Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Beserta Responnya Dalam Perspektif Analisis Wacana Kritis

Ramadan Adianto Budiman, Sumarlam Sumarlam

Abstract

Abstract:  As social being, humans must master at least two languages that are used in their daily lives. Language and its responses are used according to their needs. As a discourse, the dialogues that occurs are packaged in an utterance and their responses. The speech used by a certain community can also be referred as a speech act. An utterance or speech act cannot necessarily occur without context or is also referred to as a speech condition or situation. Therefore, in a study of speech acts and their responses, they cannot be analysed separately without involving contexts or speech situations and also the power and distance relation between the speaker and the speech partner. Every speaker and speech partner must always pay attention to the power and distance factors between them before uttering an utterance.

Abstrak: Manusia sebagai mahkluk sosial tentunya pasti menguasai minimal dua bahasa atau lebih yang digunakan dalam kesehariannya. Bahasa beserta responnya tersebut digunakan sesuai dengan kebutuhannya. Sebagai suatu wacana, tentunya dialog-dialog yang terjadi tersebut dikemas dalam suatu tuturan beserta responnya. Tuturan yang digunakan oleh suatu masyarakat tadi dapat disebut juga sebagai tindak tutur. Suatu tuturan atau tindak tutur tidak bisa serta merta terjadi tanpa adanya konteks atau disebut juga sebagai kondisi atau situasi tutur. Oleh karena itu, dalam suatu kajian tindak tutur beserta responnya tidak bisa dianalisis secara tersendiri tanpa melibatkan konteks atau situasi tutur dan juga hubungan power dan distance dari penutur dan mitra tutur. Setiap penutur maupun mitra tutur pasti selalu memperhatikan faktor power dan distance diantara mereka sebelum mengujarkan suatu tuturan.

Keywords

speech acts; response of speech acts; critical discourse analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Coulthard, M. (1979). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman Group Limited.

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.

Djamitka. (2016). Mengenal pragmatik yuk!?. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Edmondson, W. (1981). Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman Group Limited.

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis wacana. Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta.

Gumperz, J.J., & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions of sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundation in Sociolinguistic: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Press.

Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Adobe Digital Editions version]. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813313

Poerdawarminta. (1999). Psikologi komunikasi. Jakarta: UT.

Rani, Abdul dkk. (2006). Analisis wacana sebuah kajian bahasa dalam pemakaian. Malang: Bayumedia.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford, UK, Cambridge: Blackwell.

Searle, J.R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511609213

Searle, J.R. (1983). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Subandi, A. (1982). Psikologi sosial. Jakarta. Bulan Bintang.

Wiratno, T. (2010). Analisis percakapan terhadap drama Kapai-Kapai karya Arifin C. Noer. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 22(1), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v22i1.4369.

Yule, G. (2006). The study of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.