Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E untuk Meningkatkan Partisipasi Aktif Siswa Kelas X-3 SMA Negeri Gondangrejo Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016

Haris Nurhuda, Riezky Maya Probosari, Baskoro Adi Prayitno

Abstract

The aim of this research is to improve students active participation through the aplication of the learning cycle 5E model in class X-3 SMAN Gondangrejo in academic year 2015/2016. This research was a classroom action research with two cycles conducted from March until April 2016. Each cycle consisted of 4 phases, i.e. planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The participants of the research are 37 students of grade X-3 SMAN Gondangrejo Karanganyar. Data was obtained from observation, documentation, and interview. The main data of active participation includes several aspects as follows: question, opinions, and discussion. Data was analyzed descriptively, and validated using a triangulation method. The research procedure used was the spiral method by Kemmis and Mc.Taggart. The result of the research shows that learning cycle 5E increased the students’ active participation.. Observations show that the number of students who asked questions on pre-action of three students, or 8%, the first cycle of 10 students or 27%, and the second cycle 20 students or 54%. Students who express opinions on the pre-action as much as four students, or 10%, the first cycle of 15 students or 40%, and the second cycle 19 students or 51%. The average score of student participation in discussions on pre-action was 2,17 points, the first cycle of 2,79 points and the second cycle of 3,65 points.

Key Words : learning cycle 5E, active participation, questions, opinions, discussion

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdi, A. (2014). The Effect of Inquiry-based Learning Method on Students’ Academic Achievement in Science Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 37-41.

Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012a). Student’s participation in classroom:What motivates them to speakup?. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 516-522.

Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012b). The dynamics of student participation in classroom: observation on level and forms of participation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 61-70.

Arikunto, Suharsimi, Suhardjono, & Supardi (2008). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 99-102.

Chin, C., & Osborn, J. (2008). Students' Questions: a Potential Resource for Teaching and Learning Science. Studies in Science Education, 44 (1),1-39.

Coutinho, M.J., & Almeida, P.A. (2014). Promoting Student Questioning in the Learning of Natural Science. Social and Behavioral Science. 3781-3785.

Duran, M. (2014). A study on 7grade students' inquiry and communication competencies.Social and Behavioral Sciences, 4511-4516.

Foong, C., & Daniel, E.G.S. (2010). Incompetent grounds in science students’ arguments: What is amiss in the argumentation process?. Social and Behavioral Science, 1198-1207.

Himmele, P. & Himmele, W. (2011). Total Participation Techniques: Making Every Student an Active Learner. United States of America: ASCD.

Hussain, A., Azeem, M., & Shakoor, A. (2011). Physics Teaching Methods: Scientific Inquiry Vs Traditional Lecture. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 269-276.

Madu, B.C., & Amaechi, C.C. (2012). Effect of Five-Step Learning Cycle Model on Students’ Understanding of Concepts Related To Elasticity. Journal of Education and Practice,3 (9), 173-181.

Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of Student Argumentation Skill about Controversial Topics by Epistemological Understanding. Learning and Instruction. 492-509.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 994-1020.

Rahayuningsih, R., Masykuri, M. & Utami, B. (2012). Penerapan Siklus Belajar 5E (Learning Cycle 5E) disertai Peta Konsep untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Proses dan Hasil Belajar Kimia pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Kartasura Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 51-58.

Sa'idun, A. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Salter, N., P., & Conneely M., R. (2015). Structured and Unstructured Discussion Forums as Tools for Student engagement. Computer in Human Behavior. 18-25.

Trautmann, N., MaKinster, J., & Avery, L. (2004). What makes inquiry so hard? (andwhy is it worth it?). Proceeding presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Trna, J., Trnova, E., & Sibor, J. (2012). Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Education in Science Teacher Training. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 199-209.

Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from Structured to Open Inquiry: Challenges and Limits. Science Education International, 23 (4), 383-399.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.