PENGATURAN FUNGSI PENGAWASAN INTERNAL TERHADAP HAKIM KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN YANG MERDEKA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 1-2/PUU-XII/2014)

Himawan Achmad Sarif, Sunny Ummul Firdaus

Abstract

This writing aims to analyze the regulation of internal supervisory functions of Constitutional Justices as an effort to realize independent judicial power and to analyze the implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 1-2 / PUU-XII / 2014 on the implementation of supervision of Constitutional Justices.

This type of research is normative legal research that is prescriptive which is using a statutory approach, case approach, historical approach and conceptual approach. Sourceof legal materials of this research were obtained from primary legal materials and secondary legal materials that relating to legal issues reviewed. Primary legal materials used in the form of legislation and judgment decisions, while the secondary legal materials used in the form of publications about the law that is not an official document. Techniques of collecting legal materials used are document studies or literature studies which are then analyzed using the deduction method.

Based on the result of the research, it is concluded that the supervision of Constitutional Justice is initially in the form of internal and external supervision which arrangement based on Law Number 24 Year 2003 and Article 24B of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 which is further regulated in Law Number 22 Year 2004. The arrangement is changed due to the Decision The Constitutional Court Number 005/PUU-IV/2006 which makes internal controls the only supervisory system of Constitutional Justices, thereafter the supervision of the Constitutional Justices underwent several dynamics of change in order to establish effective oversight. In 2013 the Court experienced a tremendous crisis that resulted in the loss of public confidence. In response to that the government enacted Perpu No. 1 of 2013 which was then ratified into Law No. 4 of 2014. However, the law was revoked by the Constitutional based on the Constitutional Court’s  Decision Number 1-2/PUU-XII/2014. The implication of the decision is the re-enactment of Law Number 8 Year 2011 and the supervision of Constitutional Court Justice is further stipulated in PMK Number Year 2014.

Keywords

Arrangement; Supervision of Constitutional Justice

Full Text:

PDF

References

Dri Utari Christina Rachmawati dan Ismail Hasani (ed). Masa Depan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Naskah Konferensi Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pemajuan Hak Konstitusional Warga. Jakarta: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. 2007. Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Idul Rishan. 2013. Komisi Yudisial: Suatu Upaya Mewujudkan Wibawa Peradilan. Yogyakarta: Genta Press.

Inggried Dwi Wedhaswary. Melihat Lagi Catatan Refly Harun, "MK Masih Bersih?". http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2013/10/03/0837290/Melihat.Lagi.Catatan. Refly.Harun.MK.Masih.Bersih[diakses pada tanggal 24 Mei 2015 pukul 11.28

WIB].

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 2004. Cetak Biru Membangun Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Institusi Peradilan Konstitusi yang Modern dan Terpercaya. Jakarta: MK RI.

Mohammad Fajrul Falaakh (ed). 2008. Gagasan Amandemen UUD 1945 Suatu rekomendasi. Jakarta: Komisi Hukum Nasional RI.

Ni’matul Huda. 2011. Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: FH UII PRESS.

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 10/PMK/2006 tentang Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 9/PMK/2006 tentang Pemberlakuan

Deklarasi Kode Etik dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi.

Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2011. Penelitian Hukum. jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 1-2/PUU-XII/2014

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-IX/2011.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006.

Slamet Sampurno Soewondo. 2014. Eksistensi Hakim dalam Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education.

Titik Triwulan Tutik. 2012 “Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Sistem Pengawasan Hakim Menurut Undang-undang Dasar Negara RI 1945” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Volume 12 No. 2 Edisi Mei 2012. Surabaya: Fakultas Syari’ah IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Menjadi Undang-Undang.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 1999 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1970 tentang Ketentuan Ketentuan Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang kekuasaan kehakiman.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/respublica.v2i1.45494

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.