Analysis of Sarah’s Broca’s Aphasia Depicted in SymphUK Youtube Channel

Shinta Ainurrahma

Abstract

The research entitled Analysis of Sarah’s Broca Aphasia Depicted in SymphUK Youtube Channel. This research is aimed to analyze the languagedeviations and communication effectiveness that occur in Sarah’s  Scott aphasia.  The analysis is conducted by using the types  of language deviations in aphasia theory by Alfredo Ardila (2014) and communicative effectiveness theory by Lunenburg (2010). This research belongs to qualitative research and use purposivesampling technique to classifiedthe data. Meanwhile, the data of this research were the conversation of Sarah and the interviewer in seven videos from SymphUK youtube channel. The result shows that there are 16 data that can be categorized as types of language deviations. The data divided into two types, which are semantic paraphasias (verbal paraphasias) and agrammatism Then, there are three barriers of communicative effectiveness that occurred in Sarah’s case, which are process barriers, semantic barriers,  and  psychosocial  barriers.  The  finding  leads  to  a  conclusion  that Sarah’s  aphasia influenced her language using that leads into an ineffective communication with her partner of communication.

 

Keywords

Psycholinguistics; Language Deviations; Aphasia; Communication Effectiveness; SymphUKYoutube Channele

Full Text:

PDF

References

Altmann, Gerry T.M. (2001). The Language Machine: Psycholinguistics Review.The BritishJournal of Psychology. Page:129-170. Heslington: John Wiley & Sons.

Ardila, Alfredo &Roselli, Monica. (1993). Language Deviation in Aphasia: A FrequencyAnalysis. InBrain and Language, Academic Press, 1993, 165-180.

Ardila, Alfredo. (2014). Aphasia Handbook. Florida International University.

Carragher, Sage & Conroy. (2015). Outcomes Of Treatment Targeting Syntax Production in People with Broca’s-type Aphasia: Evidence from Psycholinguistic Assessment tasksAnd Everyday Conversation. University of Manchester, UK.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd edition. California: SAGE Publications.

Field, John. (2003). Psycholinguistics: The Key Concepts. New York: Taylor and Francis e-Library.

Jungwon, Janet Choy & Thompson, Cynthia K. (2009). Binding in Agrammatic Aphasia: Processing to Comprehension. In Aphasiology, Northwestern University, 2009, 551–579.

Kuhl, P. K. & Damasio, A. (2012). Principles of Neural Science. 5th ed. New York, NY:McGraw Hill.

Plontke, Ronny. (2003). “Language and Brain”. Proseminars Paper, Linguistically Relevant Films. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology. Sleeper, A. A. (2007). Speech and Language. New York: Infobase.

Steinberg, D. D., Nagata, H. and Aline, D. P. (2001) Psycholinguistic: Language, Mind and World, 2nd edn. London: Longman.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta,CV.

Tamanna, S. P. (2017). Production and Comprehension Deficit in Broca's Aphasia: A Test in Bengali. The University of Bergen.

Wiersma, William & Stephen G. Jurs. (2009). Research Methods in Education: An Introduction. 9th ed. New York: Pearson Education I.

Yuliana, Handani, Selmia, Irmawati & Yusri. (2021). A Psycholinguistic Study of Language Difficulties in Patients with Broca’s Aphasia and Potential Treatments. Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.