Pengaruh Penerapan Media Augmented Reality Eco-Ar 1-3 Berbasis Model Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Ekologi

Cornelia Zanindita1, Puguh Karyanto1, Dewi Puspitasari1, Ristanti Yustin2

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine influence of implementation of Augmented Reality ECO-AR 1-3 media based on Discovery Learning model to improve ecological concept. This research is included in ex post facto research with quantitative approach. The subjects of the study were students of class X MIPA 2 and XI MIPA 7 each class consist of 35 students. Research sampling technique used cluster random sampling. The research design used post-group design. Data obtained from NEP and posttest questionnaire. Data collection used tests, documentation, observation, and questionnaires. The research procedure includes preparation, execution, data processing and completion. Validity test and instrument reliability test using Alpha Cronbach formula with counted by SPSS 21 program. Data analysis technique used normality test, homogeneity test, and non-paired samples T test with 5% significance level. Augmented Reality ECO-AR 1-3 media based on Discovery Learning using non-paired sample t-test has significance result on knowledge and attitude aspect less than 0,05 so that H0 is rejected. H0 rejected indicate difference of effectiveness between environmental literacy result from class XI MIPA 7 subject with class X MIPA 2. The result of research shows that there is an increase in anti-anthropocentrism aspect and the highest result in aspect of limit to growth.

Keywords

Augmented Reality ECO-AR 1-3 media, environmental literacy, ecological concept.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Azar, C., Holmberg, J., & Lindgren, K. (1996). Socio-ecological indicators for sustainability. Ecologial Economics, 18(2), 89–112. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00028-6

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Al-dajeh, H. L. (2012). Assessing Environmental Literacy of Pre-Vocational Education Teachers in Jordan, 492–508.

Aloraini, S. (2012). The impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the College of Education at King Saud University. Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation, 24(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2012.05.002

Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education - cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400

Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Students’ online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Computers and Education, 78, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.006

Desfandi, M. (2015). Mewujudkan Masyarakat Berkarakter Peduli Lingkungan Melalui Program Adiwiyata. Sosio Didaktika: Social Science Education Journal, 2(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.15408/sd.v2i1.1661

Dunlap, R. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176

Hidayat, A., Mujahiduddien, A., Gerak, S., & Manusia, T. (2017). Pembelajaran Bentuk Sendi Tulang Manusia. Seri Pendidikan, 3(1), 204–208.

Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students’ learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895–1906. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1057747

Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers and Education, 71, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004

Ibanez, M. B., Serio, A. Di, Villaran, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2016). The Acceptance of Learning Augmented Reality Environments: A Case Study. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.124

Idrus, A. (2016). Pengembangan Augmented Reality Sebagai Media dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Teks Bacaan, 18(3), 140–155.

Kaiser, F. G., Wolfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. 1999. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–19.

Lewinsohn, T. M., Attayde, J. L., Fonseca, C. R., Ganade, G., Jorge, L. R., Kollmann, J., … Weisser, W. W. (2014). Ecological literacy and beyond: Problem-based learning for future professionals. Ambio, 44(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0539-2

Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.911247

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015). Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093

McBride, B. B., Brewer, C. a., Berkowitz, a. R., & Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), art67. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1

Nor Farhah Saidin1, Noor Dayana Abd Halim1 & Noraffandy Yahaya1. (2015). A Review of Research on Augmented Reality in Education: Advantages and Applications International Education Studies; Vol. 8, No. 13; 2015 ISSN 1913-9020 E-ISSN 1913-9039 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y

Rahman, A. Z., Hidayat, T. N., & Yanuttama, I. (2017). Media Pembelajaran Ipa Kelas 3 Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan Teknologi Augmented Reality Berbasis Android, 43–48.

Saidin, N. F., Halim, N. D. A., & Yahaya, N. (2015). A review of research on augmented reality in education: Advantages and applications. International Education Studies, 8(13), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p1

Sampaio, D., & Almeida, P. (2016). Pedagogical Strategies for the Integration of Augmented Reality in ICT Teaching and Learning Processes. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 894–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.240

Shamuganathan, S., & Karpudewan, M. (2015). Modeling environmental literacy of malaysian pre-university students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(5), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.264a

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta

Sunarni, T., & Budiarto, D. (2014). Persepsi Efektivitas Pengajaran Bermedia Virtual Reality (VR ), 2014(November), 179–184.

Tarng, W., Ou, K.-L., Yu, C.-S., Liou, F.-L., & Liou, H.-H. (2015). Development of a virtual butterfly ecological system based on augmented reality and mobile learning technologies. Virtual Reality, 19(3–4), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-015-0265-5

Turkan, Y., Radkowski, R., Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Behzadan, A. H., & Chen, A. (2017). Mobile augmented reality for teaching structural analysis. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 34(September), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.09.005

Waikato Regional Council Technical Report. (2013). New Ecological Paradigm Survey 2008 : Analysis of the NEP results, 4355, 1–76.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.