Daya Beda, Tingkat Kesulitan, dan Tebaan Tes Biologi Kelas 8 Semester Gasal

Suwarto Suwarto

Abstract

The aims of this research: (1) Want to know different effort in biology test items at 8 class odd semester, (2) want to know difficult level in biology test items at 8 class odd semester, (3) want to know guessing biology test items at 8 class odd semester. Biology test 8 class odd semester includes 100 question items and have tried on 200 respondent. For analysis is used R programming. The results show: (1) Different effort in biology test items at 8 class odd semester about 1,002 up to 2,969. The lowest different effort item is 8 item and the highest different effort item is 38 item. (2) Difficult level in biology test items at 8 class odd semester about 1,005 un to 1,992. The lowest difficult level test item is 83 and 93 item and the highest difficult level is 45 item. (3) Guessing biology test items at 8 class odd semester. Biology test 8 class odd semester about 0,018 up to 0,989. The lowest guessing is 80 item and the highest guessing is 68 item.

Keywords:      Discrimination, Difficulty, and Guessing

Full Text:

PDF

References

Allen, M.J. & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Anastasi, A. & Urbina,S. (1997). Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall.

Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing (Ed.6). New York: Harper & Row.

Ebel, R. L. (1979). Essential of educational measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Ebel, R.L. & Frisbie, D.A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall, Inc.

Gronlund, N.E. (1976). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

Gronlund, N. E.,& Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (6thed). New York: Macmillan.

Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamental of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication Inc.

Hambleton, R.K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory. Boston, MA: Kluwer Inc.

Heri Retnawati. (2003). Keberfungsian butir diferensial pada perangkat tes seleksi masuk SMP. Unpublished Master Tesis, Program Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Hosmer, D.W. dan Lemeshow,S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regressions. New York: John Willwy and Sons.

Hullin, C. L., et al. (1983). Item response theory : Application to psichologycal measurement. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

Kerlinger, F.N. (1986). Asas-asas penelitian behavioral (Terjemahan L.R. Simatupang). Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press.

Keeves, J.P. dan Alagumalai,S. (1999). New appoaches to measurement. Dalam

Linn, R.L. (1989). Educational measurement. (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Masters, G.N. dan Keeves, J.P.(Eds). Advances in measurement in educational research and assesment. Amsterdam : Pergamon.

Mehrens, W.A. & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Wiston,Inc.

Mislevy, R.J. & Bock,R.D. (1990). BILOG 3 : Item analysis & test scoring with binary logistic models. Moorseville : Scientific Sofware Inc.

Syaifudin Azwar. (2000). Reliabilitas dan validitas (Edisi 4). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik dalam pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Relajar

Van der Linden, W.J. dan Hambleton, R.K. (1997). Item response theory:brief history, common models and extentions. Dalam Van der Linden, W.J. dan Hambleton, R.K. (Eds). Handbook of item response theory. New York: Springer.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.