Relationship of social characteristics and local economic development (LED) activity for slum upgrading in Batik Thematic Village Semarang City

Astrini Dewi Ulamdhani, Sunarti Sunarti

Abstract

The process of LED activities that starts from access to raw material, production, and product marketing will have an impact on the quality of settlements. The aspects of slum handling  affected by LED activities include: 1) street, 2) waste, and 3) garbage. The LED activities in this research are focused on 1) the business length and 2) income. The two variables of LED activity and slum handling will be assessed for correlation with social characteristics including: 1) gender, 2) education, 3) length of stay, and 4) family income. Research location is in Batik Thematic Village, Semarang City. The problems at the location in the form of environmental impacts due to the LED activities have not been supported by the involvement of LED actors. The non-optimal participation of LED actors can be seen from the lack of communal WWTP and waste banks. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of social characteristics and LED activities for slum upgrading. The study employed a quantitative approach, through a questionnaire technique with a population of 33 respondents. The data was processed through descriptive analysis. The results of the study illustrate that the longer the perpetrators stay,the longer the businesses start and the income get.  Meanwhile, based on gender and education level, there are no relations that affect LED activities. The social characteristics and slum upgrading has strong correlation with the aspects of the street. The aspect of waste has very weak correlation, while the garbage aspect has no relation. Street aspect has high correlation because business actors get benefit from LED product access. The waste aspect has weak correlation because there are few entrepreneurs do the process independently, while the garbage aspect does not exist due to the similarity of handling and retribution.

Keywords

Relationships; Social Characteristics; LED; Slum Upgrading

Full Text:

PDF

References

Conti S, Giaccaria P. Local Economic Development A2 - Kitchin, Rob. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography; 2009.

Bartik TJ. Local Economic Development Policies. SSRN Electron J 2003. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.400820.

Goswami S, Manna PS. Urban Poor Living in Slums : A Case Study of. Glob J Hum Soc Scinence Sociol Cult 2013;13.

Minnery J, Argo T, Winarso H, Hau D, Veneracion CC, Forbes D, et al. Slum upgrading and urban governance: Case studies in three South East Asian cities. Habitat Int 2013;39:162–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.12.002.

Kłoczko-Gajewska A. General Characteristics of Thematic Villages in Poland. Visegr J Bioeconomy Sustain Dev 2014.

Altensperger ERB. Central European Case Studies 2012;2:9–14.

Indratno I, Agustina IH. Studi Kemampuan Masyarakat dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal Sebagai Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan (Studi Kasus Desa Tegalurung Kecamatan Legonkulon Kabupaten Subang). MIMBAR, J Sos Dan Pembang 2005;21:415–528. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v21i3.185.

Kellett P, Tipple AG. The home as workplace: A study of income-generating activities within the domestic setting. Environ Urban 2000;12:203–13. https://doi.org/10.1630/095624700101285190.

Saputra A. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Penyusunan Rencana Tata Ruang dan Wilayah Kabupaten Bulungan 2017.

M I, Risyanto. Pengaruh Sosial Ekonomi Penghuni Terhadap Permukiman Kumuh Di Kecamatan Wonokromo Kota Surabaya. J INKOM 2014:1–8.

Purnaweni H. Revitalization of Slum Area in Semarang City with Thematic Village Program -- A Case Study in Bandarharjo Village, Indonesia (PROCEEDING OF PAPER SUMMARY ICAS 2017). n.d.

Akbar T. Kampung Tematik Sebagai Bentuk Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Permasalahan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kota Malang. Wahana 2018;70:37–48. https://doi.org/10.36456/wahana.v70i2.1741.

Kuncoro M. Metode Kuantitatif; Teori dan Aplikasi untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. 4th ed. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN; 2011.

Margono S. Metodologi penelitian pendidikan : komponen MKDK/S. Margono. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2005.

Singarimbun M. Metode Penelitian Survai. LP3ES; 1989.

Dumas C. Training for Microenterprise Creation: The Case of the Center for Women and Enterprise. Int J Econ Dev 1999;1:201.

Putri HP, Lingkungan DT. Life Cycle Assessment ( Lca ) Emisi Pada Proses Produksi Bahan Bakar Minyak ( Bbm ) Jenis Bensin Dengan Pendekatan Analytical Hierarchy Process ( Ahp ) 2017.

Nainggolan R. Gender, Tingkat Pendidikan Dan Lama Usaha Sebagai Determinan Penghasilan Umkm Kota Surabaya. Kinerja 2016;20:1. https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v20i1.693.

Rani R. Pengaruh Modal Dan Lama Usaha Terhadap Pendapatan Pedagang Di Pasar Tradisional Pasar Minggu. Widya Cipta - J Sekr Dan Manaj 2019;3:143–8. https://doi.org/10.31294/widyacipta.v3i1.5264.

Putra A, Basri H. Representasi Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah (UMKM) Dikawasan Objek Wisata Percandian Muaro Jambi-Provinsi Jambi. JBMP (Jurnal Bisnis, Manaj Dan Perbankan) 2019;5:1. https://doi.org/10.21070/jbmp.v5i1.2036.

Ramdlani S. Toward Sustainable Cities and Communities, Through Revitalization of Pottery Urban Kampongs in Malang. MATTER Int J Sci Technol 2018;3:306–16. https://doi.org/10.20319/mijst.2018.33.306316.

Andriani R, _ H. TOKSISITAS LIMBAH CAIR INDUSTRI BATIK TERHADAP MORFOLOGI SISIK IKAN NILA GIFT (Oreochomis nilotocus). J SainHealth 2017;1:83. https://doi.org/10.51804/jsh.v1i2.108.83-91.

Maria R, Sumawijaya N, Suherman D, Marganingrum M. Pengaruh Limbah Cair Industri Batik. Pros Pemaparan Has Penelit Geoteknologi LIPI 2014:591–9.

Suryani. Analisis Beberapa Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Petani Yang Mempengaruhi Pendapatan Usahatani Tanaman Pangan Pada Lahan Kering Di Kabupaten Wonogiri 2012.

Hauschild M.Z. Introduction to LCA Methodology. Hauschild M, Rosenbaum R, Olsen S Life Cycle Assess 2017.

W HS. Hubungan antara Kelestarian Ekonomi dan Lingkungan: Suatu Kajian Literatur. Binus Bus Rev 2013;4:841–50. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v4i2.1400.

Burritt R, Schaltegger S. Eco‐efficiency in corporate budgeting. Environ Manag Heal 2001;12:158–74.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.