PEREMPUAN: TUTUR, MAKNA DAN LAKU (Sebuah Kajian Komunikasi Perempuan di Facebook dalam Prespektif Ilmu Pragmatik)

Rosita Ambarwati

Abstract

The increasing number of women’s problem in communication especially in social networks mobilize the researcher to dig more deeply the phenomenon of communication through the study of pragmatics. This study aims to describe a form of speech acts of a woman language in facebook based on Kreidler taxonomy. The results of this study are expected to provide benefits to the development of the science of Pragmatics. This study used a qualitative descriptive method. The data source of this research is the speech of women in the social networking site Facebook. In this case the researchers used purposive sampling to determine sample. The technique of collecting data through observation, interviews, documentation. The research instrument was a researcher himself as a key instrument. Content analysis is a technique used for peeling speech in text form. Test the validity of the data through the credibility test, depensabilitas and confirmability. Credibility test is done through observation and membercheck extension. The results of the study as follows: (1) the types of speech acts that are found are verdiktif, directive, commisive, expressive, phatic and assertive. (2) based on the data sources that are grouped under the age limit of respondents aged 16-25 years range mostly used type of expressive speech acts. (3) Respondents aged 30-50 years category mostly use assertif speech acts. Age 17-25 years : Expressive (30.8 %), Directives (23.04 %), Assertive (18.2 %), Verdiktif (12.6 %), commissive (9.15 %), phatic (6, 08%). Assertive (27.3), verdiktif (18.7), expressive (14.9), phatic (14.4), directive (13.8), commissive (12.9). From these results it can be concluded that the types of speech acts that used by the women to communicate in facebook there is a difference between youth and adult groups.
Keywords: Communication, Women, Facebook

Full Text:

PDF

References

Austin, J.L. 1962. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University press

Brandom, Robert. 2008. Between saying and Doing. New York; Oxford University Press

Brown, penelope dan Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, Roger dan Albert Gilman. 1968. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity, dalam Joshua

A. Fishman (ed) Readings in the Sociology of language. The Haque: Mouton & Co. N.V. Publishers, halaman 252-275

Cummings, louise. 1999. Pragmatik Sebuah perspektif multidisipliner. Jogjakarta; Pustaka Pelajar

Gasdar. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupositions and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.

Gunawan, Asim. 2007. “Implikatur dan Kesantunan Berbahasa: Beberapa Tilikan dari sandiwara Ludruk”

Grice, H. Paul. 1967,1975. Logic and Conversation, Dalam Peter Cole dan Jerry Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics, vol 3: Speech Acts. New York; Academic Press

Ibrahim, Syukur. 1993. Kapita Selekta Sosiolinguistik. Surabaya; UsahaNasional

Jacob L. Mey. 1994. Pragmatics An Introduction. Cambridge USA; Blackwell

Jurnal Pragmatics. 2011. Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate—The Royal–Sarkozy debate. Volume 43, Issue 10, August 2011, Pages 2480-2488. Béatrice Fracchiolla

Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Principles of Pragmatics. New York; Addison Wesley longman Publising

Nurkamto, Joko. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta; UNS Press

Searle, John . 1969. Speech Acts; An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.New York; Cambridge University Press

Sihabudin, ahmad. 2011. Komunikasi Antar Budaya; Satu perspektif multidimensi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Subroto, Edi. 2008. Kelana Bahana Sang Bahasawan. Jakarta; Universitas Atma Jaya.

Sudaryanto. 1992.Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta; GadjahMada University Press.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.