Efektivitas Peer Assessment dalam Menilai Kemampuan Kinerja Siswa pada Kegiatan Praktikum Biologi

Siti Sriyati, Asep Permana, Arini Arini, Mia Purnamasari

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness of peer assessment in assessing the performance ability of students in Biology lab activities. Method in this research is descriptive method. The research was  conduct  in three schools : two schools at the junior high school and one school at the senior high school level. The material of  lab activities  are characteristics of living things and the pollution of soil in Junior high school and  water pollution in senior high school. In three class sample application of peer assessment conducted through mutual judging between friends in one group. Everyone in the group assessed by at least two of the group's friends. The assessment was conducted after the practicum process is finish. The instrument used in this study of performance observation sheet that is used when the implementation of peer assessment. To see the effectiveness of student assessment results, the assessment carried out by teachers.  The results showed that the assessment of the student is larger than teacher assessment in Senior High School. Similarity assessment conducted through peer assessment of students with teacher assessment results in practical characteristics of living beings is 44 % , the material soil pollution 44 % and the material water pollution by 45 %.

Keywords:        effectiveness , peer assessment, student performance , teacher assessment , lab

Full Text:

PDF

References

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., and William, D. (2004). Working Inside The Black Box: Assessment for learning in The Classroom. (Online). http://www.defause.cse.Ucla.edu/DOCS/ pb_wor_2004.

Bostock, S. (2004). Peer Assessment. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.iml.uts.edu.au.assessment/ student/ peer.html

Grez, L.D., Valcke, M., and Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessment?. Active Learning and Higher Education. 13(2) 129-142.

Lie, L.Y. and Angelique, L. (2003). Implementing Effective Peer Assessment. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.cdtl.nus.edu.sg/brief/v6n3/sec4.htm

Purwanto, N. (1987). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Orsmond, P. (2004). Self and Peer Assessment Guidance on Practice in The Bioscience. (Online). http://www.biosciences.heacademy.ac.uk/ fulltext,pdf.

Reinhartz, J & Beach, D.M. (1997). Teaching and Learning in The Elementary School: Focus on Curriculum. New Jersey: Practice-Hall.

Rustaman, N.Y., Yudianto, S.A., dan Rochintaniawati, D. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: JICA IMSTEP: FPMIPA UPI.

Wenzel, T.J. (2007). Evaluation Tool to Guide Studen’ts Peer Assessment in Group Activities for Lab and Classroom. (Online).Tersedia: www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/

Wheater, C. (2005). Student Assessing Student: Case studies on peer assessment. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.gees.ac.uk/planet/p15/cpw.pdf.

Wulan, A.R. (2007). Penggunaan Asesmen Alternatif pada Pembelajaran Biologi. (Online). Tersedia: http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/SPS.

Zainul, A. (2001). Alternative Assessment. Jakarta: PAU-PPAI Universitas terbuka.

Zulharman. (2007). Self and Peer Assessment sebagai Penilaian Formatif dan Sumatif. (Online). Tersedia: http://zulharman79.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/self-dan-peerassessment-sebagai-penilaian-formatif-dan-sumatif/

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.