THE ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS ON ‘SIX MINUTES ENGLISH’ CONVERSATION SCRIPT OF BBC LEARNING ENGLISH: A STUDY OF DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Abstract
The essay aims to identify and to explain the application of adjacency pairs categories on a conversation script. The paper analyzes the process of adjacency pairs on ‘Six Minutes English’ conversation script; a program of BBC Learning English. The findings hope to prove that linguistic choices in conversation analysis play an important role in building up the interaction process between communicators. Adjacency pairs has a crucial role in the conversation process as a framework of communication. The method which is used is qualitative descriptive. The writer takes the data from ‘Six Minutes English’ conversation script of BBC Learning English.
The essay is divided into four parts. The first part explains the roles of language and language studies in social life. The second part notes the application of adjacency pairs categories on conversation script. The third part deals with Richard and Smith’s (1983) theory as a guideline for this analysis. The last section of the essay offers concluding remarks about result of the discussion.
Keywords : Adjacency pairs, conversation analysis, communication process, categories, framework
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Beal, C.1992.’Did You Have a Good Weekend?’ Or Why There Is No Such Thing as a Simple Question in Cross-Cultural Encounters. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 15, 1:23-52.
Coulthard, M.1993.An Introduction to Discourse Analysis (2nd edn). London: Longman. Chapter 4, Conversation Analysis.
Drew, P. 1994. Conversation analysis. In R.E. Asher and J.M.Y Simpson (eds), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon.
Gardner, R. 1995. Conversation Analysis: Some Thought on its Applicability to Applied Linguistics. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S. 11:97-119.
Heap, J.L.1997.Conversation Analysis in Researching Language and Education. In N.H. Hornberger and D. Corson (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Vol. 8: Research Methods in Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Heritage, J. 1995. Conversation Analysis: Methodological Aspects. In U.M.Quasthoff (ed), Aspects of Oral Communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hutchby, I., and Woolfell, R. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Krathwohl, David.1993. An Integrated Approach. New York: Longman
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 6, Conversational Structure.
Paltridge, Brian.2000. Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Queensland. Gold Coast
Psathas, G. 1995. Conversation: The Study of Talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richards, J.C., and Schmidt, R. 1983. Conversational Analysis. In J.C. Richards and Schmidt (eds), Language and Communication. London: Longman.
Sacks, H. 1995. Lectures on Conversation: Volumes One and Two. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., and Jefferson, G.1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation. Language 50, 4: 696-735
Ten Have, P. 1998. Doing Conversation Analysis. London: Sage.
Wray, A., Trott, K., and Bloomer, A. 1998. Project in Linguistics: A Practical Guide in Researching Language. London: Arnold. New York: Oxford University Press. Chapter 4, Conversation Analysis; Chapter 18, Transcribing Speech Orthographically.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.