Sustainability-oriented Innovation pada Kampung Kreatif Dago dengan Pendekatan Actor Network Theory

Hediyati Anisia Sinamo

Abstract

Inovasi muncul dalam diskusi pembangunan sebagai sarana untuk meningkatkan kualitas hidup dan mengubah kebiasaan masyarakat, salah satunya inovasi berorientasi keberlanjutan atau Sustainability Oriented Innovation (SOI). Konsep SOI melihat inovasi dan mempertimbangkan keberlanjutan dari perspektif sosial, lingkungan, dan ekonomi merupakan proses yang melibatkan pemangku kepentingan yang saling berinteraksi. Fenomena Kampung Kreatif Dago Pojok menggambarkan konteks lain dari Sustainability-Oriented Innovation (SOI), yang mengacu pada inovasi untuk mencapai keberlanjutan ekonomi melalui upaya yang meminimalisir degradasi lingkungan dan kesenjangan sosial. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi peran aktor dalam perkembangan SOI di kampung kreatif di Kota Bandung, dengan studi kasus Kampung Kreatif Dago Pojok. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus dengan logika deduktif. Data primer melalui wawancara serta observasi dan data sekunder dianalisis dengan metode analisis isi (content analysis) dan analisis jejaring aktor dengan pendekatan actor-network theory (ANT). Temuan menunjukkan bahwa antar aktor memiliki keterlibatan yang digambarkan melalui perspektif aktor-jaringan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis yang dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan adanya peran aktor dalam perkembangan SOI di Kampung Kreatif Dago Pojok, yang terlihat pada empat tahapan yakni Problematisation, Interessement, Enrollment, dan Mobilisation.

Keywords

Actor Network Theory; Kampung Kreatif; Sustainability Oriented Innovation

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1]Michel A, Hudon M. Community currencies and sustainable development: A systematic review. Ecological Economics 2015;116:160–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.023.

[2]Westley F, Olsson P, Folke C, Homer-Dixon T, Vredenburg H, Loorbach D, et al. Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation. Ambio 2011;40:762–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9.

[3]Adams R, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J, Denyer D, Overy P. Sustainability‐oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews 2016;18:180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068.

[4]Altenburg T, Pegels A. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Systems: Managing the Green Transformation. Innovation and Development 2 (1), (Special Issue: Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Systems in China and India) 2012.

[5]Utami S, Sofhani TF. Proses pembentukan kampung kreatif (Studi kasus: Kampung Dago Pojok dan Cicukang, Kota Bandung). Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota A SAPPK 2014;3:147–55.

[6]Agung Wisesa K, Adhi Gunadi IM, P. Mbulu Y. CREATIVITY BASED TOURISM IN KAMPUNG KREATIF DAGO POJOK BANDUNG. Journal of Tourism Destination and Attraction 2018;6:15–24. https://doi.org/10.35814/tourism.v6i1.760.

[7]Harsanto B, Permana CT. Sustainability-oriented innovation (SOI) in the cultural village: an actor-network perspective in the case of Laweyan Batik Village. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 2021;11:297–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2019-0102.

[8]Erlandsson A, Gaylong R. Navigating Sustainability Oriented Innovation Processes 2019.

[9]Harsanto B, Permana C. Understanding Sustainability-oriented Innovation (SOI) Using Network Perspective in Asia Pacific and ASEAN: A Systematic Review. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) 2019;7:1. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v7i1.5756.

[10]Lynch J, Eilam E, Fluker M, Augar N. Community-based environmental monitoring goes to school: translations, detours and escapes. Environ Educ Res 2017;23:708–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1182626.

[11]Chen H-W, Lin F-R. Evolving Obligatory Passage Points to Sustain Service Systems: The Case of Traditional Market Revitalization in Hsinchu City, Taiwan. Sustainability 2018;10:2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072540.

[12]Aka KG. Actor-network theory to understand, track and succeed in a sustainable innovation development process. J Clean Prod 2019;225:524–40.

[13]Whiteman G, Kennedy S. Sustainability as process. The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies London: SAGE 2016:417–31.

[14]Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociol Rev 1984;32:196–233.

[15]Payne L. Visualization in analysis: developing ANT Analysis Diagrams (AADs). Qualitative Research 2017;17:118–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116661229.

[16]Grimaldi E, Barzanò G. Making Sense of the Educational Present: Problematising the ‘merit Turn’ in the Italian Eduscape. European Educational Research Journal 2014;13:26–46. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.1.26.

[17]Zhou Ping. A Strategy for Knowledge Management in E-Government. 2008 International Seminar on Business and Information Management, IEEE; 2008, p. 222–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBIM.2008.30.

[18]Wang H, Ran B. Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review 2023;25:1187–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389.

[19]Uden L, Francis J. Service Innovation Using Actor Network Theory. Actor-Network Theory and Technology Innovation, IGI Global; 2011, p. 20–40. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-197-3.ch002.

[20]Inigo EA, Ritala P, Albareda L. Networking for sustainability: Alliance capabilities and sustainability-oriented innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 2020;89:550–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.06.010.

[21]Klewitz J, Hansen E. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation in SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review of Existing Practices and Actors Involved. 2011.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v20i1.88019

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.