ARGUMEN AKTOR DAN PEMETAAN FUNGSI DALAM BAHASA JAWA
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the actor properties, the actor syntactic properties, the actor role realization, the argument structural position, and the argument function mapping of Javanese actors. This study used qualitative approach with lexical functional grammar. The results of this study as follow: First, the core arguments of Javanese language were not marked neither morphological nor syntactic marking. In contrast, the non-core arguments were marked syntactically using preposition dening 'by'. Preposition dening 'by' was as the passive markers of Javanese language. Second, the actor semantic role of Javanese language consisted of animate and inanimate actors. The thematic roles as the filler role of Javanese language actor were thematic role agent, experience, effector, recipient, beneficiary, source, and theme. Third, the actor argument position in the constituent structure was on the left position of verb, on the position specifier Inflectional Phrase canonical clause or Subject Verb Object (SVO) pattern. Fourth, the actor as core argument was objectified to the highest grammatical functions Subject (SUBJ), while the actor as non-core argument was objectified to grammatical functions Oblique (OBL) as the lowest function in the grammatical functions hierarchy. Fifth, an actor in active clause, both transitive and intransitive, was mapped to the grammatical function SUBJ, with features [-r] and [-o], whereas in passive clause, actor was mapped to grammatical functions OBL with the features [+ r] and [-o]
Keywords: argument, actors, mapping, Javanese language
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alsina, Alex; Joan Bresnan; dan Peter Sells (Ed). 1997. Complex Predicates. Stanford, California: CSLI.
Arka, I Wayan. 2000. “Beberapa Aspek Intransitif Terpilah pada Bahasa-bahasa Nusantara: Sebuah Analisis Leksikal-Fungsional. Dalam Bambang Kaswanti Purwo (Ed). Kajian Serba Linguistik: 423-510. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya dan PT Gunung Mulia
Arka, I Wayan. 2003. “Tatabahasa Leksikal Fungsional: Tipologinya dan Tantangannya bagi Bahasa-bahasa Nusantara”. Dalam Kaswanti Purwo, Bambang (Peny). PELLBA 16: 51-105. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya, Unika Atmajaya.
Bauer, L. 2007. The Linguistics Student’s Handbook. Edinburg University Press.
Bresnan, Joan dan Lioba Moshi. 1998. Applicative in Kivonjo (Chago): Implication for Argument Structure and Syntax. California: Palo Alto.
Bresnan, Joan. 1998. Lexical—Functional Syntax Part III: Inflectional Morphology and Phrase Structure Variation. Stanford University.
Comrie, Bernard dan Maria Polinsky (Ed). 1993. Causative and Transitivity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Joan Benjamin Company.
Dalrymple, Mary; Ronald M. Kaplan; John T. Maxwell-III; Annie, Zaenen (Ed). 1995. Formal Issues in Lexical Functional Grammar. Stanford. California: CSLI
Dalrymple, Mary (Ed). 1999. Semantics and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar. Cambridge: the MIT Press.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foley, William A dan Robert D. Van Valin. 1984. Fungsional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul. J., Thompson, S.A. (Ed)). 1982. Syntax and Semantics: Studies in Transitivity (Volume 15). New York: Academic Press, Inc.
Kaplan, Ronald M dan Joan Bresnan. 1995. “Lexical—Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation”. Dalam Mary Dalrymple, Ronald M Kaplan, Joan T, Maxwell III, Annie Zaenen (Ed). Formal Issues in Lexical—Functional Grammar, 29—30. Stanford, California: CSLI.
Mallinson, G., Blake, B., J. 1981. Language Typology: Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: Norh-Hoolland Publising Company.
Miles, Matthew B dan A Michael Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).
Sells, P. 1985. Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories. Stanford, California: CSLIPublications.
Verhaar, J. W. M. 1999. Asas-Asas Linguitik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadjag Mada University Press. Wescoat, Michael T. dan Annie Zaenen. 1991. “Lexical Functional Grammar”. Dalam F.G. Droste dan Joseph J.E. (Ed). Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description, 103-135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Whaley, L. J. 1997. Introduction to Typology. London: SAGE Publication.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.