THE IMPLEMENTATION OF POE2WE MODEL USING SCIENTIFIC APPROACH IN LINEAR LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Nana Nana

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out and to analyze the difference between the students receiving learning using the scientific approach with POE2WE model and those receiving PBL learning model, and to find out the model effectiveness of Physical learning in Senior High Schools. The sample of research was the students of Senior High Schools in Ciamis Regency taken randomly (using a random sampling technique). The research method employed was a comparative study conducted in several schools in Ciamis Regency becoming the model of the 2013 curriculum application in the school year of 2013/2014 in the Linear Movement Material of Tenth Grade. To collect the data, several research instruments were used: pre-test and post-test, student questionnaire, observation on the implementation of POE2WE model learning and interview to get the teachers’ response. The data were analyzed using the t-test to see the difference of normalized gain in two groups. The result of research showed that there was a significant difference the students receiving learning using a scientific approach with POE2WE model and those receiving PBL learning model. The data showed that the mean scores of pretest and posttest for the learning using POE2WE model and the one using the PBL model were 42.50 and 29.93, respectively and there was an increase in the mean class learning outcome with N-gain = 0.8 (high category) for POE2WE model and N-gain = 0.5 (medium category) for the PBL model. The effectiveness test obtained Sign value (2-tailed) (0.000) < α (0.05) meaning that POE2WE model was more effective than the PBL model.

Keywords

Scientific Approach; POE2WE model; Physics of Senior High School

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, Le.W. dan Kreathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assesssing: A Revision of Bloom,s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York. Longman.

Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gunstone, R., & White, R. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65(3), 291–299.

Harding, S. (1998). Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Huinker, D. Dan Laughlin, C.(1996). Talk Your Way into Writing. In P. C. Elliot, and M. J. Kenny (Eds). Communication in matematics. K-12 and Beyond. USA: NCTM.

Joyce, Bruce. (2009). Models of Teaching. New Jersey : Upper Saddle River.

Kearney, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). An investigation of the classroom use of prediction-observation- explanation computer tasks designed to elicit and promote discussion of students’ conceptions of force and motion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, USA.

Kearney, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Constructivism as a referent in the design and development of a computer program which uses interactive digital video to enhance learning in physics. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 64–79.

Kearney, M., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. G. (2001). Students and teacher perceptions of the use of multimedia supported predict-observe-explain task to probe understanding. Research in Science Education, 31(4), 589–615.

Kearney, M. (2004) Classroom Use of Multimedia- Support Predict- Observe- Explain Task in a Social Contructivist Learning Environment. Research in Science Education. 34: 427-453.

Kearney, M and Young, K. (2007). Classroom Use of Multimedia-Support Predict-Observe-Explain Task in a Social Contuctivist Learning Environtment. Research in Sciense Education. 34:427-453.

Liew, C. W. (1995). A predict-observe-explain teaching sequence for learning about students’ understandingof heat and expansion of liquids. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(1), 68–72.

Liew, C. W., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain tasks in diagnosing students’ understanding of science and in identifying their levels of achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.

Nana. (2014). The Development of POE2WE Learning Model in Physics Learning at Senior Secondary School ( Surakarta :Disertation).

Nusa Putra. (2012). Research & Development Penelitian dan Pengembangan: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Gravindo Persada.

Palmer, D. (1995). The POE in the primary school: An evaluation. Research in Science Education, 25(3),323–332.

White, R & Gustone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.