Harefa (2025)</xref> which indicate that coarse-textured soils exhibit greater susceptibility to drought stress.</p><p>Pedons 1 and 3 exhibited intermediate water retention curves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Fig. 4</xref>), with PAWC values of 16.55% and 16.60%, respectively, and aeration porosity greater than 18%. The characteristics indicate an advantageous soil structure and suitability for various cropping systems. The slope of the SWRC between pF 1 and pF 2.54 reflects gravitational drainage, whereas the stable water content observed at higher pF values (pF 2.54–4.2) in Pedons 1–3 implies efficient water retention in micropores.</p><p>These results underscore the necessity for tailored water management strategies at specific sites. Soils such as P4, characterized by high aeration and low water retention, may improve through practices that enhance micropore volume and organic matter content, such as biochar application, cover cropping, or residue mulching <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Arif et al., 2021)</xref>. P2 represents an ideal soil physical condition that can sustain intensive cropping systems while minimizing the risks of waterlogging or drought. The findings reinforce the necessity of integrating SWRC data with bulk density and porosity measurements in the assessment of soil physical quality, as no singular parameter can comprehensively represent the complexity of soil hydraulic behavior.</p><p>The SWRC analysis demonstrated significant variability in water retention across the pedons, indicating variations in soil texture, structure, and pore connectivity. Comprehending these variations is crucial for developing accurate water management and soil conservation strategies, particularly in regions prone to variable rainfall and drought risk. Future research should incorporate SWRC characteristics with hydraulic conductivity measurements and crop performance data to strengthen the relationship between soil physical properties and agricultural productivity.</p></sec><sec id="sec-13"><title>3.3. Chemical Properties of Soil</title><p>The soils at the research site predominantly displayed loam textures, specifically clay loam, silty loam, and sandy loam. The soil pH was primarily acidic, exhibiting values from 4.5 to 5.5 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4a</xref>). Very acidic conditions (pH &lt; 4.5) were observed in the topsoil of profile P1 and in several composite soil samples, such as C1a, C1b, C2b, and C3b. C1a and C1b were collected in proximity to P1. Soil profile data revealed that subsoil layers exhibited higher pH values compared to the topsoil, indicating base leaching, likely influenced by the high annual rainfall at the study site (approximately 3,164 mm year<sup>-1</sup>). Increased sum of exchangeable cations with soil depth indicate evidence of base leaching. The soil pH measured in KCl solution revealed potential acidity, exhibiting values lower than those recorded in distilled water (pH H₂O). The pH measurement with NaF indicated the prevalence of non-crystalline minerals, specifically allophane and imogolite.</p><p>The organic carbon content in all soil profiles and composite samples exhibited variation, with most; classified as high (3–5%) to very high (&gt;5%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4a</xref>). The maximum organic carbon content in the topsoil was found in profiles P3 and P4, at 6.69%, whereas the minimum was recorded in P1, at 3.43%. The composite soil samples support these findings, displaying trends aligned with the profile data. The composite samples exhibited the highest organic carbon content in C2b (20–40 cm depth), located near P2, whereas the lowest values (2.8%) were observed in C1a and Cb, both near P1. Profile data indicated a significant reduction in organic carbon content in the subsoil relative to the topsoil, with the exception of P1, which retained a relatively high organic carbon level (3.0%) at a depth of 105 cm. The organic carbon content at comparable depths in P2 and P3 was significantly lower, record at 1.2% and 0.84%, respectively. The total nitrogen content in all samples was under 1%, except for the top layer of P3 and composite sample C2b, which exhibited N content of 1.16% and 1.06%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4a</xref>). Nitrogen levels were strongly correlated with organic carbon, with more than 90% of the measured nitrogen existing in organic form. Both parameters indicate the organic matter content in the soil. The carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio indicates the relative amounts of organic carbon and nitrogen in the soil, where organic carbon levels consistently surpass those of nitrogen. A reduced C/N ratio indicates an accelerated release of nitrogen into the soil solution, thereby enhancing its availability for plant uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">Brust, 2019</xref>). In this study, the majority of soil samples exhibited C/N ratios under 10. The highest C/N ratios were recorded in profile P1 (13–14) and in composite samples C3c and C3d (14–15). The lowest C/N ratio was recorded at 6, was found in the topsoil of profile P3 and in composite samples C2b and C3b.</p><table-wrap id="table-4"><label>Table 4a.</label><caption><p>Properties of chemical soil</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="3" align="center"><bold>Pedons/ Horizons</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="3" align="center"><bold>Solum (cm)</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="4" align="center"><bold>Soil Texture</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>pH</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>NaF</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>C</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>N</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="3" align="center"><bold>C/N</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>P</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub><bold>O</bold><sub><bold>5</bold></sub></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>K</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub><bold>O</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>P</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub><bold>O</bold><sub><bold>5</bold></sub></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>K</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub><bold>O</bold></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">Sand</th><th scope="col" align="center">Silt</th><th scope="col" align="center">Clay</th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center">Class</th></tr><tr><th scope="col" colspan="3" align="center">----------- % -----------</th><th scope="col" align="center">H<sub>2</sub>O</th><th scope="col" align="center">KCl</th><th scope="col" align="center">1'</th><th scope="col" align="center">60'</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">-------- % ---------</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">---- mg 100g<sup>-1</sup> ----</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">------ ppm ------</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="17" align="center">P1 (Alic Hapludands, Tea Plantation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-18</td><td align="center">23</td><td align="center">39</td><td align="center">38</td><td align="center">Clay loam</td><td align="center">4.43</td><td align="center">3.82</td><td align="center">11.02</td><td align="center">11.61</td><td align="center">3.43</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">12.92</td><td align="center">73.96</td><td align="center">6.37</td><td align="center">9.67</td><td align="center">54.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">18-49</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">35</td><td align="center">41</td><td align="center">Clay</td><td align="center">4.37</td><td align="center">3.84</td><td align="center">10.95</td><td align="center">11.57</td><td align="center">3.23</td><td align="center">0.26</td><td align="center">12.61</td><td align="center">70.49</td><td align="center">5.85</td><td align="center">9.51</td><td align="center">50.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">49-105</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">41</td><td align="center">40</td><td align="center">Silty clay loam</td><td align="center">4.62</td><td align="center">3.83</td><td align="center">11.15</td><td align="center">11.67</td><td align="center">3.27</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">13.14</td><td align="center">76.76</td><td align="center">6.10</td><td align="center">2.75</td><td align="center">49.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">105-129</td><td align="center">28</td><td align="center">41</td><td align="center">31</td><td align="center">Clay loam</td><td align="center">4.85</td><td align="center">3.76</td><td align="center">10.73</td><td align="center">11.37</td><td align="center">1.08</td><td align="center">0.11</td><td align="center">9.82</td><td align="center">69.18</td><td align="center">4.68</td><td align="center">3.72</td><td align="center">39.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">129-150</td><td align="center">25</td><td align="center">46</td><td align="center">29</td><td align="center">Clay loam</td><td align="center">4.76</td><td align="center">3.84</td><td align="center">11.18</td><td align="center">11.67</td><td align="center">2.42</td><td align="center">0.21</td><td align="center">11.77</td><td align="center">53.59</td><td align="center">6.97</td><td align="center">3.44</td><td align="center">66.26</td></tr><tr><td colspan="17" align="center">P2 (Alic Hapludands, Tea Plantation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-14</td><td align="center">30</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">4.50</td><td align="center">4.20</td><td align="center">11.40</td><td align="center">11.7</td><td align="center">5.72</td><td align="center">0.84</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">67.00</td><td align="center">8.00</td><td align="center">4.40</td><td align="center">73.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">14-42</td><td align="center">26</td><td align="center">71</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">4.90</td><td align="center">3.90</td><td align="center">11.00</td><td align="center">11.6</td><td align="center">2.81</td><td align="center">0.4</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">53.00</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">1.70</td><td align="center">66.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">42-82</td><td align="center">30</td><td align="center">58</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">4.90</td><td align="center">3.90</td><td align="center">11.00</td><td align="center">11.5</td><td align="center">0.98</td><td align="center">0.12</td><td align="center">8.00</td><td align="center">73.00</td><td align="center">6.00</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">58.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">82-142</td><td align="center">33</td><td align="center">57</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">3.80</td><td align="center">11.10</td><td align="center">11.6</td><td align="center">1.20</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">8.00</td><td align="center">69.00</td><td align="center">3.00</td><td align="center">1.10</td><td align="center">29.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">142-170+</td><td align="center">35</td><td align="center">50</td><td align="center">15</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">3.90</td><td align="center">11.40</td><td align="center">11.7</td><td align="center">1.09</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">72.00</td><td align="center">3.00</td><td align="center">2.10</td><td align="center">24.00</td></tr><tr><td colspan="17" align="center">P3 (Alic Hapludands, Tea Plantation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-18</td><td align="center">42</td><td align="center">42</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">4.80</td><td align="center">4.50</td><td align="center">11.60</td><td align="center">11.8</td><td align="center">6.69</td><td align="center">1.16</td><td align="center">6.000</td><td align="center">63.00</td><td align="center">6.00</td><td align="center">2.50</td><td align="center">57.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">18-48</td><td align="center">26</td><td align="center">51</td><td align="center">23</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">5.20</td><td align="center">4.00</td><td align="center">11.20</td><td align="center">11.6</td><td align="center">2.03</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">8.000</td><td align="center">76.00</td><td align="center">4.00</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">38.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">48-82</td><td align="center">35</td><td align="center">51</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">5.20</td><td align="center">3.80</td><td align="center">10.70</td><td align="center">11.2</td><td align="center">0.97</td><td align="center">0.1</td><td align="center">10.000</td><td align="center">111.00</td><td align="center">3.00</td><td align="center">0.80</td><td align="center">33.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">82-124</td><td align="center">32</td><td align="center">44</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">3.70</td><td align="center">10.70</td><td align="center">11.2</td><td align="center">0.84</td><td align="center">0.12</td><td align="center">7.000</td><td align="center">80.00</td><td align="center">3.00</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">29.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">124-170+</td><td align="center">44</td><td align="center">35</td><td align="center">21</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">5.20</td><td align="center">4.00</td><td align="center">10.40</td><td align="center">10.9</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">0.06</td><td align="center">8.000</td><td align="center">219.00</td><td align="center">4.00</td><td align="center">0.60</td><td align="center">38.00</td></tr><tr><td colspan="17" align="center">P4 (Acrudoxic Hapludands, Tea Plantation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-16</td><td align="center">69</td><td align="center">30</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">Sandy loam</td><td align="center">4.70</td><td align="center">4.60</td><td align="center">11.60</td><td align="center">11.7</td><td align="center">6.99</td><td align="center">0.98</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">78.00</td><td align="center">4.00</td><td align="center">15.30</td><td align="center">38.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">16-46</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">30</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">Sandy loam</td><td align="center">4.90</td><td align="center">4.80</td><td align="center">11.50</td><td align="center">11.7</td><td align="center">3.61</td><td align="center">0.49</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">168.00</td><td align="center">4.00</td><td align="center">4.30</td><td align="center">38.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">46-85</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">33</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">Sandy loam</td><td align="center">5.60</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">11.30</td><td align="center">11.6</td><td align="center">2.46</td><td align="center">0.18</td><td align="center">14.00</td><td align="center">120.00</td><td align="center">3.00</td><td align="center">5.10</td><td align="center">29.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">85-155</td><td align="center">45</td><td align="center">46</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">5.60</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">11.30</td><td align="center">11.5</td><td align="center">2.74</td><td align="center">0.21</td><td align="center">13.00</td><td align="center">410.00</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">9.00</td><td align="center">48.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">155-170+</td><td align="center">28</td><td align="center">61</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">5.60</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">11.30</td><td align="center">11.5</td><td align="center">2.47</td><td align="center">0.34</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">498.00</td><td align="center">3.00</td><td align="center">5.90</td><td align="center">29.00</td></tr><tr><td colspan="17" align="center">Composite</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C5a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">34</td><td align="center">53</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">4.80</td><td align="center">4.49</td><td align="center">11.40</td><td align="center">11.7</td><td align="center">4.46</td><td align="center">0.29</td><td align="center">15.50</td><td align="center">48.27</td><td align="center">15.96</td><td align="center">2.00</td><td align="center">142.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C5b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">38</td><td align="center">41</td><td align="center">21</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">4.60</td><td align="center">3.97</td><td align="center">11.40</td><td align="center">11.8</td><td align="center">3.64</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">14.50</td><td align="center">94.20</td><td align="center">11.05</td><td align="center">3.360</td><td align="center">95.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C1a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">33</td><td align="center">48</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">4.10</td><td align="center">3.70</td><td align="center">10.80</td><td align="center">11.2</td><td align="center">2.87</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">8.00</td><td align="center">148.00</td><td align="center">26.00</td><td align="center">24.60</td><td align="center">232.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C1b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">33</td><td align="center">54</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">Silty loam</td><td align="center">4.40</td><td align="center">3.80</td><td align="center">11.00</td><td align="center">11.3</td><td align="center">2.82</td><td align="center">0.37</td><td align="center">8.00</td><td align="center">61.00</td><td align="center">30.00</td><td align="center">10.00</td><td align="center">269.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C2a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">30</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">Sandy loam</td><td align="center">4.50</td><td align="center">4.40</td><td align="center">11.60</td><td align="center">11.8</td><td align="center">5.60</td><td align="center">0.75</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">98.00</td><td align="center">23.00</td><td align="center">10.20</td><td align="center">212.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C2b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">33</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">Sandy loam</td><td align="center">4.30</td><td align="center">4.20</td><td align="center">11.60</td><td align="center">11.8</td><td align="center">6.20</td><td align="center">1.06</td><td align="center">6.00</td><td align="center">125.00</td><td align="center">14.00</td><td align="center">11.20</td><td align="center">132.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C3a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">42</td><td align="center">34</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">4.50</td><td align="center">4.20</td><td align="center">11.60</td><td align="center">11.8</td><td align="center">5.47</td><td align="center">0.76</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">63.00</td><td align="center">16.00</td><td align="center">4.20</td><td align="center">156.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C3b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">36</td><td align="center">43</td><td align="center">21</td><td align="center">Loam</td><td align="center">4.40</td><td align="center">4.00</td><td align="center">11.50</td><td align="center">11.7</td><td align="center">5.13</td><td align="center">0.93</td><td align="center">6.00</td><td align="center">104.00</td><td align="center">14.00</td><td align="center">6.40</td><td align="center">132.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C4a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">28</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">Sandy loam</td><td align="center">4.90</td><td align="center">4.80</td><td align="center">11.50</td><td align="center">11.7</td><td align="center">4.88</td><td align="center">0.64</td><td align="center">8.00</td><td align="center">115.00</td><td align="center">4.00</td><td align="center">8.70</td><td align="center">37.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C4b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">68</td><td align="center">28</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">Sandy loam</td><td align="center">4.90</td><td align="center">4.80</td><td align="center">11.60</td><td align="center">11.7</td><td align="center">5.07</td><td align="center">0.73</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">123.00</td><td align="center">3.00</td><td align="center">11.00</td><td align="center">32.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5"><label>Table 4b.</label><caption><p>Properties of chemical soil (continue)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="3" align="center"><bold>Pedons/ Horizons</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="3" align="center"><bold>Solum (cm)</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Ca</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Mg</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>K</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Na</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Sum</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>CEC</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Base Saturation</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>P</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Fe-ox</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Al-ox</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Al-ox + (1/2Fe-ox)</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Al</bold><sup><bold> 3+</bold></sup></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>H</bold><sup><bold>+</bold></sup></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">Retention</th></tr><tr><th scope="col" colspan="6" align="center">------------------------------- cmol kg<sup>-1</sup> -----------------------------</th><th scope="col" colspan="5" align="center">------------------------- % -------------------------</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">--- cmol kg<sup>-1</sup> --</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="15" align="center">P1 (Alic Hapludands, Tea Plantation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-18</td><td align="center">0.70</td><td align="center">0.30</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">0.13</td><td align="center">1.23</td><td align="center">32.39</td><td align="center">3.80</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">21.71</td><td align="center">0.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">18-49</td><td align="center">1.52</td><td align="center">0.37</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">2.26</td><td align="center">32.11</td><td align="center">7.04</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">20.70</td><td align="center">0.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">49-105</td><td align="center">1.41</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">0.09</td><td align="center">0.29</td><td align="center">2.14</td><td align="center">30.82</td><td align="center">6.94</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">18.43</td><td align="center">0.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">105-129</td><td align="center">4.21</td><td align="center">0.98</td><td align="center">0.07</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">5.53</td><td align="center">28.77</td><td align="center">19.22</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">19.33</td><td align="center">0.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">129-150</td><td align="center">3.33</td><td align="center">0.76</td><td align="center">0.13</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">4.49</td><td align="center">31.63</td><td align="center">14.20</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">17.79</td><td align="center">0.72</td></tr><tr><td colspan="15" align="center">P2 (Alic Hapludands, Tea Plantation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-14</td><td align="center">1.9</td><td align="center">0.43</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.18</td><td align="center">2.66</td><td align="center">22.18</td><td align="center">12.00</td><td align="center">95.82</td><td align="center">2.23</td><td align="center">2.38</td><td align="center">3.50</td><td align="center">3.10</td><td align="center">0.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">14-42</td><td align="center">3.79</td><td align="center">1.1</td><td align="center">0.14</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">5.39</td><td align="center">13.63</td><td align="center">40.00</td><td align="center">95.82</td><td align="center">3.14</td><td align="center">2.00</td><td align="center">3.57</td><td align="center">5.49</td><td align="center">0.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">42-82</td><td align="center">2.77</td><td align="center">0.66</td><td align="center">0.12</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">3.82</td><td align="center">20.8</td><td align="center">18.00</td><td align="center">93.04</td><td align="center">2.33</td><td align="center">1.66</td><td align="center">2.83</td><td align="center">10.96</td><td align="center">1.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">82-142</td><td align="center">2.59</td><td align="center">0.69</td><td align="center">0.06</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">3.69</td><td align="center">19.17</td><td align="center">19.00</td><td align="center">95.59</td><td align="center">2.77</td><td align="center">2.02</td><td align="center">3.41</td><td align="center">15.43</td><td align="center">1.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">142-170+</td><td align="center">2.21</td><td align="center">1.12</td><td align="center">0.05</td><td align="center">0.4</td><td align="center">3.78</td><td align="center">25.75</td><td align="center">15.00</td><td align="center">93.04</td><td align="center">2.48</td><td align="center">2.29</td><td align="center">3.53</td><td align="center">12.14</td><td align="center">2.2</td></tr><tr><td colspan="15" align="center">P3 (Alic Hapludands, Tea Plantation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-18</td><td align="center">2.34</td><td align="center">0.49</td><td align="center">0.12</td><td align="center">0.34</td><td align="center">3.29</td><td align="center">25</td><td align="center">13.00</td><td align="center">96.52</td><td align="center">2.04</td><td align="center">3.05</td><td align="center">4.07</td><td align="center">1.06</td><td align="center">0.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">18-48</td><td align="center">10.8</td><td align="center">2.47</td><td align="center">0.08</td><td align="center">0.24</td><td align="center">13.59</td><td align="center">30.62</td><td align="center">44.00</td><td align="center">93.04</td><td align="center">2.27</td><td align="center">1.31</td><td align="center">2.45</td><td align="center">3.69</td><td align="center">1.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">48-82</td><td align="center">12.91</td><td align="center">1.72</td><td align="center">0.07</td><td align="center">0.28</td><td align="center">14.98</td><td align="center">23.97</td><td align="center">62.00</td><td align="center">78.65</td><td align="center">1.20</td><td align="center">0.79</td><td align="center">1.39</td><td align="center">8.42</td><td align="center">2.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">82-124</td><td align="center">7.95</td><td align="center">1.25</td><td align="center">0.06</td><td align="center">0.28</td><td align="center">9.54</td><td align="center">31.26</td><td align="center">31.00</td><td align="center">87.47</td><td align="center">1.38</td><td align="center">0.82</td><td align="center">1.51</td><td align="center">16.59</td><td align="center">1.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">124-170+</td><td align="center">7.37</td><td align="center">1.34</td><td align="center">0.08</td><td align="center">0.23</td><td align="center">9.02</td><td align="center">32.19</td><td align="center">28.00</td><td align="center">79.35</td><td align="center">0.43</td><td align="center">0.62</td><td align="center">0.84</td><td align="center">22.91</td><td align="center">4.69</td></tr><tr><td colspan="15" align="center">P4 (Acrudoxic Hapludands, Tea Plantation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Ap</td><td align="center">0-16</td><td align="center">1.35</td><td align="center">0.22</td><td align="center">0.08</td><td align="center">0.44</td><td align="center">2.09</td><td align="center">19.41</td><td align="center">11.00</td><td align="center">96.75</td><td align="center">1.62</td><td align="center">4.08</td><td align="center">4.89</td><td align="center">0.88</td><td align="center">0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw1</td><td align="center">16-46</td><td align="center">1.01</td><td align="center">0.24</td><td align="center">0.08</td><td align="center">0.24</td><td align="center">1.57</td><td align="center">15.29</td><td align="center">10.00</td><td align="center">95.36</td><td align="center">3.54</td><td align="center">4.32</td><td align="center">6.09</td><td align="center">0.47</td><td align="center">0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw2</td><td align="center">46-85</td><td align="center">1.38</td><td align="center">0.37</td><td align="center">0.06</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">1.96</td><td align="center">15.99</td><td align="center">12.00</td><td align="center">96.75</td><td align="center">4.63</td><td align="center">4.73</td><td align="center">7.05</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw3</td><td align="center">85-155</td><td align="center">1.18</td><td align="center">0.26</td><td align="center">0.09</td><td align="center">0.24</td><td align="center">1.77</td><td align="center">22.24</td><td align="center">8.00</td><td align="center">95.59</td><td align="center">4.02</td><td align="center">7.05</td><td align="center">9.06</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Bw4</td><td align="center">155-170+</td><td align="center">1.05</td><td align="center">0.23</td><td align="center">0.06</td><td align="center">0.26</td><td align="center">1.6</td><td align="center">22.54</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">97.45</td><td align="center">3.14</td><td align="center">7.72</td><td align="center">9.29</td><td align="center">0</td><td align="center">0.35</td></tr><tr><td colspan="15" align="center">Composite</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C3c</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">1.49</td><td align="center">0.26</td><td align="center">0.26</td><td align="center">0.21</td><td align="center">2.22</td><td align="center">21.20</td><td align="center">10.47</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">0.59</td><td align="center">0.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C3d</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">1.65</td><td align="center">0.35</td><td align="center">0.17</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">2.42</td><td align="center">23.37</td><td align="center">10.36</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">8.37</td><td align="center">0.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C1a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">1.23</td><td align="center">0.57</td><td align="center">0.49</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">2.56</td><td align="center">35.78</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">90.95</td><td align="center">1.23</td><td align="center">1.21</td><td align="center">1.83</td><td align="center">20.96</td><td align="center">8.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C1b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">6.35</td><td align="center">1.46</td><td align="center">0.57</td><td align="center">0.31</td><td align="center">8.69</td><td align="center">24.67</td><td align="center">35.00</td><td align="center">89.79</td><td align="center">1.46</td><td align="center">1.26</td><td align="center">1.99</td><td align="center">14.83</td><td align="center">4.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C2a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">2.16</td><td align="center">0.7</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">3.58</td><td align="center">22.53</td><td align="center">16.00</td><td align="center">95.13</td><td align="center">1.36</td><td align="center">2.56</td><td align="center">3.24</td><td align="center">1.77</td><td align="center">0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C2b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">2.06</td><td align="center">0.55</td><td align="center">0.28</td><td align="center">0.24</td><td align="center">3.13</td><td align="center">24.76</td><td align="center">13.00</td><td align="center">95.82</td><td align="center">1.56</td><td align="center">2.91</td><td align="center">3.69</td><td align="center">2.69</td><td align="center">0.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C3a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">1.54</td><td align="center">0.46</td><td align="center">0.33</td><td align="center">0.34</td><td align="center">2.67</td><td align="center">23.88</td><td align="center">11.00</td><td align="center">95.82</td><td align="center">2.18</td><td align="center">2.98</td><td align="center">4.07</td><td align="center">2.92</td><td align="center">1.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C3b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">3.37</td><td align="center">0.87</td><td align="center">0.28</td><td align="center">0.24</td><td align="center">4.76</td><td align="center">29.41</td><td align="center">16.00</td><td align="center">93.97</td><td align="center">1.70</td><td align="center">1.89</td><td align="center">2.74</td><td align="center">7.41</td><td align="center">1.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C4a</td><td align="center">0-20</td><td align="center">1.16</td><td align="center">0.24</td><td align="center">0.07</td><td align="center">0.19</td><td align="center">1.66</td><td align="center">17.9</td><td align="center">9.00</td><td align="center">96.52</td><td align="center">2.94</td><td align="center">4.08</td><td align="center">5.55</td><td align="center">0.36</td><td align="center">0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center">C4b</td><td align="center">20-40</td><td align="center">1.05</td><td align="center">0.2</td><td align="center">0.06</td><td align="center">0.24</td><td align="center">1.55</td><td align="center">15.96</td><td align="center">10.00</td><td align="center">96.05</td><td align="center">2.56</td><td align="center">3.91</td><td align="center">5.19</td><td align="center">0.48</td><td align="center">0.25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-6"><label>Table 5.</label><caption><p>Comparative analysis of various chemical properties of the soil at the research site in relation to prior studies.</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Soil Profile</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="7" align="center"><bold>pH H</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub><bold>O</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">Horizons</td><td align="center">P1<sup>1)</sup></td><td align="center">P2<sup>1)</sup></td><td align="center">P3<sup>1)</sup></td><td align="center">P4<sup>1)</sup></td><td align="center">N3<sup>2)</sup></td><td align="center">W-1<sup>3)</sup></td><td align="center">W-2<sup>3)</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">4.43</td><td align="center">4.50</td><td align="center">4.80</td><td align="center">4.70</td><td align="center">4.52</td><td align="center">5.02</td><td align="center">5.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">4.37</td><td align="center">4.90</td><td align="center">5.20</td><td align="center">4.90</td><td align="center">4.59</td><td align="center">5.15</td><td align="center">5.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">4.62</td><td align="center">4.90</td><td align="center">5.20</td><td align="center">5.60</td><td align="center">4.54</td><td align="center">5.26</td><td align="center">5.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">4.85</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">5.60</td><td align="center">4.80</td><td align="center">5.69</td><td align="center">5.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">4.76</td><td align="center">5.00</td><td align="center">5.20</td><td align="center">5.60</td><td align="center">5.54</td><td align="center">5.63</td><td align="center">5.14</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7" align="center">Organic matter (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">5.91</td><td align="center">9.86</td><td align="center">11.53</td><td align="center">12.05</td><td align="center">14.45</td><td align="center">17.77</td><td align="center">15.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">5.57</td><td align="center">4.84</td><td align="center">3.50</td><td align="center">6.22</td><td align="center">11.03</td><td align="center">14.27</td><td align="center">8.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">5.64</td><td align="center">1.69</td><td align="center">1.67</td><td align="center">4.24</td><td align="center">6.45</td><td align="center">7.93</td><td align="center">6.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">1.86</td><td align="center">2.07</td><td align="center">1.45</td><td align="center">4.72</td><td align="center">4.45</td><td align="center">7.14</td><td align="center">8.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">4.17</td><td align="center">1.88</td><td align="center">0.78</td><td align="center">4.26</td><td align="center">2.86</td><td align="center">8.50</td><td align="center">5.55</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7" align="center">C-organic (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">3.43</td><td align="center">5.72</td><td align="center">6.69</td><td align="center">6.99</td><td align="center">8.38</td><td align="center">10.31</td><td align="center">9.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">3.23</td><td align="center">2.81</td><td align="center">2.03</td><td align="center">3.61</td><td align="center">6.40</td><td align="center">8.28</td><td align="center">4.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">3.27</td><td align="center">0.98</td><td align="center">0.97</td><td align="center">2.46</td><td align="center">3.74</td><td align="center">4.60</td><td align="center">3.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">1.08</td><td align="center">1.2</td><td align="center">0.84</td><td align="center">2.74</td><td align="center">2.58</td><td align="center">4.14</td><td align="center">4.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">2.42</td><td align="center">1.09</td><td align="center">0.45</td><td align="center">2.47</td><td align="center">1.66</td><td align="center">4.93</td><td align="center">3.22</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7" align="center">Total Nitrogen (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">0.84</td><td align="center">1.16</td><td align="center">0.98</td><td align="center">0.80</td><td align="center">0.44</td><td align="center">0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">0.26</td><td align="center">0.40</td><td align="center">0.27</td><td align="center">0.49</td><td align="center">0.58</td><td align="center">0.37</td><td align="center">0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">0.25</td><td align="center">0.12</td><td align="center">0.10</td><td align="center">0.18</td><td align="center">0.31</td><td align="center">0.23</td><td align="center">0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">0.11</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.12</td><td align="center">0.21</td><td align="center">0.26</td><td align="center">0.19</td><td align="center">0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">0.21</td><td align="center">0.15</td><td align="center">0.06</td><td align="center">0.34</td><td align="center">0.19</td><td align="center">0.22</td><td align="center">0.12</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7" align="center">Cation Exchangeable Capacity (cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">32.39</td><td align="center">22.18</td><td align="center">25.00</td><td align="center">19.41</td><td align="center">20.17</td><td align="center">41.79</td><td align="center">42.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">32.11</td><td align="center">13.63</td><td align="center">30.62</td><td align="center">15.29</td><td align="center">15.39</td><td align="center">37.41</td><td align="center">41.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">30.82</td><td align="center">20.80</td><td align="center">23.97</td><td align="center">15.99</td><td align="center">10.48</td><td align="center">32.41</td><td align="center">43.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">28.77</td><td align="center">19.17</td><td align="center">31.26</td><td align="center">22.24</td><td align="center">7.84</td><td align="center">33.05</td><td align="center">40.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">31.63</td><td align="center">25.75</td><td align="center">32.19</td><td align="center">22.54</td><td align="center">8.85</td><td align="center">34.07</td><td align="center">35.46</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7" align="center">Base Saturation (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">3.80</td><td align="center">12.00</td><td align="center">13.00</td><td align="center">11.00</td><td align="center">7.36</td><td align="center">9.55</td><td align="center">7.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">7.04</td><td align="center">40.00</td><td align="center">44.00</td><td align="center">10.00</td><td align="center">5.31</td><td align="center">9.94</td><td align="center">5.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">6.94</td><td align="center">18.00</td><td align="center">62.00</td><td align="center">12.00</td><td align="center">8.72</td><td align="center">8.45</td><td align="center">5.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">19.22</td><td align="center">19.00</td><td align="center">31.00</td><td align="center">8.00</td><td align="center">14.00</td><td align="center">9.50</td><td align="center">6.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">14.20</td><td align="center">15.00</td><td align="center">28.00</td><td align="center">7.00</td><td align="center">34.16</td><td align="center">8.99</td><td align="center">6.20</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: 1) Data from P1, P2, P3, P4 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4a</xref>), 2) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">Muslim et al. (2025)</xref>, 3) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-55">Wahyudin (1989)</xref>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The levels of exchangeable cations correlated with soil pH. The maximum exchangeable cation sum was recorded in profile P3, exhibiting a soil pH between 4.8 and 5.0. Profile P4, despite a higher subsoil pH of 5.6, demonstrated the lowest base cation levels across all profiles at comparable depths. The total exchangeable cations generally increased with soil depth, presumably as a result of cation leaching from the topsoil to the subsoil. Profile P4 displayed a distinct pattern, characterized by a decrease in exchangeable cation with depth. The location of P4 in a hilly area, coupled with dense tea vegetation and thick foliage, likely contributed to reduced rainfall infiltration and minimized leaching relative to the other profiles.<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Figure 5</xref> illustrates that calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) concentrations were comparable across samples, with the highest concentrations observed in profile P3 and the lowest in profile P4. Profile data indicated that potassium (K) concentrations were highest in P2 and lowest in P4. Sodium (Na) concentrations exhibited consistency across all samples, with the peak concentration recorded in the topsoil of P4 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Fig. 5</xref>).</p><fig id="figure-5"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><p>Exchangeable cations in soil profiles according to soil depth</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/108781/version/1560/55963/362319/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-1-38-g5.png" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 5.</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>The soil CEC observed in this study varied between 15 to 35 cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>. Profile P1 exhibited the highest CEC values, ranging from 28.77 to 32.39 cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>, whereas profile P4 exhibited the lowest values, ranging from 15.29 to 22.54 cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>. The composite soil samples reflected a consistent trend, with the highest CEC observed in C1a, located near P1, and the lowest values found in C4a and C4b, located near P4.</p><p>The soils at the study site typically demonstrated low base saturation levels (&lt;50%), which correlated with elevated soil acidity. The maximum base saturation occurred in profile P3 at depths of 18–82 cm, with values between 44% and 62%. Subsequently, profile P2 exhibited a value of 40% at depths ranging from 14 to 42 cm, whereas the composite sample C1b, recorded a value of 35%. In contrast, all other samples exhibit a base saturation value below 20%.</p><p>Volcanic soils are characterized by high phosphate retention (&gt;85%). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 4b</xref> indicates that all soil profiles exhibited phosphate retention exceeding 90%, with the exception of the subsoil in profile P3. While P1 was not assessed for phosphate retention, composite samples C1a and C1b, located near P1, may act as representative indicators of its phosphate retention capacity.</p><p>Oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe-ox) and Oxalate-extractable Al (Al-ox) signify the existence of these elements in non-crystalline mineral forms. Fe-ox levels varied between 0.43% and 4.63%, with the highest concentrations observed in the subsoil of profile P4, reaching 4.02% to 4.63% at depths of 46 to 155 cm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 4b</xref>). The subsoil of profile P3 exhibited the lowest Fe-ox concentration, measured, at 0.43% within the depth range of 124–170 cm. The levels of Al-ox exhibited a comparable pattern, as both Fe-ox and Al-ox are associated to non-crystalline minerals such as allophane and ferrihydrite.</p><p>The acidic nature of volcanic soils leads to elevated levels of Al<sup>³</sup>⁺ and H⁺ saturation, particularly observed in profile P1 and composite samples C1a and C1b. In other areas, Al saturation was generally lower, as indicated by the comparatively low Al content in additional samples, especially in the surface layers. This condition is likely attributable to liming practices implemented in other blocks but not in P1, resulting in a pronounced disparity. The saturation levels of Al and H were inversely related to soil pH, with lower pH values indicating higher saturation of Al and H.</p><p>The effect of tea plantations in this area was assessed by employing a comparative approach, utilizing legacy soil data from sites near the Ciliwung Plantation, which was presumed to be similar (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-6">Table 5</xref>). Over 36 years, the Andosols of Bogor beneath tea plantations have experienced significant alterations in their chemical properties. A discernible trend of soil acidification was observed, with pH decreasing from an average of 5.26 in 1989 (W1–W2) to 4.93 in 2024 (P1–P4, N3). Substantial decreases were observed in soil organic matter (−46.6%), organic carbon (−46.6%), and CEC (−41.7%), indicating a weakening of the soil’s buffering capacity. These alterations align with prolonged leaching processes characteristics of humid tropical environments, further intensified by the ongoing use of acidifying nitrogen fertilizers in tea cultivation.</p><p>Base saturation increased from 7.7% to 18.0% during the same period; however, this increase does not signify an improvement in soil fertility. This indicates a relative increase resulting from the sharp decline in CEC. Consequently, while the percentage of exchange sites occupied by basic cations has risen, the total stock of nutrient cations has likely decreased or remained low. The total nitrogen content exhibited a slight increase from 0.24% to 0.35%, likely attributable to continuous fertilizer applications rather than an enhancement of soil organic matter reserves. These findings suggest that, despite ongoing nutrient inputs, the soil’s inherent capacity to store and regulate nutrients has been diminished.</p><p>The chemical degradation observed in these Andosols indicates progressive weathering and soil aging, likely involving the transformation of short-range order minerals into more crystalline phases with reduced charge densities. The observed trajectory, along with declining organic matter inputs and intensified acidification, highlights a sustained decline in soil quality and resilience within monoculture tea systems. The findings emphasize the necessity for restorative soil management practices, including organic matter enrichment, and balanced nutrient applications, to mitigate adverse trends and maintain the productivity of tea plantations on Andosols.</p><p>These changes indicate potential mineralogical shifts from short-range order minerals to more crystalline phases, signaling the onset of andic property deterioration. These transformations indicate that Andosols, previously considered resilient due to their high CEC and organic matter content, are actually susceptible to rapid degradation under intensive monoculture practices. The findings highlight the urgency for restorative management aimed at rebuilding organic matter, mitigates acidification, and preserving the distinctive andic properties essential for the productivity of tea plantation soils.</p></sec><sec id="sec-14"><title>3.4. Soil Mineralogical Properties</title><p>The sand fraction of the analyzed soils is primarily composed of rock fragments and weathered minerals (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-7">Table 6</xref>). Profile P1 exhibited the highest concentrations of weathered minerals and rock fragments, ranging from 22-29% and 49-60%, respectively. Small amounts of opaque minerals and quartz were identified, constituting less than &lt;15% of the total composition. The presence of opaque minerals indicates that the analyzed soils originated from volcanic parent materials, whereas the low quartz content indicates that these soils have not experienced significant weathering or are still in the developmental stage. The analyzed soils contain easily weathered minerals, including labradorite, augite, and hypersthene, in small to moderate quantities. Profile P4 exhibited the highest concentrations of augite and hypersthene, ranging from 10-16% and 14-28%, respectively. The likely reason for this is that P4 has not experienced additional pedogenic development, leading to greater reserves of easily weathered minerals such as augite and hypersthene in comparison to other profiles. This interpretation is additionally reinforced by the comparatively limited structural development of P4 and its sand-dominated texture. The significant presence of these minerals indicates that the soil originated from intermediate andesitic or volcanic parent materials. The significant presence of weathered minerals and rock fragments, along with easily weathered minerals, illustrates the substantial nutrient reserves conducive to the growth and development of tea crops.</p><table-wrap id="table-7"><label>Table 6.</label><caption><p>Properties of sand mineral.</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Soil Samples</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Hor.</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Op</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Zr</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Kk</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Kb</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Kf</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Lm</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>SiO</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub><bold>-Or</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Ze</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Mw</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Fb</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Gv</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>An</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>La</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Bi</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Sa</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Hh</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Au</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Hi</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Ep</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Tu</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>St</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Ds</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>En</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Sum</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">P1</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">29</td><td align="center">49</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">28</td><td align="center">55</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">26</td><td align="center">58</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">60</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">22</td><td align="center">57</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P2</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">42</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">46</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">43</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">40</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">20</td><td align="center">35</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P3</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">34</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">15</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">39</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">37</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">17</td><td align="center">28</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">19</td><td align="center">23</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">12</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P4</td><td align="center">I</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">8</td><td align="center">24</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">16</td><td align="center">22</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">II</td><td align="center">11</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">26</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">28</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">III</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">3</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">6</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">25</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">21</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td></td><td align="center">IV</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">5</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">27</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">13</td><td align="center">20</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td align="center">V</td><td align="center">9</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">4</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">7</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">15</td><td align="center">33</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">2</td><td align="center">sp</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">10</td><td align="center">14</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">-</td><td align="center">100</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: sp = sporadic (found during orientation but not offensive line counting), (-) = not found, Op = Opaque; Zr = Zircon; Kk = Turbid quartz;  Kb = Translucent quartz; Kf = Iron concretion;  Lm = Limonite; SiO2-Or. = SiO2-Organic; Ze = Zeolite; Mw = Mineral weathered; Fb = Glassy rocks fragment; Gv = Volcanic glass; An = Andesine; La = Labradorite; Bi = Bitownite; Au = Augite; Sa = Sanidine; Hh = Green Hornblende; Hi = Hypersthene; Ep = Epidote; Tu =Tourmaline; St = Staurolite; Ds = Diopside; En = Enstatite.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The mineral composition of the clay fraction in the analyzed soils exhibit considerable variability. Vermiculite is present in moderate quantities in Profiles P2 and P3, whereas illite is observed in small to very small quantities in Profiles P2, P3, and P4. Non-crystalline or amorphous minerals, meta-halloysite, gibbsite, quartz, goethite, and magnetite are present in small to moderate quantities. Hydrated halloysite minerals are present in limited quantities in Profile P1, whereas cristobalite is detected in minimal quantities in both Profiles P1 and P3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Fig. 6</xref>).</p><p>Meta-halloysite was identified through XRD peaks exhibiting d-spacings of 0.713 to 0.722 nm (order 1) and 0.347 to 0.350 nm (order 2) following treatments with Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> plus glycerol, and K<sup>+</sup>. Additionally, the peaks diminished after treatment with K<sup>+</sup> and heating at 550 °C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Fig. 6</xref>). Hydrated halloysite exhibits a d-spacing of 1.000 nm (order 1) and 0.447 nm (order 2) following treatments with Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> combined with glycerol, and K<sup>+</sup>. The peaks subsequently collapsed following K<sup>+</sup> treatment combined with heating at 550 °C. Vermiculite exhibits a d-spacing of 1.423 nm after treatments with Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> plus glycerol, and K<sup>+</sup>. The peaks collapse following a K<sup>+</sup> treatment combined with heating at 550°C, yielding a d-spacing of 1.011 nm. XRD analysis revealed the presence of illite, characterized by d-spacing of 1.000 to 1.015 nm (order 1), and 0.540 to 0.545 nm (order 2). After treatment with Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> plus glycerol, and K<sup>+,</sup> gibbsite exhibits a d-spacing range from 0.482 to 0.489 nm. The peaks subsequently collapse following K<sup>+</sup> treatment combined with heating at 550 °C. Cristobalite, quartz, goethite, and magnetite exhibit d-spacings of 0.404 to 0.406 nm, 0.334 to 0.339 nm, 0.255 to 0.256 nm, and 0.238 to 0.239 nm, respectively, following all treatments.</p><fig id="figure-6"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><p>X-ray diffractogram of the analyzed soils subjected to Mg 2+ , Mg 2+ plus glycerol, and K + +heating at 550°C treatments</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/download/108781/version/1560/55963/362320/Sains_Tanah_J_Soil_Sci_Agroclimatology-23-1-38-g6.png" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 6.</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec id="sec-15"></sec><sec id="sec-16"><title>3.5. Analysis of Climate Condition</title><p>Climate is a significant factor influencing soil formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-58">(Weil &amp; Brady, 2016)</xref>. Figure 2 presents the results of monthly climate data measurements for the period 2011-2022, derived from BPS data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(BPS, 2023)</xref>. The minimum air temperature was recorded in February at 24.4°C, while the maximum was observed in May at 26.5°C. The mean temperature throughout the entire duration was 25.0°C. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">Braak (1929)</xref> equation was employed to determine the minimum temperature corresponding to the elevation of each soil profile, resulting in a range of 17.3–17.7°C, with in an average of 17.6°C. The soil temperature at the research site was estimated using the equation from van Wambeke (1982) (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-1">Eq. 1</xref>).</p><disp-formula id="equation-1"><tex-math id="math-1"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle Ts = Ta + 2.5{^\circ}C \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where: Ts is soil temperature and Ta is the annual average air temperature.</p><p>The estimated annual average soil temperature, according to the equation, is 20.1°C. This condition aligns with the isohyperthermic soil temperature regime as outlined by the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">Soil Survey Staff (2022)</xref>.</p><p>February recorded the highest rainfall at 500 mm month<sup>-1</sup>, while July and August experienced the lowest, with 90 mm month<sup>-1</sup> at 92 mm month<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The monthly average rainfall was 263.7 mm month<sup>-1 </sup>leading to an annual average of 3,691.2 mm year<sup>-1</sup>. The mean air humidity was 84.82%, with the peak recorded in January at 89.29% and the lowest in September at 79.47%. The research site exhibits an udic moisture regime (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">Soil Survey Staff, 2022</xref>).</p><p>The data indicated that the rainfall is classified as type A according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">Schmidt and Ferguson (1951)</xref> classification system, characterized by a low ratio of dry months to wet months, with a Q value between 0.00 and 0.43. This indicates the absence of drought conditions for a duration of 90 consecutive days or longer at the research site. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">Ritung et al. (2011)</xref>, highlight that tea plants thrive in temperatures ranging from 19 to 21°C, with annual rainfall between 2,500 and 4,000 mm, and air humidity below 70%. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">Ishak S et al. (2017)</xref> state that soil moisture is a crucial determinant of tea plant productivity, with an optimum humidity level of 87,2%. The climate conditions indicate that elevated rainfall contributes to the leaching of cations in the soil, attributed to high soil acidity levels at the research site.</p></sec><sec id="sec-17"><title>3.6. Lithology</title><p>The research site, as indicated on a 1:100,000 scale geological map of Bogor, Java, is situated within the breccia and lava formations of Mount Kencana and Mount Limo (Qvk). This area comprises Pleistocene-aged andesite and andesite breccia, such as andesine, labradorite, and hornblende, which are abundant in mineral nutrients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Effendi et al., 1998)</xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-51">Tan (1965)</xref> highlighted that Indonesian Andisols originated from diverse parent materials during the recent Pleistocene, predominantly consisting of andesitic tuffs.</p></sec><sec id="sec-18"><title>3.7. Topography</title><p>The representative soil profile at the study site is situated in undulating to hilly terrain, with elevations ranging from of 1,430 to 1,496 meters above sea level and a slope class exceeding 3 to over 40% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-8">Table 7</xref>). Slope gradient influences surface runoff. This process results in the depletion of organic matter in the topsoil layer and may lead to surface erosion, such as sheet erosion. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">Marianti et al. (2021)</xref> stated that elevation significantly affects soil properties, surpassing the impact of slope on factors, such as CEC, total N, available P, or exchangeable K, and bulk density. Values of organic carbon, total nitrogen, and available phosphorus exhibited an increase with ascending profile position and slope class (P4 &gt; P3 &gt; P2 &gt; P1). Conversely, values of soil CEC, available potassium, and BD diminished. Soil CEC, an important measure of soil fertility, exhibited the highest value at the lowest slope and elevation, specifically in P-1 soil profile. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">Li et al. (2025)</xref> find that higher slopes exhibit greater total nitrogen and available nutrient values than lower slopes, whereas soil CEC is maximized on the middle slope. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-8">Table 7</xref> presents the location of each representative soil profile in relation to the topographic conditions of the study site.</p></sec><sec id="sec-19"><title>3.8. Classification of Soil</title><p>Soil classification refers to the procedure outlined in the methodology section. The study’s result classifies the soil according to the USDA Soil Taxonomy at the soil type level, identifying Alic Halpudands for soil profiles P-1, P-2, and P-3, and Acrudoxic Hapludands for soil profile P-4. As equivalents of the Soil Taxonomy, these soil types are classified as Andisol Distrik (soil profiles P-1, P-2, and P-3) and Andisol Okrik (soil profile P-4) in the National Soil Classification System. Meanwhile, in the FAO WRB system, they are classified as Dystric Alic Andosol and Dystric Acroxic Andosol.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec-20"><title>4. DISCUSSION</title><p>This study’s findings indicate that intensive tea cultivation affect the physical and chemical properties of soils. The implementation of cultivation and land management practices correlated with an increase in surface soil bulk density. The bulk density values recorded in this study ranged from 0.58 to 0.73 g cm⁻<sup>³ </sup>which, while relatively low due to andic properties, were higher than those found under natural conditions, indicating the influence of cultivation practices. A study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">Muslim (2024)</xref>  in the Mount Gede-Pangrango area reported bulk density values ranging from 0.43 to 0.48 g cm⁻<sup>³ </sup>in undisturbed forest soils. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">Anda and Dahlgren (2020)</xref> reported analogous findings in Andisols from Mount Tangkuban Perahu, West Java, indicating that cultivated soils exhibited higher bulk density (0.5–0.8 g cm⁻<sup>³</sup>) than pine forest soils (0.4 g cm⁻<sup>³</sup>). This finding indicates that intensive land management for tea cultivation results in increased soil compaction, as reflected by higher bulk density values, which may subsequently affect soil physical quality. The increase in bulk density is attributed to the repeated foot traffic of farmers engaged in continuous tea harvesting activities. The lack of cover crops in various areas likely exacerbates soil compaction.</p><p>The rise in bulk density due to intensive cultivation practices was accompanied by a decrease in soil porosity. Pedon P1, exhibiting the highest bulk density, demonstrated reduced porosity in comparison to other soil profiles with lower bulk density. Soil organic carbon content also influenced both properties. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">Fukumasu et al. (2022)</xref> found that the content of organic matter has a significant impact on soil porosity. The present study demonstrated this relationship, with P1 exhibiting the lowest soil organic carbon in the surface layer at 3.43%, in contrast to - the other three profiles, which ranged from 5.72% to6.99%. Moreover, a significant reduction in organic carbon content was observed in intensively cultivated tea soils compared to natural conditions. Volcanic soils in forested or uncultivated areas exhibited 11.89% organic carbon in the surface layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Muslim et al., 2025)</xref>. The organic carbon content was lower than that of the forest soil; however, the organic matter content of these Andisols remained elevated. This resulted from the ongoing deposition of litter from pruning residues, which accumulate in the topsoil.</p><p>The high organic matter content in volcanic soils is primarily due to the stabilization of organic compounds by Al/Fe oxides and non-crystalline minerals, which are typical of these soils <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">Beckstrom et al. (2025)</xref>. Soil organic matter originating from shade plants and tea plant pruning offers numerous advantages in improving physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. The prior research indicated that organic matter derived from plants contributes to the availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and exchangeable potassium and magnesium, while also enhancing CEC in the soil. </p><table-wrap id="table-8"><label>Table 7.</label><caption><p>Altitude, slope, topography, vegetation, and soil profile position.</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Soil</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Altitude</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Slope class</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Topography</bold></th><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Vegetation</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center"><bold>Coordinate</bold></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">Profile</th><th scope="col" align="center">(m asl)</th><th scope="col" align="center">(%)</th><th scope="col" align="center">Latitude</th><th scope="col" align="center">Longitude</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">P-1</td><td align="center">1430</td><td align="center">3-8</td><td align="center">Undulating</td><td align="center">Healthy tea plants</td><td align="center">-6.69904</td><td align="center">106.99600</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P-2</td><td align="center">1434</td><td align="center">8-15</td><td align="center">Rolling</td><td align="center">Rejuvenation tea plants</td><td align="center">-6.69945</td><td align="center">106.99600</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P-3</td><td align="center">1445</td><td align="center">8-15</td><td align="center">Rolling</td><td align="center">Unhealty tea plants</td><td align="center">-6.69964</td><td align="center">106.99600</td></tr><tr><td align="center">P-4</td><td align="center">1496</td><td align="center">30-40</td><td align="center">Hilly</td><td align="center">Healthy tea plants</td><td align="center">-6.69987</td><td align="center">106.99600</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Moreover, in Andisols, a significant correlation exists between soil organic carbon derived from soil organic matter, and available P, soil dry bulk density, and the microbial community. A correlation exists between available P and microbial community with CEC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-60">(Wulanningtyas et al., 2021)</xref>.</p><p>Evidence of a decline in soil physical quality was observed through surface erosion, resulting from uniform vegetation cover and partially exposed areas utilized as footpaths. These conditions reduce soil protection from rainfall impact and runoff, consequently increasing topsoil loss. This process may result in the depletion of fine particles and organic matter, thereby reducing soil fertility and structural stability. The observed erosion is primarily sheet erosion, resulting in the transport of topsoil to lower or concave areas, which subsequently leads to deposition processes. Elevated precipitation and diverse landforms, ranging from undulating to hilly terrain, facilitate these geomorphic processes. Erosion can be assessed by examining the thickness of the topsoil layer, known as the epipedon. The epipedon thickness for profiles P1, P2, P3, and P4, based on morphological data (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>), is 18 cm, 14 cm, 18 cm, and 16 cm, respectively. The P1 soil profile in the topo sequence is situated at a lower elevation compared to the other profiles. The results indicate that profile P2 exhibits the thinnest epipedon relative to the other three profiles. This condition is likely a consequence of land use in the P2 profile, characterized by tea plants that have been pruned and replanted in response to pest and disease pressures. As a result, the land surface exhibits greater exposure relative to the other three profiles, which feature denser tea vegetation. The findings suggest that elevation and slope have minimal impact on erosion levels in the study area; instead, erosion is primarily influenced by the presence or absence of vegetative cover.  </p><p>The intensive utilization of tea plantations impacts the chemical properties of the soil. A comparison of various soil chemical properties from prior studies near our research site indicates a notable increase in soil acidity, alongside reductions in organic carbon, CEC, and total nitrogen over a span of 36 years. Simultaneously, base saturation exhibits an upward trend while still adhering to the very low criteria (less than&lt;20%).</p><p>The extensive use of nitrogen fertilizers leads to heightened soil acidity. Farmers intentionally sustain this acidity level without lime addition, as tea plants thrive best at a pH of 4.5–5.5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">Ritung et al. (2011)</xref>. Maintaining soil acidity within this range can enhance production in tea cultivation. This condition contrasts with agricultural land utilized for horticulture, where farmers apply lime intensively, in soil pH beyond its natural level. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">Anindita et al. (2022)</xref>  found that horticultural farmland on volcanic soils exhibited higher pH values than uncultivated forest soils. </p><p>The content of soil carbon and the clay fraction significantly affect soil CEC. Soils exhibiting elevated CEC demonstrate reduced vulnerability to nutrient depletion. Profile P1 demonstrates a greater clay content relative to other profiles, which aligned with its elevated CEC. Conversely, pedons P2 and P4 exhibited very low organic carbon contents, especially in the surface horizon, with values ranging from 1% to 2% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4a</xref>), attributed to the leaching of clay into the subsoil. The downward movement of clay indicates a decline in soil performance due to prolonged intensive land use.</p><p>Soil minerals were analyzed to assess weathering intensity, focusing on the quantity of easily weatherable minerals alongside physical and chemical properties. The presence of easily weathered minerals suggests potential nutrient reserves in volcanic soil accessible to plants. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-65">Yatno et al. (2021)</xref> observed that Andisols in Lembang District, West Java, exhibit both high porosity and substantial nutrient reserves attributed to the presence of fresh magnetite iron minerals. This is advantageous for the growth and development of root plants. The study area, despite intensive management for tea cultivation, exhibits a high nutrient reserve due to its significant content of easily weathered minerals. The presence of easily weathered minerals indicates the potential for nutrient reserves in volcanic soils accessible to plants.</p><p>This study identifies- easily weathered minerals found in volcanic soils, specifically the pyroxene group (augite and hypersthene) and feldspar (andesine, labradorite, biotite, sanidine). Augite ((Ca,Na)(Mg,Al,Fe)(Si,Al)₂O₆) was present in all profiles, exhibiting the highest concentration in profiles P3 and P4. Augite is classified within the ferromagnesium mineral group, serving as a principal reservoir for Fe and Mg <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Churchman &amp; Lowe, 2012)</xref>. Furthermore, augite serves as source of additional nutrients, including calcium and sodium. In addition to augite, hypersthene ((Mg,Fe<sup>2+</sup>)SiO3) serves as a significant nutrient reserve for  Fe and Mg <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Huang &amp; Wang, 2005)</xref>. Hypersthene, similar to augite, is present in all profiles, with the highest abundance observed in profiles P3 and P4. Research conducted by (Muslim et al., 2024)  indicates that volcanic soil on Mount Gede-Pangrango in West Java is dominated by augite and hypersthene. With high levels of augite and hypersthene, P3 has the highest primarily composed of augite and hypersthene. P3 exhibits elevated levels of aufite and hypersthebe, resulting in the highest exchangeable Ca and Mg content. In contrast, although profile P4 possesses substantial Mg nutrient reserves, it exhibits the lowest exchangeable Mg Contents (Figure 5). The incorporation of organic matter facilitates weathering processes, leading to the release of available nutrients into the soil solution.</p><p>Volcanic soils are notably characterized by their elevated P retention in comparison to other soil types.  Nutrient inputs during cultivation can modify this characteristic. In general, the phosphorus retention value exceeds 90% across all soil profile and sample composites. However, at P3 at the depths greater than 48 cm, the P retention values are 78%, 79 % and 87 %. The retention of P exhibits a positively correlation with Alo, supported by a 78% confidence interval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-59">(Wibisono et al., 2016)</xref>. This supports the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">Prasetyo et al. (2009)</xref>, which indicate that elevated levels of Alo, Sio, and Feo are associated with increased P retention in Andisols. High P retention, as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 4b</xref>, is a primary issue in Andisols. Several measures can be implemented   to enhance P availability in these soils.  Significant quantities of fresh soil organic carbon enhance and sustain biological activity while facilitating organic P mineralization, thereby increasing P availability in Andisols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Takeda et al., 2009)</xref>.  The application fresh organic fertilizer is an effective method for enhancing phosphorus availability for plants. The research indicates that NPK fertilization may serve effective management strategy for enhancing soil organic carbon sequestration through increased microbial carbon use efficiency in Andosols. Additionally, improved, soil Carbon and Phosphorus availability imitigated microbial P limitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Lyu et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>Based on the observed physical and chemical properties, we classified the soils using Soil Taxonomy to enhance the interpretation of soil characteristics and enable comparison among profiles. According to Soil Taxonomy, all soil profiles were classified as Andisols (Hapludands). The chemical analysis, indicated that all profiles demonstrated andic properties surpassing 60% within 60 cm from the surface. The criteria for andic properties comprise included P retention exceeding &gt;85% and Alo + ½Feo &gt;2% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">Soil Survey Staff, 2022</xref>). Furthermore, bulk density below &lt;1 g cm<sup>-3</sup> and NaF pH exceeding&gt;10 across all profiles suggest the predominant features   of Andisols, which are linked to non-crystalline minerals. Profiles P1, P2, and P3 were classified into the subgroup Acrudoxic, into the subgroup Alic Hapludands, as they exhibited Al<sup>³</sup>⁺ saturation exceeding &gt;2 cmol kg<sup>-1</sup> with a thickness greater than of &gt;10 cm. Soil profile P4 was classified in the subgroup as Acrudoxic, indicating a indicates that the soil has very low effective CEC of less than &lt;2 cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>, The total amount of bases extracted from the fine soil fraction using NH4OAc and Al<sup>3+</sup> extracted with 1 N KCl of &lt; 2 cmol kg<sup>-1</sup>.</p><p>Strategies to reduce erosion and avert soil degradation involve the planting of shade trees in open-field regions. Incorporating shade trees into tea cultivation provides multiple advantages. Shade trees that provide both protection and nitrogen fixation include Crotalaria usaramoensis, C. anaggreoides, and Tephrosia sp. Once the plants exceed 1 meter in height, they should be pruned by 50 centimeters to prevent root interference with the tea plants. Shade trees undergo pruning every 4 to 6 months during the two rainy seasons, and with the resulting pruning utilize as mulch for the tea plants. This mulch serves to safeguard protect the soil against erosion. Relying solely on mulching is frequently inadequate; therefore, mulch derived from Guatemala grass, various grasses, and straw is essential. During the pruning of tea plants, the residual pruning are covering the plants. This offers multiple advantages, including shielding the soil from direct sunlight, reducing evaporation, thereby regulating surface temperatures, and mitigating erosion. Additionally, the residual pruning decompose serving, as a source of organic matter and nutrients in the soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Effendi et al., 2010)</xref>. In addition, research conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">Le et al. (2023)</xref> indicated that agroecological management practices, such as the use of organic manure, organic mulching, and integrated pest and disease management, led   higher net income for tea farmers in comparison to conventional management practices. The application of mulch derived from pruning residues is crucial, particularly in P2, which has the highest erosion levels and is characterized by the thinnest epipedon layer.</p><p>The preceding discussion reveals that all profiles exhibit deep soil layers, low base saturation values, elevated acidity levels, and high organic carbon content in the topsoil, with lower levels in the subsoil, aligning with the observed soil depth and low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. Profiles P1 and P4 exhibit robust, tea plant vigor and possess deep root systems. P4 demonstrated a lower bulk density and greater porosity compared to P1. Nonetheless, P1 exhibited a greater proportion of available water. Both profiles demonstrate acidic soil pH and low base saturation levels. Site P1 exhibits a clay loam texture, leading to a greater CEC compared to P4.  P4 exhibits a sandy loam texture and possesses elevated levels of organic carbon and nitrogen compared to P1. Each site has unique attributes that facilitate optimal tea growth.</p><p>In profile P2, characterized by enhanced plant vigor, the observed physical properties include low bulk density and high porosity. The organic carbon value is low, characterized by minimal organic matter content, and the upper solum is the thinnest relative to the other three profiles. The pruned tea canopy enhances soil surface exposure. This influences the decomposition of organic matter and enhances the weathering of minerals in the vicinity of profile P2. These conditions are also assessed as a nutrient source for tea plants, as indicated by the high and diverse mineral content. Profile P3 demonstrates poor tea plant vigor, exhibiting conditions that closely resemble those of the other three profiles. The findings suggest that the soil properties at the study site continue to facilities tea plant growth, health conditions of the plants. The soil characterized that underpin our findings indicates substantial mineral nutrient reserves with variability and a low C/N ratio.</p><p>The findings demonstrate deterioration in soil quality in tea plantations adjacent to the study area, likely attributable to land management practices that overlooking the intrinsic soil and site-specific attributes. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">Hafif (2020)</xref>, identifies topsoil thinning due to erosion as an indicator of plantation degradation, at the site. A deterioration of soil chemical properties has been observed, notably reduction in organic matter content, which subsequently affects other chemical attributes. Soil functionality remains adequate, bolstered by significant nutrient reserves in primary minerals. Land management strategies that account for the distinct characteristic of volcanic soils is crucial to mitigating degradation and ensuring sustained agricultural productivity over the long term.</p><table-wrap id="table-9"><label>Table 8.</label><caption><p>Pearson’s correlation of soil properties and yield.</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="2" align="center"><bold>Soil Profile</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Block</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Solum</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>BS</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>CEC</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>C-org.</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>N</bold></th><th scope="col" align="center"><bold>Yield</bold></th><th scope="col" colspan="4" align="center"><bold>Pearson's correlation</bold></th></tr><tr><th scope="col" align="center">Plantations</th><th scope="col" align="center">(cm)</th><th scope="col" align="center">(%)</th><th scope="col" align="center">(Cmol.kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th scope="col" colspan="2" align="center">(%)</th><th scope="col" align="center">ton/block</th><th scope="col" align="center">BS</th><th scope="col" align="center">CEC</th><th scope="col" align="center">C-org.</th><th scope="col" align="center">N</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center">Profile P1</td><td align="center">C-12</td><td align="center">0-18</td><td align="center">3,8</td><td align="center">32,39</td><td align="center">3,43</td><td align="center">0,27</td><td align="center">990,46</td><td align="center">-0,056</td><td align="center">0,091</td><td align="center">0,256</td><td align="center">0,227</td></tr><tr><td align="center">Profile P2</td><td align="center">C-10</td><td align="center">0-14</td><td align="center">12,00</td><td align="center">22,18</td><td align="center">5,72</td><td align="center">0,84</td><td align="center">384,17</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Profile P3</td><td align="center">C-9</td><td align="center">0-18</td><td align="center">13,00</td><td align="center">25,00</td><td align="center">6,69</td><td align="center">1,16</td><td align="center">1241,68</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td align="center">Profile P4</td><td align="center">C-4</td><td align="center">0-16</td><td align="center">11,00</td><td align="center">19,41</td><td align="center">6,99</td><td align="center">0,98</td><td align="center">1181,43</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="sec-21"><title>4.1. Relationship Topsoil Characteristics with Tea Plant Productivity</title><p>The Pearson coefficient correlation between base saturation and yield is –0.056 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-9">Table 8</xref>), suggesting an extremely weak and practically negligible association.  A value near zero indicates that variation in base saturation does not significantly affect tea production. The CEC shows a correlation of 0.091 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-9">Table 8</xref>), indicating a very weak association. This indicates that the soil’s capacity for cation retention and exchange is not a key factor influencing yield variation in the study area: rather, external factors such as microclimate, plant age, pruning intensity, or field management are likely to be more significant in determining productivity.</p><p>Soil organic carbon and nitrogen exhibit higher correlations with yield, recorded at 0.256 and 0.227, respectively. These values indicate weak relationships; however, they suggest a modest correlation between higher organic matter and nitrogen levels and increased production. This pattern corresponds with the functional roles of organic matter in enhancing soil structure, water retention, and nutrient availability, alongside the significance of nitrogen in promoting shoot growth in tea plants. Despite the low correlations, the impact of these soil properties on yield is minimal, indicating that productivity is primarily determined by agronomic practices and environmental conditions rather than the chemical soil characteristics assessed in this study.</p></sec><sec id="sec-22"><title>4.2. Limitations of Research and Plant Vigor</title><p>This research focuses exclusively on the physiological analysis of plant tissue. We sought to acquire soil properties and establish correlation with plant vigor. This study examined soil characteristics across various layers of a selected soil profile, correlating them with the vigor of tea plants and their respective locations. The vigor of the tea plant in this study was assessed based on the physiological characteristic of the leaves at the apex, specifically their color and physical shape. Healthy tea plants exhibit leaves that range from light to dark green, characterized by a symmetrical, smooth, and uniform shape, devoid of any damage. Tea plants exhibiting poor health display a combination of dark and light green leaves, accompanied by yellowish and brownish patches resulting from pest and disease infestations, as well as   wavy or curled leaf structures. Rejuvenated tea plants, resulting from pruning or rejuvenation, exhibit a light green coloration with predominantly bud-shaped leaves.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec-23"><title>5. CONCLUSION</title><p>Cultivation of tea on Andosols has resulted in notable chemical degradation, characterized by acidification, depletion of organic matter, diminished CEC, and a decline in of andic properties. No significant relationship was found between the health of tea plants and soil fertility properties. Consequently, it is posited that the health of tea plants at the study site is predominantly affected by external factors, including crop management practices and elevator temperatures linked to diminished canopy cover. This requires confirmation through future research involving tea plant tissue analysis. The observed changes indicate advanced weathering and diminished soil resilience in monoculture systems. Restorative management practices, including the addition of organic matter and balanced fertilization, are essential or preserving soil quality and ensuring sustained tea productivity.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of landscape fragmentation on soil quality and ecosystem services in land use and landform types</article-title><source>Environmental Earth Sciences</source><volume>81</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmadi Mirghaed</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Souri</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>330</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12665-022-10454-1</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ahmadi Mirghaed, F., &amp; Souri, B. (2022). Effect of landscape fragmentation on soil quality and ecosystem services in land use and landform types. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(12), 330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10454-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The Emergence and Development of Indigenous Tea Plantations in West Java, 1875–1941</article-title><source>KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities</source><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alatas</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wan Sulong</surname><given-names>W.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><page-range>39-58</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21315/kajh2020.27.2.3</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Alatas, A., &amp; Wan Sulong, W. S. (2020). The Emergence and Development of Indigenous Tea Plantations in West Java, 1875–1941. KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities, 27(2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2020.27.2.3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Long-term response of tropical Andisol properties to conversion from rainforest to agriculture</article-title><source>CATENA</source><volume>194</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anda</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dahlgren</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>104679</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2020.104679</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Anda, M., &amp; Dahlgren, R. A. (2020). Long-term response of tropical Andisol properties to conversion from rainforest to agriculture. CATENA, 194, 104679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104679</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Land use impacts on weathering, soil properties, and carbon storage in wet Andosols, Indonesia</article-title><source>Geoderma</source><volume>423</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anindita</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sleutel</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vandenberghe</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Grave</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vandenhende</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Finke</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>115963</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115963</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Anindita, S., Sleutel, S., Vandenberghe, D., De Grave, J., Vandenhende, V., &amp; Finke, P. (2022). Land use impacts on weathering, soil properties, and carbon storage in wet Andosols, Indonesia. Geoderma, 423, 115963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115963</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Pengaruh pemangkasan dan aplikasi sitokinin terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman teh (Camellia sinensis</article-title><source>Effect of Pruning and Cytokinin Application on the Growth and Yield of Tea (Camellia sinensis)]. Jurnal Tanaman Industri dan Penyegar</source><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anjarsari</surname><given-names>I.R.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamdani</surname><given-names>J.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suherman</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurmala</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Syahrian</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rahadi</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rezamela</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><page-range>61-63</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/11070" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Pengaruh pemangkasan dan aplikasi sitokinin terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman teh (Camellia sinensis">https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/11070</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Anjarsari, I. R. D., Hamdani, J. S., Suherman, C., Nurmala, T., Syahrian, H., Rahadi, V., &amp; Rezamela, E. (2019). Pengaruh pemangkasan dan aplikasi sitokinin terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman teh (Camellia sinensis) [Effect of Pruning and Cytokinin Application on the Growth and Yield of Tea (Camellia sinensis)]. Jurnal Tanaman Industri dan Penyegar, 6(2), 61-63. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/11070</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimizing biofertilizer application and fertilizing technique for enhanced tea plant growth and flavonoid composition after drought season</article-title><source>Research on Crops</source><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anjarsari</surname><given-names>I.R.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wiharti</surname><given-names>N.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maxiselly</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31830/2348-7542.2024.ROC-1105</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Anjarsari, I. R. D., Wiharti, N. R., &amp; Maxiselly, Y. (2024). Optimizing biofertilizer application and fertilizing technique for enhanced tea plant growth and flavonoid composition after drought season. Research on Crops, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2024.ROC-1105</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Biochar and leguminous cover crops as an alternative to summer fallowing for soil organic carbon and nutrient management in the wheat-maize-wheat cropping system under semiarid climate</article-title><source>Journal of Soils and Sediments</source><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arif</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ikramullah</surname><given-names>Jan</given-names></name><name><surname>T.</surname><given-names>Riaz</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Akhtar</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Ali</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1395</fpage><lpage>1407</lpage><page-range>1395-1407</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-020-02866-y</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arif, M., Ikramullah, Jan, T., Riaz, M., Akhtar, K., Ali, S., . . . Wang, H. (2021). Biochar and leguminous cover crops as an alternative to summer fallowing for soil organic carbon and nutrient management in the wheat-maize-wheat cropping system under semiarid climate. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 21(3), 1395-1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02866-y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Characteristics of Andisols Developed from Andesitic and Basaltic Volcanic Ash in Different Agro-Climatic Zones</article-title><source>Soil Systems</source><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arifin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Devnita</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anda</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goenadi</surname><given-names>D.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nugraha</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>78</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/soilsystems6040078</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arifin, M., Devnita, R., Anda, M., Goenadi, D. H., &amp; Nugraha, A. (2022). Characteristics of Andisols Developed from Andesitic and Basaltic Volcanic Ash in Different Agro-Climatic Zones. Soil Systems, 6(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6040078</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Kajian Hubungan Hara Tanah terhadap Produktivitas Tanaman Teh Produktif di Perkebunan Teh Pagar Alam</article-title><source>Sumatera Selatan [Study of the Relationship Between Soil Nutrients and the Productivity of Mature Tea Plants at the Pagar Alam Tea Plantation, South Sumatra]. JTSL (Jurnal Tanah dan Sumberdaya Lahan</source><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Azurianti</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wulansari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Athallah</surname><given-names>F.N.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prijono</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>161</lpage><page-range>153-161</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21776/ub.jtsl.2022.009.1.17</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Azurianti, A., Wulansari, R., Athallah, F. N. F., &amp; Prijono, S. (2022). Kajian Hubungan Hara Tanah terhadap Produktivitas Tanaman Teh Produktif di Perkebunan Teh Pagar Alam, Sumatera Selatan [Study of the Relationship Between Soil Nutrients and the Productivity of Mature Tea Plants at the Pagar Alam Tea Plantation, South Sumatra]. JTSL (Jurnal Tanah dan Sumberdaya Lahan), 9(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtsl.2022.009.1.17</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>From volcanic ash to abundant earth: understanding Andisol organic matter dynamics in relation to soil health on Hawaiʻi Island</article-title><source>Biogeochemistry</source><volume>168</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beckstrom</surname><given-names>T.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maaz</surname><given-names>T.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deenik</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Peter-Contesse</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Koch</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tallamy Glazer</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Crow</surname><given-names>S.E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>22</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-025-01216-9</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Beckstrom, T. B., Maaz, T. M., Deenik, J. L., Peter-Contesse, H., Koch, A., Tallamy Glazer, C., . . . Crow, S. E. (2025). From volcanic ash to abundant earth: understanding Andisol organic matter dynamics in relation to soil health on Hawaiʻi Island. Biogeochemistry, 168(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-025-01216-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="webpage"><article-title>Kabupaten Bogor Dalam Angka 2023 [Bogor Regency in Figures 2023</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>B.P.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><comment>Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bogor (Statistics of Bogor Regency).</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://bogorkab.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/ecc46f13dd34e43cfc1ffbdc/kabupaten-bogor-dalam-angka-2023.html" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Kabupaten Bogor Dalam Angka 2023 [Bogor Regency in Figures 2023">https://bogorkab.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/ecc46f13dd34e43cfc1ffbdc/kabupaten-bogor-dalam-angka-2023.html</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="webpage">BPS. (2023). Kabupaten Bogor Dalam Angka 2023 [Bogor Regency in Figures 2023]. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bogor (Statistics of Bogor Regency). https://bogorkab.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/ecc46f13dd34e43cfc1ffbdc/kabupaten-bogor-dalam-angka-2023.html</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The Climate of The Netherlands Indies</article-title><source>Verhandelingen</source><volume>8</volume><issue>1602</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Braak</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1929</year></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Braak, C. (1929). The Climate of The Netherlands Indies. Verhandelingen, 8(1602).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Chapter 9 - Management Strategies for Organic Vegetable Fertility</article-title><source>Safety and Practice for Organic Food</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brust</surname><given-names>G.E.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Biswas</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Micallef</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>212</lpage><page-range>193-212</page-range><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-812060-6.00009-X</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Brust, G. E. (2019). Chapter 9 - Management Strategies for Organic Vegetable Fertility. In D. Biswas &amp; S. A. Micallef (Eds.), Safety and Practice for Organic Food (pp. 193-212). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812060-6.00009-X</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="webpage"><article-title>Chemical, physical, and mineralogical characteristics for the soil data base</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buurman</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1990</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/chemical-physical-and-mineralogical-characteristics-for-the-soil-/" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Chemical, physical, and mineralogical characteristics for the soil data base">https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/chemical-physical-and-mineralogical-characteristics-for-the-soil-/</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="webpage">Buurman, P. (1990). Chemical, physical, and mineralogical characteristics for the soil data base. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/chemical-physical-and-mineralogical-characteristics-for-the-soil-/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Alteration, formation, and occurrence of minerals in soils</article-title><source>Handbook of Soil Sciences: Properties and Processes</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Churchman</surname><given-names>G.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lowe</surname><given-names>D.J.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>P.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sumner</surname><given-names>M.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><publisher-name>CRC press</publisher-name><edition>2nd</edition></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Churchman, G. J., &amp; Lowe, D. J. (2012). Alteration, formation, and occurrence of minerals in soils. In P. M. Huang, Y. Li, &amp; M. E. Sumner (Eds.), Handbook of Soil Sciences: Properties and Processes (2nd ed.). CRC press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Soil physical quality: Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth</article-title><source>Geoderma</source><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dexter</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>214</lpage><page-range>201-214</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.004</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dexter, A. R. (2004). Soil physical quality: Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma, 120(3), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Peta Geologi Lembar</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Effendi</surname><given-names>A.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kusnama</surname></name><name><surname>Hermanto</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><publisher-loc>Bogor, Jawa Barat</publisher-loc></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Effendi, A. C., Kusnama, &amp; Hermanto, B. (1998). Peta Geologi Lembar Bogor, Jawa Barat.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Budidaya dan Pascapanen Teh [Tea Cultivation and Postharvest Handling</article-title><source>Pusat Penelitian dan Perkembangan Perkebunan. Bogor</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Effendi</surname><given-names>D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Syakir</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yusron</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Wiratno</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.pertanian.go.id/server/api/core/bitstreams/08191407-1bdd-41e8-a6a3-f699f5b0903a/content" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Budidaya dan Pascapanen Teh [Tea Cultivation and Postharvest Handling">https://repository.pertanian.go.id/server/api/core/bitstreams/08191407-1bdd-41e8-a6a3-f699f5b0903a/content</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Effendi, D. S., Syakir, M., Yusron, M., &amp; Wiratno. (2010). Budidaya dan Pascapanen Teh [Tea Cultivation and Postharvest Handling]. Pusat Penelitian dan Perkembangan Perkebunan. Bogor. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/server/api/core/bitstreams/08191407-1bdd-41e8-a6a3-f699f5b0903a/content</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Analisis Sifat Kimia Tanah, Jaringan Tanaman, Air, dan Pupuk [Analysis of Soil Chemical Properties, Plant Tissue, Water, and Fertilizers</article-title><source>Soil Research Institute , Agricultural Research And Development Agency, Agricultural Ministry of Indonensia</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eviati</surname><given-names>Sulaeman</given-names></name><name><surname>Herawaty</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anggria</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Usman</surname><given-names>Tantika</given-names></name><name><surname>E.</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wuningrum</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2023</year><edition>3rd</edition><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/23044" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Analisis Sifat Kimia Tanah, Jaringan Tanaman, Air, dan Pupuk [Analysis of Soil Chemical Properties, Plant Tissue, Water, and Fertilizers">https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/23044</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Eviati, Sulaeman, Herawaty, L., Anggria, L., Usman, Tantika, H. E., . . . Wuningrum, P. (2023). Analisis Sifat Kimia Tanah, Jaringan Tanaman, Air, dan Pupuk [Analysis of Soil Chemical Properties, Plant Tissue, Water, and Fertilizers] (3rd ed.). Soil Research Institute , Agricultural Research And Development Agency, Agricultural Ministry of Indonensia. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/23044</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Hubungan Antara Perbedaan Kelas Kelerengan dengan Karakteristik Kimia Tanah pada Perkebunan Teh Jolotigo Lingkup PTPN</article-title><source>IX [Relationship Between Differences in Slope Classes and Soil Chemical Characteristics in the Jolotigo Tea Plantation under PTPN IX]. JTSL (Jurnal Tanah dan Sumberdaya Lahan</source><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Febriantika</surname><given-names>P.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Athallah</surname><given-names>F.N.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wulansari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suprayogo</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>171</fpage><lpage>179</lpage><page-range>171-179</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21776/ub.jtsl.2022.009.1.19</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Febriantika, P. T., Athallah, F. N. F., Wulansari, R., &amp; Suprayogo, D. (2022). Hubungan Antara Perbedaan Kelas Kelerengan dengan Karakteristik Kimia Tanah pada Perkebunan Teh Jolotigo Lingkup PTPN IX [Relationship Between Differences in Slope Classes and Soil Chemical Characteristics in the Jolotigo Tea Plantation under PTPN IX]. JTSL (Jurnal Tanah dan Sumberdaya Lahan), 9(1), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtsl.2022.009.1.19</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Carbon and Phosphorus in Volcanic Soils of Mt. Kerinci (Sumatra) After Long Term Tea and Paddy Cultivation</article-title><source>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</source><volume>54</volume><issue>22</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fiantis</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rudiyanto</surname><given-names>Gusnidar</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginting</surname><given-names>F.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Padrikal</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prayoga</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>3169</fpage><lpage>3184</lpage><page-range>3169-3184</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103624.2023.2253843</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fiantis, D., Rudiyanto, Gusnidar, Ginting, F. I., Padrikal, R., Prayoga, D., . . . Nelson, M. (2023). Carbon and Phosphorus in Volcanic Soils of Mt. Kerinci (Sumatra) After Long Term Tea and Paddy Cultivation. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 54(22), 3169-3184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2023.2253843</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Relations between soil organic carbon content and the pore size distribution for an arable topsoil with large variations in soil properties</article-title><source>European Journal of Soil Science</source><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukumasu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jarvis</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Koestel</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kätterer</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Larsbo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>13212</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.13212</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fukumasu, J., Jarvis, N., Koestel, J., Kätterer, T., &amp; Larsbo, M. (2022). Relations between soil organic carbon content and the pore size distribution for an arable topsoil with large variations in soil properties. European Journal of Soil Science, 73(1), e13212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13212</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Kerusakan tanah pada lahan perkebunan dan strategi pencegahan serta penanggulangannya [Soil Deterioration of Plantation Land and Strategies for Its Prevention and Handling</article-title><source>Perspektif</source><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hafif</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>121</lpage><page-range>105-121</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349119457" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Kerusakan tanah pada lahan perkebunan dan strategi pencegahan serta penanggulangannya [Soil Deterioration of Plantation Land and Strategies for Its Prevention and Handling">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349119457</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hafif, B. (2020). Kerusakan tanah pada lahan perkebunan dan strategi pencegahan serta penanggulangannya [Soil Deterioration of Plantation Land and Strategies for Its Prevention and Handling]. Perspektif, 19(2), 105-121. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349119457</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The Influence of Soil Texture Types on Land Resilience to Drought in South Nias</article-title><source>Jurnal Sapta Agrica</source><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harefa</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.57094/jsa.v4i1.2585</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Harefa, D. (2025). The Influence of Soil Texture Types on Land Resilience to Drought in South Nias. Jurnal Sapta Agrica, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.57094/jsa.v4i1.2585</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Estimated Stored Carbon Stock in Tea Plantation at Various Elevation</article-title><source>Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim</source><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heryana</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rokhmah</surname><given-names>D.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>162</lpage><page-range>155-162</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jti/article/view/3281" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Estimated Stored Carbon Stock in Tea Plantation at Various Elevation">https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jti/article/view/3281</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Heryana, N., &amp; Rokhmah, D. N. (2021). Estimated Stored Carbon Stock in Tea Plantation at Various Elevation. Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim, 45(2), 155-162. https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jti/article/view/3281</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The Pedogenesis of Soil Derived from Carbonate Rocks along a Climosequence in a Subtropical Mountain, China</article-title><source>Forests</source><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ci</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lian</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1044</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f12081044</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hu, J., Ci, E., Li, S., Lian, M., &amp; Zhong, S. (2021). The Pedogenesis of Soil Derived from Carbonate Rocks along a Climosequence in a Subtropical Mountain, China. Forests, 12(8), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081044</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Minerals, Primary</article-title><source>Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>P.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>M.K.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Hillel</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><fpage>500</fpage><lpage>510</lpage><page-range>500-510</page-range><publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00464-1</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Huang, P. M., &amp; Wang, M. K. (2005). Minerals, Primary. In D. Hillel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment (pp. 500-510). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00464-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Tea Plantation Dynamic in West Java Based on Productivity and Institutional Research [Land conversion, Tea Plantation, Tea Production</article-title><source>Indonesia Tea Export, Institutional Role</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ishak</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Sudarsono</given-names></name><name><surname>Widiatmaka</surname></name><name><surname>Yahya</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>7</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29313/mimbar.v33i1.2315</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ishak S, M., Sudarsono, Widiatmaka, &amp; Yahya, S. (2017). Tea Plantation Dynamic in West Java Based on Productivity and Institutional Research [Land conversion, Tea Plantation, Tea Production, Indonesia Tea Export, Institutional Role]. 2017, 7. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v33i1.2315</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>World reference base for soil resources</article-title><source>World Soil Resources Reports</source><issue>106</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>WRB</surname><given-names>I.U.S.S.Working Group</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><publisher-name>FAO</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc><ext-link xlink:href="https://isric.org/explore/wrb" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="World reference base for soil resources">https://isric.org/explore/wrb</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">IUSS Working Group WRB. (2015). World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps (Update 2015). World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome. https://isric.org/explore/wrb</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Diverse response of vegetation growth to multi-time-scale drought under different soil textures in China&#39;s pastoral areas</article-title><source>Journal of Environmental Management</source><volume>274</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>110992</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110992</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jiang, P., Ding, W., Yuan, Y., &amp; Ye, W. (2020). Diverse response of vegetation growth to multi-time-scale drought under different soil textures in China's pastoral areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 274, 110992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110992</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="webpage"><article-title>Sifat Fisika Tanah dan Metode Analisisnya [Soil Physical Properties and Their Methods of Analysis</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kurnia</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agus</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adimihardja</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rachman</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutono</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santri</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ariani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><edition>2nd</edition><comment>Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/22009" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Sifat Fisika Tanah dan Metode Analisisnya [Soil Physical Properties and Their Methods of Analysis">https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/22009</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="webpage">Kurnia, U., Agus, F., Adimihardja, A., Rachman, A., Sutono, S., Santri, J. A., &amp; Ariani, R. (2022). Sifat Fisika Tanah dan Metode Analisisnya [Soil Physical Properties and Their Methods of Analysis] (2nd ed.). Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/22009</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Sustainable green tea production through agroecological management and land conversion practices for restoring soil health, crop productivity and economic efficiency</article-title><source>Evidence from Northern Vietnam. Soil Use and Management</source><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Le</surname><given-names>V.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Herrmann</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bräu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesueur</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>1185</fpage><lpage>1204</lpage><page-range>1185-1204</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sum.12885</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Le, V. S., Herrmann, L., Bräu, L., &amp; Lesueur, D. (2023). Sustainable green tea production through agroecological management and land conversion practices for restoring soil health, crop productivity and economic efficiency: Evidence from Northern Vietnam. Soil Use and Management, 39(3), 1185-1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12885</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Slope Position Modulates Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Dynamics in Tea Plantation Ecosystems</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xia</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>538</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy15030538</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Li, L., Chen, L., Li, H., Xia, Y., Wang, H., Wang, Q., . . . Wang, B. (2025). Slope Position Modulates Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Dynamics in Tea Plantation Ecosystems. Agronomy, 15(3), 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030538</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Long-term NPK fertilization enhances microbial carbon use efficiency in Andosols by alleviating P limitation and shifting microbial strategies</article-title><source>Environmental Research</source><volume>277</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lyu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakai</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Toyota</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayashi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morigasaki</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugihara</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>121598</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2025.121598</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lyu, H., Sakai, K., Toyota, K., Hayashi, H., Morigasaki, S., Tanaka, H., &amp; Sugihara, S. (2025). Long-term NPK fertilization enhances microbial carbon use efficiency in Andosols by alleviating P limitation and shifting microbial strategies. Environmental Research, 277, 121598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121598</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Kajian Perkembangan Teh di Indonesia [A Review of Tea Development in Indonesia</article-title><source>AGRIFITIA : Journal of Agribusiness Plantation</source><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manumono</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Listiyani</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>146</lpage><page-range>133-146</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55180/aft.v2i2.281</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Manumono, D., &amp; Listiyani. (2023). Kajian Perkembangan Teh di Indonesia [A Review of Tea Development in Indonesia]. AGRIFITIA : Journal of Agribusiness Plantation, 2(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.55180/aft.v2i2.281</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effect of slope and altitude on soil characteristics in tea plantation area, Central Java, Indonesia</article-title><source>International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Plantation</source><volume>12</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marianti</surname><given-names>Pulungan</given-names></name><name><surname>J.</surname><given-names>N.A.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gunadi</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>154</fpage><lpage>160</lpage><page-range>154-160</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://ijafp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IJAFP12-069.pdf" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="The effect of slope and altitude on soil characteristics in tea plantation area, Central Java, Indonesia">https://ijafp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IJAFP12-069.pdf</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Marianti, Pulungan, N. A. H. J., &amp; Gunadi, R. (2021). The effect of slope and altitude on soil characteristics in tea plantation area, Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Plantation, 12, 154-160. https://ijafp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IJAFP12-069.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="thesis"><article-title>Pengaruh Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan terhadap Karakteristik Tanah dan Stabilitas Bahan Organik pada Tanah Vulkanik</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muslim</surname><given-names>R.Q.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><publisher-name>IPB University</publisher-name><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/135736" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Pengaruh Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan terhadap Karakteristik Tanah dan Stabilitas Bahan Organik pada Tanah Vulkanik">https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/135736</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Muslim, R. Q. (2024). Pengaruh Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan terhadap Karakteristik Tanah dan Stabilitas Bahan Organik pada Tanah Vulkanik [Master’s thesis, IPB University]. https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/135736</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Karakteristik Mineral Pasir Tanah Vulkanik Sebagai Cadangan Hara Untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas Tanah</article-title><source>Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Pertanian Indonesia (STPI</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muslim</surname><given-names>R.Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suryaningtyas</surname><given-names>D.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Subiksa</surname><given-names>I.G.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mulyanto</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://prosiding-stpi.ub.ac.id/index.php/stpi2023/article/view/67" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Karakteristik Mineral Pasir Tanah Vulkanik Sebagai Cadangan Hara Untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas Tanah">https://prosiding-stpi.ub.ac.id/index.php/stpi2023/article/view/67</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Muslim, R. Q., Suryaningtyas, D. T., Subiksa, I. G. M., &amp; Mulyanto, B. (2024). Karakteristik Mineral Pasir Tanah Vulkanik Sebagai Cadangan Hara Untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas Tanah. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Pertanian Indonesia (STPI). https://prosiding-stpi.ub.ac.id/index.php/stpi2023/article/view/67</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of land use change on soil chemical properties in Gede-Pangrango volcanic soil, West Java</article-title><source>Indonesia [Article]. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology</source><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muslim</surname><given-names>R.Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suryaningtyas</surname><given-names>D.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Subiksa</surname><given-names>I.G.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mulyanto</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>8</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><page-range>8-15</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105001951745&amp;partnerID=40&amp;md5=a7784771b6d1fbb2a05b66735d753975" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Effect of land use change on soil chemical properties in Gede-Pangrango volcanic soil, West Java">https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105001951745&amp;partnerID=40&amp;md5=a7784771b6d1fbb2a05b66735d753975</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Muslim, R. Q., Suryaningtyas, D. T., Subiksa, I. G. M., &amp; Mulyanto, B. (2025). Effect of land use change on soil chemical properties in Gede-Pangrango volcanic soil, West Java, Indonesia [Article]. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 47(1), 8-15. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105001951745&amp;partnerID=40&amp;md5=a7784771b6d1fbb2a05b66735d753975</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Karakteristik Tanah-Tanah Bersifat Andik dari Bahan Piroklastis Masam di Dataran Tinggi Toba [Characteristics of Andic Soils Derived from Acidic Pyroclastic Materials in the Toba Highlands</article-title><source>Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim</source><volume>29</volume><issue>2009</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prasetyo</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suharta</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yatno</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><page-range>1-14</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.pertanian.go.id/server/api/core/bitstreams/8c1269f3-afc0-464c-962a-b0ece694cd60/content" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Karakteristik Tanah-Tanah Bersifat Andik dari Bahan Piroklastis Masam di Dataran Tinggi Toba [Characteristics of Andic Soils Derived from Acidic Pyroclastic Materials in the Toba Highlands">https://repository.pertanian.go.id/server/api/core/bitstreams/8c1269f3-afc0-464c-962a-b0ece694cd60/content</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Prasetyo, B., Suharta, N., &amp; Yatno, E. (2009). Karakteristik Tanah-Tanah Bersifat Andik dari Bahan Piroklastis Masam di Dataran Tinggi Toba [Characteristics of Andic Soils Derived from Acidic Pyroclastic Materials in the Toba Highlands]. Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim, 29(2009), 1-14. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/server/api/core/bitstreams/8c1269f3-afc0-464c-962a-b0ece694cd60/content</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Pengaruh Luas Lahan Teh dan Produktivitas Teh terhadap Ekspor Teh di Indonesia Tahun 1985 sampai 2019 [The Influence of Tea Plantation Area and Tea Productivity on Tea Exports in Indonesia from 1985 to 2019</article-title><source>Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Unimal</source><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pratiwi</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Andriyani</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><page-range>29-37</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29103/jepu.v4i1.4436</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pratiwi, S. A., &amp; Andriyani, D. (2021). Pengaruh Luas Lahan Teh dan Produktivitas Teh terhadap Ekspor Teh di Indonesia Tahun 1985 sampai 2019 [The Influence of Tea Plantation Area and Tea Productivity on Tea Exports in Indonesia from 1985 to 2019]. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Unimal, 4(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.29103/jepu.v4i1.4436</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Assessing Pruning Intensity to Improve the Tea Productivity in Tropical Plantations by Multispectral Image Classification Model Using K-Means Algorithm</article-title><source>International Journal of Plant &amp; Soil Science</source><volume>35</volume><issue>23</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramadhan</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Devnita</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arifin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>464</fpage><lpage>473</lpage><page-range>464-473</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i234263</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ramadhan, I., Devnita, R., &amp; Arifin, M. (2023). Assessing Pruning Intensity to Improve the Tea Productivity in Tropical Plantations by Multispectral Image Classification Model Using K-Means Algorithm. International Journal of Plant &amp; Soil Science, 35(23), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i234263</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Petunjuk Teknis Evaluasi Lahan untuk Komoditas Pertanian [Technical Guidelines for Land Evaluation for Agricultural Commodities</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ritung</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nugroho</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mulyani</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suryani</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><publisher-name>Indonesian Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development (BBSDLP</publisher-name></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Ritung, S., Nugroho, K., Mulyani, A., &amp; Suryani, E. (2011). Petunjuk Teknis Evaluasi Lahan untuk Komoditas Pertanian [Technical Guidelines for Land Evaluation for Agricultural Commodities]. Indonesian Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development (BBSDLP).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Rainfall types based on wet and dry period ratios for Indonesia with Western New Guinea</article-title><source>Verhandelingen, Djawatan Meteorologi dan Geofisik</source><issue>42)</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmidt</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferguson</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1951</year><page-range>77</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19510600016" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Rainfall types based on wet and dry period ratios for Indonesia with Western New Guinea">https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19510600016</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schmidt, F., &amp; Ferguson, J. (1951). Rainfall types based on wet and dry period ratios for Indonesia with Western New Guinea. Verhandelingen, Djawatan Meteorologi dan Geofisik, Djakarta(No. 42), 77. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19510600016</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The Relationship between Climate and Productivity of Tea Plants (Camellia sinensis L</article-title><source>Bah-Butong Gardens PT. Perkebunan Nusantara IV, North Sumatra Province in 2005-2009. Jurnal Online Pertanian Tropik</source><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siahaan</surname><given-names>A.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Irsal</surname></name><name><surname>Sitorus</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><page-range>1-8</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32734/jopt.v11i2.17559</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Siahaan, A. J., Irsal, &amp; Sitorus, B. (2024). The Relationship between Climate and Productivity of Tea Plants (Camellia sinensis L.) in Bah-Butong Gardens PT. Perkebunan Nusantara IV, North Sumatra Province in 2005-2009. Jurnal Online Pertanian Tropik, 11(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32734/jopt.v11i2.17559</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Keys to Soil Taxonomy</article-title><source>Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Staff</surname><given-names>Soil Survey</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Keys-to-Soil-Taxonomy.pdf" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Keys to Soil Taxonomy">https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Keys-to-Soil-Taxonomy.pdf</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Soil Survey Staff. (2022). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Keys-to-Soil-Taxonomy.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Petunjuk Teknis Klasifikasi Tanah Nasional [Technical Guidelines for National Soil Classification</article-title><source>Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Subardja</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ritung</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anda</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sukarman</surname><given-names>Suryani</given-names></name><name><surname>E.</surname></name><name><surname>Subandiono</surname><given-names>R.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/20639" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Petunjuk Teknis Klasifikasi Tanah Nasional [Technical Guidelines for National Soil Classification">https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/20639</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Subardja, D., Ritung, S., Anda, M., Sukarman, Suryani, E., &amp; Subandiono, R. E. (2014). Petunjuk Teknis Klasifikasi Tanah Nasional [Technical Guidelines for National Soil Classification]. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/20639</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Pedoman Pengamatan Tanah di Lapangan [Guidelines for Field Soil Observation</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sukarman</surname><given-names>Ritung</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Anda</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname></name><name><surname>Suryani</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><publisher-name>IAARD Press</publisher-name><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/20124" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Pedoman Pengamatan Tanah di Lapangan [Guidelines for Field Soil Observation">https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/20124</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Sukarman, Ritung, S., Anda, M., &amp; Suryani, E. (2017). Pedoman Pengamatan Tanah di Lapangan [Guidelines for Field Soil Observation]. IAARD Press. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/20124</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The Influence of Climate on Tea Crop Productivity (Camellia sinensis L.) in the Bah Butong plantation 2000-2004</article-title><source>JURNAL AGROTEKNOLOGI</source><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Surbakti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Irsal</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>6</lpage><page-range>1-6</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32734/ja.v12i1.18758</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Surbakti, E., &amp; Irsal. (2024). The Influence of Climate on Tea Crop Productivity (Camellia sinensis L.) in the Bah Butong plantation 2000-2004. JURNAL AGROTEKNOLOGI, 12(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.32734/ja.v12i1.18758</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Phosphorus availability and soil biological activity in an Andosol under compost application and winter cover cropping</article-title><source>Applied Soil Ecology</source><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takeda</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakamoto</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyazawa</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murayama</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Okada</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><fpage>86</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><page-range>86-95</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.02.003</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Takeda, M., Nakamoto, T., Miyazawa, K., Murayama, T., &amp; Okada, H. (2009). Phosphorus availability and soil biological activity in an Andosol under compost application and winter cover cropping. Applied Soil Ecology, 42(2), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.02.003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The andosols in Indonesia</article-title><source>Soil Science</source><volume>99</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>K.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1965</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/28517" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="The andosols in Indonesia">https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/28517</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tan, K. H. (1965). The andosols in Indonesia. Soil Science, 99(5). http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/28517</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-52"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effectiveness of glyphosate potassium 660 g/L herbicide in controlling weeds at productive tea plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O</article-title><source>Kuntze). Research on Crops</source><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Umiyati</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurniadie</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fakhriah</surname><given-names>R.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31830/2348-7542.2024.ROC-1027</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Umiyati, U., Kurniadie, D., &amp; Fakhriah, R. L. (2024). Effectiveness of glyphosate potassium 660 g/L herbicide in controlling weeds at productive tea plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). Research on Crops, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2024.ROC-1027</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-53"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Calculated Soil Moisture and Temperature Regimes of Africa</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wambeke</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1982</year><publisher-loc>Soil Conservation Service, USDA</publisher-loc></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">van Wambeke, A. (1982). Calculated Soil Moisture and Temperature Regimes of Africa. Soil Conservation Service, USDA.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-54"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Enhancing Soil Resilience to Climate Change: Long-Term Effects of Organic Amendments on Soil Thermal and Physical Properties in Tea-Cultivated Ultisols</article-title><source>Sustainability</source><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vidana Gamage</surname><given-names>D.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Peiris</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kasthuriarachchi</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohotti</surname><given-names>K.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Biswas</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>1184</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su17031184</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vidana Gamage, D. N., Peiris, T., Kasthuriarachchi, I., Mohotti, K. M., &amp; Biswas, A. (2025). Enhancing Soil Resilience to Climate Change: Long-Term Effects of Organic Amendments on Soil Thermal and Physical Properties in Tea-Cultivated Ultisols. Sustainability, 17(3), 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031184</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-55"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Sifat-Sifat Tanah, Tingkat Pelapukan, Pedogenesis dan Klasifikasi Andosol Menurut Taksonomi Tanah pada Suatu Transek Lereng di Perkebunan Teh Gunung Mas/Cikopo Selatan</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wahyudin</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1989</year><publisher-name>IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>PTP XII, Cisarua Bogor [Under</publisher-loc><ext-link xlink:href="https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/30253" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Sifat-Sifat Tanah, Tingkat Pelapukan, Pedogenesis dan Klasifikasi Andosol Menurut Taksonomi Tanah pada Suatu Transek Lereng di Perkebunan Teh Gunung Mas/Cikopo Selatan">https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/30253</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Wahyudin, D. (1989). Sifat-Sifat Tanah, Tingkat Pelapukan, Pedogenesis dan Klasifikasi Andosol Menurut Taksonomi Tanah pada Suatu Transek Lereng di Perkebunan Teh Gunung Mas/Cikopo Selatan, PTP XII, Cisarua Bogor [Under, IPB University]. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/30253</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-56"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Status and influential factors of soil nutrients and acidification in Chinese tea plantations: a meta-analysis</article-title><source>SOIL</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>191</lpage><page-range>175-191</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/soil-11-175-2025</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wang, D., Liu, B., Li, F., Wang, Z., Hou, J., Cao, R., . . . Yang, W. (2025). Status and influential factors of soil nutrients and acidification in Chinese tea plantations: a meta-analysis. SOIL, 11(1), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-175-2025</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-57"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Soil Organic Carbon Content and Its Relationship with the Stand Age in Tea Plantations (Camellia sinensis L.) in Fujian Province, China</article-title><source>Land</source><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>834</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land13060834</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wang, M., Zhao, J., Chen, J., Zhang, X., &amp; Zhu, S. (2024). Soil Organic Carbon Content and Its Relationship with the Stand Age in Tea Plantations (Camellia sinensis L.) in Fujian Province, China. Land, 13(6), 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060834</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-58"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>The Nature and Properties of Soils</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weil</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brady</surname><given-names>N.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><publisher-name>Pearson Education</publisher-name></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Weil, R. R., &amp; Brady, N. C. (2016). The Nature and Properties of Soils. Pearson Education.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-59"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Karakteristik andisol berbahan induk breksi dan lahar dari bagian timur laut Gunung Gede, Jawa Barat [Characteristics of Andesols Derived from Breccia and Lahar Parent Materials from the Northeastern Part of Mount Gede, West Java</article-title><source>Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim</source><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wibisono</surname><given-names>M.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sudarsono</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Darmawan</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>70</lpage><page-range>61-70</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jti/article/view/3164" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Karakteristik andisol berbahan induk breksi dan lahar dari bagian timur laut Gunung Gede, Jawa Barat [Characteristics of Andesols Derived from Breccia and Lahar Parent Materials from the Northeastern Part of Mount Gede, West Java">https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jti/article/view/3164</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wibisono, M. G., Sudarsono, S., &amp; Darmawan, D. (2016). Karakteristik andisol berbahan induk breksi dan lahar dari bagian timur laut Gunung Gede, Jawa Barat [Characteristics of Andesols Derived from Breccia and Lahar Parent Materials from the Northeastern Part of Mount Gede, West Java]. Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim, 40(1), 61-70. https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jti/article/view/3164</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-60"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A cover crop and no-tillage system for enhancing soil health by increasing soil organic matter in soybean cultivation</article-title><source>Soil and Tillage Research</source><volume>205</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wulanningtyas</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakagami</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishiwaki</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Komatsuzaki</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>104749</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2020.104749</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wulanningtyas, H. S., Gong, Y., Li, P., Sakagami, N., Nishiwaki, J., &amp; Komatsuzaki, M. (2021). A cover crop and no-tillage system for enhancing soil health by increasing soil organic matter in soybean cultivation. Soil and Tillage Research, 205, 104749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104749</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-61"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of slope and year of pruning of tea plants on soil water content in Indonesian tea plantations [journal article</article-title><source>Soil Science Annual</source><volume>73</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wulansari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Athallah</surname><given-names>F.N.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pramudita</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><page-range>1-7</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37501/soilsa/157103</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wulansari, R., Athallah, F. N. F., &amp; Pramudita, A. A. (2022). Effect of slope and year of pruning of tea plants on soil water content in Indonesian tea plantations [journal article]. Soil Science Annual, 73(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.37501/soilsa/157103</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-62"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Analisis pengaruh topografi lereng dan waktu pemangkasan terhadap kesuburan tanah di perkebunan teh, Jawa Barat [Analysis of the Effects of Slope Topography and Pruning Time on Soil Fertility in Tea Plantations, West Java</article-title><source>Jurnal Pengelolaan Perkebunan (JPP</source><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wulansari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huga</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>74</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><page-range>74-80</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://ojs.polteklpp.ac.id/index.php/JPP/article/view/64" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Analisis pengaruh topografi lereng dan waktu pemangkasan terhadap kesuburan tanah di perkebunan teh, Jawa Barat [Analysis of the Effects of Slope Topography and Pruning Time on Soil Fertility in Tea Plantations, West Java">https://ojs.polteklpp.ac.id/index.php/JPP/article/view/64</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wulansari, R., &amp; Huga, A. (2024). Analisis pengaruh topografi lereng dan waktu pemangkasan terhadap kesuburan tanah di perkebunan teh, Jawa Barat [Analysis of the Effects of Slope Topography and Pruning Time on Soil Fertility in Tea Plantations, West Java]. Jurnal Pengelolaan Perkebunan (JPP), 5(2), 74-80. https://ojs.polteklpp.ac.id/index.php/JPP/article/view/64</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-63"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Degradasi bahan organik di beberapa perkebunan teh di Jawa Barat [Analysis of the Effects of Slope Topography and Pruning Time on Soil Fertility in Tea Plantations, West Java</article-title><source>Jurnal Penelitian Teh dan Kina</source><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wulansari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pranoto</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><page-range>57-64</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://tcrjournal.com/index.php/tcrj/article/view/144" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Degradasi bahan organik di beberapa perkebunan teh di Jawa Barat [Analysis of the Effects of Slope Topography and Pruning Time on Soil Fertility in Tea Plantations, West Java">https://tcrjournal.com/index.php/tcrj/article/view/144</ext-link></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wulansari, R., &amp; Pranoto, E. (2018). Degradasi bahan organik di beberapa perkebunan teh di Jawa Barat [Analysis of the Effects of Slope Topography and Pruning Time on Soil Fertility in Tea Plantations, West Java]. Jurnal Penelitian Teh dan Kina, 21(2), 57-64. https://tcrjournal.com/index.php/tcrj/article/view/144</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-64"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Karakteristik sifat fisik andisols typic melanudands pada beberapa kemiringan lereng di perkebunan teh gambung</article-title><source>Jawa barat [Physical Characteristics of Typic Melanudands Andisols across Different Slope Gradients in the Gambung Tea Plantation</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wulansari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pranoto</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saragih</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><comment>West Java]. Jurnal Pengelolaan Perkebunan (JPP), 3(1).</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54387/jpp.v3i1.11</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Wulansari, R., Pranoto, E., &amp; Saragih, J. (2022). Karakteristik sifat fisik andisols typic melanudands pada beberapa kemiringan lereng di perkebunan teh gambung, Jawa barat [Physical Characteristics of Typic Melanudands Andisols across Different Slope Gradients in the Gambung Tea Plantation, West Java]. Jurnal Pengelolaan Perkebunan (JPP), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.54387/jpp.v3i1.11</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-65"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Micromorphological characteristics of soils developed on volcanic ash in Lembang area, West Java, Indonesia</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source><volume>648</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yatno</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hikmat</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suryani</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>012005</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/648/1/012005</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yatno, E., Hikmat, M., &amp; Suryani, E. (2021). Micromorphological characteristics of soils developed on volcanic ash in Lembang area, West Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 648(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/648/1/012005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-66"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Improvement of soil acidification in tea plantations by long-term use of organic fertilizers and its effect on tea yield and quality [Original Research</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>13</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>-2022</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1055900</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ye, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Hong, L., Jia, X., Kang, J., . . . Wang, H. (2022). Improvement of soil acidification in tea plantations by long-term use of organic fertilizers and its effect on tea yield and quality [Original Research]. Frontiers in Plant Science, Volume 13 - 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1055900</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="BIBR-67"><citation-alternatives><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Dynamics of soil organic carbon mineralization in tea plantations converted from farmland at Western Sichuan, China</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>0185271</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0185271</pub-id></element-citation><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zhu, R., Zheng, Z., Li, T., Zhang, X., He, S., Wang, Y., . . . Li, W. (2017). Dynamics of soil organic carbon mineralization in tea plantations converted from farmland at Western Sichuan, China. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0185271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185271</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>