Socio-demographic factors and children's independent mobility: A comparative analysis of discretionary and non-discretionary trips

Rufia Andisetyana Putri, Imam Buchori, Anang Wahyu Sejati, Apin Fitri Amalina

Abstract

Children's independent mobility (CIM) has declined in recent decades, affecting not only non-discretionary trips but also discretionary trips undertaken for leisure purposes. This trend may have implications for children's development and environmental sustainability. At the same time, neighbourhood resilience can be enhanced through the provision of neighbourhood-scale facilities that support children's daily mobility and independent travel. This study aims to compare children's independent mobility in discretionary and non-discretionary trips based on socio-demographic characteristics. The study was conducted in Perumnas Krapyak, Semarang City, Indonesia, and focused on children aged 7–12 years. The research area was delineated using GIS-based analysis according to children's walking-distance capabilities. Data were collected through questionnaires administered to 30 children equally distributed by age and gender and analysed descriptively. The results show that children's independent mobility was higher in discretionary trips (70%; CIM Level 3) than in non-discretionary trips (51.11%; CIM Level 2). Higher levels of independent mobility were associated with older age, male gender, peer presence, bicycle ownership, and familiarity with neighbours. These findings suggest that neighbourhood characteristics and socio-demographic factors play an important role in supporting children's independent mobility and contribute to the development of more child-friendly and resilient neighbourhoods.

Keywords

Children Independent Mobility; Discretionary Trip; Non-Discretionary Trip; Socio-Demographic Characteristics

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1]Ma L, Ye R, Ettema D, van Lierop D. Role of the neighborhood environment in psychological resilience. Landsc Urban Plan 2023;235:104761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104761.

[2]Kyttä M, Hirvonen J, Rudner J, Pirjola I, Laatikainen T. The last free-range children? Children’s independent mobility in Finland in the 1990s and 2010s. J Transp Geogr 2015;47:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.07.004.

[3]Tyagi M, Raheja G. Indian parents’ perception of children’s independent mobility in urban neighbourhoods: a case study of Delhi. Child Geogr 2021;19:390–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2020.1797996.

[4]Garau C, Annunziata A. Supporting Children’s Independent Activities in Smart and Playable Public Places. Sustainability 2020;12:8352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208352.

[5]Riazi NA, Wunderlich K, Yun L, Paterson DC, Faulkner G. Social-Ecological Correlates of Children’s Independent Mobility: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031604.

[6]Morris S, Lawlor ER, Foley L, Summerbell C, Panter J, Adams J, et al. Children’s experiences of the journey between home and school: A qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography. Health Place 2022;76:102819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102819.

[7]Berg P, Rinne T, Hakala P, Pesola AJ. Children’s independent mobility and activity spaces during COVID-19 in Finland. Child Geogr 2023;21:624–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2022.2118028.

[8]Horton J, Christensen P, Kraftl P, Hadfield-Hill S. ‘Walking … just walking’: how children and young people’s everyday pedestrian practices matter. Soc Cult Geogr 2014;15:94–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2013.864782.

[9]Sharmin S, Kamruzzaman Md, Haque MM. The proportion of independent to dependent trips: A new measure to understand the effects of the built environment on children independent mobility. J Transp Health 2021;22:101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101127.

[10]Veitch J, Carver A, Salmon J, Abbott G, Ball K, Crawford D, et al. What predicts children’s active transport and independent mobility in disadvantaged neighborhoods? Health Place 2017;44:103–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.02.003.

[11]Bagheri H, Zarghami E. Assessing the effects of Children’s independent mobility range and time. J Transp Health 2020;19:100960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100960.

[12]Mitra R, Buliung RN. Exploring differences in school travel mode choice behaviour between children and youth. Transp Policy (Oxf) 2015;42:4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.005.

[13]Fyhri A, Hjorthol R, Mackett RL, Fotel TN, Kyttä M. Children’s active travel and independent mobility in four countries: Development, social contributing trends and measures. Transp Policy (Oxf) 2011;18:703–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.005.

[14]Marzi I, Reimers AK. Children’s Independent Mobility: Current Knowledge, Future Directions, and Public Health Implications. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112441.

[15]Soltani A, Javadpoor M, Shams F, Mehdizadeh M. Street network morphology and active mobility to school: Applying space syntax methodology in Shiraz, Iran. J Transp Health 2022;27:101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101493.

[16]Wales M, Mårtensson F, Jansson M. ‘You can be outside a lot’’: independent mobility and agency among children in a suburban community in Sweden.’ Child Geogr 2021;19:184–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2020.1773401.

[17]Larouche R, Mammen G, Rowe DA, Faulkner G. Effectiveness of active school transport interventions: a systematic review and update. BMC Public Health 2018;18:206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-5005-1.

[18]Gong X, van den Berg PEW, Dane GZ, Arentze TA. The relationship between parental perception of child friendliness in neighborhoods and children’s physical activity. Child Geogr 2025;23:467–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2025.2532722.

[19]Smith M, Amann R, Cavadino A, Raphael D, Kearns R, Mackett R, et al. Children’s Transport Built Environments: A Mixed Methods Study of Associations between Perceived and Objective Measures and Relationships with Parent Licence for Independent Mobility in Auckland, New Zealand. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081361.

[20]Hamad SS, Moustafa YM, Khalil MH. Children’s Independent Mobility: A Study of Middle Childhood Home Ranges in Two Different Socio-Physical Settings in El-Shorouk City, Egypt. Environment and Ecology Research 2022;10:146–60. https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2022.100204.

[21]Putri RA, Rini EF, Imtiyas S, Sinniah GK, Ghani NA. The factors influencing the modal choice for home-to-school trips based on neighborhood unit typology towards Surakarta as a child-friendly city. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2020;447:012071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012071.

[22]Rini EF, Putri RA, Mulyanto, Handayani N. The ecological impacts of primary education facilities based on a child-friendly neighborhood unit criteria in Surakarta. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2018;129:012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/129/1/012022.

[23]Sharmin S, Kamruzzaman Md, Haque MM. The impact of topological properties of built environment on children independent mobility: A comparative study between discretionary vs. nondiscretionary trips in Dhaka. J Transp Geogr 2020;83:102660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102660.

[24]Bhosale J, Duncan S, Schofield G. Intergenerational change in children’s independent mobility and active transport in New Zealand children and parents. J Transp Health 2017;7:247–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.09.004.

[25]Putri RA, Buchori I, Sejati AW, Amalina AF. Potential Carbon Emission Savings from Children’s School Commuting in Urban Areas Based on Smart Mobility Tracking. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering 2026;20:5–26. https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2026.20.2.5.

[26]DeChiara J, Panero J, Zelnik M. Time-Saver Standards for Housing and Residential Development. Second. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Education; 1984.

[27]Crawford SB, Bennetts SK, Hackworth NJ, Green J, Graesser H, Cooklin AR, et al. Worries, ‘weirdos’, neighborhoods and knowing people: a qualitative study with children and parents regarding children’s independent mobility. Health Place 2017;45:131–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.005.

[28]Love P, Villanueva K, Whitzman C. Children’s independent mobility: the role of school-based social capital. Child Geogr 2020;18:253–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1634244.

[29]Suliyanto. Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Untuk Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset; 2018.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v21i2.118121

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.