URGENSI STUDI LINGUISTIK HISTORIS BAHASA SUBRUMPUN HALMAHERA SELATAN-PAPUA BARAT

Burhanuddin Burhanuddin, Sumarlam Sumarlam, Mahsun Mahsun, Inyo Yos Fernandez

Abstract

This paper intends to explain two issues that the rationales for the importance of investigating South Halmahera-West New Guinea (SHWNG) languages from linguistic-historical perspective and that if so which of its aspects are feasible for further investigation? To provide scientific answer for this enquiry, diverse ranges of relevant and recent literature have been reviewed. The data from lietature review were gathered using observation method and were analyzed qualitatively through data reduction, organization and interpretation

Review of lietarture suggests the importance for investigating South Halmahera-West New Guinea (SHWNG) languages from linguistic-historical perspective for six reasons. First, the evidence for grouping the main Austronesian (AN) languages that of which include SHWNG proposed by Blust (2013) is considered theoretically weak.Second, the geographical position and existence of SHSPB is still debatable. From positional point of view, while Esser (1938) and Salzner (1968) put SHWNG equal with other Indonesian language groups, Blust (2013) put it at otherwise. From the existence point of view, Dyen (1983) stipulatesthe non-existence of this sub-language, while Blust (2013) confirms its existence. Third, the position of SHSPB in Blust’s (2013) grouping is that of proximate to Oceania, yet the observation of protofonem from the main AN in Blust(2013) reveals that the protofonem is closely tied to Central Malaya-Polinesia. Fourth, the absence of agreement among linguists toward the characteristics of SHSPB: among those 4 characteristics proposed by Adriani dan Kruyt (1914), 7 of which proposed byBlust (1993), 9 of that proposed by Ross (1994), and 7 of those by Kamholz (2014), only single charateritic found to be similar. Fifth, the eviedence supporting the existence of sub-group members within SHSPB is insufficent. Sixth, the coverage of membership and the level of language kinship among language members in SHSPB remain blure. For this reason, the study of historical linguistic is intended to cover two aspects that (1) to determine the relationship between SHWNG and other sub-groups – of among SHWNG groups – and the kinship levels among languages within SHWNG, and (2) to reconstruct the proto language of SHWNG and that of language groups within SHWNG.

 

Keys words: Linguistic historic; level of kinship; proto language; protofonem

 

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adelaar, K.A. 2005. Malayo-Sumbawan. Oceanic Linguistics (OL) Journal, Nomor 44: 357-388. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Adriani, N., dan Alb. C. Kruyt. 1914. De Bare’e-sprekende Toradjas van Midden-Celebes. Batavia: Landsdrukkerij.

Berg, Rene. 2009. Possession in South Halmahera-West New Guinea: Typology and Reconstruction. In Adelaar and Pawley 2009, 217-247.

Blust, Robert A. 1978. Eastern Malayo-Polynesian: a subgrouping argument. Halaman 181-234 Nomor 61 Pacific Linguistics Series C. Dalam S.A. Wurm and Lois Carrington (eds). SICAL proceedings. Canberra: ANU.

Blust, R. A. 1983-84. More on the Position of the Languages of Eastern Indonesia. OL Journal, No. 22-23, hal. 1-28. Honolulu: Universitas Hawaii.

Blust, Robert A. 1993. Central and Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics Journal, No. 32, halaman 241-293. Honolulu: Univesitas Hawaii.

Blust, Robert A. 2008. Is there a Bima-Sumba Subgroup? Oceanic Linguistics Journal Nomor 47: 46-114. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Blust, Robert A. 2009. Position of the Languages of Eastern Indonesia: A Reply to Donohue and Grimes. OL Journal, No. 48 hal. 36-77. Honolulu: Universitas Hawaii.

Blust, Robert A. 2012. The Marsupials Strike Back: A Reply to Schapper (2011). IL Journal, No. 51 hal. 261-277. Honolulu: Universitas Hawaii.

Blust, Robert A. 2013. The Austronesian Languages. Revision Edition. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Bodgan, R. dan Taylor, S. J. 1992. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Son.

Collins, J. T. 1980. The Historical Relationship of the Languages of Central Maluku, Indonesia. Pasific Linguistics D47. Canberra: Australian National University.

Collins, James T. 1981. Preliminary Notes on Proto-West Central Maluku: Buru, Sula, Taliabo, and Ambelau. Historical Linguistics in Indonesia Part I Journal. Seri NUSA. Jakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

Cresswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publication, Inc.

Crowley, Terry dan Bowern, Claire. 2010. An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Fourth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press

Donohue, Mark, and C.E. Grimes. 2008. Yet More on the Position of the Languages of Eastern Indonesia. Oceanic Linguistics Journal, No. 47 hal. 114-158. Honolulu: Universitas Hawaii.

Dyen, Isodore. 1965. A Lexicostatistical Classification of the Austronesian Languages. Dalam International Journal of American Linguistics, Vol. 31 No. I, Memoir 19.

Esser, S. J. 1938. Languages. Atlas van Tropisch Nederland, sheet 9, 9b. Amsterdam: Koninklijk Nederlandsch Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.

Kamholz, David Christopher. 2014. Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and Change in South Halmahera-West New Guinea. Disertasi. Berkeley: University of California.

Lewis, M. Paul dkk, ed. 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 17th edition. Dallas, Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Inc.

Mahsun. 2010. Genolinguistik: Kolaborasi Linguistik dengan Genetika dalam Pengelompokkan Bahasa dan Populasi Penuturnya. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mills, R. F. 1975. Proto South Sulawesi and Proto Austronesian phonology. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, The University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms International.

Nothofer, B. 1992. Central Melayo Poynesian and Central-East Melayu Polynesian: Two Subgroup? Makalah pada seminar

Ross, Malcolm D. 1994. Some Current Issues in Austronesian Linguistics. In Darrell T. Tryon (ed.) CAD, pp.45-120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Salzner, Richard. 1960. Sprachen-Atlas des Indopazifischen Raumes. Wiesbaden: Otto Harasowitz.

Schapper, Antoinette. 2011. Phalanger Facts: Notes on Blust’s Marsupial Reconstruction. Oceanic Linguistics Journal, Nomor 50 halaman 258-272.

SIL. 2006. Language of Indonesia. Jakarta: SIL Cabang Indonesia

Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.