ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 55/PUU-XVII/2019 TERKAIT DESAIN PEMILIHAN UMUM SERENTAK GUNA MEWUJUDKAN PENYELENGGARAAN PEMILIHAN UMUM YANG DEMOKRATIS
Abstract
This research aims to identify and examines issues related to the law interpretation used in the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019 and to analyze the extent to which this verdict has fulfilled the principles of democratic general election in order to formulate an ideal construction model of concurrent election to manifest a democratic election. The type of research in this article is normative or doctrinal and is a descriptive analytical legal research. The result shows that in the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019, the Constitutional Judge in interpreting uses historical and functional interpretation on which is the basis for expanding the meaning of concurrent election into 6 (six) variants of concurrent election design. Thereafter, in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019, there are several variants of concurrent election designs that do not yet fulfill the elements and principles of democratic election management. Based on various studies and considerations, it is necessary to reconstruct the concurrent election model through the division of national concurrent election and local concurrent election.
Keywords : Constitutional Court Verdict Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019, Concurrent Election, Interpretation, Democratic Election
References
Buku
- Agus Riwanto, Hukum Partai Politik dan Hukum Pemilu di Indonesia, Yogyakarta : Thafa Media.
- Aminuddin Ilmar, Hukum Tata Pemerintahan, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
- Janedjri M. Gaffar, Demokrasi dan Pemilu di Indonesia, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
- International IDEA, International Electoral Standards, Guidelines for Reviewing the Legal Framework of Elections, Stockholm : International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2002.
- Tim Penyusun, Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 : Buku V Pemilihan Umum (ed revisi), Jakarta : Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Jurnal
- Mardian Wibowo, “Menakar Konstitusionalitas Sebuah Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 12, Nomor 2, Juni 2015.
- Muhammad Jufri, “Konstitusionalitas Periodeisasi Pemilu Serentak Analisa Terhadap Beberapa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Pengawasan Pemilu, April 2020.
- Ramlan Surbakti, “Understanding the Flaws in Indonesia's Electoral Democracy”, Strategic Review : The Indonesian Journal of Leadership Policy and World Affairs, Volume 4, Nomor 1, Januari-Maret 2014.
- Ratnia Solihah, “Peluang dan Tantangan Pemilu Serentak 2019 dalam Perspektif Politik”, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, Volume 3, Nomor 1, 2018.
- Ria Casmi Arrsa, “Pemilu Serentak dan Masa Depan Konsolidasi Demokrasi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 11, Nomor 3, September 2014.
Scott Mainwaring, “Presidentialism, Multipartiism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination”. Comparative Political Studies, Volume 26, Nomor 2, Juli 1993.
- Suanro, “Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam Tafsir Mahkamah Konstitusi: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 43/PUU-XIII/2015”, Jurnal Yudisial, Volume 9, Nomor 2, Agustus 2016.
- Syarifuddin Jurdi, “Format Pemilu Serentak Pasca Putusan MK No. 55/2019: Kajian dan Analisis dengan Perspektif Sosiologi Politik”, Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, Volume 15, Nomor 1, Oktober 2020.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
- Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
- Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
- Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU-XVII/2019.
- Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
